EPEL epel beta report: 20140514 changes
Compose started at Wed May 14 08:15:02 UTC 2014 New package: ceph-0.80.1-1.el7 User space components of the Ceph file system New package: dvdauthor-0.7.1-3.el7 Command line DVD authoring tool New package: nagios-plugins-bonding-1.4-1.el7 Nagios plugin to monitor Linux bonding interfaces New package: perl-CGI-Application-4.50-9.el7 Framework for building reusable web-applications New package: perl-HTTP-Exception-0.04006-1.el7 Throw HTTP-Errors as (Exception::Class-) Exceptions Updated Packages: htmldoc-1.8.27-25.el7 - * Sat Aug 03 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.8.27-25 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild rxvt-unicode-9.20-2.el7 --- * Tue May 13 2014 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org - 9.20-2 - There is no need for the patches below, as they change the behavior of our package and break the principle of least astonishment. - Remove Fedora-specific patch to scroll up/down one line. Any users wanting this behavior can create their own key bindings. - Remove Fedora-specific patch to open new tabs with Control-t. Any users wanting this behavior can create their own key bindings. - The popular 'tabbed' extension can now work properly (#1096791). stompclt-1.2-1.el7 -- * Tue May 13 2014 Alexandre Beche alexandre.be...@gmail.com 1.2-1 - Update to upstream, rhbz #1097055. Summary: Added Packages: 5 Removed Packages: 0 Modified Packages: 3 ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: Firefox 29.0.1
Why do you think it's fixed in 29.0.1? I see only some Android and network fixes there (http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/). ma. On 05/13/2014 11:34 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote: Could someone please build that. The blank PDF print thing is a bit annoying with 29. Thanks, -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
need review and help
Hi, I just submitted[0] library for review, but there problem with versioning or something (from upstream it should be static). I wrote patch for doing shared library, but something went wrong. Help me ;) [0]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097584 -- -Igor Gnatenko -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Firefox 29.0.1
Martin Stransky wrote: Why do you think it's fixed in 29.0.1? I see only some Android and network fixes there (http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/). https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0.1/releasenotes/ -https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/1003707 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Firefox 29.0.1
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 08:59 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: Why do you think it's fixed in 29.0.1? I see only some Android and network fixes there (http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/). http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0.1/releasenotes/ -- Bojan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6
Il 24/04/2014 16:50, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: Well, in the current plan (make libdb5 compat package and updating the libdb to v6), after the mass rebuild the packages would start using v6. Yeah, which makes technical sense... but the concern is packagers who aren't paying attention rebuild for some other reason and are not on v6 when it's a licensing problem. ;( (Sorry for the late reply). It's not just packagers, it's also users. If a dependent package switches from GPL (any release) to AGPL, users will have to add the get sources button to their code when the AGPL conditions apply. If they are not able to distribute sources at all, they will have a problem (of course the same happens for say GPLv2+ - GPLv3+ switches, but then it only affects redistribution and not usage). Paolo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Firefox 29.0.1
On 05/14/2014 10:20 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 08:59 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: Why do you think it's fixed in 29.0.1? I see only some Android and network fixes there (http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/). http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0.1/releasenotes/ The release notes are wrong, the patch is not applied in 29.0.1 but only in an upcoming Firefox 30. ma. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Firefox 29.0.1
On May 14, 2014 7:57:25 PM GMT+10:00, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: The release notes are wrong, the patch is not applied in 29.0.1 but only in an upcoming Firefox 30. Sure works in Windows with 29.0.1. -- Bojan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Detecting unnecessary build requirements
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 09:14:14AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: As packages age sometimes build requirements chance and may not be caught by the package maintainer. Is there a known way of determining if there are unnecessary build requirements in a package? Yes, using auto-buildrequires: http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/auto-buildrequires/ Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests. http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Firefox 29.0.1
On 05/14/2014 12:37 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote: On May 14, 2014 7:57:25 PM GMT+10:00, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: The release notes are wrong, the patch is not applied in 29.0.1 but only in an upcoming Firefox 30. Sure works in Windows with 29.0.1. Actually it works because of backout bug 991767 in Firefox 29.0.1. ma. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Detecting unnecessary build requirements
On Tue, 13 May 2014 19:23:50 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I would think you would need to step through the BR:'s get the capabilities of the packages that the -devel package pull in, and then check that against the requires of the resultant packages. BR's don't always map/result into any dependencies in binary packages. True. That makes them interesting though. ;-) Even more interesting than superfluous/unneeded BR. There are packages that specify BR intentionally, but the build process doesn't find the specified stuff and doesn't fail either. As a result, some feature is missing. Or an executable is missing that doesn't make the spec file fail either because of '*' wildcards in the %files list. Work-arounds? Check that a configure script would fail when explicitly requesting a feature with a --enablefoo or --with-foo options. Add guards to the spec file more often than not. E.g. grep configure script output, examine files in the buildroot, add file-existance checks in the %check section if not in the %files list. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Firefox 29.0.1
On May 14, 2014 9:05:39 PM GMT+10:00, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: Anyway, I'll update Fedora builds today. Cool, thanks! -- Bojan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
F21 Self Contained Change: Review Board 2.0
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Review Board 2.0 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReviewBoard2 Change owner(s): Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com Review Board is a powerful tool for managing patch reviews. == Detailed Description == Review Board integrates with many types of repository (svn, git, mercurial, perforce and more) as well as popular hosting environments such as Fedora Hosted, Github and Bitbucket. It provides a powerful and clean interface to managing patches for review. Review Board 2.0 adds the ability to post committed changes from a branch directly from the web UI, adds review of text file attachments, greatly extends the capabilities of the public API and extension framework, and offers significant performance improvements, usability enhancements, and visual cleanups. == Scope == * Proposal owners: Review Board 2.0 RC3 is in Rawhide today and will be upgraded to 2.0 final when it is released (expected by the end of May, 2014) * Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change) ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
F21 Self Contained Change: Web Application Authentication
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Web Application Authentication = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_App_Authentication Change owner(s): Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com, Jakub Hrozek On operating system level, there are numerous authentication and identity lookup mechanisms, some of them using sssd. With new Apache modules and new sssd, some of those mechanisms become more easily consumable by web applications. Various web application environments and frameworks can then consume results of the authentication and information retrieval using environment variables similar to REMOTE_USER. == Detailed Description == With mod_authnz_pam, PAM authentication and access checks are available to web applications, allowing wider combination of authentication and access controls. One specific target is host-based access control rules of FreeIPA for Kerberos SSO via pam_sss and sssd. The mod_intercept_form_submit module makes it possible to enable the PAM authentication of mod_authnz_pam on normal logon form handling paths, which can then be consumed by web application with fairly minimal changes. The mod_lookup_identity uses sssd-dbus to retrieve additional attributes like name, email address, or group membership, and populates environment variables for easy consumption of this information by web applications. The sssd-dbus implements new service ifp which provides access to additional user-related pieces of information. == Scope == * Proposal owners: Three new packages (Apache modules) and rebase of sssd. * Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change) ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
F21 Self Contained Change: SSSD GPO-Based Access Control
= Proposed Self Contained Change: SSSD GPO-Based Access Control = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SssdGpoBasedAccessControl Change owner(s): Yassir Elley yel...@redhat.com This change will enhance SSSD, by adding support for centrally managed host- based access control in an Active Directory (AD) environment, using Group Policy Objects (GPOs). == Detailed Description == GPO policy settings are commonly used to manage host-based access control in an AD environment. The two specific GPO policy settings (Allow Log On Locally and Deny Log On Locally) essentially serve as a whitelist and blacklist of domain users/groups that are consulted to determine whether logon access to a particular domain computer should be granted. When dealing with GPOs, there is typically a management piece (used to specify the policy settings) and a client-side processing piece (used to retrieve and enforce the policy settings). Since the two policy settings of interest already exist in AD, administrators can continue to use existing mechanisms to specify the whitelist and blacklist (e.g. Group Policy Management Console, or GPMC). As such, this change is related only to the retrieval and enforcement of policy settings. This change only affects SSSD's AD provider. It has no effect on any other SSSD providers (e.g. IPA provider).The upstream design page that includes deeper technical details can be found in the SSSD Trac [1]. == Scope == Since this functionality would only be used by SSSD's AD provider, it would be included as part of the sssd-ad package. This feature would be enabled by default, but a build switch would be provided for those who do not wish to deploy this functionality. * Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change) [1] http://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/ActiveDirectoryGPOIntegration ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
F21 System Wide Change: Web Assets
= Proposed System Wide Change: Web Assets = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets Change owner(s): T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com This is multi-release change, already approved for Fedora 20. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001197.html Traditionally, Fedora has been pushing bits from its various servers to people's browsers in an ad-hoc fashion, and issues surrounding JavaScript have been swept under the rug. This change proposal provides a simple framework for shipping static web content and a way forward to treat JavaScript more closely to other code in the distribution. == Detailed Description == A standard directory (/usr/share/web-assets) for static bits that are intended to be delivered to web browsers, such as CSS Frameworks, UI libraries, etc. will be introduced. HTTP daemons in the distribution should make this directory available publicly as /.sysassets. Additionally, a standard directory (/usr/share/javascript) for JavaScript code, which may be used in browsers or server-side by applications such as nodejs or rubygem-execjs will also be introduced. Finally, new packaging guidelines [1] will provide instructions for making proper use of these new directories. == Scope == See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets#Scope [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Patches/PackagingDrafts/Web_Assets ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: F21 System Wide Change: Web Assets
2014-05-14 15:17 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com: == Scope == See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets#Scope This is usefully detailed, but it’s not always clear what parts need to be done by “other developers” (to use the template wording), particularly the two “will need to be modified” references to Ruby/Java/Node.js . Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
F21 Self Contained Change: Serf 0.4.5
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Serf 0.4.5 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Serf_0.4.5 Change owner(s): Jeff Schroeder jeffschroe...@computer.org Serf [1] is a decentralized solution for service discovery and orchestration that is lightweight, highly available, and fault tolerant. This change is to package serf for Fedora users. == Detailed Description == This is the first set of dependencies for serf. After these are merged, the second set of dependencies can be independently reviewed and merged. Finally, once all of the dependencies are available in fedora, serf can be packaged. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Serf_0.4.5#Detailed_Description == Scope == * Proposal owners: Package dependencies and serf itself. * Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change) [1] http://www.serfdom.io/ ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Detecting unnecessary build requirements
I've always thought it would be super great to make a distinction of BuildRequires, and things required to perform build tests... say TestRequires. Stepping through the BRs is probably not enough, tests could also be disabled through this process. Say for example perl or python scripts are used to run a test suite, but not any part of build/compilation process. Stuff to think about. Thanks, -Jon Disnard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
go2rpm: Tool to aid packaging Go modules
Hi, while attempting to package Go stuff I've created this tool that automates the repetitive tasks in the similar manner to what cpanspec does for Perl: https://github.com/lkundrak/go2rpm/blob/master/go2rpm.pl Hopefully some might find this useful. Opinions, suggestions, fixes and enhancements are welcome. Thanks, Lubo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: go2rpm: Tool to aid packaging Go modules
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:54:35PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote: while attempting to package Go stuff I've created this tool that automates the repetitive tasks in the similar manner to what cpanspec does for Perl: https://github.com/lkundrak/go2rpm/blob/master/go2rpm.pl It's kind of awesomely ironic that this is written _in Perl_. :) -- Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project--mat...@fedoraproject.org Tepid change for the somewhat better! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Detecting unnecessary build requirements
On Ter, 2014-05-13 at 15:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: I would think you would need to step through the BR:'s get the capabilities of the packages that the -devel package pull in, and then check that against the requires of the resultant packages. BR's don't always map/result into any dependencies in binary packages. Of course, I'm not talking about anything fully automated. The package maintainer would need to review the result of the findings to determine if the BR's were actually superfluous. I agree that could be a great tool to include in fedora-review pkg Hope not repeating someone else in this thread . Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
fedpkg update returning internal server error
Hi, I am trying to push openvswitch to f20, but I am receiving this: [makerpm@t520 openvswitch]$ fedpkg build Could not execute build: openvswitch-2.1.2-1.fc20 has already been built [makerpm@t520 openvswitch]$ fedpkg update Creating a new update for openvswitch-2.1.2-1.fc20 ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/openvswitch/Fedora/20, 404, Not Found) The build is this one: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6849088 Any ideas? Thanks Flavio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: fedpkg update returning internal server error
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Flavio Leitner f...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, Hi, I am trying to push openvswitch to f20, but I am receiving this: [makerpm@t520 openvswitch]$ fedpkg build Could not execute build: openvswitch-2.1.2-1.fc20 has already been built [makerpm@t520 openvswitch]$ fedpkg update Creating a new update for openvswitch-2.1.2-1.fc20 ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/openvswitch/Fedora/20, 404, Not Found) The build is this one: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6849088 Any ideas? There now reconstruction. Moving to pkgdb2. Check status[0]. Thanks Flavio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct [0]http://status.fedoraproject.org/ -- -Igor Gnatenko -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: fedpkg update returning internal server error
- Original Message - From: Flavio Leitner f...@redhat.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:29:07 PM Subject: fedpkg update returning internal server error Hi, I am trying to push openvswitch to f20, but I am receiving this: [makerpm@t520 openvswitch]$ fedpkg build Could not execute build: openvswitch-2.1.2-1.fc20 has already been built [makerpm@t520 openvswitch]$ fedpkg update Creating a new update for openvswitch-2.1.2-1.fc20 ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/openvswitch/Fedora/20, 404, Not Found) Probably due to https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2014-May/001397.html ? (thought pkgdb2 doesn't seem to be working yet either. Maybe wait how the new URL will look like) The build is this one: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6849088 Any ideas? Thanks Regards, Jan. -- Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Technologies Team Thanks Flavio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: fedpkg update returning internal server error
Yep, this is due to the pkgdb2 upgrade. We are working on issues and hope to have everything back up soon. Sorry for any trouble... kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: fedpkg update returning internal server error
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:32:17PM +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Flavio Leitner f...@redhat.com wrote: [makerpm@t520 openvswitch]$ fedpkg update Creating a new update for openvswitch-2.1.2-1.fc20 ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/openvswitch/Fedora/20, 404, Not Found) There now reconstruction. Moving to pkgdb2. Check status[0]. [0]http://status.fedoraproject.org/ Thanks Igor! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
FESCo Meeting Minutes (2014-05-14)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-05-14) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 16:58:45 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-05-14/fesco.2014-05-14-16.58.log.html . Meeting summary - --- * init process (sgallagh, 16:58:53) * pjones will be unable to attend while at UEFI hackfest (sgallagh, 16:59:10) * #1178 Fedora 21 scheduling strategy (sgallagh, 17:04:18) * ACTION: nirik and dgilmore to coordinate and make a recommendation in the ticket (sgallagh, 17:08:05) * #1250 F21 Self Contained Changes (sgallagh, 17:08:59) * #1291 F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BerkeleyDB_6 (sgallagh, 17:10:10) * Waiting one more week for upstream response (sgallagh, 17:24:21) * FESCo is concerned about the wide-ranging impact that the license change to AGPL may cause and is considering how to proceed. (sgallagh, 17:24:52) * #1307 F22 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver (sgallagh, 17:25:18) * Taking off the meeting agenda until we receive feedback on the container issues (sgallagh, 17:28:51) * Next week's chair (sgallagh, 17:28:54) * t8m to chair next week's meeting (sgallagh, 17:29:03) * Open Floor (sgallagh, 17:29:06) * #1178 Fedora 21 scheduling strategy (sgallagh, 17:29:51) * LINK: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildtargets (dgilmore, 17:33:29) * AGREED: Side tags must complete their builds by May 26th. The mass rebuild will take place on June 6th. (+7, 0, -0) (sgallagh, 17:50:39) * Open Floor (sgallagh, 17:50:45) Meeting ended at 17:54:42 UTC. Action Items - * nirik and dgilmore to coordinate and make a recommendation in the ticket Action Items, by person - --- * dgilmore * nirik and dgilmore to coordinate and make a recommendation in the ticket * nirik * nirik and dgilmore to coordinate and make a recommendation in the ticket * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) - --- * sgallagh (62) * dgilmore (56) * nirik (31) * jreznik_ (21) * t8m (12) * mitr (11) * zodbot (10) * mattdm (10) * notting (6) * kalev (5) * abadger1999 (2) * pjones (1) * jwb (0) * mmaslano (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlNzrmsACgkQeiVVYja6o6OVcwCgkMOTEKYwpTx+HR8q7z5Waz3Q 1gIAnRv4sKo3ePo1SEd87UwtPkzI1qvB =P+Ee -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: go2rpm: Tool to aid packaging Go modules
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 11:10 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:54:35PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote: while attempting to package Go stuff I've created this tool that automates the repetitive tasks in the similar manner to what cpanspec does for Perl: https://github.com/lkundrak/go2rpm/blob/master/go2rpm.pl It's kind of awesomely ironic that this is written _in Perl_. :) Pick the right tool for a task! Actually, this is more like right tool for a person doing the task. :) Lubo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Mass Rebuild for Fedora 21
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, It was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5877 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 21 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC49 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F21Make40 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java8 we will start the mass rebuild on 2014-06-06, all existing side tags and anything that you wish to land in Fedora before the mass rebuild needs to be completed by 2014-04-26. we will be merging over all side tags at that point and removing the targets for them. This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting. Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTc7PoAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRg0cP/Rg1Jo7At3Q/NoxhvhN7Ya5w FsAwqTNfTvo64/o/K6Q+RneearYeVugMipruoNLIaAq7gYkv59yR9nDL53KzE+be XVepX3FifHx4qrx54gx5vh/R4J3vSf1ZgrM27e+9HTKT6bYEfqmuwltI/hnym0ZL MYyHcBQOsMaiitRLc61brFBFsqWkX4/md9VS6AZLpBpmMuvVfB91XSCvTolRwp/x IY5Wz6O58xB6S0iuUODTsBhgbEmB/7ddDuneUCfsDpSRYJe5YCqMfKQqu0JJFevG f/ihuLz6lppsrQIaJFdat/lxXZnraE/sGjWonTh7lBLREzSu0DdWTlY+4Do7WhLK DxdnnD9PId198w1x+Btri+iLMggBya9SPk0vUHCc4h9TUzIrEe4MeaRGazE3pnaC AUHOZH8anSx3B54BLtgGtAjlpS/gcAvdVoLqvUeH+JMEeQal3iKT9o6hYgjkD7MH pYZDYq/FoNrFsT/W6YWils5YaVd+lquBhTXy+Z1gkopYN8BJYMih990hkKatZXhW tXh8Fb7kYNaH70wcJugMfKAtUX5f1BEvYbxB0ToScunX13sP1SxaGZm0Bok+iMCf ++dTtJH8CgnkN1ApUVavbYS27jaQKRK3gaGbFriqe4AkiFBA7cajrBRPLqbA83CI 7K+LgGbiFANhaGUnazPh =aG6O -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-05-15 16:00 UTC)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2014-05-15 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2014-05-15 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2014-05-15 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2014-05-15 16:00 Thu UTC - 2014-05-15 17:00 Thu Europe/London BST 2014-05-15 18:00 Thu Europe/Paris CEST 2014-05-15 18:00 Thu Europe/Berlin CEST 2014-05-15 21:30 Thu Asia/Calcutta IST --new day-- 2014-05-16 00:00 Fri Asia/Singapore SGT 2014-05-16 00:00 Fri Asia/Hong_Kong HKT 2014-05-16 01:00 Fri Asia/Tokyo JST 2014-05-16 02:00 Fri Australia/Brisbane EST Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/12 = Followups = (approval and retirement sections already passed, /opt exception passed) #topic #339 software collections in Fedora .fpc 339 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/339 #topic #382 Go Packaging Guidelines Draft .fpc 382 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382 #topic #400 Exception for bundled library FoX in exciting .fpc 400 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/400 (needs to be reworded to match new .desktop wording) #topic #414 Please consider requiring AppData for all desktop applications .fpc 414 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/414 (seems fine, needs more votes and rebase/provide answer) #topic #418 Bundling exception for reaver-wps .fpc 418 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/418 (dots in name, utility of ruby without rails) #topic #419 ruby193 in SCL .fpc 419 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/419 (needs fakesystemd, or another solution) #topic #425 systemd or systemd-units should not be required if a spec file does a %systemd_post command .fpc 425 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/425 = New business = #topic #422 move an existing package to a different upstream fork .fpc 422 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/422 #topic #423 Bundling exception request (copylib) for TommyDS library used in SnapRAID .fpc 423 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/423 #topic #424 Bundling exception request for nodejs-weak-map .fpc 424 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/424 #topic #426 Need policy and macros for binfmt.d file handling .fpc 426 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/426 #topic #427 Bundling exception requests for new julia package .fpc 427 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/427 #topic #428 Exception for bundling css in infrastructure application .fpc 428 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/428 #topic #429 Bundling exception request for apitrace: libbacktrace .fpc 429 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/429 #topic #430 Minor PHP Guidelines change .fpc 430 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/430 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/12 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: fedpkg update returning internal server error
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:34:42PM -0400, Jan Lieskovsky wrote: - Original Message - From: Flavio Leitner f...@redhat.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:29:07 PM Subject: fedpkg update returning internal server error Hi, I am trying to push openvswitch to f20, but I am receiving this: [makerpm@t520 openvswitch]$ fedpkg build Could not execute build: openvswitch-2.1.2-1.fc20 has already been built [makerpm@t520 openvswitch]$ fedpkg update Creating a new update for openvswitch-2.1.2-1.fc20 ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/openvswitch/Fedora/20, 404, Not Found) Probably due to https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2014-May/001397.html ? (thought pkgdb2 doesn't seem to be working yet either. Maybe wait how the new URL will look like) Bodhi should be back to normal now, sorry for the disruption :) Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
PkgDB2 is now in production
After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2 into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ pkgdb is the application that manages package metadata for Fedora, including commit access for packagers, bugzilla assignment, and scm changes notifications. A few of the more notable changes in this new version of pkgdb: * Redesigned interface: faster and cleaner * Packages no longer have 'owners', instead there is now a 'point of contact' who is assigned bugs in bugzilla. * Now uses Fedora OpenID for authentication * Provide a clearly defined and documented API (but completely different from the pkgdb1 one) * Re-written in the flask framework There might still be minor bugs or un-expected features, if you face some of them please let us know. For more information, see: Project page: https://fedorahosted.org/pkgdb2/ Documentation: http://pkgdb2.rtfd.org Git repository: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/pkgdb2 Github mirror: https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2 Mailing list: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/packagedb Many thanks to the hard work of the Fedora Infrastructure development team ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Fwd: git commit Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
More fallout from pkgdb2?
Original Message
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 04:38:59 + (UTC)
From: mailer-dae...@fedoraproject.org (Mail Delivery System)
To: or...@fedoraproject.org
This is the mail system at host pkgs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
octave-io-ow...@fedoraproject.org: host bastion[10.5.126.12] said: 550
5.1.1
octave-io-ow...@fedoraproject.org: Recipient address rejected: User
unknown in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
Reporting-MTA: dns; pkgs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 441492FA94
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; orion@fedoraproject.org
Arrival-Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 04:38:59 + (UTC)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; octave-io-owner@fedoraproject.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: dns; bastion
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 octave-io-owner@fedoraproject.org: Recipient
address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table
---BeginMessage---
commit 634b4dd1fcb49926322a9af74408ba5562655aa3
Author: Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
Date: Wed May 14 22:38:51 2014 -0600
Update to 2.2.2
.gitignore |1 +
octave-io.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index c5dd3f2..41dcfd2 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
/io-2.0.2.tar.gz
/io-2.2.0.tar.gz
/io-2.2.1.tar.gz
+/io-2.2.2.tar.gz
diff --git a/octave-io.spec b/octave-io.spec
index 93f9254..c432655 100644
--- a/octave-io.spec
+++ b/octave-io.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
%global octpkg io
Name: octave-%{octpkg}
-Version:2.2.1
+Version:2.2.2
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Input/Output in external formats
Group: Applications/Engineering
@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ Input/Output in external formats.
%changelog
+* Wed May 14 2014 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com - 2.2.2-1
+- Update to 2.2.2
+
* Sat Apr 26 2014 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com - 2.2.1-1
- Update to 2.2.1
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 870a8d8..583764e 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-b8b2a75450730b25204e1a18e5016a0f io-2.2.1.tar.gz
+d53d3bb3eab58cc43abbc69ba9b50fee io-2.2.2.tar.gz
---End Message---
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1097538] [abrt] asciio: gtk_file_system_model_sort.part.0(): perl killed by SIGABRT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097538 Sam Wilson cycloptiv...@internode.on.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2014-05-14 02:06:58 --- Comment #11 from Sam Wilson cycloptiv...@internode.on.net --- It appears that this may not actually be a bug. 1. Create a new file, enter some content 1. Use the *save* or *save as* function 1. Save the file as /path/to/filename Outcome: Resulting file is binary and loads OK --- 1. Create a new file, enter some content 1. Use the *save* or *save as* function 1. Save the file as /path/to/filename.txt Outcome: Resulting file is ascii and does not load --- 1. Create a new file, enter some content 1. Use the *save* or *save as* function 1. Save the file as /path/to/filename.ext Outcome: Resulting file is binary and loads OK Looks to me like the author forgot to mention undocumented features :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zMIMNesCLUa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1058728] FTBFS: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-13.fc21: tests fail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058728 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|steve.tray...@cern.ch |ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- The problem is that F21 openssl cannot use the pregenerated 512-bit RSA key for signing digest which is to large with modern openssl. The server complains: 140107221378928:error:04075070:rsa routines:RSA_sign:digest too big for rsa key:rsa_sign.c:127: 140107221378928:error:1409B006:SSL routines:SSL3_SEND_SERVER_KEY_EXCHANGE:EVP lib:s3_srvr.c:1982: Proper solution is to generated the keys and certificates at test time with OpenSSL default settings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BRDkfsDyNna=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1058728] FTBFS: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-13.fc21: tests fail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058728 --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch --- Thanks I missed this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kmt0E8mWo2a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 997835] perl-Language-Expr-0.23 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997835 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org --- Version 0.23 builds successfully in Rawhide, though this is because it has disabled all of its tests. Building it would get rid of the daily broken deps nagmail though... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eA1DJLMkZta=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1097640] New: IO::Socket:SSL::Utils::KEY_free() dies with: Can't locate auto/Net/SSLeay/EVP_KEY_fre.al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097640 Bug ID: 1097640 Summary: IO::Socket:SSL::Utils::KEY_free() dies with: Can't locate auto/Net/SSLeay/EVP_KEY_fre.al Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: perl-IO-Socket-SSL Assignee: p...@city-fan.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jose.p.oliveira@gmail.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org $ perl -MIO::Socket::SSL::Utils -e 'KEY_free(KEY_create_rsa())' Can't locate auto/Net/SSLeay/EVP_KEY_fre.al in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib64/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 .) at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/IO/Socket/SSL/Utils.pm line 96. $ rpm -q perl-IO-Socket-SSL perl-Net-SSLeay perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.984-1.fc21.noarch perl-Net-SSLeay-1.61-1.fc21.x86_64 This is probably a bug in perl-Net-SSLeay. The same issue is in Fedora 20. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1KbxKIZ6FUa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL] Do not test weak keys
commit 3ee6bba50022ad36259059780e24bdaae33cef4b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 14 10:41:41 2014 +0200
Do not test weak keys
...nerate-keys-and-certificates-at-test-time.patch | 90
perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec |8 ++-
2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
a/HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-Generate-keys-and-certificates-at-test-time.patch
b/HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-Generate-keys-and-certificates-at-test-time.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..c923f5e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-Generate-keys-and-certificates-at-test-time.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+From 2b728bdd6df8968d1dae92856ac5ebed85d71d2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
+Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 10:36:50 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH] Generate keys and certificates at test-time
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+This fixes https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=88998.
+
+Signed-off-by: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
+---
+ Makefile.PL| 2 ++
+ t/testmodule.t | 38 +-
+ 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/Makefile.PL b/Makefile.PL
+index 17fe591..b8927b2 100644
+--- a/Makefile.PL
b/Makefile.PL
+@@ -10,5 +10,7 @@ WriteMakefile(
+ 'VERSION_FROM' = 'SSL.pm',
+ 'DISTNAME' = 'HTTP-Daemon-SSL',
+ 'PREREQ_PM' = { 'HTTP::Daemon' = 1.0, 'IO::Socket::SSL' = 0.93 },
++ 'BUILD_REQUIRES' = { 'HTTP::Daemon' = 1.0, 'IO::Socket::SSL' = 0.93,
++ 'IO::Socket::SSL::Utils' = 0 },
+ 'dist' = { COMPRESS = 'gzip', SUFFIX = 'gz', },
+ );
+diff --git a/t/testmodule.t b/t/testmodule.t
+index 6ca235a..c83d9ab 100644
+--- a/t/testmodule.t
b/t/testmodule.t
+@@ -4,10 +4,11 @@
+
+ use HTTP::Daemon::SSL;
+ use HTTP::Status;
++use IO::Socket::SSL::Utils;
+ eval {require t/ssl_settings.req;} ||
+ eval {require ssl_settings.req;};
+
+-$numtests = 9;
++$numtests = 14;
+ $|=1;
+ $SIG{PIPE}='IGNORE';
+
+@@ -22,6 +23,41 @@ print 1..$numtests\n;
+
+ $test = 0;
+
++my ($ca_cert, $ca_key) = CERT_create(
++subject = { commonName = 'Dummy IO::Socket::SSL Certificate Authority'
},
++CA = 1,
++);
++(defined $ca_cert and defined $ca_key) || print 'not ';
++ok('authority certificate generated');
++
++my ($server_cert, $server_key) = CERT_create(
++subject = { commonName = 'IO::Socket::SSL Dummy Server Certificate' },
++CA = 0,
++issuer_cert = $ca_cert,
++issuer_key = $ca_key,
++);
++(defined $server_cert and defined $server_key) || print 'not ';
++ok('server certificate generated');
++
++eval { PEM_cert2file($ca_cert, 'certs/test-ca.pem') };
++(!$@ and -s 'certs/test-ca.pem') || print 'not ';
++ok('authority certificate saved');
++
++PEM_cert2file($server_cert, 'certs/server-cert.pem');
++(!$@ and -s 'certs/server-cert.pem') || print 'not ';
++ok('server certificate saved');
++
++PEM_key2file($server_key, 'certs/server-key.pem');
++(!$@ and -s 'certs/server-key.pem') || print 'not ';
++ok('server key saved');
++
++# freeing fails now https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097640
++#CERT_free($ca_cert);
++#KEY_free($ca_key);
++#CERT_free($server_cert);
++#KEY_free($server_key);
++
++
+ unless (fork) {
+ sleep 1;
+
+--
+1.9.0
+
diff --git a/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec b/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec
index 2b2c760..09b42b6 100644
--- a/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec
+++ b/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL
Version:1.04
-Release:13%{?dist}
+Release:14%{?dist}
Summary:Simple http server class with SSL support
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Daemon-SSL/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/HTTP/HTTP-Daemon-SSL-%{version}.tar.gz
# Adapt tests to IO::Socket::SSL 1.80, CPAN RT#81932
Patch0: HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-Adapt-tests-to-IO-Socket-SSL-1.80.patch
+# Do not test weak keys with OpenSSL 1.0.1, bug #1058728, CPAN RT#88998
+Patch1:
HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-Generate-keys-and-certificates-at-test-time.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
@@ -25,6 +27,7 @@ IO::Socket::SSL, so you can perform socket operations
directly on it too.
%prep
%setup -q -n HTTP-Daemon-SSL-%{version}
%patch0 -p1
+%patch1 -p1
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
@@ -53,6 +56,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/HTTP::Daemon::SSL.3pm*
%changelog
+* Wed May 14 2014 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.04-14
+- Do not test weak keys (bug #1058728)
+
* Sat Aug 03 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.04-13
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
[perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL] Declare build-dependency on IO::Socket::SSL::Utils
commit 5bc595c4e13790f8c304f9a83abe39ca6d4f22c3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 14 10:51:32 2014 +0200
Declare build-dependency on IO::Socket::SSL::Utils
perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec b/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec
index 09b42b6..ac77412 100644
--- a/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec
+++ b/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL.spec
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(HTTP::Daemon) = 1
BuildRequires: perl(IO::Socket::SSL) = 0.93
+BuildRequires: perl(IO::Socket::SSL::Utils)
Requires: perl(HTTP::Daemon) = 1
Requires: perl(IO::Socket::SSL) = 0.93
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1058728] FTBFS: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-13.fc21: tests fail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058728 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-1 ||4.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-05-14 04:52:26 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pqEEVM8iF9a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1097640] IO::Socket:SSL::Utils::KEY_free() dies with: Can't locate auto/Net/SSLeay/EVP_KEY_fre.al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097640 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org --- Created attachment 895420 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=895420action=edit Possible fix I think it's a typo in Utils.pm Can you give the attached patch a try? It works for the test case in this ticket but I'm sure you'll have a better one... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kOdR2Jjrtsa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1097640] IO::Socket:SSL::Utils::KEY_free() dies with: Can't locate auto/Net/SSLeay/EVP_KEY_fre.al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097640 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- Yes. This works even in bigger picture. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mfvOXiM952a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 997835] perl-Language-Expr-0.23 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997835 --- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com --- I think that building a non-functional package is against the guidelines. But it would certainly be better than now. Should I ask on packaging mailing list? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9fmpRDehzfa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1097640] IO::Socket:SSL::Utils::KEY_free() dies with: Can't locate auto/Net/SSLeay/EVP_KEY_fre.al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097640 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED External Bug ID||CPAN 95633 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VcZ1tcIij5a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1083396] perl-Padre-0.90-10.fc21 FTBFS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083396 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED URL|http://koji.fedoraproject.o |http://comments.gmane.org/g |rg/koji/taskinfo?taskID=669 |mane.comp.ide.padre.devel/2 |8307|071 Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=F3kxdZN3HXa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-IO-Socket-SSL] Fix typo in Utils.pm (#1097640, CPAN RT#95633)
commit 91de4e03c6e345bb1649da90a23f78c0d8f62ecc
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed May 14 11:56:53 2014 +0100
Fix typo in Utils.pm (#1097640, CPAN RT#95633)
$ perl -MIO::Socket::SSL::Utils -e 'KEY_free(KEY_create_rsa())'
Can't locate auto/Net/SSLeay/EVP_KEY_fre.al in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/local/lib64/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 .) at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/IO/Socket/SSL/Utils.pm line 96.
Net::SSLeay::EVP_KEY_free should be Net::SSLeay::EVP_PKEY_free.
IO-Socket-SSL-1.984-key-free.patch | 11 +++
perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec|9 -
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/IO-Socket-SSL-1.984-key-free.patch
b/IO-Socket-SSL-1.984-key-free.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..b0e90c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/IO-Socket-SSL-1.984-key-free.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+--- lib/IO/Socket/SSL/Utils.pm
lib/IO/Socket/SSL/Utils.pm
+@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ sub CERT_free {
+
+ sub KEY_free {
+ my $key = shift or return;
+-Net::SSLeay::EVP_KEY_free($key);
++Net::SSLeay::EVP_PKEY_free($key);
+ }
+
+ sub KEY_create_rsa {
diff --git a/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec b/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec
index 4b007c1..3c6c2ff 100644
--- a/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
Name: perl-IO-Socket-SSL
Version: 1.984
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: Perl library for transparent SSL
Group: Development/Libraries
License: GPL+ or Artistic
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-Socket-SSL/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SU/SULLR/IO-Socket-SSL-%{version}.tar.gz
+Patch0:IO-Socket-SSL-1.984-key-free.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: openssl = 0.9.8
@@ -58,6 +59,9 @@ mod_perl.
%prep
%setup -q -n IO-Socket-SSL-%{version}
+# Fix typo in Utils.pm (#1097640, CPAN RT#95633)
+%patch0
+
%build
echo n | perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
@@ -83,6 +87,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%{_mandir}/man3/IO::Socket::SSL::Utils.3*
%changelog
+* Wed May 14 2014 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.984-2
+- Fix typo in Utils.pm (#1097640, CPAN RT#95633)
+
* Sat May 10 2014 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.984-1
- Update to 1.984
- Added OCSP support:
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 997835] perl-Language-Expr-0.23 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997835 --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org --- I don't think that's necessary. It's no less functioning than the current situation, and it's upstream's current release, and upstream is aware of the issue. At least people would be able to install or upgrade now, and be able to read the documentation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pRB8GxptbHa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Building a non functional package just to remove dependency mess
Hi, perl-Language-Expr FTBFS in rawhide and F20 (since F20 was rawhide). There is some crazy stuff in Perl itself that prevents perl-Regexp-Grammars to work properly and perl-Language-Expr cannot work without proper perl-Regexp-Grammars. This leads to perl-Language-Expr in F20 being from F19 and having unresolved dependencies on perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2). * It makes mess when updating F19 to F20 * It emails me on daily basic * I cannot fix it However, new version of upstream Language::Expr is out, that disables tests, while still not being functional. I would like to update perl-Language-Expr in F20 and rawhide. That would lead to: * No more mess * No more email for me * Nonfunctional package in Fedora While I believe that nonfunctional package is a bad think, I believe that anything is better than the situation now. Any thoughts? Links: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992666 perl-Language-Expr: FTBFS in rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997835 perl-Language-Expr-0.23 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009919 perl-5.18: Regexp::Grammars does not work due to bug in perl -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 997835] perl-Language-Expr-0.23 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997835 --- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com --- While I agree with you, I've send the e-mail a minute ago. If nobody says anything against it by the end of the week, I'll do it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=t08HwhTCyUa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-IO-Socket-SSL/f20] Fix typo in Utils.pm (#1097640, CPAN RT#95633)
commit 3b9ca03aeb16613ef46db3dc5c4fbe18de8c8984
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed May 14 11:56:53 2014 +0100
Fix typo in Utils.pm (#1097640, CPAN RT#95633)
$ perl -MIO::Socket::SSL::Utils -e 'KEY_free(KEY_create_rsa())'
Can't locate auto/Net/SSLeay/EVP_KEY_fre.al in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/local/lib64/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 .) at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/IO/Socket/SSL/Utils.pm line 96.
Net::SSLeay::EVP_KEY_free should be Net::SSLeay::EVP_PKEY_free.
IO-Socket-SSL-1.955-key-free.patch | 11 +++
perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec|9 -
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/IO-Socket-SSL-1.955-key-free.patch
b/IO-Socket-SSL-1.955-key-free.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..b4cb55d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/IO-Socket-SSL-1.955-key-free.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+--- lib/IO/Socket/SSL/Utils.pm
lib/IO/Socket/SSL/Utils.pm
+@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ sub CERT_free {
+
+ sub KEY_free {
+ my $key = shift or return;
+-Net::SSLeay::EVP_KEY_free($key);
++Net::SSLeay::EVP_PKEY_free($key);
+ }
+
+ sub KEY_create_rsa {
diff --git a/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec b/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec
index c2a2720..c4c6b08 100644
--- a/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
Name: perl-IO-Socket-SSL
Version: 1.955
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: Perl library for transparent SSL
Group: Development/Libraries
License: GPL+ or Artistic
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-Socket-SSL/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SU/SULLR/IO-Socket-SSL-%{version}.tar.gz
+Patch0:IO-Socket-SSL-1.955-key-free.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: openssl = 0.9.8
@@ -46,6 +47,9 @@ mod_perl.
%prep
%setup -q -n IO-Socket-SSL-%{version}
+# Fix typo in Utils.pm (#1097640, CPAN RT#95633)
+%patch0
+
%build
perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
@@ -70,6 +74,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%{_mandir}/man3/IO::Socket::SSL::Utils.3pm*
%changelog
+* Wed May 14 2014 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.955-2
+- Fix typo in Utils.pm (#1097640, CPAN RT#95633)
+
* Wed Nov 13 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.955-1
- Switch back to upstream versioning scheme
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-IO-Socket-SSL] Created tag perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.984-2.fc21
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.984-2.fc21' was created pointing to: 91de4e0... Fix typo in Utils.pm (#1097640, CPAN RT#95633) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-IO-Socket-SSL] Created tag perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.955-2.fc20
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.955-2.fc20' was created pointing to: 3b9ca03... Fix typo in Utils.pm (#1097640, CPAN RT#95633) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1097640] IO::Socket:SSL::Utils::KEY_free() dies with: Can't locate auto/Net/SSLeay/EVP_KEY_fre.al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097640 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.955-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.955-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=n0YTy6gMM6a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Padre] Fix compatibility with Pod::Perldoc = 3.21_01
commit 0da761f42193aa7c064ac4fdb4e9c0f5b51406ec
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 14 15:52:46 2014 +0200
Fix compatibility with Pod::Perldoc = 3.21_01
Padre-0.90-No-exit-in-Pod-Perldoc.patch | 33 +++
perl-Padre.spec | 14 ++--
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/Padre-0.90-No-exit-in-Pod-Perldoc.patch
b/Padre-0.90-No-exit-in-Pod-Perldoc.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..75de093
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Padre-0.90-No-exit-in-Pod-Perldoc.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+From 79ab948e1f844cf7e9ea476c21f77449e2978c58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Vladimir Lettiev thec...@gmail.com
+Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 16:00:54 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH] No exit in Pod::Perldoc
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+Fix compatibility with Pod::Perldoc = 3.21_01.
+
+http://mail.perlide.org/pipermail/padre-dev/2014-April/003593.html
+
+Signed-off-by: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
+---
+ lib/Padre/Browser/PseudoPerldoc.pm | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/lib/Padre/Browser/PseudoPerldoc.pm
b/lib/Padre/Browser/PseudoPerldoc.pm
+index 30a8b5c..e0b4ba0 100644
+--- a/lib/Padre/Browser/PseudoPerldoc.pm
b/lib/Padre/Browser/PseudoPerldoc.pm
+@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ sub process {
+ $self-find_good_formatter_class;
+ $self-formatter_sanity_check;
+
+- $self-maybe_diddle_INC;
++ $self-maybe_extend_searchpath;
+
+ # for when we're apparently in a module or extension directory
+
+--
+1.9.0
+
diff --git a/perl-Padre.spec b/perl-Padre.spec
index 9853123..1bb2aa5 100644
--- a/perl-Padre.spec
+++ b/perl-Padre.spec
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: perl-Padre
Version:0.90
-Release:10%{?dist}
+Release:11%{?dist}
Summary:Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PL/PLAVEN/Padre-%{versi
Source1:padre.desktop
# Fix compatibility with ORLite-1.98, in Padre-1.96, bug #914310
Patch0:
Padre-0.90-Migrating-to-the-delete_where-method-for-bulk-deleti.patch
+# Fix compatibility with Pod::Perldoc = 3.21_01, bug #1083396
+Patch1: Padre-0.90-No-exit-in-Pod-Perldoc.patch
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: gettext
BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils
@@ -95,7 +97,8 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Parse::ExuberantCTags) = 1.00
BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Abstract) = 0.16
BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Functions)
BuildRequires: perl(Pod::POM) = 0.17
-BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Perldoc) = 3.15
+# Pod::Perldoc 3.15 and 3.21 for Patch1
+BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Perldoc) = 3.21
# perl(Pod::Perldoc::ToPod) at lib/Padre/Browser/PseudoPerldoc.pm
BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Perldoc::ToPod)
BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Simple) = 3.07
@@ -223,7 +226,8 @@ Requires: perl(Params::Util) = 0.33
Requires: perl(Parse::ErrorString::Perl) = 0.14
Requires: perl(Parse::ExuberantCTags) = 1.00
Requires: perl(Pod::Abstract) = 0.16
-Requires: perl(Pod::Perldoc) = 3.15
+# Pod::Perldoc 3.15 and 3.21 for Patch1
+Requires: perl(Pod::Perldoc) = 3.21
Requires: perl(Pod::POM) = 0.17
Requires: perl(Pod::Simple) = 3.07
Requires: perl(Pod::Simple::XHTML) = 3.04
@@ -301,6 +305,7 @@ in a directory called .padre.
%prep
%setup -q -n Padre-%{version}
%patch0 -p1
+%patch1 -p1
find share/{examples,templates} -type f \( -name '*.pl' -o -name '*.t' \) \
-exec chmod 755 {} +
@@ -382,6 +387,9 @@ mkdir $HOME
%changelog
+* Wed May 14 2014 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.90-11
+- Fix compatibility with Pod::Perldoc = 3.21_01 (bug #1083396)
+
* Tue Oct 15 2013 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.90-10
- Fix compatibility with ORLite-1.98 (bug #914310)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1083396] perl-Padre-0.90-10.fc21 FTBFS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083396 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Padre-0.90-11.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-05-14 10:22:48 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- This was caused by a change in Pod::Perldoc 3.21_01. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LMyZqSQ9iZa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1058699] FTBFS: perl-AutoClass-1_01-20.fc21: Random tests failure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058699 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 95642 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FE2TX2cipEa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Building a non functional package just to remove dependency mess
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 01:08:51PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hi, perl-Language-Expr FTBFS in rawhide and F20 (since F20 was rawhide). There is some crazy stuff in Perl itself that prevents perl-Regexp-Grammars to work properly and perl-Language-Expr cannot work without proper perl-Regexp-Grammars. This leads to perl-Language-Expr in F20 being from F19 and having unresolved dependencies on perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2). * It makes mess when updating F19 to F20 * It emails me on daily basic * I cannot fix it However, new version of upstream Language::Expr is out, that disables tests, while still not being functional. I would like to update perl-Language-Expr in F20 and rawhide. That would lead to: * No more mess * No more email for me * Nonfunctional package in Fedora While I believe that nonfunctional package is a bad think, I believe that anything is better than the situation now. Any thoughts? It sounds like this would just hide the issues from you. If it's nonfunctional, why not retire perl-Language-Expr instead? -Toshio Links: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992666 perl-Language-Expr: FTBFS in rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997835 perl-Language-Expr-0.23 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009919 perl-5.18: Regexp::Grammars does not work due to bug in perl pgpFVTXLSBxMo.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1058699] FTBFS: perl-AutoClass-1_01-20.fc21: Random tests failure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058699 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|al...@users.sourceforge.net |ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bkKSLtMcc0a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-AutoClass] Fix changelog entry
commit e5e4779ea7fbebb4d5f0e223256715797dc6f8ce Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Wed May 14 16:50:11 2014 +0200 Fix changelog entry perl-AutoClass.spec |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-AutoClass.spec b/perl-AutoClass.spec index e7663f7..c230afc 100644 --- a/perl-AutoClass.spec +++ b/perl-AutoClass.spec @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * Tue Sep 04 2007 Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 1_01-3 - Clarified license terms: GPL+ or Artistic -* Thu Mar 30 2007 Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 1_01-2 +* Mon Apr 02 2007 Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 1_01-2 - Add perl(Test::Deep) to BR. * Thu Mar 29 2007 Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 1_01-1 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-AutoClass] Fix test failures due randomized hash key order
commit 987c36ca2e11f57ac95a4836ee8b0c24d981ea6c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 14 16:47:39 2014 +0200
Fix test failures due randomized hash key order
...consistent-declarations-for-error-message.patch | 33
perl-AutoClass.spec|8 -
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
a/autoclass-v1.01-Sort-inconsistent-declarations-for-error-message.patch
b/autoclass-v1.01-Sort-inconsistent-declarations-for-error-message.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..7ee306d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/autoclass-v1.01-Sort-inconsistent-declarations-for-error-message.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+From fcc5bac3264420de0203589753b732da1dbc27bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
+Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 16:42:24 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH] Sort inconsistent declarations for error message
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+Random hash key ordering casues test failures. It's also good to have
+stable output for human error messages.
+
+https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=95642
+Signed-off-by: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
+---
+ lib/Class/AutoClass.pm | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/lib/Class/AutoClass.pm b/lib/Class/AutoClass.pm
+index 1d7337a..83fd07a 100644
+--- a/lib/Class/AutoClass.pm
b/lib/Class/AutoClass.pm
+@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ sub declare {
+ @cattributes_recursive{keys %cattributes}=values %cattributes;
+ push(@attributes_recursive,keys %iattributes,keys %cattributes);
+ # are all these declarations consistent?
+- if (my @inconsistents=grep {exists $cattributes_recursive{$_}} keys
%iattributes_recursive) {
++ if (my @inconsistents=sort grep {exists $cattributes_recursive{$_}} keys
%iattributes_recursive) {
+# inconsistent class vs. instance declarations
+my @errstr=(Inconsistent declarations for attribute(s) @inconsistents);
+map {
+--
+1.9.0
+
diff --git a/perl-AutoClass.spec b/perl-AutoClass.spec
index 6bcaf2a..e7663f7 100644
--- a/perl-AutoClass.spec
+++ b/perl-AutoClass.spec
@@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
Name: perl-AutoClass
Version:1_01
-Release:20%{?dist}
+Release:21%{?dist}
Summary:Automatically define classes and objects for Perl
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/autoclass/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Class/autoclass_v%{version}.tgz
+# Fix test failures due randomized hash key order, bug #1058699, CPAN RT#95642
+Patch0:
autoclass-v1.01-Sort-inconsistent-declarations-for-error-message.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(IO::Scalar)
@@ -21,6 +23,7 @@ inheritance structure.
%prep
%setup -q -n AutoClass
+%patch0 -p1
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
@@ -49,6 +52,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Wed May 14 2014 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1_01-21
+- Fix test failures due randomized hash key order (bug #1058699)
+
* Sat Aug 03 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1_01-20
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-AutoClass/f20] (2 commits) ...Fix changelog entry
Summary of changes: 987c36c... Fix test failures due randomized hash key order (*) e5e4779... Fix changelog entry (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1058699] FTBFS: perl-AutoClass-1_01-20.fc21: Random tests failure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058699 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Version|rawhide |20 Fixed In Version||perl-AutoClass-1_01-21.fc21 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- Fedora 20 is affected too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gWpLCsVyyRa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
perl-File-MimeInfo and perl-File-DesktopEntry in EPEL
Hi folks, Thanks a lot for packaging perl-File-MimeInfo and perl-File-DesktopEntry. Would you mind approving my requests for co-maintainership? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-File-MimeInfo https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-File-DesktopEntry Do you mind if I branch these two packages for EPEL 6? I'm using the ikiwiki software on wiki.openafs.org, which was recently migrated from Debian to CentOS, and these two packages are in the dependency chain. - Ken -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Building a non functional package just to remove dependency mess
Dne 14.5.2014 16:38, Toshio Kuratomi napsal(a): It sounds like this would just hide the issues from you. If it's nonfunctional, why not retire perl-Language-Expr instead? 1) Retiring the package would not solve the F19 to F20 update issue 2) The bug in Perl is supposed to be fixed in near future, however I'm not quite sure when -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Building a non functional package just to remove dependency mess
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:43:14PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dne 14.5.2014 16:38, Toshio Kuratomi napsal(a): It sounds like this would just hide the issues from you. If it's nonfunctional, why not retire perl-Language-Expr instead? 1) Retiring the package would not solve the F19 to F20 update issue 2) The bug in Perl is supposed to be fixed in near future, however I'm not quite sure when But you say it's been non-functional in Fedora 20 since before release? If you think it'll be fixed soon, maybe a half measure would be to have the perl package Obsolete perl-Language-Expr to get it off the user's systems but don't retire it yet. If you don't think that it will be fixed soon (for instance, there's no commitment by anyone that they are working on the issue) then it's likely you do want to retire the package on rawhide in addition to throwing in the Obsoletes. The package is just a re-review away from being brought back when the problems are fixed. We really don't want to be shipping packages that are irretrievably broken to users. And shipping another package that has no purpose to hide the fact that the first package is broken to the package maintainer just doesn't seem right. Really the system is emailing you because as package maintainer you're supposed to fix the software. If you can't then we likely don't want the software in Fedora until the issue can be resolved. :-( -Toshio pgpbfC9QyEynU.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1094660] ctstream-19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094660 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ctstream-19-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=C8o2qRRKXUa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1097055] Upgrade to new upstream version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097055 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package stompclt-1.2-1.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing stompclt-1.2-1.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6353/stompclt-1.2-1.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jJ5hfRsOq0a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1097640] IO::Socket:SSL::Utils::KEY_free() dies with: Can't locate auto/Net/SSLeay/EVP_KEY_fre.al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097640 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.955-2.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.955-2.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6355/perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.955-2.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=45F2C1icAIa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1094660] ctstream-19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094660 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ctstream-19-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FQIGJt4sOMa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1058699] FTBFS: perl-AutoClass-1_01-20.fc21: Random tests failure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058699 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-AutoClass-1_01-21.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-AutoClass-1_01-21.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8TnPDUXaSMa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1098012] New: autoclass has been replaced by Class-AutoClass
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098012 Bug ID: 1098012 Summary: autoclass has been replaced by Class-AutoClass Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-AutoClass Assignee: al...@users.sourceforge.net Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: al...@users.sourceforge.net, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org The autoclass-v1.01 CPAN distribution in Fedora is old. Upstream has been replaces by Class-AutoClass CPAN distribution. Please package perl-Class-AutoClass and obsolete this perl-autoclass package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VmbYCqw8qIa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
libtaskotron-config required now for everyone
Hello guys, please be sure to install libtaskotron-config from Tim's repo [1]. It's required now due to some changes [2] [3], even if you just use your local git checkout. Otherwise some tasks will crash for you (like upgradepath). Kamil [1] http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tflink/taskotron/fedora-20-x86_64/ [2] https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D85 [3] https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D80 ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
F21 Self Contained Change: Review Board 2.0
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Review Board 2.0 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReviewBoard2 Change owner(s): Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com Review Board is a powerful tool for managing patch reviews. == Detailed Description == Review Board integrates with many types of repository (svn, git, mercurial, perforce and more) as well as popular hosting environments such as Fedora Hosted, Github and Bitbucket. It provides a powerful and clean interface to managing patches for review. Review Board 2.0 adds the ability to post committed changes from a branch directly from the web UI, adds review of text file attachments, greatly extends the capabilities of the public API and extension framework, and offers significant performance improvements, usability enhancements, and visual cleanups. == Scope == * Proposal owners: Review Board 2.0 RC3 is in Rawhide today and will be upgraded to 2.0 final when it is released (expected by the end of May, 2014) * Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change) ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
F21 Self Contained Change: Serf 0.4.5
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Serf 0.4.5 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Serf_0.4.5 Change owner(s): Jeff Schroeder jeffschroe...@computer.org Serf [1] is a decentralized solution for service discovery and orchestration that is lightweight, highly available, and fault tolerant. This change is to package serf for Fedora users. == Detailed Description == This is the first set of dependencies for serf. After these are merged, the second set of dependencies can be independently reviewed and merged. Finally, once all of the dependencies are available in fedora, serf can be packaged. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Serf_0.4.5#Detailed_Description == Scope == * Proposal owners: Package dependencies and serf itself. * Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change) [1] http://www.serfdom.io/ ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
Mass Rebuild for Fedora 21
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, It was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5877 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 21 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC49 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F21Make40 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java8 we will start the mass rebuild on 2014-06-06, all existing side tags and anything that you wish to land in Fedora before the mass rebuild needs to be completed by 2014-04-26. we will be merging over all side tags at that point and removing the targets for them. This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting. Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTc7PoAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRg0cP/Rg1Jo7At3Q/NoxhvhN7Ya5w FsAwqTNfTvo64/o/K6Q+RneearYeVugMipruoNLIaAq7gYkv59yR9nDL53KzE+be XVepX3FifHx4qrx54gx5vh/R4J3vSf1ZgrM27e+9HTKT6bYEfqmuwltI/hnym0ZL MYyHcBQOsMaiitRLc61brFBFsqWkX4/md9VS6AZLpBpmMuvVfB91XSCvTolRwp/x IY5Wz6O58xB6S0iuUODTsBhgbEmB/7ddDuneUCfsDpSRYJe5YCqMfKQqu0JJFevG f/ihuLz6lppsrQIaJFdat/lxXZnraE/sGjWonTh7lBLREzSu0DdWTlY+4Do7WhLK DxdnnD9PId198w1x+Btri+iLMggBya9SPk0vUHCc4h9TUzIrEe4MeaRGazE3pnaC AUHOZH8anSx3B54BLtgGtAjlpS/gcAvdVoLqvUeH+JMEeQal3iKT9o6hYgjkD7MH pYZDYq/FoNrFsT/W6YWils5YaVd+lquBhTXy+Z1gkopYN8BJYMih990hkKatZXhW tXh8Fb7kYNaH70wcJugMfKAtUX5f1BEvYbxB0ToScunX13sP1SxaGZm0Bok+iMCf ++dTtJH8CgnkN1ApUVavbYS27jaQKRK3gaGbFriqe4AkiFBA7cajrBRPLqbA83CI 7K+LgGbiFANhaGUnazPh =aG6O -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
PkgDB2 is now in production
After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2 into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ pkgdb is the application that manages package metadata for Fedora, including commit access for packagers, bugzilla assignment, and scm changes notifications. A few of the more notable changes in this new version of pkgdb: * Redesigned interface: faster and cleaner * Packages no longer have 'owners', instead there is now a 'point of contact' who is assigned bugs in bugzilla. * Now uses Fedora OpenID for authentication * Provide a clearly defined and documented API (but completely different from the pkgdb1 one) * Re-written in the flask framework There might still be minor bugs or un-expected features, if you face some of them please let us know. For more information, see: Project page: https://fedorahosted.org/pkgdb2/ Documentation: http://pkgdb2.rtfd.org Git repository: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/pkgdb2 Github mirror: https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2 Mailing list: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/packagedb Many thanks to the hard work of the Fedora Infrastructure development team ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
