- Original Message -
On 23/07/13 03:16 -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
- Original Message -
On 19/07/13 02:41 -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:24:22AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
FAQ:
Q: Why do we need to switch to
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Billy Crook billycr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:18:47AM -0500, Billy Crook wrote:
Since it _isn't_ served via DHCP in any environment I'm aware of, that's
Le Mer 24 juillet 2013 08:30, drago01 a écrit :
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Billy Crook billycr...@gmail.com wrote:
Default should include what people 'generally expect of a GNU+Linux
system' -- and that includes an MTA.
Citation needed. Given that one very distribution with a very big
On 24/07/13 11:50, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Thought's comment flames?
To me, crowd sourcing seems to work because it's about some exciting new
technology that people have to have and it's the only way to have it.
There's a buzz, an excitement that needs to light up twitter in order to
get
On 07/24/2013 03:50 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Earlier this evening I was asked how I expected Fedora to function in
any way similarly to how it does now without the backing of one or more
organizations like Red Hat.
I gave the quick answer through donations since I was not in mood to
On 07/24/2013 04:53 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi list,
FYI, as this link[1] announced, 2 desktops have been merged into one.
Razor-qt just got in Fedora in April, what shall we do next?
Early days yet (nothing has been released as yet?), but I imagine it
will be up to the current razorqt
On 07/23/2013 07:00 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 06:23:20PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
#topic #1136 F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_as_Primary
.fesco 1136
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1136
Is
On 07/24/2013 07:33 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 07/24/2013 03:50 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Earlier this evening I was asked how I expected Fedora to function in
any way similarly to how it does now without the backing of one or more
organizations like Red Hat.
I gave the quick answer
On 22/07/13 05:04 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I'm more curious why there are packages at a Fedora downstream that
aren't on the main Fedora repositories. Are these non free?
If Russian Fedora is a remix that uses packages that are not in Fedora,
especially non free ones, it should be following the
commit 3d848e3dea227f4a14d836ecb21036ea61ebf999
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jul 24 10:59:45 2013 +0200
Perl 5.18 rebuild
perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders.spec
commit b694d5cec28e7c671a000d4e5f6503758ec26992
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jul 24 10:59:45 2013 +0200
Perl 5.18 rebuild
perl-ExtUtils-CChecker.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-ExtUtils-CChecker.spec
2013/7/24 Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org:
On 22/07/13 05:04 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I'm more curious why there are packages at a Fedora downstream that
aren't on the main Fedora repositories. Are these non free?
If Russian Fedora is a remix that uses packages that are not in
commit 7628023733e1e5826bbd5a6c7e97c5ab8d85b4bf
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jul 24 11:04:03 2013 +0200
Perl 5.18 rebuild
perl-XML-Simple.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-XML-Simple.spec b/perl-XML-Simple.spec
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:46:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:00:46PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 06:15:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
However for some reason I can't quite
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:28:20AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 18:15 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:57:50PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:17:01PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
So this thread is complaining
commit 140652d30ab4242cf5b44d39c27c5908c0cc61c7
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jul 24 11:19:26 2013 +0200
Perl 5.18 rebuild
perl-Config-Extend-MySQL.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Config-Extend-MySQL.spec
Dne 24.7.2013 06:32, Toshio Kuratomi napsal(a):
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 02:40:56AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
The problem is that you're basically saying my mental model is the right
one, which is not necessarily true for everyone (and not necessarily true
generally). Taking your arguments a
On Monday 22 July 2013 20:18:04 Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:14:32AM +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
BTW: nobody ever answered how desktop users are supposed to read the
output of their cron-jobs (they don't have permissions to read logs).
They do have permissions to
On Tuesday 23 July 2013 02:34:25 Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 23.07.13 03:14, Oron Peled (o...@actcom.co.il) wrote:
BTW: nobody ever answered how desktop users are supposed to read the
output of their cron-jobs (they don't have permissions to read logs).
Actually, if you'd look
commit 00bcb535bd499da3c4beba3a5d4f1e28f67c8e6b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jul 24 11:53:39 2013 +0200
Perl 5.18 rebuild
perl-MARC-XML.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-MARC-XML.spec b/perl-MARC-XML.spec
index
On 07/24/2013 07:33 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 07/24/2013 03:50 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Earlier this evening I was asked how I expected Fedora to function in
any way similarly to how it does now without the backing of one or more
organizations like Red Hat.
I gave the quick answer
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:17:14AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:46:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:00:46PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 06:15:32PM +0100,
On 07/24/2013 02:33 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:01:51PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 2013-07-23 08:04, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
For similar purposes, I have been using the CSV table returned by
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/lists/bugzilla?tg_format=plain;
I am
On 07/23/2013 07:47 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 2013-07-22 18:55, Thomas Moschny wrote:
Maybe you could use searchco.de in some creative way?
http://searchcode.com/?q=url%3Afedora+ext%3Aspec+docdir
Thanks for the pointer -- but what makes that less useful than it could
be is that the url
- Original Message -
On 07/23/2013 07:00 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 06:23:20PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
#topic #1136 F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_as_Primary
.fesco 1136
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:08:41AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:17:14AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:46:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:00:46PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, 22.07.13 19:33, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 22.07.2013 18:29, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
If you want to centralize system configuration, rather then services,
then go ahead and do, that, but actually centralize *the configuration*,
not the service. In
On 07/23/2013 10:18 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
As a part of cronie upstream I should probably answer. Cron was
patched long time ago to log into syslog if mail can't be send. There
is also option for using syslog by default.
Should we change cron to be using syslog by default if this
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-Server:
b256c35a18caecc8fce9e6e1f2825658 Net-Server-2.007.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 23.07.13 04:03, Oron Peled (o...@actcom.co.il) wrote:
Cron was already mentioned, but every one seem to ignore the fact that
regular users don't have permission to read system logs.
journald actually splits out user logs and use filesystem ACLs to ensure
that the user gets
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/2013 09:50 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Earlier this evening I was asked how I expected Fedora to function
in any way similarly to how it does now without the backing of one
or more organizations like Red Hat.
I gave the quick
On Tue, 23.07.13 11:52, Billy Crook (billycr...@gmail.com) wrote:
Default should include what people 'generally expect of a GNU+Linux
system' -- and that includes an MTA. It should include a syslog, and
it should include screen too for that matter.
This is the let's do this out of tradition
On 07/24/2013 01:11 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/23/2013 10:18 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
As a part of cronie upstream I should probably answer. Cron was
patched long time ago to log into syslog if mail can't be send. There
is also option for using syslog by default.
Should we
Le Mer 24 juillet 2013 13:11, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
The second part of my mail that you conveniently removed actually
explains why that doesn't work: because the SASL auth is inherently
per-user configuration but in sendmail you can configure it only
globally for the client side.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/23/2013 07:00 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 06:23:20PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
#topic #1136 F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture -
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:50:11AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
Obvious we cannot have crowd funding for every moving part in Fedora
that would just be ludicrous so we need to apply that concept upon
the entire project, as in Fedora would be just a one crowd founded
project.
snip
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 02:40:56AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
The problem is that you're basically saying my mental model is the right
one, which is not necessarily true for everyone (and not necessarily true
Le Mer 24 juillet 2013 13:39, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
This is particularly a bad argument as most Linux distribution
installations do not include an MTA anymore (Ubuntu is substantially
more popular than Fedora, and not just on the desktop). There's enough
reason to believe that the
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:25:31PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/23/2013 11:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
you claimed more than once that they are a less woth part of the community
because they get paid for their work and are not completly free in their
doings
Yes not because they
On 07/24/2013 11:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
While I*am* pleased that you've given some real thought to this, I
think you may have missed the real point I was trying to make there,
which also ties back to the original purpose of that thread.
Fedora is hemorrhaging users to other
On 07/24/2013 12:15 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:50:11AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
Obvious we cannot have crowd funding for every moving part in Fedora
that would just be ludicrous so we need to apply that concept upon
the entire project, as in Fedora
- Original Message -
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 02:40:56AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
The problem is that you're basically saying my mental model is the right
one, which is not necessarily true for everyone (and not necessarily true
generally). Taking your arguments a bit
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:37:09PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/24/2013 12:15 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:50:11AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
Obvious we cannot have crowd funding for every moving part in Fedora
that would just be ludicrous
On 07/24/2013 12:49 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:37:09PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/24/2013 12:15 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:50:11AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
Obvious we cannot have crowd funding for every
On 07/22/2013 05:36 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Also, cronie will split up the messages
by line anyway if it logs to syslog instead of sendmail.
That sounds particularly horrible for concurrent cron jobs that would
thus have their output interleaved in the log.
--
Bob Nichols NOSPAM is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/24/2013 08:31 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/24/2013 11:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
While I *am* pleased that you've given some real thought to this,
I think you may have missed the real point I was trying to make
there, which
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
We should probably discuss mass rebuild status/timing as well.
Mirek
--
devel
On 07/22/2013 03:38 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
This is a draft of the proposal I'm presenting at Flock, An Architecture
for a More Agile Fedora (http://sched.co/19ugKGM). It represents a big
change to how we as the Fedora project put together our distribution. I've
gone through several drafts of
Dne 22.7.2013 18:29, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson napsal(a):
As for cruft in the spec files, why not bring a proposal to the FPC to
update the packaging guidelines stating that Fedora spec files must
not contain RHEL/EPEL macros? Then the git branches would be
maintained separately and the spec files
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Other for the fact that this would allow everyone to contribute to
the project not just Red Hat which in turn would make us less
depended on it ( or they spending money on us from their point of
view ).
My
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 02:11:18PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 24 juillet 2013 13:11, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
The second part of my mail that you conveniently removed actually
explains why that doesn't work: because the SASL auth is inherently
per-user configuration but in
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:37:09PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/24/2013 12:15 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:50:11AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
Obvious we cannot have
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson píše v St 24. 07. 2013 v 10:01 +:
On 07/24/2013 07:33 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 07/24/2013 03:50 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Earlier this evening I was asked how I expected Fedora to function
in
any way similarly to how it does now without the
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
My understanding is that Fedora is registered as a non-profit
organization in the United States which I believe allows for anyone to
donate to it *today* if they so chose. The fact that the only
donations we see are
New thread to get clear of some of the flames and wreckage...
On 07/23/2013 05:25 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:34:15PM -0400, Peter MacKinnon wrote:
Well, compat libraries are certainly an option but I view that as a tactical
solution to an institutional, um,
On 07/24/2013 01:23 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/24/2013 08:31 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/24/2013 11:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
While I *am* pleased that you've given some real thought to this,
I think you may have missed
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:05:40AM -0500, inode0 wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:37:09PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
We would need to form a financial sig that handles that.
Are these people going to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981398
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Here, done, time elapsed: 1 min googling.
Great. But does this really solve anything except refuting the most
immediate statement by Lennart, taken out of context?
'Context' does not ameliorate a foundation
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:05:40AM -0500, inode0 wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:37:09PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
We would need
Le Mer 24 juillet 2013 15:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 02:11:18PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 24 juillet 2013 13:11, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
The second part of my mail that you conveniently removed actually
explains why that doesn't work:
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de writes:
[...] essentially boils down to I hate change. Which is an OK
opinion to have, but certainly not four Fedora, where the four Fs
mean Freedom, Friends, Features, First. The First indicates that
we should be pioneers, and *not* the guys who never
Le Mer 24 juillet 2013 16:17, Peter MacKinnon a écrit :
A generalization which I would disagree with in the Java space. I think
many projects
eventually reach steady-state where they have acquired the set of dep
bundles
they need to satisfy their runtime and test requirements. For example,
I'm going to be going to the WBC this weekend and will be getting back
after a bit more than a week.
I'll have crappy internet access while I'm there and should be able to
keep a lookout for urgent issues. I should be back in time to handle
branching spin-kickstarts for Fedora branch. I don't
On 07/24/2013 02:08 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
But let me add a link to this discussion:
http://opensource.com/business/13/7/donations-open-source-projects
I think I've got some experience with how open source projects work and
there is a lot of truth in that article.
From an opensource
On 07/24/2013 02:13 PM, inode0 wrote:
Fedora is not any sort of legally recognized entity as far as I know.
And the fact that the vast majority of contributions are time rather
than money is because in order to contribute money requires one to
send a check made out to Red Hat and I don't think
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/24/2013 02:13 PM, inode0 wrote:
Fedora is not any sort of legally recognized entity as far as I know.
And the fact that the vast majority of contributions are time rather
than money is because in order to
Probably because no one has tested it yet? Feel free to test it and
leave karma in bodhi.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013, at 10:42 PM, Ibrahim Yurtseven wrote:
On 23.07.2013 21:41, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
457
Am 24.07.2013 13:11, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Mon, 22.07.13 19:33, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 22.07.2013 18:29, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
If you want to centralize system configuration, rather then services,
then go ahead and do, that, but actually centralize
Am 24.07.2013 15:58, schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 02:11:18PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 24 juillet 2013 13:11, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
The second part of my mail that you conveniently removed actually
explains why that doesn't work: because
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
I gave the quick answer through donations
Reading through this thread, it seems to me that you are wanting to
change something you don't understand.
While I am not a RH employee, I have been deeply involved in
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
I as a donor donating $20 would like those to run to
$20? It's going to be a long road!
25,000 to 50,000 of those could get us
On 07/24/2013 03:24 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
The best I can suggest is: build that funding source, and get it to
grow to an important size_without_ messing with RH as a sponsor. The
cost of running Fedora is likely to be huge. Fundraising is incredibly
hard, and generally fails.
None ever
On 07/24/2013 03:47 PM, inode0 wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
I as a donor donating $20 would like those to run to
$20? It's going to be a long road!
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:55:41PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/24/2013 03:47 PM, inode0 wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
I as a donor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
I'm editing .spec file of MUMPS package to conform it to the MPI
packaging guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI). I
have a modest experience in this particular case so I need some
suggestions.
This is initial .spec file of
On 07/24/2013 11:03 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 24 juillet 2013 16:17, Peter MacKinnon a écrit :
A generalization which I would disagree with in the Java space. I think
many projects
eventually reach steady-state where they have acquired the set of dep
bundles
they need to satisfy their
On 07/24/2013 04:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:55:41PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/24/2013 03:47 PM, inode0 wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler f...@redhat.com wrote:
It's tempting to carry this argument too far. We can be first with
good new ideas; first with experimental stuff; first with additions.
We need not be first with bad ideas (and discussions here are a way of
figuring out
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/24/2013 04:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:55:41PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/24/2013 03:47 PM, inode0 wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Martin Langhoff
On 07/15/2013 10:36 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: No Default Sendmail =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSendmail
Change owner(s): Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering net, Matthew
Miller mattdm at fedoraproject org
No longer install an MTA
On 07/24/2013 04:40 PM, inode0 wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
The entire budget is not public so you won't get a definitive answer
for a large portion of the budget.
Why is it not public any reason why we the community cannot know how
On 24/07/13 05:04 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
This phrase in MPI guidelines is little clear for me:
Software that supports MPI MUST be packaged also in serial mode [i.e.
no MPI], if it is supported by upstream.
What does mean serial mode ? :)
Serial in this case means non-parallel, running
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983001
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/24/2013 04:40 PM, inode0 wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
The entire budget is not public so you won't get a definitive answer
for a large portion
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
The infrastructure cost ( with the exception of any paid manpower ) is what
sets the baseline for host/run and that cost is what would determine the
infra/hosting tax % or at least gives a number for a minimum we
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, July 24th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting
1) Problem packages
2) Kernel Status Update
3) Aarch64 - Status
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 07:35:42AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Fedora is hemorrhaging users to other distributions (and to
closed-source platforms).
Do we actually know that this is the case?
The statistics wiki page does show a drop of total repository
connections around Fedora 15 but
On 07/24/2013 05:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:28:20AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 18:15 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:57:50PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:17:01PM -0700, Adam Williamson
On 07/24/2013 01:36 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 07/24/2013 05:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:28:20AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 18:15 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:57:50PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul
Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) said:
But the qemu-kvm binary can still run in TCG mode - you don't need to
install the QEMU emulators too. So your dep could be
%ifarch %{ix86} x86_64
Requires: libvirt-daemon-kvm = 0.10.2-3
%else
Requires:
On 07/24/2013 05:02 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
So all you can do is gather the core metrics for utility use...
cpu/band/storage... and with those metrics in hand price what it would
take to build and run a koji builder in the public cloud as a starting
point and plan your initial crowdsourcing
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-07-25 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net. Note that there was no meeting last week, and that
time constraints will probably prevent us from getting through the
entire volume of new business
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/24/2013 05:02 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
So all you can do is gather the core metrics for utility use...
cpu/band/storage... and with those metrics in hand price what it would
take to build and run a koji
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Agree that's one way of figuring out but ( share number of
servers/cpu/storage ) honestly i would have thought the infrastructure team
would already know this.
Well, luckily you never have to know everything
Hello,
my name is Marcus and I am 32 years old, working as senior system engineer
and life in Germany. My focus is on monitoring and automation in data
center enviroments. I am using linux since 2000 and have tried nearly all
main distributions.
I choose fedora because of the integration of new
Am Mittwoch, den 24.07.2013, 20:53 +0200 schrieb Marcus Asshauer:
Hello,
my name is Marcus and I am 32 years old, working as senior system
engineer and life in Germany. My focus is on monitoring and automation
in data center enviroments. I am using linux since 2000 and have tried
nearly
Hi Marcus, welcome to the free side of the force; welcome to Fedora ;)
I wonder if you've already read our documentation about packaging, if
not, this links can be helpful for you
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
Hello Marcus!
Welcome to the Fedora community!
- Chris
Marcus Asshauer fed...@asshaueronline.de 7/24/2013 2:53 PM
Hello,
my name is Marcus and I am 32 years old, working as senior system engineer and
life in Germany. My focus is on monitoring and automation in data center
enviroments. I
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-07-24)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:00:37 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-07-24/fesco.2013-07-24-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting
1 - 100 of 293 matches
Mail list logo
