Angus Salkeld <asalk...@redhat.com> writes: > On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >>On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote: >>> On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF >>> > >>> > Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future? >>> > >>> > According to what is written here >>> > https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-Considered-for-Dropping >>> > history function will likely be dropped. >>> > >>> > From my POV history feature is very useful. Is there a plan to provide >>> > history function in Fedora dnf if yum gets dropped? >>> > >>> >>> Hi Michal, >>> >>> Thanks for pointing this out. I considered history a candidate for >>> dropping because I didn't realize people had usecases for it. It is not >>> present in the early versions of DNF but I will make sure to put it back >>> in later. >> >>Just to add my voice to the choir, I use it extensively and I suspect >>many others in QA group too. It's extremely useful when trying to >>determine exactly what update caused a given problem. > > Maybe a "yum history bisect" would be a neat feature?
nice one, sir -- Nikola -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
