Announce: Fedora Layered Image Release

Hello all, On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release[2]. At this time the following Container Images are available in the Fedora Registry. Base Images:

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2017-06-15 16:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2017-06-15 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2017-06-15 09:00 PDT  US/Pacific 2017-06-15

Fedora 26-20170614.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 5/102 (x86_64), 2/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170611.n.1): ID: 108234 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL:

Re: F26 Mesa update

On 06/14/2017 04:06 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: the buildroot issues are now fixed, but I built mesa before the llvm-4 were stable in F-26 (about the time stuff unfroze) but I need to pull a couple of patches in for RPi stability, I'll do that today and push an update. Thanks. I've created a

Re: Package suggestions

On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 01:22 +0200, rugk wrote: > Hi, > I've been looking into how to suggest packages for inclusion in Fedora > for some time. See > https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/106042/where-do-i-request-new-packages-to-be-added-to-the-fedora-repos/. > > Finally I'm giving a list

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On 06/13/2017 03:47 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > For actual artifacts such as cloud/disk/installer images I agree but > at least pushing out individual packages so people can do "dnf > upgrade" picks up issues such as dependency issues that also kill the > compose and allows people to still test

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 09:36 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * Composes are really slow (likely related to storage slowness), if they > were faster or could fail faster we could untag/fix/iterate more. Right > now we are lucky to get 2 chances a day. When you're mentioning storage slowness, are we

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On 06/14/2017 04:16 AM, Martin Kolman wrote: > I agree with that - for example the Anaconda installer CI broke due to > a rawhide package change in the last "working" compose. There is a > fixed package available and built in Koji, but it's not reaching the > Rawhide repos due to the broken

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On 06/14/2017 10:00 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 09:36 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> * Composes are really slow (likely related to storage slowness), if they >> were faster or could fail faster we could untag/fix/iterate more. Right >> now we are lucky to get 2 chances a day.

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:11:21AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide > composes in a while (13 days as of today). > > This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now > failing composes that

Re: Non-responsive maintainer process for caillon, and retiring xchat

I'd be interested in gnuchess and xboard, should they be orphaned. I've been doing a lot with gnuchess in later years. On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I would like to initiate the non-responsive maintainer process [1] for >

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 06/13/2017 03:47 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> For actual artifacts such as cloud/disk/installer images I agree but >> at least pushing out individual packages so people can do "dnf >> upgrade" picks up issues such as

Non-responsive maintainer process for caillon, and retiring xchat

Hello everybody, I would like to initiate the non-responsive maintainer process [1] for Christopher Aillon [2]. A long time ago, he used to be part of the Fedora and Red Hat desktop teams. He is no longer around. He left software development and was last seen living off the grid in Hawaii [3].

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 14:58 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:11:21AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed > > rawhide > > composes in a while (13 days as of today). > > > > This has been due to

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 16:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Yes, I'm well aware of the plans but it doesn't help us now. There was > over 3500 package updates in the compose, it shows how quickly we got > behind. FWIW I really see this as a resource/priority problem, not a process problem. We

Re: F27 Self Contained Change: Making sudo pip Safe (Again)

There are plenty of bugs [0] reported by users, who break their systems using sudo pip and new bugs appear very often. For example the bug [1] was opened a week ago. The biggest issue is that in the current state it is not easy or even possible to recover from such situations. This issue is

Re: Migrating sub-package to a different package: How to resolve file conflicts

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:22:53PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > IMO, the latest package should be always non-versioned one and versioned > should be only the compat packages. > E.g. the llvm package is always the latest, shipping llvm 4.0 ATM and > llvm3.9 should be compat package, shipping the

Re: dnf bodhi plugin

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 04:08:55AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 16:04 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:48:37AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:44:57AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > See

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 2:26:33 PM CEST Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2017-06-13, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >> vim-syntastic praiskup 38 > >> weeks ago > > > > Please don't remove this set of vim-syntastic* packages, there's > > nothing to do

Re: Migrating sub-package to a different package: How to resolve file conflicts

> "MM" == Matthew Miller writes: MM> All other things aside, this is pragmatically easier, because MM> creating a new package4 or package5 triggers a new package review. That's not actually the case, though: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process

Re: Migrating sub-package to a different package: How to resolve file conflicts

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:05:38PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > MM> All other things aside, this is pragmatically easier, because > MM> creating a new package4 or package5 triggers a new package review. > That's not actually the case, though: >

Re: Migrating sub-package to a different package: How to resolve file conflicts

> "MM" == Matthew Miller writes: MM> Thanks for the correction! Sure. It seems a lot of people miss this, though I tried to announce it loudly back when it changed (in August). I've been trying to cut down on the bureaucracy, and a package that needs to add a

Re: Migrating sub-package to a different package: How to resolve file conflicts

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:58:32PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Sure. It seems a lot of people miss this, though I tried to announce it > loudly back when it changed (in August). I've been trying to cut down > on the bureaucracy, and a package that needs to add a > parallel-installable

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 04:20:25PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 2:26:33 PM CEST Petr Pisar wrote: > > On 2017-06-13, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > >> vim-syntastic praiskup 38 > > >> weeks ago > > > > > > Please

Flock hotel discount code is available + Last-minute CFP reminder!

Hi everyone, Our hotel discount code for Flock went live yesterday. It is... *drumroll* "FLOCK". Here are the rates: - A $139/night* rate per double, queen, or king room is available from August 27 to August 31. You will need to use the "Group Attendee" code "FLOCK" on the hotel

Package suggestions

Hi, I've been looking into how to suggest packages for inclusion in Fedora for some time. See https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/106042/where-do-i-request-new-packages-to-be-added-to-the-fedora-repos/. Finally I'm giving a list of some very useful pieces of software I am partially

Re: F26 Mesa update

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a reason for delaying the update for mesa-17.1.2 to F26? > > We're getting buildroot failures for some F26 packages that depend on mesa > (llvm was updated). The mesa update and the buildroot

Re: F26 Mesa update

On 06/14/2017 05:05 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 06/13/2017 06:32 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is there a reason for delaying the update for mesa-17.1.2 to F26? >> >> We're getting buildroot failures for some F26 packages that depend on >> mesa (llvm was updated). >> >>

Re: Migrating sub-package to a different package: How to resolve file conflicts

IMO, the latest package should be always non-versioned one and versioned should be only the compat packages. E.g. the llvm package is always the latest, shipping llvm 4.0 ATM and llvm3.9 should be compat package, shipping the previous version. Once new version is released, lets say llvm 5.0, the

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 22:47 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > Greetings. > > > > > > > > > > Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed > > > > > rawhide > > > > > composes in a while (13 days as of today). > > > > > > > > > > This has been due to a variety of bugs and

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:38:11 + (UTC), till fedoraproject org wrote: > eflspot, dchen, sereinit 114 weeks ago > audacious-plugins (maintained by: mschwendt, atkac, danfruehauf) > audacious-plugins-jack-3.8.2-2.fc26.i686 requires

Fedora Rawhide-20170613.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Server boot i386 Workstation live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 78/102 (x86_64), 18/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170531.n.1): ID: 107819 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso

[Bug 1461612] New: perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.31 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461612 Bug ID: 1461612 Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.31 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Text-CSV_XS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1461610] perl-String-Print-0.90 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461610 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-String-Print-0.90-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20024917

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible.

[Bug 1461605] New: perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin-0.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461605 Bug ID: 1461605 Summary: perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin-0.20 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1461610] perl-String-Print-0.90 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461610 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1287857 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1287857=edit [patch] Update to 0.90 (#1461610) -- You are

[Bug 1461611] New: perl-Test-WriteVariants-0.013 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461611 Bug ID: 1461611 Summary: perl-Test-WriteVariants-0.013 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-WriteVariants Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1461610] New: perl-String-Print-0.90 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461610 Bug ID: 1461610 Summary: perl-String-Print-0.90 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-String-Print Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1458528] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458528 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: Installing all core Perl modules by perl package

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 01:52:41PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > Hello, > > as you know Fedora's perl package does not provide all core modules. Fedora > has > perl-core package for that. As you probably know, this is not welcomed by some > people. They expect "perl" package means Perl. > > I had

[Bug 1461419] perl-Net-SSH2-0.65 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461419 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

Re: Installing all core Perl modules by perl package

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > Therefore I offered them that Fedora can make "dnf install perl" working as > thay want and it will be implemented by renaming perl-core to perl and > giving a new name to present perl package. > > Thus I created this

ppisar pushed to perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule (master). "0.03 bump"

From b48f7bde585bbf6d50c06ace31b8126016ed9c24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 08:00:11 +0200 Subject: 0.03 bump --- .gitignore| 1 +

Re: Installing all core Perl modules by perl package

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:25:05PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > Looking at the IRC backlog, I don't think this will actually > solve the issue; it will only install the full Perl when you > explicitly type "dnf install perl". If parts of Perl get pulled > in as dependencies of something else, the

ppisar pushed to perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts (master). "0.032 bump"

From 01656b8c485417b7d0137ef249dd4284f4d865ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:46:37 +0200 Subject: 0.032 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec | 7 +-- sources

ppisar uploaded MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.032.tar.gz for perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts

d5dc10802ec1f947be7205c2abdfc833aae42986689ee51d60156498c753e49eb245f8d64c637550ebf5885a4e6471c4a91742cf45673247c010ae63e37711d5 MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.032.tar.gz

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on rpms/perl-Apache-Reload (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on rpms/perl-Apache-Reload (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Apache-Reload/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on rpms/perl-Apache-Reload (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on rpms/perl-Apache-Reload (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Apache-Reload/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on rpms/perl-Apache-Reload (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on rpms/perl-Apache-Reload (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Apache-Reload/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on rpms/perl-Apache-Reload (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on rpms/perl-Apache-Reload (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Apache-Reload/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-SSH2 (master). "0.65 bump"

From 0e213a6f77b81ca2903d30e336933746b639bcb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:10:02 +0200 Subject: 0.65 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Net-SSH2.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+),

[Bug 1461422] New: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.032 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461422 Bug ID: 1461422 Summary: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.032 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 1461422] perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.032 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461422 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

jplesnik uploaded Net-SSH2-0.65.tar.gz for perl-Net-SSH2

6a46858bcb8c0e4f546364cc3f1bcd0b9aec7dae2fd9269eec83390ac1bc0d02c321de4ed44eb6a51b976e825c8b934b98b7008b1867f34f3405964a5b545589 Net-SSH2-0.65.tar.gz

ppisar pushed to perl-Dist-Milla (master). "1.0.18 bump"

From 30356d484dc8d6064ae3c3b16cde85caad7a31fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 16:21:56 +0200 Subject: 1.0.18 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + .rpmlint | 2 ++ perl-Dist-Milla.spec | 11 +++

[Bug 1459138] perl-Dist-Milla-v1.0.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459138 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1458072] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458072 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.13

Broken dependencies: perl-Gtk3-WebKit

perl-Gtk3-WebKit has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-7.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-7.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On ppc64le:

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot

perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71-6.fc27.aarch64 requires libperl.so.5.24()(64bit) perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71-6.fc27.aarch64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On x86_64:

ppisar pushed to perl-Gearman (f26). "2.004.008 bump"

From f0155e9074d2fc4338f65ee4ae9aa88b8dc4bef0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 08:10:49 +0200 Subject: 2.004.008 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Gearman.spec | 6 -- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed,

ppisar pushed to perl-Gearman (master). "2.004.008 bump"

From 230b95d9b384ce4375aadd94a82f34cc999b042d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 08:10:49 +0200 Subject: 2.004.008 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Gearman.spec | 8 +--- sources | 2 +- 3 files

[Bug 1461219] perl-Gearman-2.004.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461219 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1461219] perl-Gearman-2.004.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461219 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gearman-2.004.008-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-54ed90f2f0 -- You are receiving this

Broken dependencies: perl-Catalyst-View-Email

perl-Catalyst-View-Email has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Catalyst-View-Email-0.36-4.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-Catalyst-View-Email-0.36-4.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On ppc64le:

Broken dependencies: perl-Net-SSH-Perl

perl-Net-SSH-Perl has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Net-SSH-Perl-1.42-8.fc27.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-Net-SSH-Perl-1.42-8.fc27.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On ppc64le:

Broken dependencies: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit

perl-Algorithm-CurveFit has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-18.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-18.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On ppc64le:

Broken dependencies: perl-HTML-FormFu-MultiForm

perl-HTML-FormFu-MultiForm has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-HTML-FormFu-MultiForm-1.00-9.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-HTML-FormFu-MultiForm-1.00-9.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On ppc64le:

Broken dependencies: perl-HTML-Mason-PSGIHandler

perl-HTML-Mason-PSGIHandler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-HTML-Mason-PSGIHandler-0.53-9.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-HTML-Mason-PSGIHandler-0.53-9.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On ppc64le:

Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO

perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-21.fc26.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.24()(64bit) perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-21.fc26.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-Crypt-RSA

perl-Crypt-RSA has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Crypt-RSA-1.99-21.fc27.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-Crypt-RSA-1.99-21.fc27.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On ppc64le: perl-Crypt-RSA-1.99-21.fc27.noarch

Broken dependencies: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks

perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks-1.19-8.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks-1.19-8.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)

Broken dependencies: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason

perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason-0.14-17.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason-0.14-17.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On

Broken dependencies: perl-Crypt-PWSafe3

perl-Crypt-PWSafe3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Crypt-PWSafe3-1.22-2.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-Crypt-PWSafe3-1.22-2.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On ppc64le:

Broken dependencies: perl-Net-SFTP

perl-Net-SFTP has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Net-SFTP-0.10-24.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-Net-SFTP-0.10-24.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On ppc64le: perl-Net-SFTP-0.10-24.fc26.noarch

Broken dependencies: perl-Crypt-Primes

perl-Crypt-Primes has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Crypt-Primes-0.50-30.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-Crypt-Primes-0.50-30.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On ppc64le:

Broken dependencies: perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder

perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder-0.06-17.fc27.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder-0.06-17.fc27.noarch requires

ppisar uploaded Gearman-2.004.008.tar.gz for perl-Gearman

43484b2ef7cdce607736c429d18f37251b925cee14b3577409c487a1beab647b017d501e3b109ad842a8c16905dad4a3f78972fb076a13dc3e22c6a386a4c9c8 Gearman-2.004.008.tar.gz

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 706 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 700 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 590

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 828 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 590 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 172

Broken dependencies: perl-Math-Pari

perl-Math-Pari has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Math-Pari-2.010809-4.fc27.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.24()(64bit) perl-Math-Pari-2.010809-4.fc27.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-Math-Pari-2.010809-4.fc27.armv7hl

Broken dependencies: perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession

perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession-0.31-4.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession-0.31-4.fc26.noarch requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Task-Catalyst

perl-Task-Catalyst has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-13.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On armhfp: perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-13.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) On ppc64le:

Flock hotel discount code is available + Last-minute CFP reminder!

Hi everyone, Our hotel discount code for Flock went live yesterday. It is... *drumroll* "FLOCK". Here are the rates: - A $139/night* rate per double, queen, or king room is available from August 27 to August 31. You will need to use the "Group Attendee" code "FLOCK" on the hotel

Installing all core Perl modules by perl package

Hello, as you know Fedora's perl package does not provide all core modules. Fedora has perl-core package for that. As you probably know, this is not welcomed by some people. They expect "perl" package means Perl. I had a chat with some people from #perl channel ragarding this topic on

[Bug 1461419] New: perl-Net-SSH2-0.65 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461419 Bug ID: 1461419 Summary: perl-Net-SSH2-0.65 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-SSH2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: