Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com writes:
On 2014-02-12, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
Le mercredi 12 février 2014 à 07:11 -0500, Matthew Miller a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:08:20PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
Are there any existing packages that already do that?
vim advertises
Hi,
On 02/07/2014 10:06 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
openlmi-networking-0:0.2.1-1.fc20.src
openlmi-networking-0:0.2.2-2.fc20.src
openlmi-providers-0:0.4.1-2.fc20.src
openlmi-providers-0:0.4.2-2.fc20.src
openlmi-scripts-0:0.2.4a-3.fc20.src
openlmi-scripts-0:0.2.6-5.fc20.src
From the original post at [1]:
Directory Tiles will instead suggest pre-packaged content for
first-time users. Some of these tile placements will be from the
Mozilla ecosystem, some will be popular websites in a given geographic
location, and some will be sponsored content from hand-picked
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064778
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
Hi,
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 20:19 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Parag N(पराग़) panem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built few
packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person can't
carry
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote:
sorry for stepping on your toes -- it was late in the evening and there
were three packages blocking my build, I simply overlooked that harfbuzz
was rebuilt already (I checked the others in koji and no builds were
Hi,
With current changes in Fedora regarding Fedora.next and productization
of Fedora distribution I would like to suggest following change.
Package systemd ships file 90-default.preset [1] (full path:
/usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/90-default.preset) which contains rules
for command
Hi,
The gluster community has been trying to get its
glusterfs-openstack-swift package reviewed since August (2013).
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003089
I realize that reviewers are often unpaid volunteers working on their
own time. On the flip side, the package owner, who
Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
The New Tab feature will provide quick access to popular sites in the
users location, without any collection of personal data (except of
course from checking the location of his IP). At lease this is the
current design by Mozilla.
And
On 02/13/2014 12:33 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
From the original post at [1]:
Directory Tiles will instead suggest pre-packaged content for
first-time users. Some of these tile placements will be from the
Mozilla ecosystem, some will be popular websites in a given geographic
location, and
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
The New Tab feature will provide quick access to popular sites in the
users location, without any collection of personal data (except of
course from checking the location of his
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:36:00PM +0100, Kai Engert wrote:
Question (2)
Is the Fedora community willing to accept Mozilla's desire to show
advertisements in Firefox?
Sub-question (2b):
Why do we care about using the Firefox trademark? We should just
rename the package. Debian do that
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:54:14AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Quite a lot of packages rely on Sphinx, so I
think we may even want to deal with this in a side-tag.
My understanding from Dennis is that creating and then merging side tags in
koji is not a trivial thing (I can't remember is
On February 13, 2014 6:04:01 PM EET, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:36:00PM +0100, Kai Engert wrote:
Question (2)
Is the Fedora community willing to accept Mozilla's desire to show
advertisements in Firefox?
Sub-question (2b):
Why do we care about
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:04:15 -0800
Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:54:14AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Quite a lot of packages rely on Sphinx, so I
think we may even want to deal with this in a side-tag.
My understanding from Dennis is that
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 16:04:01 +,
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Sub-question (2b):
Why do we care about using the Firefox trademark? We should just
rename the package. Debian do that and it hasn't hurt them. It makes
the software more free because we don't have to beg
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 16:47:38 +0200,
Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
The New Tab feature will provide quick access to popular sites in the
users location,
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:53:13 +0100
Václav Pavlín vpav...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
...snip...
Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this file to
the fedora-release package (or elsewhere, if you can suggest better
place). This package is specific to Fedora distribution as well
Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
Is there anything that can be done to wrap up this package review so
that we can move forward?
Given sufficient non-responsiveness, sounds like there has been...
Remove the reviewer, so someone else can step in.
-- rex
--
devel mailing list
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Václav Pavlín vpav...@redhat.com wrote:
Package systemd ships file 90-default.preset [1] (full path:
/usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/90-default.preset) which contains rules for
command 'systemctl preset NAME'.
snip
Based on these arguments, I'd like to
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:53:13 +0100
Václav Pavlín vpav...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
...snip...
Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this file to
the fedora-release package (or elsewhere, if you can suggest
Le Jeu 13 février 2014 15:47, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
The New Tab feature will provide quick access to popular sites in
the
users location, without any collection of personal
Why do we care about using the Firefox trademark? We should just
rename the package. Debian do that and it hasn't hurt them.
Debian has different core values than Fedora does. The relevent
Fedora value is this one:
Friends
We believe success comes from a strong community, made of
On Thu, 13.02.14 17:40, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this file to
the fedora-release package (or elsewhere, if you can suggest better
place). This package is specific to Fedora distribution as well and
On 02/13/2014 05:04 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:36:00PM +0100, Kai Engert wrote:
Question (2)
Is the Fedora community willing to accept Mozilla's desire to show
advertisements in Firefox?
Sub-question (2b):
Why do we care about using the Firefox trademark?
I
On 02/13/2014 05:41 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Why do we care about using the Firefox trademark? We should just
rename the package. Debian do that and it hasn't hurt them.
Debian has different core values than Fedora does. The relevent
Fedora value is this one:
Friends
We believe
A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly
is my friend.
Those are strong words, and based mostly on here-say. Even the Fedora
installer molests you with ads for various non-default packages.
Should we ban the installer? Of course not.
There are specific issues that
Hi
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly is my
friend.
That certainly goes way too far. We have assurance from Mozilla that there
is no spying or tracking going on here and we have yet to see what form of
On 02/12/2014 10:54 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 02/07/2014 04:06 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Dear all,
Unless there are objections, I will be updating the python-sphinx
documentation generator in Rawhide to the latest 1.2.1 release.
For the convenience of maintainers of affected
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Václav Pavlín vpav...@redhat.com
wrote:
Currently this file is part of systemd package which doesn't seem to
be
right. It contains default values specific for distribution, is not
part
of systemd upstream repository and is maintained downstream.
Right,
Le Jeu 13 février 2014 19:40, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
Hi
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly is
my
friend.
That certainly goes way too far. We have assurance from Mozilla that
there
is no spying
On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 15:03 +0100, poma wrote:
With a companion libraries. ;)
↗ libmbim-1.6.0
↗ libqmi-1.8.0
↗ ModemManager-1.2.0
poma
Oh Danny boy, the pipes, the pipes are calling
From glen to glen, and down the mountain side
The summer's gone, and all the flowers are dying
On Qui, 2014-02-13 at 12:56 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 15:03 +0100, poma wrote:
With a companion libraries. ;)
↗ libmbim-1.6.0
↗ libqmi-1.8.0
↗ ModemManager-1.2.0
poma
Oh Danny boy, the pipes, the pipes are calling
From glen to glen, and down
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 10:23 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 16:47:38 +0200,
Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
The New Tab feature will
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Well, if the products want to diverge on what to start/enable, we could
do this I suppose. It's been suggested that we look at having a
fedora-release for each product (with deps on those things the product
advertises as part of
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 17:39 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 13 février 2014 15:47, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
The New Tab feature will provide quick access to popular sites
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 13:21 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly
is my friend.
Those are strong words, and based mostly on here-say. Even the Fedora
installer molests you with ads for various non-default packages.
Those aren't
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 11:03 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
in the shape of a long short rectangle
sometimes, I wonder what goes on in my brain.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
Hi
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
How can they give any assurance? Unless the targets of those ads are
hosted by mozilla...
Maybe that is exactly what they are going to do? They haven't published all
of their plans yet and when they do, we can very well verify
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:39:40 +0100
Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Václav Pavlín vpav...@redhat.com
wrote:
Package systemd ships file 90-default.preset [1] (full path:
Summary of changes:
936e6be... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
65d60a8... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
On 2-6-14 17:44:11 Ales Kozumplik wrote:
We ship
Delta RPM support
What a pleasant surprise on a slow network to see drpm-s rebuilt in
the background while downloading others.
Thank you.
--
Garry T. Williams
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-Load-XS:
c4d992d7023fa3015322916850ee95d9 Class-Load-XS-0.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 474fae091668db88b29b3bcf9a9a730d2c8e7f0a
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Feb 13 20:05:01 2014 +
Update to 0.08
- New upstream release 0.08:
- Switched packaging to just EUMM, as MBT wants the .xs file in a
different
place
- Switch to
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 17:44 +0100, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
dnf-0.4.13 is out [1], [2]. F20 version will follow shortly. We ship
Delta RPM support, bash completion and keepcache again in this version.
Remember to come meet the team at DevConf.cz this weekend.
Sorry I missed you guys at
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 14:11:38 -0500,
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
How can they give any assurance? Unless the targets of those ads are
hosted by mozilla...
Maybe that is exactly what they are going to do? They
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/525
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/525/0001-Ticket-525-Replication-retry-time-attributes-cannot-.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-IniFiles:
c34156374d3842289e537aaafa7b937f Config-IniFiles-2.83.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
What do I do about this?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6526911
[While building and running tests]:
CC ../build/flintxx/test/t-traits
CC ../build/flintxx/test/t-fmpzxx
virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory
make[1]: *** [../build/flintxx/test/t-fmpzxx]
On 13 February 2014 18:50, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Le Jeu 13 février 2014 19:40, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
Hi
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly is
my
friend.
That
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 13:44 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:39:40 +0100
Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this file to
the fedora-release package (or elsewhere, if you can suggest better
place).
I agree
Hi,
On Qui, 2014-02-13 at 00:48 -0300, Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote:
now i don't now if i can update to fedora 21 branched when this is out
I also don't know when F21 is branched , but should be soon ,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases#Development still in TBA (to be
announced)
btw
On Feb 12, 2014 4:54 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-2-12 PM6:32于 Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com写道：
By the way, concerning OpenCASCADE, this would also open up the
possibility for packaging Code-Aster and Salome for Fedora. I once started
looking at packaging them, but
I wrote:
but several people suggested that it would be better to wait for OCE
(downstream) to be rebased on the new OpenCASCADE release, and the OCE
package to be moved from RPM Fusion into Fedora.
I see that OCE 0.15 was released yesterday, and is now based on the
upstream OpenCASCADE 6.7.0,
On 14.02.2014 00:12, Eric Smith wrote:
I wrote:
but several people suggested that it would be better to wait for OCE
(downstream) to be rebased on the new OpenCASCADE release, and the OCE
package to be moved from RPM Fusion into Fedora.
I see that OCE 0.15 was released yesterday, and is
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:26 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
Hi,
From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built
few packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person
can't carry such a few package rebuilds for libicu soname bump.
Whoever (people names)
Kai Engert wrote:
Are we allowed to ship software in Fedora that dynamically loads
advertisements from the web and shows them to users?
Not sure, but it's really not a nice thing for software to do.
Is the Fedora community willing to accept Mozilla's desire to show
advertisements in Firefox?
Sérgio Basto wrote:
I also don't know when F21 is branched , but should be soon ,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases#Development still in TBA (to be
announced)
Fedora 21 is actually being delayed for an unknown amount of time because
people want to completely change how Fedora works
Colin Walters wrote:
Right, it's a lame workaround for a lack of higher order structure
beyond set of packages.
For live images, the spin kickstarts could just drop that preset file
directly into the file system. For installers, it'd need some magic in
Anaconda though (unless we do away with
On Feb 13, 2014 4:29 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14.02.2014 00:12, Eric Smith wrote:
but several people suggested that it would be better to wait for OCE
(downstream) to be rebased on the new OpenCASCADE release, and the OCE
package to be moved from RPM Fusion into Fedora.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 02:09:29 +0100,
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
This is a particular case because Firefox is our default browser on almost
all our spins (only the KDE spin defaults to Konqueror+KWebKitPart). Given
that, IMHO, it is completely unacceptable for Firefox to
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Eric Smith space...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 13, 2014 4:29 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14.02.2014 00:12, Eric Smith wrote:
but several people suggested that it would be better to wait for OCE
(downstream) to be rebased on the new
Hi all,
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:26 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
Hi,
From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built
few packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 09:27 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
Hi all,
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:26 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
Hi,
From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see
On 02/13/2014 07:21 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly
is my friend.
Those are strong words, and based mostly on here-say. Even the Fedora
installer molests you with ads for various non-default packages.
Should we ban the installer? Of
On 02/13/2014 07:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 13 février 2014 19:40, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
Hi
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly is
my
friend.
That certainly goes way too far. We have
On Sex, 2014-02-14 at 02:11 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Sérgio Basto wrote:
I also don't know when F21 is branched , but should be soon ,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases#Development still in TBA (to be
announced)
Fedora 21 is actually being delayed for an unknown amount of
Hi Sérgio,
On 02/14/2014 02:28 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
sorry I don't have time to follow fedora.next tread / discussion , btw I
also have a big idea for fedora.stable , pretty simple idea, to a fedora
releases more stable like one fedora 20.1
There used to be such an effort (look up Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064232
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050042
--- Comment #4 from do...@uhusystems.com ---
I can confirm, the updated package fixed the problem.
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
perl-Authen-Simple has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-Authen-Simple-0.5-4.el7.noarch requires perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
dspam has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
dspam-3.10.2-9.el7.x86_64 requires perl(Mail::MboxParser)
On ppc64:
dspam-3.10.2-9.el7.ppc64 requires perl(Mail::MboxParser)
On x86_64:
dspam-web-3.10.2-9.el7.x86_64 requires perl(GD::Graph::lines3d)
On ppc64:
stompclt has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
stompclt-1.1-1.el7.noarch requires perl(Net::STOMP::Client) = 0:2.0
stompclt-1.1-1.el7.noarch requires perl(Messaging::Message::Queue)
stompclt-1.1-1.el7.noarch requires perl(Messaging::Message)
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.x86_64 requires perl(Prima::MsgBox)
On ppc64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(Prima::MsgBox)
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(PDL::Slatec)
Please resolve this as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064747
Bug ID: 1064747
Summary: Request epel7 branch
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: perl-GDGraph3d
Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
Reporter: nathan...@gnat.ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043149
Fedora Perl Development Team perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064271
--- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
pcre-8.34-3.fc21 is used instead of pcre-8.34-2.fc21, the difference is only in
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pcre.git/commit/?id=e73104aed3ff90f784f8ee2d04ede2a94c34e412
- it's only about
commit 0e2ce29c619c8fe43e6e486143342a34228e43fb
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Feb 13 09:17:46 2014 +0100
Clarify license
...cense-statement-in-README-to-Same-as-Perl.patch | 32
perl-Test-Pod.spec |9 +-
2
commit a87707737fabc482fe325b445363871a92baaa0f
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Feb 13 09:20:23 2014 +0100
Correct changelog entry
perl-Test-Pod.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Pod.spec b/perl-Test-Pod.spec
index
commit 2b7ace7601579953d3a05c459900cbdaae790ba3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Feb 13 10:10:15 2014 +0100
Remove under-specified dependcies
perl-Test-Pod.spec |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Pod.spec
commit efc13fe7c7cbdcee8595c19845ba7e35f8022e46
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Feb 13 10:05:13 2014 +0100
Remove run-time dependency on Test::Builder::Tester
perl-Test-Pod.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Pod.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Build:
bfc8504e845131625308bd4389c69fbe Module-Build-0.4205.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 94927a8db9ac8219b6c8bbf631a22ddfec6478c9
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Feb 13 10:40:13 2014 +0100
0.4205 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Build.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064775
Bug ID: 1064775
Summary: perl-Pod-Spell-1.14 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Pod-Spell
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064778
Bug ID: 1064778
Summary: perl-XML-Writer-0.624 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-XML-Writer
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Summary of changes:
4595525... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
0ec46e2... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063771
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064689
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064271
--- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
Is there a way of testing with pcre-8.34-2.fc21, to try to isolate if that's
what's causing the failure? Or otherwise bisecting the buildroot changes that
caused a previously-working build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064690
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064690
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dSOZORp8LPa=cc_unsubscribe
--
commit 8cc75202b9138ae91d69170a46f3ba1e98e9
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Feb 13 10:16:03 2014 +
Spec tidy-up
- Fix some typos in the %changelog
- Specify more build dependencies
- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064747
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On 13/02/14 07:27, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
Upstream Class-MethodMaker has identified a (minor) licensing issue with
code in its testsuite:
https://github.com/renormalist/class-methodmaker/issues/2
This licensing issue was fixed upstream in Class-MethodMaker-2.20 (They
removed the offending
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064778
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This release enables empty string as a DTD system ID. It's suitable for all
Fedoras.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-Writer:
ac797a3f49b837f39131240869b9d789 XML-Writer-0.624.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3ded8b07d3490370dc7176c6fbb89a0948b565ef
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Feb 13 12:27:05 2014 +0100
0.624 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-XML-Writer.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
Summary of changes:
3ded8b0... 0.624 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 03a8aad910b288f27d91d998f54433956c4ba066
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jul 3 17:15:30 2013 +0200
Change license to CC0
perl-XML-Writer.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-XML-Writer.spec
commit b90e90a447678715b66743ec3fc5678455578851
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Feb 13 12:27:05 2014 +0100
0.624 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-XML-Writer.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
