Hello everyone, and thanks to one and all for a remarkable distribution!
With the coverage of the freeworld fontconfig enhancements, I wonder if
some of the configuration settings currently implemented in
https://github.com/silenc3r/fedora-better-fonts will be considered as
defaults?
Hello,
I live in Brazil, pt_BR. :-)
I installed Fedora 29 by live USB, but him not know Windows 10
partition in grub. I am using dualboot for studying. My machine is
Asus Zenbook.
Command:
grub-mkconfig, more.. [0]
A possible solution for problem[1]. I need to test.
0 -
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018, 10:54 Milan Crha Hello,
> next week's 3.31.2 release of evolution-data-server (on 2018-11-12)
> will contain soname version bump of libedataserver due to removal of
> some semi-private API (e-gdbus-templates). I expect that most of the
> packages can be just rebuilt,
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 05:15:57PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> What about this part? There's an "Autopush — enabled" item in bodhi, but
> afaict, it doesn't do anything and I always click "push to batched"
> manually
> on all updates. I'd like to have the update got to batched automatically
>
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 at 05:01, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > This is not about forcing modules unto people. The drive comes from
> > the other direction: packages want to be available only as modules,
>
> But that is exactly what I mean by "forcing modules onto
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 at 08:28, Nicolas De Amicis wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm Nicolas De Amicis, I'm 37 years old and I live in Switzerland. My
> native language is french. I'm married and I have 2 children.
>
> I'm software engineer in a metallurgical industry since 2006.
>
> I'm Fedora user since 2004 and
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 30 Rawhide 20181109.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 3:27 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> Hello,
Hey Ankur
>
> libb64 still requires review---thanks to the comments it has already
> received, it should be quite an easy one:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848
>
> python-petlink is another really simple python
Dne 09. 11. 18 v 3:33 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>> Moreover, as it stands, I don't think modularity provides any quality
>> of life improvements for packagers within Fedora (it adds extra steps
>> and makes it confusing to figure out what is maintained),
> There is one I can see
On 11/09/2018 02:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 6:00 AM Wolfgang Stoeggl wrote:
what about "push to batched": How is this currently handled?
Current docs say:
"... waiting until the next Tuesday when Bodhi will automatically switch the request to
"stable" at 03:00
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 1:18 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> recordmydesktop was retired in F27:
>
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/4RCB6MBC4JVGG4SYLIKUDOOT2REGA6N4/
>
> It's claimed that it doesn't work and is full of crash bugs, but I was
>
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 3:42 PM Randy Barlow
wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 08:07 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > The 'Autopush' happens when the update reaches the karma threshold.
> > It
> > > is not applied based on days in testing.
> >
> > That's what I thought. This seems bad
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 9:53 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Raphael Groner wrote:
>
> > Kevin,
> >>* that no package may ever be module-only, but
> >> modules can only be used for non-default
> >> versions.
> >
> > That statement doesn't make any sense for me. Can you explain, please? How
> > should
Hi,
I'm Nicolas De Amicis, I'm 37 years old and I live in Switzerland. My native
language is french. I'm married and I have 2 children.
I'm software engineer in a metallurgical industry since 2006.
I'm Fedora user since 2004 and I'm never contribute to a open source project
before now. I create
Hello,
next week's 3.31.2 release of evolution-data-server (on 2018-11-12)
will contain soname version bump of libedataserver due to removal of
some semi-private API (e-gdbus-templates). I expect that most of the
packages can be just rebuilt, because it was never meant to be used
outside
Hello,
libb64 still requires review---thanks to the comments it has already
received, it should be quite an easy one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848
python-petlink is another really simple python review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648251
Any takers? I'm
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 6:00 AM Wolfgang Stoeggl wrote:
> what about "push to batched": How is this currently handled?
> Current docs say:
> "... waiting until the next Tuesday when Bodhi will automatically switch the
> request to "stable" at 03:00 UTC." [1]
> Is this still only on the next
> The advantage for packagers is just temporary, as long as the
> (supposedly) older library they still use is maintained. One day, they
> will need to move forward. This is just postponing the inevitable.
And for the same reason we have compat packages, we can't always honor
the First principle
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 at 19:50, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 12:17:00 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > recordmydesktop was retired in F27:
> >
> >
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/4RCB6MBC4JVGG4SYLIKUDOOT2REGA6N4/
> >
> >
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 at 23:19, Qixiang Wan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is for an issue we encountered while building Ursa-Major on EPEL7
> branch [1], the build task failed due to missing libmodulemd, seems
> libmodulemd was retired on EPEL7 because it's available in RHEL7.6,
> but our buildroot is
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 37/142 (x86_64), 9/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181105.n.1):
ID: 306907 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/306907
ID: 306908 Test:
Le vendredi 09 novembre 2018 à 11:21 +, Mat Booth a écrit :
>
> It's not about forcing modules onto users, it's about not forcing more
> work than necessary onto already overstretched maintainers.
Then help finish
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2004
and
Hi all,
I would like to create a new custom locale (basically irish english +
monday as first day of the week). Where can I find recent information
on how locales are implemented in Fedora (I am on Fedora 29)? I found
lots of outdated information, which was somewhat helpful, but also
quite
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:56:13PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:26 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > As a hypothetical example, maybe python-sphinx has a major
> > backwards-incompatible update that becomes the default in Fedora 30.
> > The package you maintain will only
Raphael Groner wrote:
> Kevin,
>>* that no package may ever be module-only, but
>> modules can only be used for non-default
>> versions.
>
> That statement doesn't make any sense for me. Can you explain, please? How
> should modules live without packages in background? We'd already discussed
>
Greetings,
The sole purpose of this thread is to bring attention to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646930
Unreliable time on the system is a daily annoyance that will be easily fixed by
aligning the Fedora version with the upstream's. Could someone ping the package
maintainer?
> I'm seeing the problem with Windows installations often enough still
> on user@ and Ask Fedora that I think we could use a consolidated guide
> or wiki for installing to Windows 10; including a guide on how to get
> the Windows 10 bootloader reinstalled if it's accidentally erased. On
> BIOS
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 05:09:24PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> Suprisingly, recently I've found use for modularity. It's a crutch
> for bad software (OpenShift breaking backwards compatibility) but it
> worked.
I mean, software is software. :)
> That's as an user. I'm still to discover the
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 3:27 AM, Bino wrote:
> Hello,
> I live in Brazil, pt_BR. :-)
>
> I installed Fedora 29 by live USB, but him not know Windows 10
> partition in grub. I am using dualboot for studying. My machine is
> Asus Zenbook.
>
> Command:
> grub-mkconfig, more.. [0]
>
> A possible
> Consider the Go case: we know that most Go packages will be statically
> linked (issues with that are a different topic), so we know they will
> work fine once built. However, if the application upstream cannot
> build with the latest "stable" version because of
> backwards-incompatible changes,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 11:20 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Consider the Go case: we know that most Go packages will be statically
> linked (issues with that are a different topic), so we know they will
> work fine once built.
How does this scale to ecosystems that *aren't* statically linked,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648509
Bug ID: 1648509
Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 S3.pm module defines subroutine
BUILD two times
Product: Fedora
Version: 29
Component: perl-Net-Amazon-S3
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648308
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.5-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644619
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-IRI-0.009-1.fc30 |perl-IRI-0.009-1.fc30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644619
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-IRI-0.009-1.fc30 |perl-IRI-0.009-1.fc30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648308
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648308
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.5-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644619
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648489
Bug ID: 1648489
Summary: rt-4.4.2-2 dosen't work correctly
Product: Fedora
Version: 28
Component: rt
Severity: medium
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648308
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.5-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ee8ba0816b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648308
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.5-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-24c7f249d2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-PPIx-Regexp on branch
master, which you are following:
b16cc432b70ca4892aad594afe5ee60a357c94d6Petr Písař0.063 bump
To view more about the commits, visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPIx-Regexp/commits/master
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Net-UPnP on branch
f29, which you are following:
122725eb22e73d8256e5e0e31f75a3c8eac687faPetr Písař1.4.5 bump
To view more about the commits, visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-UPnP/commits/f29
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648308
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648310
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648307
Bug ID: 1648307
Summary: Upgrade perl-Mojolicious to 8.06
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
Reporter:
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Net-UPnP on branch
master, which you are following:
122725eb22e73d8256e5e0e31f75a3c8eac687faPetr Písař1.4.5 bump
To view more about the commits, visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-UPnP/commits/master
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Net-UPnP on branch
f28, which you are following:
e1db03bd359748fb67dce57a6fbf66f609e1bf64Petr Písař1.4.5 bump
To view more about the commits, visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-UPnP/commits/f28
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Net-UPnP on branch
f27, which you are following:
fca8f91460db841867717be88721133652726447Petr Písař1.4.5 bump
To view more about the commits, visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-UPnP/commits/f27
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648308
Bug ID: 1648308
Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-UPnP to 1.4.5
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-UPnP
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648310
Bug ID: 1648310
Summary: Upgrade perl-PPIx-Regexp to 0.063
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648308
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.5-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-829d36a3c1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
52 matches
Mail list logo
