Hi,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:22:26 + (UTC)
Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 13:19:13 GMT, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
I wonder if it would be possible to do it on shutdown instead of
during start up? I usually do not care if shutdown takes ten
seconds or five
Hi,
Which is one of a number of reasons why I then suggested that instead of
replacing grubby entirely, we could simply patch grubby to call
grub2-mkconfig if the bootloader is grub2. That would accomplish everything
I wanted to achieve (compliance with /etc/grub.d and /etc/default/grub,
On 06/19/2012 08:23 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Would it be helpful, if there was a list of extensively used options
so that DNF knew what high notes it needed to hit sooner rather than
later?
Absolutely, I created a wiki page for it:
https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-backlog
Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com writes:
On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are there any
2012/6/20 Nikola Pajkovsky npajk...@redhat.com:
Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com writes:
On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF
- Original Message -
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 22:14 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 06/19/2012 09:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'll add to that to note that we now have Xfce, LXDE and Sugar
all on
the DVD.
Which should have been added to the release blocker process when
- Original Message -
It's worth noting that we certainly have shipped non-blocking spins
in
completely broken states in past releases, and there is at present
nothing to prevent this happening. There is zero guarantee of testing
for non-blocking spins. QA did no formal validation of
- Original Message -
As far as QA is concerned it's entirely your decision (as a personal
note to self, I'll have to update the Deliverables SOP draft). We
just
need to know so we know what limit to check against in testing.
As a personal comment, though, doesn't this seem a
On 20 June 2012 08:08, Stijn Hoop st...@sandcat.nl wrote:
I agree that mind reading computers may not be the final answer...
Well, switching to system-update.service from a running desktop should
probably kill off everything and start the offline update, so that
would be possible with the new
Would it not be better to work with yum upstream to make the current yum
depsolver more modular so you could plugin another libsolv based depsolver,
instead of making a fork of yum and starts trashing the current API. There
is a lot more to yum, that just solving dependencies. And making a fork
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:22:22 +0100
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 June 2012 08:08, Stijn Hoop st...@sandcat.nl wrote:
I agree that mind reading computers may not be the final answer...
Well, switching to system-update.service from a running desktop should
probably kill off
So, ...
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Jun 18, 2012, at 4:08 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Chris Murphy wrote:
Grubby does not work fine with GRUB 2, it creates sloppy menu lists that
eventually break the advanced menu entries, as well as totally
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Jun 18, 2012, at 6:36 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jun 18, 2012, at 4:08 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Chris Murphy wrote:
Grubby does not work fine with GRUB 2, it creates sloppy menu lists that
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Correct approach would be to save state before installation of new
version starts and start dovecot (if flag is set) after old version is
removed - that would mean %postun script. This does not seem to work on
reinstall (the same version is installed) - %postun script
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
On 06/19/2012 04:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.2012 09:53, schrieb drago01:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On 18/06/12 09:30, drago01 wrote:
This would just
On 06/19/2012 11:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 23:28 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
So far, the only actual arguments against this (specifically, the
above solution to the problem) I've heard is that it breaks being able
to configure /boot/grub2/grub.cfg by hand. But that's
Again: I'm perfectly happy if it is rejected as a feature. I don't
really care either way. What I'd really hate to see is a checkbox in the
installer so we are compelled to test both variations...
Yeah, I won't be adding any checkboxes to have people pick their /tmp
style.
- Chris
--
devel
Good day all,
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday June
20th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
CST: 10pm
Current items on the agenda:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:40:14 +0900, you wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:56:20 +0100
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
System76 (and possibly others) will be supplying systems
that provide (2), so that choice is available to you.
Matthew, I often read you referring to System76, since
On 06/20/2012 03:35 PM, Chris Lumens wrote:
Again: I'm perfectly happy if it is rejected as a feature. I don't
really care either way. What I'd really hate to see is a checkbox in the
installer so we are compelled to test both variations...
Yeah, I won't be adding any checkboxes to have
I think I got this fixed in
doxygen-1.8.1.1-2.fc18 :
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=325050
I'll talk to than about getting a fixed build for f17 too
-- rex
Thanks for all the answers and thanks for the fixed doxygen. I'll try to
build the package I have
Am 20.06.2012 14:32, schrieb Björn Persson:
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Correct approach would be to save state before installation of new
version starts and start dovecot (if flag is set) after old version is
removed - that would mean %postun script. This does not seem to work on
reinstall
Am 20.06.2012 14:33, schrieb Joel Rees:
A) continue using grub1 and continue working with diminishing resources to
keep grub1 working in the new environments a boot loader will be needed in.
B) consume what upstream gives us in the form of grub2.
C) Maintain grub1 ourselves (not that I'm
Am 20.06.2012 16:11, schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 06/20/2012 03:35 PM, Chris Lumens wrote:
Again: I'm perfectly happy if it is rejected as a feature. I don't
really care either way. What I'd really hate to see is a checkbox in the
installer so we are compelled to test both variations...
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 08:28 +1000, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:44:38AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
Its not his ignorance - he's on vacation for the next two weeks...
Brian replied to Lennart 7 minutes after Lennart's e-mail and
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I think what's actually needed is a small patch to grubby to make it keep
track of the bounding block the current default is in and add the new
bounding block there, so that we don't accidentally change the cosmetic
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:57:58 -0400
Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:40:14 +0900, you wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:56:20 +0100
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
System76 (and possibly others) will be supplying systems
that provide (2), so
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Glib:
faa052bdf6e9b87ea30b630c2806e71e Glib-1.260.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b680de6aa6a8bc3f2aa2920809fc1d3f537350df
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 20 17:06:16 2012 +0200
1.260 bump
Required by perl-Gtk3-0.006.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Glib.spec | 37 ++---
sources|2 +-
3
On Thu, 21.06.12 00:01, Joel Rees (joel.r...@gmail.com) wrote:
If Puttering really went on vacation after dropping a bombshell like
My name is Poettering, not Puttering.
community to do the grunt work on his Master's thesis on things that
My master's thesis? Nah, no thanks, already got a
On 06/20/2012 11:04 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com
mailto:pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I think what's actually needed is a small patch to grubby to make it keep
track of the bounding block the current default is in and add the new
On 20 June 2012 12:51, Stijn Hoop st...@sandcat.nl wrote:
Good to know, thanks -- although I wonder, in what capacity is this
supported then?
Well, I've got no idea if it works at all, let alone if it works well ;)
Would you / others be willing to deal with both update
timings in this
Hi,
On 06/15/2012 09:30 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Fedora still has quite strict printing policies even if users choose
to be a part of Administrator group during installation still need to
input passwords while changing even the minor printer settings (like
unpausing). This is
On 06/20/2012 03:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2012 14:32, schrieb Björn Persson:
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Correct approach would be to save state before installation of new
version starts and start dovecot (if flag is set) after old version is
removed - that would mean %postun script.
On 06/20/2012 06:42 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 06/20/2012 03:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2012 14:32, schrieb Björn Persson:
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Correct approach would be to save state before installation of new
version starts and start dovecot (if flag is set) after old
On 06/20/2012 10:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2012 16:11, schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 06/20/2012 03:35 PM, Chris Lumens wrote:
Again: I'm perfectly happy if it is rejected as a feature. I don't
really care either way. What I'd really hate to see is a checkbox in the
installer so we
Ok, I guess this topic has been brought up before, but I think some
things changed recently that would warrant seriously considering adding
a default caching name server in fedora installs.
There are at least 2 situations where it is needed, and they are common
or will be common enough.
The 2
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/328
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/328/0001-Ticket-328-make-sure-all-internal-search-filters-are.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark Reynolds
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
Since you can look at it either way in that regard, it's completely
reasonable to have the option that's best for most users as the
default. As I see it, that's to enable tmpfs for /tmp .
Given a choice between works for everyone and works well for most,
but fails in obscure ways for some,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:47:17 -0400
Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
Ok, I guess this topic has been brought up before, but I think some
things changed recently that would warrant seriously considering
adding a default caching name server in fedora installs.
...snip...
Discuss.
You can
Am 20.06.2012 17:42, schrieb Panu Matilainen:
On 06/20/2012 03:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2012 14:32, schrieb Björn Persson:
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Correct approach would be to save state before installation of new
version starts and start dovecot (if flag is set) after old
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 10:01 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:47:17 -0400
Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
Ok, I guess this topic has been brought up before, but I think some
things changed recently that would warrant seriously considering
adding a default caching name
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:05:57 -0400
Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes this is all good 'n' nice.
The point is, can we/should we/want we make this the default ?
(And work on integrating NM - unbound automatic configuration ?)
I'd be in favor of that. ;)
I don't want to speak for the
Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) said:
Of course for this to work properly we need some level of integration
between Network Manager and the DNS caching server so that the dynamic
configurations can be pushed in/out when the related networks come
up/down.
Discuss.
man NetworkManager.conf:
On 06/20/2012 06:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2012 17:42, schrieb Panu Matilainen:
On 06/20/2012 03:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2012 14:32, schrieb Björn Persson:
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Correct approach would be to save state before installation of new
version starts and
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 09:21 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
On 06/19/2012 11:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 23:28 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
So far, the only actual arguments against this (specifically, the
above solution to the problem) I've heard is that it breaks being
On 06/20/2012 05:45 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
On 06/20/2012 10:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2012 16:11, schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 06/20/2012 03:35 PM, Chris Lumens wrote:
Again: I'm perfectly happy if it is rejected as a feature. I don't
really care either way. What I'd really hate to
On 06/20/2012 12:42 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 09:21 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
On 06/19/2012 11:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 23:28 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
So far, the only actual arguments against this (specifically, the
above solution to the
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 12:21 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) said:
Of course for this to work properly we need some level of integration
between Network Manager and the DNS caching server so that the dynamic
configurations can be pushed in/out when the related
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 21:33 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
You seem to think we, the Fedora project, have any sort of sway as to how
things get written in their various upstreams. We don't, except for very
few cases. Our choices here with grub2 are
A) continue using grub1 and continue
Hi Fedora community,
I know that I can fix the new address of sources files with sed
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Wrong_FSF_address). I
think that timestamp should not be preserved because it's a change, a
really small change, but a change after all , what do you think?
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 04:46 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
We get help fairly often for GNOME
and KDE, and satellit_ usually covers Sugar, but we very rarely get
anything for Xfce or LXDE.
The main issue here is - the TC/RC images are released too fast to
be able to fill in the matrix
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:59:33AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, someone already pointed to
http://people.freedesktop.org/~kay/loader/ , which seems intriguing. I
haven't read anything Kay's said publicly about it, though. Of course,
it's UEFI-specific.
Which is a good reason for it
On 06/20/2012 09:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 12:21 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) said:
Of course for this to work properly we need some level of integration
between Network Manager and the DNS caching server so that the dynamic
Am 20.06.2012 18:26, schrieb Panu Matilainen:
i was there, i saw was happened on dist-upgrades, i fixed them
i saw a dist-upgrade on the fist-testmachine restart httpd
which failed for some reason and AFTER some time you could
start httpd again
* i rebuilt the httpd package
* i removed the
Am 20.06.2012 18:49, schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
Since you can look at it either way in that regard, it's completely
reasonable
to have the option that's best for most users as the default. As I see it,
that's to enable tmpfs for /tmp .
Again: It is not reasonable, it's generally and
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
i bet now someone is coming up wth he must not dump a 100 Gb file to /tmp
this is the wrong perspective
the right one is the system must not crash if someone does
Good thing it doesn't.
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:04 AM, nomnex nom...@gmail.com wrote:
Things have changed. That's a good news (for once). Thanks for the
update.
Bravo, so apparently there is a leader on this, a free software UEFI
on its own trustworthy hardware, that hopefully will tell the truth to
the user about
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:19:22PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:04 AM, nomnex nom...@gmail.com wrote:
Things have changed. That's a good news (for once). Thanks for the
update.
Bravo, so apparently there is a leader on this, a free software UEFI
on its own
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
Thats not true (and I've used tmpfs for tmp for years, so I'm speaking
from experience)— tmpfs is backed by swap on demand. Just add the
space that you would have used for /tmp to your swap.
I am _very_ concerned about
Proceed to the next paragraph then. ;-)
Seth
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:19:22PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:04 AM, nomnex nom...@gmail.com wrote:
Things have changed. That's a good news
would fixing this also fix the bug where installing a new kernel changes
the default boot OS even when the default is non Linux?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 06/20/2012 01:32 PM, Naheem Zaffar wrote:
would fixing this also fix the bug where installing a new kernel changes the
default boot OS even when the default is non Linux?
What's the bugzilla number for that?
--
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 06/20/2012 06:59 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi Fedora community,
I know that I can fix the new address of sources files with sed
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Wrong_FSF_address). I
think that timestamp should not be preserved because it's a change, a
really small change, but
So, how does this scenario work?
* The machine has 4G of RAM,
* 50% RAM is being used by actual software (firefox, eclipse, mail
client, etc), so the other 50% is pagecache
* The machine has 4G of swap, none of which is active.
So then a user drops a 8.5G DVD image into /tmp.
On a
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
As a sysadmin...for a multi-seat configuration in a home network
environment...do I really need to anticipate maximum large file tmp
usage in calculating my swap partition size for my multi-user family?
8 gigs of ram... so
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tmpfs volumes have a size set as a mount option. The default is half
the physical ram (not physical ram plus swap). You can change the size
with a remount. When its full, its full, like any other filesystem
Okay that
Once upon a time, Brian Wheeler bdwhe...@indiana.edu said:
So, how does this scenario work?
* The machine has 4G of RAM,
* 50% RAM is being used by actual software (firefox, eclipse, mail
client, etc), so the other 50% is pagecache
* The machine has 4G of swap, none of which is active.
On 06/20/2012 01:41 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
What happens when I have 2 users who are both downloading dvd iso
sized images into /tmp as well as other things going on. Remind me...
where does firefox by default cache in progress downloads for the
Open in facility. Isn't it down in tmp?
On 20/06/12 18:55, Chris Adams wrote:
2G gets written and then -ENOSPC. 2G gets pushed to swap.
The default for tmpfs mounts is an fs that is sized to RAM/2.
What is the scenario,
where it's a KVM host and 3/4 physical ram is assigned to Guests?
--
Regards,
Frank
Jack of all, fubars
--
On 06/20/2012 01:55 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Brian Wheeler bdwhe...@indiana.edu said:
So, how does this scenario work?
* The machine has 4G of RAM,
* 50% RAM is being used by actual software (firefox, eclipse, mail
client, etc), so the other 50% is pagecache
* The machine
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
it is simply a fact that drop a 100 or 200 Gb file into tmpfs
will bring down each machine existing currently and in the next
No, it won't.
Also, the default partitioning scheme for the existing Fedora setup
(with /tmp on /) also
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tmpfs volumes have a size set as a mount option. The default is half
the physical ram (not physical ram plus swap). You can change the size
with a
Simo,
For the VPN scenario I've been happily using dnrd for some time.
I use it to steer DNS requests for mycompany.com to the
company's DNS servers, and all other DNS requests to the
external servers.
Unlike just adding the company DNS servers to /etc/resolv.conf,
this never uses the
Am 20.06.2012 19:18, schrieb Gregory Maxwell:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
i bet now someone is coming up wth he must not dump a 100 Gb file to /tmp
this is the wrong perspective
the right one is the system must not crash if someone does
Am 20.06.2012 19:41, schrieb Gregory Maxwell:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
As a sysadmin...for a multi-seat configuration in a home network
environment...do I really need to anticipate maximum large file tmp
usage in calculating my swap partition
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Simo Sorce wrote:
There are at least 2 situations where it is needed, and they are common
or will be common enough.
The 2 use cases for which a properly configurable and dynamically
changeable caching DNA name server would be really useful are:
- DNSSEC verification
-
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Connect your vpn, etc.
Then tell unbound what you want it to do:
unbound-control forward_add redhat.com x.x.x.x y.y.y.y
unbound-control forward_add yourdomain z.z.z.z
(unbound-control gives you a lot of control, you can flush cache, setup
forward, see
People have might missed it before, but Fedora does a lot now with
handling the various DNS manglings it can encounter in the wild.
If you install dnssec-trigger from rawhide, then your DNS will be
automatically configured using DNSSEC and with as much security as
possible, while detecting
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote
I just tested a fresh install from F17 desktop live; the /home/user
directory created after firstboot is 700. /home/user created by s-c-u is
700. /home/user created by useradd is 700. /home/user created by GNOME
On 06/20/2012 02:16 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tmpfs volumes have a size set as a mount option. The default is half
the physical ram (not physical
commit 4ae6dbd2a14d7bb7afa360937c34d4cf10efe896
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 20 23:02:00 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Test-YAML-Valid.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-YAML-Valid.spec
commit 8bd30f03664d32ca48170b3b0b4e7d2be77863de
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 20 23:02:02 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-DateTime-Format-Oracle.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DateTime-Format-Oracle.spec
commit 7d10dea09b7d746986f4616712ffa71a0cb70e4a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 20 23:02:18 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-XML-XQL.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-XML-XQL.spec b/perl-XML-XQL.spec
index
commit eb4899e677d45cecf89c9647d37a94ff0f001478
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 20 23:02:46 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Module-Inspector.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Inspector.spec
commit f219f305e10fcf847ed1c76e8afb9e52541672e9
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 20 23:02:47 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-DateTime-Format-Pg.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DateTime-Format-Pg.spec
On Jun 19, 2012, at 9:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
grub2-mkconfig is inherently a more 'destructive' operation than grubby,
is really my only thought. But I wouldn't mind the change much at all.
pjones' opinion would be the most valuable to have, I guess.
FWIW, grub-mkconfig writes out a
commit 733652197f0c60ea910498f3fd815786206b3cf9
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 20 23:08:29 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Module-Starter-PBP.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Starter-PBP.spec
commit 09c7d5107a433b403576d24f43d48d84f0b22694
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jun 20 23:09:15 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Test-Database.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Database.spec
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:59:26 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi Fedora community,
I know that I can fix the new address of sources files with sed
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Wrong_FSF_address). I
think that timestamp should not be preserved because it's a change, a
really
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Brian Wheeler bdwhe...@indiana.edu wrote:
But in any case the I/O advantages have never been shown, despite multiple
requests by myself and others.
I posted some example numbers earlier in this thread. e.g. make on an
already compiled firefox source was half
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833723
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
Good day all,
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today.
For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-06-20/fedora-meeting-1.2012-06-20-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:25:50 -0700
Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net escribió:
On 06/19/2012 03:59 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Again anything that gets handed out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:19:35 -0400 (EDT)
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com escribió:
As reaction to approved MiniDebugInfo feature, we agreed on KDE SIG
meeting that we would have to break CD size limit (and the breaking
of CD size image was used
2012/6/20 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:59:26 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi Fedora community,
I know that I can fix the new address of sources files with sed
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Wrong_FSF_address). I
think that timestamp should
Hello,
As per the instructions at the web page at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers I
wanted to give a brief introduction.
My name is Gary Gatling and I work at North Carolina State University
supporting Linux in the college of engineering. I mainly work with
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 10:19 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:05:57 -0400
Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes this is all good 'n' nice.
The point is, can we/should we/want we make this the default ?
(And work on integrating NM - unbound automatic configuration ?)
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 16:24 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Simo Sorce wrote:
There are at least 2 situations where it is needed, and they are common
or will be common enough.
The 2 use cases for which a properly configurable and dynamically
changeable caching DNA name
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
