Tried on my Gigabyte AM4 X370 w/ AMD Ryzen 2600 and Nvidia GT1050
I got to GDM just fine but there was some weird jerkiness when I moused
over the "Try Fedora / Install" buttons but not when moving the mouse
cursor over the desktop area. I coped dmesg and journalctl to a separate
machine if it's
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2019-04-11 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2019-04-11 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2019-04-11
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 8:40 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 19:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Tried on my Gigabyte AM4 X370 w/ AMD Ryzen 2600 and Nvidia GT1050
> >
> > I got to GDM just fine but there was some weird jerkiness when I moused
> > over the "Try Fedora /
On 2019-04-10 8:36 a.m., Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Please try it again, and if it doesn't work please do the following:
>
> curl -O https://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org/fedpkg_new-sources.sh
>
> run the command with the upload and paste the output and also a
> `klist` as some of the
On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 19:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Tried on my Gigabyte AM4 X370 w/ AMD Ryzen 2600 and Nvidia GT1050
>
> I got to GDM just fine but there was some weird jerkiness when I moused
> over the "Try Fedora / Install" buttons but not when moving the mouse
> cursor over the desktop
I'm really interested on the livet crash, but I can't reproduce it with
latest branched compose.
Can you provide us with reproduction steps?
Hau idatzi du Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak (2019 api. 10,
az. (02:59)):
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:35 PM Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> >
> >
Le mardi 09 avril 2019 à 10:11 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
>
> To be specific here, 'at' is part of the @standard group. 'chrony' is
> pulled in several ways. It's part of @standard *if gnome-control-
> center
> is being installed*, so effectively it'll be installed with
> Workstation
> but
Repeated errors on the console like this:
Starting udev Kernel Device Manager...
[FAILED] Failed to start udev Kernel Device Manager.
See 'systemctl status systemd-udevd.service' for details.
[ OK ] Stopped udev Kernel Device Manager.
Starting udev Kernel Device Manager...
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 09:53:26AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Forgot to say that the version of systemd is:
> systemd-242~rc3-1.fc31.x86_64
systemd-242~rc4-1.fc31 is also broken. Maybe critical packages like
these could be tested in a VM before we let ordinary users suffer
them?
Hi All,
I just noticed that Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-20190408.n.0.iso still
contains the dbus-daemon package even though we are using dbus-broker now.
I've tried to rpm -e it and it for some reason it is required by
anaconda-core which seems weird.
So should I file a bug against
Yes, system is unable to boot anymore. With previous kernels and rescue
modes as well. I used the opportunity to install silver blue.
BR,
Damian
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, 11:53 Richard W.M. Jones, wrote:
>
> Forgot to say that the version of systemd is:
> systemd-242~rc3-1.fc31.x86_64
>
> Rich.
>
>
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:21 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Hmm, but the installed OS is not 100% the same as the livesys, or is
> it? If not, it should be possible to add a "systemctl disable
> dmraid.service --root=/path/to/os" somewhere, no?
>
AFAIK, they are 100% same. There's a hack, check
On Mi, 10.04.19 08:16, Julen Landa Alustiza (ju...@zokormazo.info) wrote:
> I'm really interested on the livet crash, but I can't reproduce it with
> latest branched compose.
> Can you provide us with reproduction steps?
Urks, I don't remember. I think created an ESP part, two ext4
partitions,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 2:35 AM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> > 1. multipathd.
>
> I'm pretty sure it gets dragged in by the installer
Nope, multipath seems to be present because libblockdev and udisks (and
perhaps some more), which is in turn required by GNOME:
$ rpm -q --whatrequires
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 4:08 AM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
>
> Hello team,
>
> dlib needs an update but the maintainer has not responded for month to
> verify and merge the change.
> Can a proven test push the merge and update that package matching
> upstream release.
From looking at it quickly,
On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 14:20 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 1:11 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 12:54 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 12:07, Lennart Poettering
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Heya,
> > > >
> > > > today I
Yet, if they are free to be redestributed a flatpak on flathub would be
great?
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, 11:31 Dan Čermák,
wrote:
> Hi Andi,
>
> the games you listed are proprietary and can thus not be shipped with
> Fedora.
>
> What you could do, is to try to improve the out of the box experience
>
I see that too, filed it as
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7704
ma
On 4/8/19 12:08 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hi all.
I can't upload source archive of new package 'smoldyn'
$ fedpkg import ../../smoldyn-2.58-1.fc29.src.rpm
Uploading:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 02:55:23PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>Other than having it as a direct option in [1]src.fp.org I think being
>part of a special file in git would be next best.
In the recent releases pagure grew the possibility to have 3rd party extensions
with their own URL
On 10/04/19 05:50, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 4:21 AM Antonio Trande wrote:
>> We can complete the coin-or-Bonmin, coin-or-Couenne, coin-or-Dip,
>> coin-or-OS reviews before, of course.
>>
>> Let me check them.
>
> I had hoped to get a COPR set up tonight, but alas! I ran out
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:40 PM Japheth Cleaver wrote:
> Is this really worth the effort? cronie in F30 is a 103K package, and a
> decent chunk of that might be the ChangeLog. crontabs is all of 18K,
> which is 95% the GPL and the RPM header. It seems like a very small
> price to pay for something
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 7:34 PM Karsten Andreas Artz
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> my name is Andi, 29 and I'm from Germany. I'm using Fedora almost 2 years
> (Fedora 26). My programming skills are on Python, Java/Java Script, and
> C/C++. But acutally I prefer mostly Python hacking. I studied B.A. of
Hi Andi,
the games you listed are proprietary and can thus not be shipped with
Fedora.
What you could do, is to try to improve the out of the box experience
when trying to install and play these games. But that is quite an
undertaking as that will require diving into the guts of wine.
My
Forgot to say that the version of systemd is:
systemd-242~rc3-1.fc31.x86_64
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to
Thank you, Todd.
Output attached and posted in
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7704
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
fedpkg_test.tar.xz
Description:
Hi Dan,
I’ve checked again and I guess the clones should be the one which can be
included on Fedora, can’t they?
Let me list my favors: Pizza Buisness, FreeRails, Jagged Alliance 2 -
Steaciatella.
This should be not proprietary, shouldn’t they?
Thx in forward!
Cheers
Andi
Sent from Yahoo
Yeah that would be great too.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, April 10, 2019, 11:08 AM, Damian Ivanov
wrote:
Yet, if they are free to be redestributed a flatpak on flathub would be great?
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, 11:31 Dan Čermák, wrote:
Hi Andi,
the games you listed are
On Mi, 10.04.19 12:49, Kamil Paral (kpa...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Hmm, but the installed OS is not 100% the same as the livesys, or is
> > it? If not, it should be possible to add a "systemctl disable
> > dmraid.service --root=/path/to/os" somewhere, no?
>
> AFAIK, they are 100% same. There's a
On Di, 09.04.19 18:34, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> > Ideally, the top 4 wouldn't be installed at all anymore (in case of
> > the first two at least on the systems which do not need them). But if
> > that's not in the cards, it would be great to at least not enable
> > these
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 02:45:48PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 April 2019 11:04:11 CEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 02:55:23PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > >Other than having it as a direct option in [1]src.fp.org I think being
> > >
Hi Kamil,
personally I'd prefer containing the games on Flatpak to be more flexible and
it can be provided for a hugh user base.
I hope the games I've suggested now are mostly clones. Thus they might be
included for Fedora. The Dark Mod sounds an interesting game! I've made a
notice for your
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 11:29, Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> On 2019-04-10 5:06 a.m., Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> >> From looking at it quickly, it seems like you've updated the .spec for
> >> version 19.17 but have only uploaded sources for 19.16. > > If he's not
> the maintainer he probably doesn't
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:21 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> Then I tried with Thinkpad T450s. I had to boot in UEFI with CSM on,
> because CSM off or even SecureBoot on make the image unbootable (I'll
> report a separate bug about that).
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698550
On 2019-04-10 5:06 a.m., Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
>> From looking at it quickly, it seems like you've updated the .spec for >>
>> version 19.17 but have only uploaded sources for 19.16. > > If he's
not the maintainer he probably doesn't have the privileges to do so. > >
Dridi >
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 02:17:43PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mi, 10.04.19 14:08, Vít Ondruch (vondr...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > Just FTR, my Rawhide is working fine with
> > systemd-242~rc3-1.fc31.x86_64.
>
> does adding a drop-in for the service unit with the following contents fix
On Wednesday, 10 April 2019 11:04:11 CEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 02:55:23PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> >Other than having it as a direct option in [1]src.fp.org I think being
> >part of a special file in git would be next best.
>
>
> In the recent
FESCo has given us the go-ahead to turn zchunk metadata on again[1] for
the F30 fedora repository after the librepo segmentation fault bug[2]
was fixed. An updated librepo[3] was built a week ago and was pushed
to stable five days ago, so most beta users should have the new
version.
If you're
On Mi, 10.04.19 14:08, Vít Ondruch (vondr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Just FTR, my Rawhide is working fine with
> systemd-242~rc3-1.fc31.x86_64.
does adding a drop-in for the service unit with the following contents fix it?
[Service]
RestrictSUIDSGID=no
ProtectHostname=no
Lennart
> From looking at it quickly, it seems like you've updated the .spec for
> version 19.17 but have only uploaded sources for 19.16.
If he's not the maintainer he probably doesn't have the privileges to do so.
Dridi
___
devel mailing list --
Just FTR, my Rawhide is working fine with systemd-242~rc3-1.fc31.x86_64.
Vít
Dne 10. 04. 19 v 10:50 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> Repeated errors on the console like this:
>
> Starting udev Kernel Device Manager...
> [FAILED] Failed to start udev Kernel Device Manager.
> See
On 4/9/19 6:26 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 2:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> We have had at least 3 reports of this today...
>> (upload causing 408 error).
>>
>> Can any of you folks seeing this:
>>
>> Run this script:
>>
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:22 PM Michael Watters wrote:
>
> You mean like systemd? ;)
Given the origin of this thread, I tried not to go there. However,
now that you've broached it, yes. This :D.
systemd is a lot of things, but it also is the way forward we think
that our audience wants. It
On 4/10/2019 4:10 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:40 PM Japheth Cleaver wrote:
Is this really worth the effort? cronie in F30 is a 103K package, and a
decent chunk of that might be the ChangeLog. crontabs is all of 18K,
which is 95% the GPL and the RPM header. It
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 3:03 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> A few weeks back we asked for testing of 'basic graphics mode' /
> nomodeset booting - the feedback from that was very helpful in
> establishing that we had a generic issue which dated back to Fedora 29,
> thanks a lot. We
You mean like systemd? ;)
On 4/10/19 7:10 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> Adding software the user doesn't want
> to have it as assumed for other users is always a trade-off.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Have tried two machines so far, a MacBook
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960
Integrated Graphics Controller (primary) (rev 03)
and a Dell Precision M4600 with:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF106GLM [Quadro
2000M] (rev a1)
The
On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 11:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just noticed that Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-20190408.n.0.iso still
> contains the dbus-daemon package even though we are using dbus-broker now.
>
> I've tried to rpm -e it and it for some reason it is required by
>
> I think abrt should figure out if the crashing binary is part of
Would it be an option to create your own configuration for libreport?
It is much simpler and robust to deliver a config tailored for your
packages than trying to generalize the task and define a global policy
Example:
I've just submitted nodejs-10.15.3-1 into Bodhi and buildroot
overrides for F29 and F30 (it was built for Rawhide last night).
This new build provides two new subpackages:
* `nodejs-libs` provides libnode.so which is ABI-compatible with
libv8_libbase.so.6 and libv8_libplatform.so.6, for which it
I have a no boot, too. Reported in the Bugzilla.
L.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:41 PM Geoffrey Marr wrote:
> Have tried two machines so far, a MacBook
>
> 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960
> Integrated Graphics Controller (primary) (rev 03)
>
> and a Dell
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:07 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I just noticed that Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-20190408.n.0.iso still
> contains the dbus-daemon package even though we are using dbus-broker now.
>
> I've tried to rpm -e it and it for some reason it is required by
>
On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 11:03 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:07 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I just noticed that Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-20190408.n.0.iso still
> > contains the dbus-daemon package even though we are using dbus-broker now.
> >
> >
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/04/11/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.2-20190410git51eb5b2.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698704
Bug ID: 1698704
Summary: perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.48 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Cache-FastMmap
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698173
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1698172
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698174
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1698172
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698172
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1698173, 1698174
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698173
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.007-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-222d8a64ac
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698173
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.007-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3201ee80ae
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697634
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698173
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.007-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a203e0e74a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697635
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.006-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697634
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697635
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.007-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8cd7dca507
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697635
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698174
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.007-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6b8d5826ee
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698174
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.007-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6d62add2b9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698174
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.007-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8cd7dca507
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698174
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698172
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698173
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698315
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
40 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-06b243cced
guacamole-server-1.0.0-1.el6
19 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-62f9745b71
drupal7-7.65-1.el6
10
FESCo has given us the go-ahead to turn zchunk metadata on again[1] for
the F30 fedora repository after the librepo segmentation fault bug[2]
was fixed. An updated librepo[3] was built a week ago and was pushed
to stable five days ago, so most beta users should have the new
version.
If you're
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697634
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.006-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697635
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697630
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
77 matches
Mail list logo
