Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

2017-12-12 Thread nicolas . mailhot 
De: "Adam Williamson" 

On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 13:34 +0100, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
>> I don't have a good history with %autosetup :) It tends to hate the patches 
>> I produce.

> Did you know you still can/have to pass it a prefix level? That tripped
> me up for a while. For most cases, you want:

> %autosetup -p1

That's probably what I needed last time, but it was faster to add a %patch line 
than to investigate :). I find out nowadays there are lots of things I could do 
better if only I had the time to look them up.

> If you have patches that apply at different levels, you can't use it,
> unless there's a trick I don't know about.

My patches are all -p1 as taught by ancient rpm lore, but sometimes I mix 
patches from other origins and those can be anything.


Thanks for the tip, I will try to remember it

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

2017-12-12 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 21:11 +0100, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
> 
> > If you have patches that apply at different levels, you can't use
> > it,
> > unless there's a trick I don't know about.
> 
> My patches are all -p1 as taught by ancient rpm lore, but sometimes I
> mix patches from other origins and those can be anything.
> 
> 
> Thanks for the tip, I will try to remember it

No problem. I find %autosetup so handy that usually if I need to use a
patch from somewhere else that's at a different prefix level, I just
hand-edit that patch to be at level 1 so I can keep using it...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [SO-NAME BUMP] libjson-c.so.3 comes to Rawhide

2017-12-12 Thread Jan Pokorný 
On 11/12/17 01:05 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> I'll update json-c to v0.13 for Rawhide.  This will bump libjson-c so-
> name from 2 to 3 and will remove some deprecated stuff from its API.

Looks like json-c is not that compatible between 0.12 and 0.13 to
rush with changes like this:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sway/c/bc85e0dfab91ae77c09250dbf54b8b7e48d43229

that counter the intentional decision of upstream:

https://github.com/swaywm/sway/pull/1438

leading to:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525020

> I'll bump and rebuild all affected packages in the same run and add
> patches for the new API, if needed.

The above change was not an instance of patching to support the new API.

-- 
Jan (Poki)


pgp6i2VD71Jyu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

F27 GNOME crashes

2017-12-12 Thread Aron Griffis 
Hi all,

I'm writing to ask for attention on 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518486

F27 brought a major crashing regression in GNOME. It must not affect everyone, 
or I think it would have held up release. But for the people it affects, 
shutting off the monitor, including by screen locker DPMS, crashes GNOME. It's 
not just esoteric systems either--mine is an Intel NUC connected to an ASUS 
monitor by DP cable.

There are a couple upstream bugs that seem related:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788764
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788788

If I can do anything to provide more information, or test patches, please let 
me know. Mainly it would just be nice to know it's on someone's radar.

Thanks,
Aron
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

F28 Self Contained Change: Django 2.0

2017-12-12 Thread Jan Kurik 
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Django 2.0 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Django20

Change owner(s):
* Matthias Runge 
* Miro Hrončok 
* Petr Viktorin 


This change is about upgrading python-django to version 2.0. The
latest Django release drops support for Python 2, but a few Django
apps packaged in Fedora do not yet support Python 3. A compatibility
package will be provided for those.


== Detailed Description ==
The latest Django release 2.0 finally drops support for Python 2.7.
Not all dependent applications in Fedora can keep up with Djangos
pace. This change describes a way how to enable both, keeping 2.7
compatibility and also leveraging the latest version.

The python-django package will be updated to 2.0, Python 2
subpackage(s) will be removed. A new compatibility python2-django1.11
package will be created with Python 2 version of Django 1.11. The
Django 1.11.x series is the last to support Python 2.7, it also has
Long Term Support (supported until April 2020 by upstream). See the
Django 2.0 release notes for details about Django compatibility with
various Python versions.

The new python2-django1.11 package will obsolete python2-django < 2
and python-django < 2, but it will deliberately not provide either of
those. This will render packages depending on python(2)-django FTBFS
(or broken runtime dependencies if they don't require Django at
buildtime). This is intentional. If we don't do that, all Django
packages in Fedora will just keep dragging the Legacy Python
dependency chain forever. Package owners of Django applications
requiring Python 2 will need to manually adjust their dependencies to
use python2-django1.11 or move to Python 3 only (this is preferred but
not always possible). Package owners of Django libraries will need to
coordinate this with package owners of the applications. The rule of
thumb is: If the library is not required by an application (packaged
in Fedora) that uses Legacy Python, remove the Python 2 subpackage (or
retire the package, if it cannot support Python 3).

There will be packages that fail to build or have broken dependencies.
Package owners shall fix those by the steps described above. Proposal
owners will send dist-git Pull Requests or Bugzilla patches to help.
Proven packager powers will be used to merge those after 14 days of no
activity. The removal of leftover packages from Fedora will be
coordinated with FESCo (for approval) and releng (for execution).

Most of the Django packages in Fedora are already Python 3 compatible.

Note that we are aware that naming the compatibility package
python2-django would make this entire change much easier. But we'd
very much like to retire the entire Python 2 based Django ecosystem at
this point already. Creating python2-django1.11 and not providing
python2-django is a compromise. Also, we plan to provide it as a
contingency plan if necessary, see bellow.


== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
drop Python 2 subpackage(s) from python-django, upgrade python-django
to 2.0 and package python2-django1.11 for Python 2 only.

* Django apps owners:
Either update to Python 3 or use python2-django1.11 as a dependency.

* Django libraries owners:
Either drop Python 2 subpackages (eventually retire the package if no
subpackages are left) or use python2-django1.11 as a dependency for
the python 2 subpackages iff those are needed by apps. When removing
subpackages, add proper Obosletes tags to their Python 3 counterparts.
When orphaning entire packages, add Obosletes to the python3-django
package.

* Release engineering:
releng will help with bulk retirement of packages that fail to keep up
with this proposal
Releng ticket: #7211 https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7211

* Policies and guidelines:
- Python packaging guidelines
- Documentation should be provided

* List of packages requiring python2-django/ python-django without
having django in their name:
cobbler-web
fts-monitoring
gramps-webapp
graphite-web
pony
pulp-server
python2-kobo-admin
python2-kobo-hub
python2-pelican
python2-testfixtures-tests
python2-whitenoise
python2-xmlrunner


-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Current state of Rawhide

2017-12-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi 
On 12/12/2017 07:15 AM, Martin Kolman wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 15:08 +0100, Marian Csontos wrote:
>> On 12/11/2017 04:33 AM, Scott Talbert wrote:
>>> I'm trying to get an install of Rawhide going, but not having too much 
>>> luck.  I tried installing from Fedora-Rawhide-20171127.n.0 which appears 
>>> to be the "Last known good" from [1].  The install succeeds, but it 
>>> boots to a blank screen.  The OpenQA tests results seem to indicate the 
>>> same problem with more recent composes.  Has anyone filed a bug already 
>>> on this?
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.happyassassin.net/nightlies.html
>>> ___
>>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>> 2 weeks since last update...
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513024
> That bug should be long fixed - do you have any pointers that it's the cause 
> of the recent Rawhide compose failures ?
> 
> Also I think part of the resons for many of the failures was the Fedora 
> infrastructure server move, which was going on
> during most of the previous week.

That was a small part of it, but it was a series of other things:

https://www.scrye.com/wordpress/nirik/2017/12/11/rawhide-notes-from-the-trail-the-early-december-issue/

for the entire list.

kevin



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: Forge-hosted projects packaging automation

2017-12-12 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 13:34 +0100, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
> I don't have a good history with %autosetup :) It tends to hate the patches I 
> produce.

Did you know you still can/have to pass it a prefix level? That tripped
me up for a while. For most cases, you want:

%autosetup -p1

If you have patches that apply at different levels, you can't use it,
unless there's a trick I don't know about.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide-20171212.n.0 compose check report

2017-12-12 Thread Fedora compose checker 
Missing expected images:

Server boot x86_64
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server dvd x86_64
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 49/106 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171211.n.0):

ID: 180126  Test: x86_64 universal install_anaconda_text
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180126

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20171211.n.0):

ID: 180089  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180089
ID: 180091  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180091
ID: 180092  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180092
ID: 180093  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180093
ID: 180094  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180094
ID: 180104  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180104
ID: 180105  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180105
ID: 180107  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180107
ID: 180110  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180110
ID: 180112  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180112
ID: 180121  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180121
ID: 180123  Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180123
ID: 180132  Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180132
ID: 180134  Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180134
ID: 180138  Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180138
ID: 180149  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180149
ID: 180154  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180154
ID: 180155  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180155
ID: 180156  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180156
ID: 180157  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180157
ID: 180158  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180158
ID: 180159  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180159
ID: 180160  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180160
ID: 180161  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180161
ID: 180162  Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180162
ID: 180163  Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180163
ID: 180164  Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180164
ID: 180165  Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180165
ID: 180166  Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180166
ID: 180167  Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180167
ID: 180168  Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180168
ID: 180169  Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180169
ID: 180170  Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180170
ID: 180171  Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180171
ID: 180172  Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180172
ID: 180174  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180174
ID: 180175  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180175
ID: 180176  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180176
ID: 180177  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/180177
ID: 180179  Test: x86_64

Re: Package review requests: Splitting the "sustmi" GNOME Shell extensions into separate packages

2017-12-12 Thread Andrew Toskin 
Update: I'm still working on splitting the "sustmi" GNOME Shell extension 
subpackages into their own packages. I've opened an issue on the releng pagure 
page:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7124

I've also executed `fedpkg retire ...` for the old package on EPEL7, f27, and 
master. And the package review requests for the newly split packages have 
passed. The Bugzilla threads are here:

* HistoryManager Prefix Search -- 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428
* WindowOverlay Icons -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506429

I *think* I might be done with my part of the process, but I haven't gotten any 
feedback in a little while. Is there anything else I need to do?

Thanks,
~ Andrew Toskin / terrycloth


> I'm the RPM package maintainer for these two GNOME Shell extensions:
> 
> * gnome-shell-extension-sustmi-windowoverlay-icons
> * gnome-shell-extension-sustmi-historymanager-prefix-search
> 
> They're both currently subpackages of the main "sustmi" package, because
> upstream had been developing them in a single git repository. The two shell 
> extensions
> have nothing to do with each other, though, and upstream finally decided to 
> split them
> into separate repositories. So I think it now makes sense to also split them 
> into separate
> packages.
> 
> I'm not entirely clear on the procedure. This wiki page
> 
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitt...
> 
> talks at first about *font* packages, but otherwise seems relevant. So, I've 
> started
> by splitting and updating the spec files, and creating these review requests. 
> As I
> understand it, because the packages were already accepted into Fedora, and 
> the extension
> code hasn't changed, just the packaging, I think all a reviewer should really 
> need to
> check is whether the upgrade path is sane and works properly.
> 
> * HistoryManager Prefix Search -- 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428
> * WindowOverlay Icons -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506429
> 
> Please take a look, and let me know if I've missed anything.
> 
> Thanks,
> ~ Andrew / terrycloth
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Schedule for Wednesday's FPC Meeting (2017-12-13 18:00 UTC)

2017-12-12 Thread James Antill 
 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Wednesday at 2017-12-13 18:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.

 Local time information (via. uitime):

= Day: Wednesday =
2017-12-13 10:00 PST  US/Pacific
2017-12-13 13:00 EST  --> US/Eastern <--
2017-12-13 18:00 GMT  Europe/London 
2017-12-13 18:00 UTC  UTC   
2017-12-13 19:00 CET  Europe/Berlin 
2017-12-13 19:00 CET  Europe/Paris  
2017-12-13 23:30 IST  Asia/Calcutta 
--- New Day: Thursday 
2017-12-14 02:00 HKT  Asia/Hong_Kong
2017-12-14 02:00 +08  Asia/Singapore
2017-12-14 03:00 JST  Asia/Tokyo
2017-12-14 04:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane

 Links to all tickets below can be found at: 

https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open=meeting

= Followups =

#topic #654 glibc file triggers
.fpc 654
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/654

#topic #691 noarch *sub*packages with arch-specific dependencies
.fpc 691
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/691

#topic #693 Wiki:Packaging:RPMMacros
.fpc 693
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/693

#topic #694 Packaging guidelines for application independence 
.fpc 694
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/694

#topic #708 Allocating a static uid and gid for openvswitch
.fpc 708
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/708

#topic #710 Ruby packaging guidelines update
.fpc 710
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/710

#topic #713 Forward-looking conditionals by default
.fpc 713
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/713

#topic #714 let's kill file deps!
.fpc 714
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/714

#topic #715 Separately building package documentation
.fpc 715
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/715

#topic #719 Simplify packaging of forge-hosted projects 
.fpc 719
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/719

#topic #720 Easy way of changing/removing shebangs
.fpc 720
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/720

#topic #723 Guidelines for handling deprecated dependencies during
review 
.fpc 723
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/723

#topic #726 Review for SELinux Independent Policy packaging Draft   
.fpc 726
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/726

= Open Floor = 

 For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket.  The
report of the agenda items can be found at:

https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open=meeting

 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://pagure.io/packaging-committee
,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until
the following meeting.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] Fedora 25 End Of Life

2017-12-12 Thread Mohan Boddu 
As of the 12th of December 2017, Fedora 25 has reached its end of life

 for updates and support. No further updates, including security updates,
will be available for Fedora 25. Fedora 26 will continue to receive updates
until approximately one month after the release of Fedora 28. The
maintenance schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project
wiki [0]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [1] on how to
upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates.
Mohan Boddu.


[0]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle#
Maintenance_Schedule

[1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading?rd=DistributionUpgrades
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Reminder: upcoming retirement of webkitgtk and webkitgtk3 packages

2017-12-12 Thread Tomas Popela 
Hi,

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Neal Gompa  wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Sérgio Basto  wrote:
> > Thank you Michael , btw about package naming IMHO webkitgtk4 should be
> > called webkit2gtk3 and for gtk4 webkit2gtk4
> >
>
> The webkitgtk4-devel package already provides pkgconfig(webkit2gtk-4.0).
>
> The GNOME system for naming pkg-config files is
> -, so it's clearer with the pkgconfig name
> than the package name.
>
> The naming of the packages was especially dumb in Fedora. It might
> make sense to add some Provides that add sensible names, too.
>

The right name from upstream's POV (I talked to them when adding the
package to Fedora - and I was considering webkit2gtk3 as well) is
webkitgtk4 as the 4 on the ends means API version and it's not connected to
GTK+ version.

But during the last Web Engines Hackfest Michael was keen on renaming the
package to webkit2gtk3 (so we are ready for GTK+ 4 based WebKit).

Tom
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

thans

2017-12-12 Thread chan zaib 
Wap
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: What to I have to do....

2017-12-12 Thread Graham Leggett 
On 09 Dec 2017, at 8:21 PM, Philip Kovacs  wrote:

> I am opposed to allowing PP unfettered access to projects in which the 
> maintainer(s) 
> are responsive.  It's common for developers to have artistic (volatile) 
> temperaments , 
> like a painter who paints on canvas owned by someone else.

We need to nip this kind of thing in the bud.

“Artistic (volatile) temperament” is just a euphemistic way of saying “engages 
in unchecked abusive behaviour toward their peers”, and no member of the 
community should be expected to bend over backwards to tolerate this or to turn 
a blind eye to it.

Even more specifically nobody at Fedora should be forced to ask special 
permission from or give special notification to specific individuals over and 
above the established procedures before doing their work. Their commit 
privileges / karma / following the established procedure give them that 
permission.

If someone makes a change to your code, start with the premise that the person 
who made the change did so in good faith, and respond appropriately from there.

Regards,
Graham
—



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: What to I have to do....

2017-12-12 Thread Philip Kovacs 
>Artistic (volatile) temperament” is just a euphemistic way of saying “engages 
>in unchecked abusive behaviour toward their peers”, and no member of the 
>community should be expected to bend over backwards to >tolerate this or to 
>turn a blind eye to it.

You completely, utterly and totally misread the meaning and spirit of what I 
said.  
To reiterate, if the maintainer is responsive, my opinion is that is a courtesy 
to notify him/her.  
That's all.  Some people are more attached and involved with their code and 
would appreciate the gesture. 
No need to imagine that the maintainer is demonstrating "unchecked abusive 
behavior."  
For Pete's sake.  
 

On Tuesday, December 12, 2017 7:09 AM, Graham Leggett  
wrote:
 

 On 09 Dec 2017, at 8:21 PM, Philip Kovacs  wrote:

I am opposed to allowing PP unfettered access to projects in which the 
maintainer(s) are responsive.  It's common for developers to have artistic 
(volatile) temperaments , like a painter who paints on canvas owned by someone 
else.

We need to nip this kind of thing in the bud.
“Artistic (volatile) temperament” is just a euphemistic way of saying “engages 
in unchecked abusive behaviour toward their peers”, and no member of the 
community should be expected to bend over backwards to tolerate this or to turn 
a blind eye to it.
Even more specifically nobody at Fedora should be forced to ask special 
permission from or give special notification to specific individuals over and 
above the established procedures before doing their work. Their commit 
privileges / karma / following the established procedure give them that 
permission.
If someone makes a change to your code, start with the premise that the person 
who made the change did so in good faith, and respond appropriately from there.
Regards,Graham—
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


   ___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Current state of Rawhide

2017-12-12 Thread Marian Csontos 

On 12/11/2017 04:33 AM, Scott Talbert wrote:
I'm trying to get an install of Rawhide going, but not having too much 
luck.  I tried installing from Fedora-Rawhide-20171127.n.0 which appears 
to be the "Last known good" from [1].  The install succeeds, but it 
boots to a blank screen.  The OpenQA tests results seem to indicate the 
same problem with more recent composes.  Has anyone filed a bug already 
on this?


[1] https://www.happyassassin.net/nightlies.html
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


2 weeks since last update...

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513024
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

F28 Self Contained Change: librealsense2

2017-12-12 Thread Jan Kurik 
= Proposed Self Contained Change: librealsense2 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/librealsense2

Change owner(s):
* Till Hofmann 

A new version of librealsense has been released, which does not
support older camera versions. Bump librealsense to the new release
and add the old library as librealsense1.


== Detailed Description ==
The upstream librealsense2 release does not support older camera
models such as F200, R200, LR200 and ZR300. Newer models are only
supported by the new version. Thus, we need both libraries in order to
support all camera models. The librealsense package will be bumped to
the new release, and an additional librealsense1 package will be
submitted for review.

Currently, no package depends on librealsense:

 $ dnf repoquery --releasever=rawhide --alldeps --whatrequires 'librealsense*'
 Last metadata expiration check: 0:30:06 ago on Mon 11 Dec 2017 10:15:08 CET.
 librealsense-devel-0:2.7.9-0.2.fc28.i686
 librealsense-devel-0:2.7.9-0.2.fc28.x86_64

See also the discussion on the devel list [1] for more info.

== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
Update librealsense to latest upstream release, add Provides for
librealsense2 Submit legacy librealsense1 for review

* Other developers:
N/A (not a System Wide Change)

* Release engineering:
#7204 https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7204

* List of deliverables:
N/A (not a System Wide Change)

* Policies and guidelines:
N/A (not a System Wide Change)

* Trademark approval:
N/A (not needed for this Change)


[1] 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/F5QD4CB5IO5UFIC73OEHPU36UC6NBSPT/#F5QD4CB5IO5UFIC73OEHPU36UC6NBSPT

-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Current state of Rawhide

2017-12-12 Thread Martin Kolman 
On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 15:08 +0100, Marian Csontos wrote:
> On 12/11/2017 04:33 AM, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > I'm trying to get an install of Rawhide going, but not having too much 
> > luck.  I tried installing from Fedora-Rawhide-20171127.n.0 which appears 
> > to be the "Last known good" from [1].  The install succeeds, but it 
> > boots to a blank screen.  The OpenQA tests results seem to indicate the 
> > same problem with more recent composes.  Has anyone filed a bug already 
> > on this?
> > 
> > [1] https://www.happyassassin.net/nightlies.html
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
> 2 weeks since last update...
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513024
That bug should be long fixed - do you have any pointers that it's the cause of 
the recent Rawhide compose failures ?

Also I think part of the resons for many of the failures was the Fedora 
infrastructure server move, which was going on
during most of the previous week.


> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

2017-12-12 Thread Miro Hrončok 

On 7.12.2017 10:56, Matthias Runge wrote:

To follow-up on this, I'm drafting a change[1]. Since my
responsibilities changed, this has a quite low priority for me.
Any help is greatly appreciated!

Best,
Matthias
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mrunge/Django20


Today, we proposed https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Django20 and 
set it to Ready For Wrangler.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

2017-12-12 Thread Nicolas Chauvet 
2017-12-12 16:17 GMT+01:00 Miro Hrončok :
> On 7.12.2017 10:56, Matthias Runge wrote:
>>
>> To follow-up on this, I'm drafting a change[1]. Since my
>> responsibilities changed, this has a quite low priority for me.
>> Any help is greatly appreciated!
>>
>> Best,
>> Matthias
>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mrunge/Django20

It would be more simple to introduce a separate python2-django given
this package namespace is free.
It would just need to be bump at version-release: 1.11.5-2.fc28
because python(2)-django sub-package in f27 is currently at 1.11.5-1
This could even be introduced in epel7 (if python is recent enought
there, but then this is a separate issue).


Thx

-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

2017-12-12 Thread Miro Hrončok 

On 12.12.2017 16:52, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

2017-12-12 16:17 GMT+01:00 Miro Hrončok :

On 7.12.2017 10:56, Matthias Runge wrote:


To follow-up on this, I'm drafting a change[1]. Since my
responsibilities changed, this has a quite low priority for me.
Any help is greatly appreciated!

Best,
Matthias
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mrunge/Django20


It would be more simple to introduce a separate python2-django given
this package namespace is free.


We are aware of that and we are deliberately not doing that.
See the motivation in Detailed Description [2].

Note that providing it is our contingency plan [3].

[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Django20#Detailed_Description
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Django20#Contingency_Plan


It would just need to be bump at version-release: 1.11.5-2.fc28
because python(2)-django sub-package in f27 is currently at 1.11.5-1
This could even be introduced in epel7 (if python is recent enought
there, but then this is a separate issue).


Thx



--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2017-12-12 Thread updates 
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 888  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031   
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
 882  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168   
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
 772  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
 743  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-35e240edd9   
thttpd-2.25b-24.el6
 354  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-e3e50897ac   
libbsd-0.8.3-2.el6
  83  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-4c76ddcc92   
libmspack-0.6-0.1.alpha.el6
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-9882374b91   
wordpress-4.9.1-1.el6
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-678916467d   
exim-4.89-4.el6
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-ed87c07972   
hostapd-2.6-7.el6
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-6aaee32b7e   
optipng-0.7.6-6.el6
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-3432442a31   
shellinabox-2.20-5.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

GitPython-0.3.2-0.7.RC1.el6

Details about builds:



 GitPython-0.3.2-0.7.RC1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e580d70574)
 Python Git Library

Update Information:

Fix interaction with repositories cloned/created with git >= 2.15.0

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1520479 - fedpkg local and prep fail after latest stable updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520479
  [ 2 ] Bug #1508639 - GitPython and git 2.15.0 don't play nicely
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508639

___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

2017-12-12 Thread smooge 
Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   EPEL Steering Committee on 2017-12-13 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
   At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net

The meeting will be about:
There is a weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting to go over events, ideas, and 
tickets about EPEL.

More information available at:
[https://pagure.io/epel/blob/master/f/docs/source/EPEL-meeting-process.rst](https://pagure.io/epel/blob/master/f/docs/source/EPEL-meeting-process.rst)


Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/6592/

___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

F28 Self Contained Change: Django 2.0

2017-12-12 Thread Jan Kurik 
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Django 2.0 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Django20

Change owner(s):
* Matthias Runge 
* Miro Hrončok 
* Petr Viktorin 


This change is about upgrading python-django to version 2.0. The
latest Django release drops support for Python 2, but a few Django
apps packaged in Fedora do not yet support Python 3. A compatibility
package will be provided for those.


== Detailed Description ==
The latest Django release 2.0 finally drops support for Python 2.7.
Not all dependent applications in Fedora can keep up with Djangos
pace. This change describes a way how to enable both, keeping 2.7
compatibility and also leveraging the latest version.

The python-django package will be updated to 2.0, Python 2
subpackage(s) will be removed. A new compatibility python2-django1.11
package will be created with Python 2 version of Django 1.11. The
Django 1.11.x series is the last to support Python 2.7, it also has
Long Term Support (supported until April 2020 by upstream). See the
Django 2.0 release notes for details about Django compatibility with
various Python versions.

The new python2-django1.11 package will obsolete python2-django < 2
and python-django < 2, but it will deliberately not provide either of
those. This will render packages depending on python(2)-django FTBFS
(or broken runtime dependencies if they don't require Django at
buildtime). This is intentional. If we don't do that, all Django
packages in Fedora will just keep dragging the Legacy Python
dependency chain forever. Package owners of Django applications
requiring Python 2 will need to manually adjust their dependencies to
use python2-django1.11 or move to Python 3 only (this is preferred but
not always possible). Package owners of Django libraries will need to
coordinate this with package owners of the applications. The rule of
thumb is: If the library is not required by an application (packaged
in Fedora) that uses Legacy Python, remove the Python 2 subpackage (or
retire the package, if it cannot support Python 3).

There will be packages that fail to build or have broken dependencies.
Package owners shall fix those by the steps described above. Proposal
owners will send dist-git Pull Requests or Bugzilla patches to help.
Proven packager powers will be used to merge those after 14 days of no
activity. The removal of leftover packages from Fedora will be
coordinated with FESCo (for approval) and releng (for execution).

Most of the Django packages in Fedora are already Python 3 compatible.

Note that we are aware that naming the compatibility package
python2-django would make this entire change much easier. But we'd
very much like to retire the entire Python 2 based Django ecosystem at
this point already. Creating python2-django1.11 and not providing
python2-django is a compromise. Also, we plan to provide it as a
contingency plan if necessary, see bellow.


== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
drop Python 2 subpackage(s) from python-django, upgrade python-django
to 2.0 and package python2-django1.11 for Python 2 only.

* Django apps owners:
Either update to Python 3 or use python2-django1.11 as a dependency.

* Django libraries owners:
Either drop Python 2 subpackages (eventually retire the package if no
subpackages are left) or use python2-django1.11 as a dependency for
the python 2 subpackages iff those are needed by apps. When removing
subpackages, add proper Obosletes tags to their Python 3 counterparts.
When orphaning entire packages, add Obosletes to the python3-django
package.

* Release engineering:
releng will help with bulk retirement of packages that fail to keep up
with this proposal
Releng ticket: #7211 https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7211

* Policies and guidelines:
- Python packaging guidelines
- Documentation should be provided

* List of packages requiring python2-django/ python-django without
having django in their name:
cobbler-web
fts-monitoring
gramps-webapp
graphite-web
pony
pulp-server
python2-kobo-admin
python2-kobo-hub
python2-pelican
python2-testfixtures-tests
python2-whitenoise
python2-xmlrunner


-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1525285] New: perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.23 is available

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525285

Bug ID: 1525285
   Summary: perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.23 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Protocol-WebSocket
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: dd...@cpan.org
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: dd...@cpan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 0.23
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.22-1.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Protocol-WebSocket/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3292/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1525285] perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.23 is available

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525285



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1367029
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1367029=edit
[patch] Update to 0.23 (#1525285)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1525289] New: perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99012 is available

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525289

Bug ID: 1525289
   Summary: perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99012 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Net-Whois-Raw
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: dd...@cpan.org
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: dd...@cpan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 2.99012
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.99.011-1.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-Whois-Raw/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6677/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1525289] perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99012 is available

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525289



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['rpmbuild',
'-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
u'/var/tmp/thn-t57Skr/perl-Net-Whois-Raw.spec'] returned 1: error: line 5:
unclosed macro or bad line continuation

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1525285] perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.23 is available

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525285



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
hotness's scratch build of perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.23-1.el7.src.rpm for
rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23660246

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1524382] ack-2.20 is available

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524382



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
ack-2.20-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-4afd9ef2f0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1524382] ack-2.20 is available

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524382



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
ack-2.20-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-24b9f598e6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1524382] ack-2.20 is available

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524382



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
ack-2.20-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f7ce6d8b98

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283764] Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/share/ perl5/vendor_perl/File/Tail.pm line 391

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764

Harald Reindl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|25  |26



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1456817] Use of uninitialized value $fh in pattern match (m//) at / usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Proc/PID/File.pm line 286.

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456817

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |NEW
 CC||jples...@redhat.com
Version|25  |26
 Resolution|EOL |---
   Keywords||Reopened



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1517572] Please add unar dependency/ configuration for *.rar and comment *.lrz support

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572



--- Comment #6 from Juan Orti  ---
I still can download lrzip from the epel7 repositories, shouldn't it be
removed?

I'm going to submit the removal of lrzip. I've also made the dependencies weak
in rawhide.

I'm holding the unar update because it doesn't support pipes and doesn't seem
to work with amavis. We may need a wrapper to support it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1517572] Please add unar dependency/ configuration for *.rar and comment *.lrz support

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
amavisd-new-2.11.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-5f6d89febd

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1517572] Please add unar dependency/ configuration for *.rar and comment *.lrz support

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
amavisd-new-2.9.1-3.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-0f72359c5d

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1517572] Please add unar dependency/ configuration for *.rar and comment *.lrz support

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572



--- Comment #5 from Juan Orti  ---
unar is not working as-is, it uses different arguments. I'm looking into it.

dic 12 09:36:40 helio amavis[3002]: (03002-01) (!)Decoding of p003 (RAR archive
data, v4, os: Win32) failed, leaving it unpacked: do_unrar: can't get a list of
archive members: exit 1; Unknown option -idcdp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1502214] abi-compliance-checker: behavior changed within f25 release

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1502214

Fedora End Of Life  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |EOL
Last Closed||2017-12-12 05:06:55



--- Comment #4 from Fedora End Of Life  ---
Fedora 25 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-12-12. Fedora 25 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

F28 Self Contained Change: librealsense2

2017-12-12 Thread Jan Kurik 
= Proposed Self Contained Change: librealsense2 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/librealsense2

Change owner(s):
* Till Hofmann 

A new version of librealsense has been released, which does not
support older camera versions. Bump librealsense to the new release
and add the old library as librealsense1.


== Detailed Description ==
The upstream librealsense2 release does not support older camera
models such as F200, R200, LR200 and ZR300. Newer models are only
supported by the new version. Thus, we need both libraries in order to
support all camera models. The librealsense package will be bumped to
the new release, and an additional librealsense1 package will be
submitted for review.

Currently, no package depends on librealsense:

 $ dnf repoquery --releasever=rawhide --alldeps --whatrequires 'librealsense*'
 Last metadata expiration check: 0:30:06 ago on Mon 11 Dec 2017 10:15:08 CET.
 librealsense-devel-0:2.7.9-0.2.fc28.i686
 librealsense-devel-0:2.7.9-0.2.fc28.x86_64

See also the discussion on the devel list [1] for more info.

== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
Update librealsense to latest upstream release, add Provides for
librealsense2 Submit legacy librealsense1 for review

* Other developers:
N/A (not a System Wide Change)

* Release engineering:
#7204 https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7204

* List of deliverables:
N/A (not a System Wide Change)

* Policies and guidelines:
N/A (not a System Wide Change)

* Trademark approval:
N/A (not needed for this Change)


[1] 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/F5QD4CB5IO5UFIC73OEHPU36UC6NBSPT/#F5QD4CB5IO5UFIC73OEHPU36UC6NBSPT

-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1029710] Amavisd fails to identify attached zipped files with .exe extensions

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029710

Juan Orti  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Last Closed||2017-12-12 09:48:05



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1484066] $daemon_group in /etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf doesn' t set the daemon group

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484066

Juan Orti  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-12-12 10:04:03



--- Comment #2 from Juan Orti  ---
Fixed in rawhide.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23656173

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1436968] Numerous testsuite errors w/ DBD::MySQL 4.042

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436968

Fedora End Of Life  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |EOL
Last Closed||2017-12-12 05:32:15



--- Comment #2 from Fedora End Of Life  ---
Fedora 25 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-12-12. Fedora 25 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1456817] Use of uninitialized value $fh in pattern match (m//) at / usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Proc/PID/File.pm line 286.

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456817

Fedora End Of Life  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |EOL
Last Closed||2017-12-12 05:47:14



--- Comment #2 from Fedora End Of Life  ---
Fedora 25 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-12-12. Fedora 25 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1471436] Please link weblint(1) man page to HTML::Lint(3pm)

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471436

Fedora End Of Life  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |EOL
Last Closed||2017-12-12 05:22:33



--- Comment #2 from Fedora End Of Life  ---
Fedora 25 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-12-12. Fedora 25 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1418399] _WARN: Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at / usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Encode/MIME/Header.pm line 198

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418399

Fedora End Of Life  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |EOL
Last Closed||2017-12-12 05:33:41



--- Comment #5 from Fedora End Of Life  ---
Fedora 25 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-12-12. Fedora 25 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1462406] Perl-Tk widget demo fails to display earth.gif

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462406

Fedora End Of Life  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |EOL
Last Closed||2017-12-12 05:36:39



--- Comment #2 from Fedora End Of Life  ---
Fedora 25 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-12-12. Fedora 25 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1309199] Rebuilding perl-DBD-MySQL-4.033-2.fc24 results into unresolvable mysql.so : symbol mysql_read_query_result, version libmysqlclient_16 not defined in file libmysqlclient.so.18 with l

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309199
Bug 1309199 depends on bug 1312151, which changed state.

Bug 1312151 Summary: Symbols verion behavior changed and breaks linking against 
libmysqlclient.so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312151

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |EOL



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283764] Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/share/ perl5/vendor_perl/File/Tail.pm line 391

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764

Fedora End Of Life  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |EOL
Last Closed|2017-08-08 08:26:16 |2017-12-12 06:10:22



--- Comment #13 from Fedora End Of Life  ---
Fedora 25 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-12-12. Fedora 25 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1517572] Please add unar dependency/ configuration for *.rar and comment *.lrz support

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.d
   ||e
   See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
   ||/show_bug.cgi?id=1449179



--- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar  ---
(In reply to Juan Orti from comment #6)
> I still can download lrzip from the epel7 repositories, shouldn't it be
> removed?
> 
Probably. "robert" is a maintainer in EPEL.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1517572] Please add unar dependency/ configuration for *.rar and comment *.lrz support

2017-12-12 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572



--- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck  ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #8)
> Probably. "robert" is a maintainer in EPEL.

Yes, that's me...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2017-12-12 Thread updates 
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 1009  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087   
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
 771  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
 354  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-04bc9dd81d   
libbsd-0.8.3-1.el7
 251  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-d241156dfe   
mod_cluster-1.3.3-10.el7
 248  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-7ecb12e378   
python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-1.el7
  83  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e27758bd23   
libmspack-0.6-0.1.alpha.el7
  81  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-52b8147c68   
openvpn-auth-ldap-2.0.3-15.el7
  20  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e64eeb6ece   
nagios-4.3.4-5.el7
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-71f816e116   
collectd-5.8.0-1.el7
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-12e12a6bff   
borgbackup-1.1.3-1.el7
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-08f3522912   
wordpress-4.9.1-1.el7
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-f58e92e860   
exim-4.89-4.el7
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-d704442ae7   
qpid-cpp-1.37.0-1.el7
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-97efaab7e7   
tor-0.2.9.14-1.el7
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-f2055d3f62   
shellinabox-2.20-5.el7
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-77cc9084cb   
nodejs-6.12.2-1.el7
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-30026fdcc1   
hostapd-2.6-7.el7
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-701c41f4c8   
python34-3.4.5-5.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

atop-2.3.0-7.el7
python-django16-1.6.11.6-7.el7
python34-3.4.5-5.el7

Details about builds:



 atop-2.3.0-7.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-3fc29cb70f)
 An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level

Update Information:

try-restart, not restart in cron job.    Support NVME disks, support
sysconfig config file.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1524436 - Cron job should only restart atop if running
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524436
  [ 2 ] Bug #1523419 - Add support nvme disks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523419
  [ 3 ] Bug #1520475 - atop rpm package from EPEL-7 - INTERVAL hardcoded
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520475




 python-django16-1.6.11.6-7.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-b4207a980b)
 A high-level Python Web framework

Update Information:

Drop incorrect virtual Provides:

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1524560 - Import error on django modules on epel.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524560




 python34-3.4.5-5.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-701c41f4c8)
 Version 3 of the Python programming language aka Python 3000

Update Information:

Fix for CVE-2017-1000158

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1519601 - CVE-2017-1000158 python34: python: Integer overflow in 
PyString_DecodeEscape results in heap-base buffer overflow [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519601

___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

2017-12-12 Thread Miro Hrončok 

On 12.12.2017 16:52, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

2017-12-12 16:17 GMT+01:00 Miro Hrončok :

On 7.12.2017 10:56, Matthias Runge wrote:


To follow-up on this, I'm drafting a change[1]. Since my
responsibilities changed, this has a quite low priority for me.
Any help is greatly appreciated!

Best,
Matthias
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mrunge/Django20


It would be more simple to introduce a separate python2-django given
this package namespace is free.


We are aware of that and we are deliberately not doing that.
See the motivation in Detailed Description [2].

Note that providing it is our contingency plan [3].

[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Django20#Detailed_Description
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Django20#Contingency_Plan


It would just need to be bump at version-release: 1.11.5-2.fc28
because python(2)-django sub-package in f27 is currently at 1.11.5-1
This could even be introduced in epel7 (if python is recent enought
there, but then this is a separate issue).


Thx



--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org