On 17/06/12 05:08, Ben Rosser wrote:
In Fedora 17, when you install grub2 and generate a fresh config file,
that config is produced by grub2-mkconfig. However, when you install a
kernel update, the kernel's entry is added to the grub2 boot menu by grubby.
This produces messy grub boot menus.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:09:17PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having a problem with building the coq package for the new OCaml
4.00.0, and I'm at my wits' end. There were some bad interactions
between the new
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 02:57:30PM +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:15:53PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
#topic ticket 869 F18 Feature: Offline Updates using systemd and
packagekit -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OfflineSystemUpdates
.fesco 869
The
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:06:10PM +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:57:30 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote
One of the most inportant advance of Linux over Windows is the
fact, that there are only a few situations - like kernel updates -
which requires a reboot of your
On 16/06/12 00:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
.fesco 868
#topic ticket 869 F18 Feature: Offline Updates using systemd and
packagekit -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OfflineSystemUpdates
.fesco 869
Not much use to Xfce users.
--
Regards,
Frank
Jack of all, fubars
--
devel mailing list
Ben Rosser rosser.bjr at gmail.com writes:
It seems to me that we should make the boot menu more consistent somehow. I
feel like the simplest solution is just to run grub2-mkconfig at every kernel
update, and stop using grubby for this. Then everything would look
consistent- the Fedora Linux
On 17 June 2012 10:53, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
So this is a problem that needs to be solved, but does it require a
reboot? Not really ... it's possible to list all processes using
zlib, convert that back into a list of packages, then instruct those
packages to restart
Am 17.06.2012 01:14, schrieb Chris Murphy:
Please provide an example of a better option, with sufficient detail as to
constitute a successful relay of the baton.
The point of the thread from the outset was to explore alternatives, but so
far those alternatives are vaporware.
why do people
Am 17.06.2012 06:08, schrieb Ben Rosser:
In Fedora 17, when you install grub2 and generate a fresh config file, that
config is produced by grub2-mkconfig.
However, when you install a kernel update, the kernel's entry is added to the
grub2 boot menu by grubby.
This produces messy grub
On 16 June 2012 14:04, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
the next have solution, searching problem of Lennart?
hopefully this leads not sooner or later in uncareful
designs where it get more and more a must
No, if you mist blame somebody please send insults to me instead. I
asked
On 17 June 2012 11:00, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Not much use to Xfce users.
Xfce doesn't have a native PackageKit client. If you run the
gnome-settings-daemon updates plugin then it just works. I don't
think XFCE has the manpower to re-implement all the stuff needed for
the
On 17/06/12 17:17, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 17 June 2012 11:00, Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Not much use to Xfce users.
Xfce doesn't have a native PackageKit client.
If you run the
gnome-settings-daemon updates plugin then it just works.
Not since F16. iirc
I don't
think
On Jun 16, 2012, at 6:36 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
Calls for speculation. We know what the certification policy used to be. We
also know how long DOJ takes to do anything, let alone politicking behind
the scenes
On Jun 16, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.06.2012 01:14, schrieb Chris Murphy:
Please provide an example of a better option, with sufficient detail as to
constitute a successful relay of the baton.
The point of the thread from the outset was to explore alternatives, but so
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
It was justified. Only one is speculation. The other utilizes evidence and a
track record of behavior.
... Right, In one case the actual participants in the discussion have
expressed doubt that they had any effect,
Am 17.06.2012 19:16, schrieb Chris Murphy:
On Jun 16, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.06.2012 01:14, schrieb Chris Murphy:
Please provide an example of a better option, with sufficient detail as to
constitute a successful relay of the baton.
The point of the thread from
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 17 June 2012 10:53, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
So this is a problem that needs to be solved, but does it require a
reboot? Not really ... it's possible to list all processes using
zlib, convert that back
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
you are aware that on ARM platform is NO DISABLE SECURE BOOT allowed
this is not future requirement
this is CURRENT requirement for Win8 on ARM
It was also the original requirement on x86 before negative PR was
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
That's simply not possible. Some processes like dbus-daemon and
gnome-session just cannot be restarted in this way. It's a complete
fallacy to believe you can update core libraries on a modern Linux
system without
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:51:32 -0400
Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
you are aware that on ARM platform is NO DISABLE SECURE BOOT allowed
this is not future requirement
this is CURRENT requirement for
On Jun 17, 2012, at 11:25 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.06.2012 19:16, schrieb Chris Murphy:
What I believe is irrelevant. You're proposing emotional reaction based
on a future hardware requirement that has not been proposed,
is not in the interest of Microsoft or their OEMs
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
And now some mere userspace daemons mean users will constantly need to
reboot for upgrades?
No.
Regressions against featuresets from the
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:08 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
If slippery slope arguments are to be dismissed when they're used
against new features like systemd (or Wayland or whatever), then
Fedora really does need to draw a line in the sand and say no to bad
effects when they
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
you are aware that on ARM platform is NO DISABLE SECURE BOOT allowed
this is not future requirement
this is CURRENT requirement for Win8 on
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.06.2012 06:08, schrieb Ben Rosser:
In Fedora 17, when you install grub2 and generate a fresh config file, that
config is produced by grub2-mkconfig.
However, when you install a kernel update, the kernel's
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 2:08 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
A new feature is being added nothing is getting removed so no there is
no regression.
Thats newspeak if I ever saw any.
Going from a system which generally doesn't prompt users to reboot to
one that does is a regression.
dbus
Am 17.06.2012 20:15, schrieb drago01:
By that logic we could just stop development today.
+1
--
Regards
Heiko Adams
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 2:08 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
A new feature is being added nothing is getting removed so no there is
no regression.
Thats newspeak if I ever saw any.
Going from a system which
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 08:40:31PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
Yeah but those where examples not the sole reason why reboots are required.
It is not like if we didn't switch to systemd this problem wouldn't
exist. (which was my point re blaming).
Do we realy need a complete reboot of the system? I
Am 17.06.2012 20:21, schrieb Heiko Adams:
Am 17.06.2012 20:15, schrieb drago01:
By that logic we could just stop development today.
+1
mhh and some changes for the sake of the change are showing that
there are things which are working fine and should not be touched
and changed and to say
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 09:01:11PM +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 08:40:31PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
Yeah but those where examples not the sole reason why reboots are required.
It is not like if we didn't switch to systemd this problem wouldn't
exist. (which was my
On 17 June 2012 20:01, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote:
In this case we may save outage time, because we don't have waste time
for the BIOS POST, loading the bootloader and the kernel.
It takes me 4 seconds to POST, boot the kernel, get into
system-update.service, and then reboot.
On Jun 17, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.06.2012 20:21, schrieb Heiko Adams:
Am 17.06.2012 20:15, schrieb drago01:
By that logic we could just stop development today.
+1
mhh and some changes for the sake of the change are showing that
there are things which are
On 17 June 2012 18:49, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
You're asserting that dbus-daemon etc cannot be restarted, but without
saying why.
Okay, I'll say why. The core protocol was never designed to support
the dbus-daemon being restarted.
The current design may make restarting
On 17/06/12 20:15, drago01 wrote:
By that logic we could just stop development today.
Yes, and there are places where we should. That is to stop reinventing
the wheel.
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com writes:
It takes me 4 seconds to POST, boot the kernel, get into
system-update.service, and then reboot. Using a new rpm version,
applying several dozen test updates takes another 20 seconds.
Your hardware is too cheap. BIOS boot time is proportional to
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Benny Amorsen benny+use...@amorsen.dk wrote:
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com writes:
It takes me 4 seconds to POST, boot the kernel, get into
system-update.service, and then reboot. Using a new rpm version,
applying several dozen test updates takes another
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.06.2012 01:14, schrieb Chris Murphy:
Please provide an example of a better option, with sufficient detail as to
constitute a successful relay of the baton.
The point of the thread from the outset was to
On 17 June 2012 11:49, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 17 June 2012 10:53, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
So this is a problem that needs to be solved, but does it require a
reboot? Not really ...
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 06:49:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
You're asserting that dbus-daemon etc cannot be restarted, but without
saying why.
Because designing an asynchronous messaging bus that can be restarted
without losing any messages is a difficult problem.
--
Matthew Garrett
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:54:17PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 17.06.2012 01:14, schrieb Chris Murphy:
Please provide an example of
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Ben Rosser rosser@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to me that we should make the boot menu more consistent somehow. I
feel like the simplest solution is just to run grub2-mkconfig at every
kernel update, and stop using grubby for this. Then everything would look
On 2012-06-16 21:08, Ben Rosser wrote:
It seems to me that we should make the boot menu more consistent
somehow. I feel like the simplest solution is just to run grub2-mkconfig
at every kernel update, and stop using grubby for this. Then everything
would look consistent- the Fedora Linux boot
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:54:17PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.06.2012 01:14, schrieb Chris Murphy:
Please provide an example of a better
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:54:17PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 17.06.2012 01:14, schrieb
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:54:17PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:21:14 -0400 (EDT)
Jay Sulzberger j...@panix.com wrote:
I think 50 million dollars toward buying, and properly arranging
the UEFI, of several lots of x86 computers would indeed solve
part of the problem you point out.
Why not?
Why? 50million dollars is a big order,
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:01:53 -0400, you wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:54:17PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 17.06.2012 01:14,
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:21:14 -0400 (EDT)
Jay Sulzberger j...@panix.com wrote:
I think 50 million dollars toward buying, and properly arranging
the UEFI, of several lots of x86 computers would indeed solve
part of the problem you point
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:21:14 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:54:17PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 17.06.2012 01:14,
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:09:37 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:21:14 -0400 (EDT)
Jay Sulzberger j...@panix.com wrote:
I think 50 million dollars toward buying, and properly arranging
the UEFI, of several lots of x86
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:01:53 -0400, you wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:54:17PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Reindl
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:21:14 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:54:17PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Reindl
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:21:14PM -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
I think 50 million dollars toward buying, and properly arranging
the UEFI, of several lots of x86 computers would indeed solve
part of the problem you point out.
Why not?
Because said machines would cost more than identical
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:52:48PM -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
So why does the SecureBoot private key require a so much higher
cost of administration?
Fedora's keys are currently only relevant on hardware where users have
voluntarialy installed Fedora. If all x86 machines shipped with a
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Jay Sulzberger j...@panix.com wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote:
Not to mention that you are effectively telling anyone not currently
using Red Hat Hardware that they can't run Linux, thus eliminating
the ability to gain
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:41:20AM -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
We do not have to have every motherboard work well with free
software. But we do need at least one, and we hope many.
What market share Linux has is storngly infuenced by people's ability to
install Linux on computers that they
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:09:37 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:21:14 -0400 (EDT)
Jay Sulzberger j...@panix.com wrote:
I think 50 million dollars toward
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:54:56AM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
But the best thing is that a free software UEFI would let anybody put
their own key as hardware root, and this would stymie the
rationalizing of big shots holding root and granting signing services
to their hardware.
All UEFI
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:56:54AM -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
We just need hardware we can install Fedora on, as once we did,
without asking Microsoft for permission.
System76 have committed to providing hardware without pre-enabled secure
boot.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:54:56AM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
But the best thing is that a free software UEFI would let anybody put
their own key as hardware root, and this would stymie the
rationalizing of big shots
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:21:14PM -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
I think 50 million dollars toward buying, and properly arranging
the UEFI, of several lots of x86 computers would indeed solve
part of the problem you point
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 01:00:33AM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:54:56AM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
But the best thing is that a free software UEFI would let anybody put
their own key as
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 01:09:52AM -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
The game is now just about over. What if one day, Microsoft
makes it even harder to install Fedora without a Microsoft
controlled key? What if, as has already happened with ARM,
Microsoft refuses to grant Fedora a special key?
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 01:00:33AM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:54:56AM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
But the
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 01:09:52AM -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
The game is now just about over. What if one day, Microsoft
makes it even harder to install Fedora without a Microsoft
controlled key? What if, as has
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 01:16:37AM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
The machine will have a functional UEFI implementation. Why would we
want to replace it?
Um, because you're not asking permission?
I'm sorry, I
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 01:17:19AM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 01:09:52AM -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
The game is now just about over. What if one day, Microsoft
makes it even harder to
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Seth Johnson seth.p.john...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 01:00:33AM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org
wrote:
commit bf5191431f870659ac09dc2206e0e916fd93
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 09:22:37 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-TheSchwartz.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-TheSchwartz.spec b/perl-TheSchwartz.spec
commit ee486cf0fd7c67c89768cedc6e6c43b820c6cf7e
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 09:22:36 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Data-Structure-Util.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Data-Structure-Util.spec
commit 07f3d699c7f51e1f7a46bcebe585831721060524
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 09:22:38 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Ima-DBI.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Ima-DBI.spec b/perl-Ima-DBI.spec
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786080
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Latest upstream release: 2.4.32
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.4.31
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Shipwright/
Please consult the package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786080
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit 73f54e61ac9e17d44c29a95dc0e42cae1aad928b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 13:32:17 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-IPC-SharedCache.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IPC-SharedCache.spec
commit 099c38d128b8570cc0d57c1cd685b718f9c72940
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 13:32:17 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Cache-Cache.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Cache-Cache.spec b/perl-Cache-Cache.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-NoTabs:
00128394b3817803a8e003cbc89ee51a Test-NoTabs-1.2.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9937d0ac9f8052541e9ddc79ee745d430578b1cd
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sun Jun 17 12:58:34 2012 +0100
Update to 1.2
- New upstream release 1.2:
- Fix to ignore inc/ for Module::Install
- BR: perl(Cwd), perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker), perl(File::Spec),
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-NoTabs-1.2-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
9937d0a... Update to 1.2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-EOL:
cbff8e06b0ddefdd37d89ea1be4fabb1 Test-EOL-1.3.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Package-Pkg:
47c35b11c07d4ec6a67b3c6b0f81d4b1 Package-Pkg-0.0020.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1a25c7f3bc22460d93c3c86959f6098b25a80310
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 07:51:31 2012 -0600
update to 0.0020
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Package-Pkg.spec | 10 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema:
1678e306429e5c9475721e3640bd030f Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.60.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Types-Common:
0346d19397c3a3e83c25d82c23f64549 MooseX-Types-Common-0.001008.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5cd9abaf7409a8aa758456a8ab616a763297e7f6
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 09:09:16 2012 -0600
update to 0.001008
.gitignore|1 +
perl-MooseX-Types-Common.spec | 11 +++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed,
commit a6bf9a81d7b95038edc4fb56651c80be2a295d5b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 17:46:40 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Class-DBI-Pg.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-DBI-Pg.spec
commit a65ef7b97a798f4aa6e3367d923fddac0079ead6
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 17:46:40 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Class-DBI-FromCGI.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-DBI-FromCGI.spec
commit a8f299ad6f30ba46b1cf4c032574760eafe7385b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 17:46:40 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Ace.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Ace.spec b/perl-Ace.spec
index 0d24522..b9377e8
commit 7cfa3bbf80febd52e659c098298ef80a5c513946
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 17:46:40 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Class-DBI-mysql.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-DBI-mysql.spec
commit a7c24a3c529052afe71d28fcb5c1bf9303df508c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 17:46:41 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Class-DBI-Plugin.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-DBI-Plugin.spec
commit b96b19aae473cb97b90de71eeb3b19429839fd37
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 17:46:40 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Class-DBI-SQLite.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-DBI-SQLite.spec
commit b6dabf5cbedbbaa2d9dd5ff7488920042ff59409
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 17:46:41 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Class-DBI-Pager.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-DBI-Pager.spec
commit f367b70560e40dba0c4b964e1af71016df699593
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 17:52:06 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-HTML-Template.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-HTML-Template.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832663
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Latest upstream release: 0.13
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.11
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-Socket-IP/
Please consult the package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832663
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832825
Bug ID: 832825
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
commit c0b3c7d180edb60c9723d1fc5d68dac49dcc8c88
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 21:51:34 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit a87c2bcb6127df1295dbee051345b4a264ed54b4
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 21:51:35 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-RetrieveAll.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit c18bea543fc879ef35da6391d18f9d6fb2468e16
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 21:51:35 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Class-DBI-Loader.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-DBI-Loader.spec
commit cb1bd6185a5565907c5418c5ae04408fbd928de2
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Jun 17 21:51:35 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-Type.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-Type.spec
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
