Re: GNOME 3.28.0 megaupdate

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm wrangling the GNOME 3.28.0 builds in Fedora and the plan is to > submit a single megaupdate with all of 3.28.0 builds into Bodhi. If > you're helping with builds, please use 'fedpkg build --target

Re: GNOME 3.28.0 megaupdate

On 03/13/2018 08:00 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm wrangling the GNOME 3.28.0 builds in Fedora and the plan is to >> submit a single megaupdate with all of 3.28.0 builds into Bodhi. If >> you're

Re: [ACTION NEEDED #2] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

* Igor Gnatenko [07/03/2018 08:43] : > > This is the second iteration of my mass-scratch-rebuild without > gcc/gcc-c++ in the buildroot[0]. Everything what was written in > original mail still applies. I've fixed the following: perl-AI-DecisionTree perl-Algorithm-FastPermute perl-Algorithm-SVM

Fedora-Atomic 27-20180313.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 17:27 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Does that sound right? Hi, yes, it does. Thanks. Bye, Milan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Broken rawhide buildroot/tools?

* Jan Synacek [13/03/2018 09:59] : > > [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25678436 From the root.log: DEBUG util.py:439: No matching package to install: 'NetworkManager-glib-devel' DEBUG util.py:439: Not all dependencies satisfied DEBUG util.py:439: Error: Some packages

Re: [RFC] Replace glibc's libcrypt with libxcrypt for Fedora 29/30

On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 18:08 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Hello everyone, > > since there has been some discussion in the last time about removing > libcrypt from glibc in some time [1,2,3,4] and splitting it out into > a > separate project which can evolve quicker, I'd like to hear your

Re: How to get qtpass RPM into EPEL7?

I can take it and maintain for EPEL. вт, 13 мар. 2018 г. в 12:16, Marcin Dulak : > Hi, > > I would like qtpass is built for EPEL7, but the maintainer is not > interested. > I provided a patch for EPEL7 build > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541439 > How to

Re: QMake equivalent of CMake flag -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR:PATH=%{_libdir}

Il 11/03/2018 01:56, Kevin Kofler ha scritto: > The upstream makefile hardcodes /usr/lib here: > https://github.com/open-eid/chrome-token-signing/blob/master/host-linux/chrome-token-signing.pro#L22 > The easiest fix is probably to just change: > ffconf.path =

Google Summer of Code 2018

Hi, the student application period for this year's GSoC has begun! If you were thinking about posting a project idea or applying as a mentor, there's still time to do so! For this year, we have a project idea page here: [1]. You can create a new idea by opening a pull request against

Re: Google Summer of Code 2018

On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:32:18 +0100, Martin Bříza wrote: Hi, the student application period for this year's GSoC has begun! If you were thinking about posting a project idea or applying as a mentor, there's still time to do so! For this year, we have a project idea page

Broken rawhide buildroot/tools?

Hi, I was trying to update pidgin, but the package doesn't build and it doesn't seem to be a packaging problem to me [1]. What's happening? [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25678436 -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat ___

Re: Broken rawhide buildroot/tools?

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018, 10:00 Jan Synacek wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to update pidgin, but the package doesn't build and it > doesn't seem to be a packaging problem to me [1]. What's happening? > > [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25678436 It looks

Re: Broken rawhide buildroot/tools?

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Jan Synacek [13/03/2018 09:59] : >> >> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25678436 > > From the root.log: > > DEBUG util.py:439: No matching package to install: > 'NetworkManager-glib-devel'

How to get qtpass RPM into EPEL7?

Hi, I would like qtpass is built for EPEL7, but the maintainer is not interested. I provided a patch for EPEL7 build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541439 How to proceed further? Best regards, Marcin ___ devel mailing list --

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Enable dbus-broker

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:13:15PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >> Proposed System Wide Change: Enable dbus-broker >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableDbusBroker > > What about renaming this to

Re: Improving the glibc32 situation

On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 14:07 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > Some x86_64 packages need a 32-bit glibc during build time.  Koji > does not provide it. > [...] > Comments?  Suggestions? Why don't we just make koji provide it? That is how a normal 64bit Fedora install looks like. Those have the 32bit

speed-dreams compilation problem

Hi, speed-dreams fails on rawhide, f28, f27 and f26 with this error message: -- Checking for module 'FreeSOLID' -- Package 'qhull', required by 'FreeSOLID', not found -- Checking for module 'SOLID' -- Package 'SOLID', required by 'virtual:world', not found -- Looking for SOLID - found

Re: fedpkg request-repo always fails - Could not execute request_repo

On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 10:33 +, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > > tried to create a new repo, but this fails always with: > > [martin@f27 ~]$ fedpkg --module-name gnome-shell-extension-netspeed > request-repo 1377631 > Could not execute request_repo: The following error occurred while >

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Enable dbus-broker

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 01:38:24PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:13:15PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > >> Proposed System Wide Change: Enable dbus-broker > >>

Re: Improving the glibc32 situation

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 02:58:37PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 14:07 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Some x86_64 packages need a 32-bit glibc during build time.  Koji > > does not provide it. > > [...] > > Comments?  Suggestions? > > Why don't we just make koji provide

Re: new section for 'Join the package collection maintainers'

On 12/03/18 21:02 -0300, Athos Ribeiro wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:35:19AM +0100, René Genz wrote: the other day I wanted to contribute a fix to an RPM package's spec file. I struggled with uploading my changes to my fork on src.fedoraproject.org. puiterwijk and clime from #fedora-admin

Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

Hi all, I'm looking for reviewers for the review request [1] for the glusterd2 package. It has been reviewed once before on initial submission by Robert-Andre. The spec is updated based on the comments recieved, and the dependencies have been packaged and/or updated in rawhide. The package is now

Request for testing: dbus-broker as system and user bus

Hi, dbus-broker is a new DBus message bus implementation. We are proposing it as the default in Fedora as of F29 [0], and as such we would be grateful for as much testing as possible before the switch is made. For instructions on how to test, see [1]. Cheers, Tom and David [0]:

Re: new section for 'Join the package collection maintainers'

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 02:13:14PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: [snip...] > How about: > > 3. One-off contributions > > Changes to existing packages can be suggested by submitting requests (https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/usage/pull_requests.html)>. > You must have a to create > a pull

Re: speed-dreams compilation problem

forgot to post the CMakeError.log file: CMakeError.log: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/speed-dreams/CMakeError.log ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: speed-dreams compilation problem

On mardi 13 mars 2018 15:14:51 CET Martin Gansser wrote: > -- Could NOT find CURL (missing: CURL_LIBRARY CURL_INCLUDE_DIR) > CMake Error at cmake/thirdpartydeps.cmake:449 (MESSAGE): > Cannot find CURL header files Well did you try the obvious, adding libcurl-devel as a BR?

Re: Improving the glibc32 situation

On 03/13/2018 03:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 02:58:37PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 14:07 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: Some x86_64 packages need a 32-bit glibc during build time.  Koji does not provide it. [...] Comments?  Suggestions? Why don't

F29 System Wide Change: Make dbus-broker the default DBus implementation

= Proposed System Wide Change: Make dbus-broker the default DBus implementation = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DbusBrokerAsTheDefaultDbusImplementation Owner(s): * David Herrmann * Tom Gundersen Enable dbus-broker.service to use dbus-broker as system and session message bus

Fedora 28-20180313.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 19/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 202806 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/202806 ID: 202812 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso

Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code

Hi! We've had some more discussions regarding this topic within the CI team. Here's a brief summary of the recommendation we agreed upon: Tests may be written in different ways, but are enabled in a standard way directly in the package git repository as defined by the Standard Test Interface.

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Make dbus-broker the default DBus implementation

Hello, Just a quick question...dbus was patched to support SE Linux. I see no mention of SE Linux support below. Does it replicate the same SE Linux support? Thanks, -Steve On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:32:20 +0100 Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Make dbus-broker

Re: Improving the glibc32 situation

Hi, On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 03:31:40PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 03/13/2018 03:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > The right fix would be to make koji deal with multilibs properly, > > mock can handle that fine already, then glibc32 wouldn't be needed at all. > > I think we requested these

librsvg2 CVEs

Why are CVEs about librsvg2 not being tracked within the package? Bugzilla shows several CLOSED EOL and a few current ones not mentioned within the package %changelog. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: new section for 'Join the package collection maintainers'

On 13.03.2018 01:02, Athos Ribeiro wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:35:19AM +0100, René Genz wrote: >> I propose to: >> add a new major point 2, so: >> "2. How to join the Fedora Package Collection Maintainers?" >> will be: >> "3. How to join the Fedora Package Collection Maintainers?" >> >>

Fedora 28 compose report: 20180313.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-28-20180312.n.0 NEW: Fedora-28-20180313.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 9 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 10 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 137.73 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Make dbus-broker the default DBus implementation

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:55 PM, Steve Grubb wrote: > Does it replicate the same SE Linux support? Yes. Cheers, Tom ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: new section for 'Join the package collection maintainers'

On 13.03.2018 15:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 12/03/18 21:02 -0300, Athos Ribeiro wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:35:19AM +0100, René Genz wrote: [snip] >>> I propose to: >>> add a new major point 2, so: >>> "2. How to join the Fedora Package Collection Maintainers?" >>> will be: >>> "3.

[Bug 1554576] perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-0.100005 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554576 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-0.15-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3d3096c129 -- You are

[Bug 1551203] amavisd-release and amavisd-submit use wrong default socket path

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551203 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- amavisd-new-2.11.0-14.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0422ddea55 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1551203] amavisd-release and amavisd-submit use wrong default socket path

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551203 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- amavisd-new-2.11.0-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-c639cc859a -- You are receiving this

[rpms/amavisd-new] PR #2: fix RHBZ#1551203 - correct sock location

jorti merged a pull-request against the project: `amavisd-new` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` fix RHBZ#1551203 - correct sock location `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/amavisd-new/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1551203] amavisd-release and amavisd-submit use wrong default socket path

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551203 Juan Orti changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1554802] New: perl-File-BaseDir-0.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554802 Bug ID: 1554802 Summary: perl-File-BaseDir-0.08 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-File-BaseDir Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1554802] perl-File-BaseDir-0.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554802 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

[Bug 1554576] perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-0.100005 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554576 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1551203] amavisd-release and amavisd-submit use wrong default socket path

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551203 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA

[Bug 1554802] perl-File-BaseDir-0.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554802 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1549551] perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549551 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Clownfish-0.6.3-1.fc26, perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this

[Bug 1489529] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0129-7.fc28 FTBFS: tests fail with libxml2-2.9.5

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489529 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-XML-LibXML-2.0129-3.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1549550] perl-Clownfish-0.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549550 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Clownfish-0.6.3-1.fc26, perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this

[Bug 1525990] [RFE] please provide in EPEL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525990 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1542721] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542721 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1546268] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546268 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1543181] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543181 Bug 1543181 depends on bug 1546268, which changed state. Bug 1546268 Summary: Please provide a package for EPEL7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546268 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1529811] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529811 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.10-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1549551] perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549551 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Clownfish-0.6.3-1.fc27, perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this

[Bug 1529811] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529811 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.10-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1549884] perl-RDF-NS-20180227 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549884 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RDF-NS-20180227-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1549550] perl-Clownfish-0.6.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549550 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Clownfish-0.6.3-1.fc27, perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.3-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this

[Bug 1550056] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1550752] perl-Locale-Codes-3.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550752 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Locale-Codes-3.56-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1550056] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1550055] perl-Test-Harness-3.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Harness-3.41-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1549884] perl-RDF-NS-20180227 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549884 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RDF-NS-20180227-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2018-03-14 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: The EPEL Steering Committee will have a weekly meeting to cover current tasks and problems needed to keep EPEL

[Bug 1555093] New: perl-HTTP-Message-6.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1555093 Bug ID: 1555093 Summary: perl-HTTP-Message-6.15 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-HTTP-Message Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1555096] New: perl-Gearman-2.004.014 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1555096 Bug ID: 1555096 Summary: perl-Gearman-2.004.014 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Gearman Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 973 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 863 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 835

[Bug 1551203] amavisd-release and amavisd-submit use wrong default socket path

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551203 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- amavisd-new-2.11.0-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1555101] New: perl-MCE-1.835 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1555101 Bug ID: 1555101 Summary: perl-MCE-1.835 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MCE Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: p...@city-fan.org