* John Harris:
> On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 9:27:56 AM MST Chris Peters wrote:
>> Maybe the code of conduct could politely nudge people towards *quality* over
>> quantity (so that voices don't get drowned and big threads aren't so
>> tiresome to keep up with)
>
> Such a rule would make it very
Responding to the first message because I'm not interested in further
discussion. It's clear to me that there will be no agreement in this
matter unless there are reasonable potential alternatives. Therefore,
this message is just to let you all know that I'm at least trying to
push for better
Packages are now built. Update is submitted for F31
[https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-af50f19b83].
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 08:08:23AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started doing the rebuilds now. I'll submit buildroot overrides
> as I go. (I was hoping
Hello,
A reminder of today's meeting at 1500UTC in #fedora-neuro on Freenode
(details below).
Please inform me if you'd like to add new items to the agenda. I'll see
you there!
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 15:57:46 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> You are invited to attend the Open
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
9 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:32 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> Also python36, python35, and python34.
They could have been pulled in via Recommends:
$ dnf repoquery --whatrecommends python38
python3-tox-0:3.5.3-3.fc30.noarch
$ dnf repoquery --whatrecommends python36
asv-0:0.3.1-7.fc30.x86_64
Also python36, python35, and python34.
I'm 100% confident that I never explicitly installed these.
Having python38 broke my devel setup due to there being no Cython in
/usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/... I don't know how long it was
broken. Very annoying to discover this.
How do I prevent
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190828.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190829.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 23
Dropped packages:24
Upgraded packages: 91
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 209.44 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Guys, I'm still getting this message:
fedpkg update
Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: Cannot find
release associated with build: copyq-3.9.2-1.fc31, tags: ['f31']
A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last
I just checked bodhi and other packages
On 29. 08. 19 15:31, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
Also python36, python35, and python34.
I'm 100% confident that I never explicitly installed these.
Having python38 broke my devel setup due to there being no Cython in
/usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/... I don't know how long it was broken.
On 8/26/19 3:43 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:46 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> We're just over a month away from Hacktoberfest[1], a month-long event
>> where people can earn a t-shirt by contributing to open source
>> projects (or at least ones hosted on GitHub). It occurs
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 17:36, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> If I do that, I believe I get into a situation where the other builds f29,
> f30 and F32 are behind, which if I remember correctly causes other issues -
> and shouldn't we understand what is wrong with the system rather than just
> trying
Thanks all for the replies... I was under the impression from the previous
response I needed to submit to bodhi, but I believe I misinterpreted and
that was intended for future changes going forward. Looking at bodhi now
it's a little confusing seeing f29, f30 and f32 there but no f31.
On Thu,
On 8/27/19 5:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> I think that all the major milestones happen typically on Tuesday, so
>> this must have been (unfortunate) typo IMO.
>
> But the point is that this was corrected less than 24 hours before the
> freeze kicks in. This is a completely
On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 5:46:58 PM MST Christopher wrote:
> > > A similar idea that would keep it separate from the installer might be
> > > to offer a dialogue as a "first-boot"
On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 07:56 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Guys, I'm still getting this message:
> fedpkg update
> Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: Cannot find
> release associated with build: copyq-3.9.2-1.fc31, tags: ['f31']
> A copy of the filled in template is saved
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:47:49 -0700
"Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
> I'm still getting these messages when I try to do "fedpkg update" for
> F31:
>
> fedpkg update
> Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: Cannot
> find release associated with build: copyq-3.9.2-1.fc31, tags:
mcatanz...@gnome.org writes:
> Well the thing is, blocknig ports tends to break applications that want
> to use those ports. We're not going to do that, period. It also doesn't
> really accomplish anything: either your app or service needs network
> access and you have whitelisted it (in which
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:11 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris
> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 5:46:58 PM MST Christopher wrote:
> > > > A similar idea that would keep it separate from
If I do that, I believe I get into a situation where the other builds f29,
f30 and F32 are behind, which if I remember correctly causes other issues -
and shouldn't we understand what is wrong with the system rather than just
trying to hack around it?
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:17 PM Adam
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 18:06, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> Thanks all for the replies... I was under the impression from the previous
> response I needed to submit to bodhi, but I believe I misinterpreted and that
> was intended for future changes going forward. Looking at bodhi now it's a
>
On Tuesday, June 4, 2019 9:43:53 AM CEST Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 6/4/19 9:56 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
>
> > Dne 31. 05. 19 v 2:15 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
> >
> >> On Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:38:25 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dne 29. 05. 19 v 23:52 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> >>>
>
Aug 29, 2019, 00:23 by joh...@splentity.com:
> On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 9:27:56 AM MST Chris Peters wrote:
>
>> Maybe the code of conduct could politely nudge people towards *quality* over
>> quantity (so that voices don't get drowned and big threads aren't so
>> tiresome to keep up with)
>>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:36 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 25. 08. 19 v 14:06 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Right now, the snakeyaml package in fedora is out of date by more than
> > three years (1.17, released in February 2016). We plan to merge the PR
> > rebasing it
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 29, 2019, at 12:58 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, June 4, 2019 9:43:53 AM CEST Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>> On 6/4/19 9:56 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
>>>
>>> Dne 31. 05. 19 v 2:15 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
>>>
> On Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:38:25 AM CEST
Several of us are getting errors in our c++ packages related to missing PIC
flags in aarch64.
Something is amiss there. A small snippet from openmpi:
make[2]: Entering directory
'/builddir/build/BUILD/openmpi-4.0.2rc1/ompi/mpi/cxx'
/bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -DNDEBUG
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If I say:
>
> 2019-08-20 at 00:00UTC I think I can guess this to be the very start of
> that day, perhaps?
>
> 2019-08-29 at 24:00UTC is... what? the last miliseconds of that day and
> thus really right next to 2019-08-30 00:00UTC?
2019-08-29 24:00UTC = 2019-08-30 00:00UTC
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Also this bugzilla was open to let users remove them and not get them
> again when the package that recommends them updates, but the dnf team
> disagrees:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699672
Maybe it would be time for FESCo to require them to implement
On 29. 08. 19 23:54, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
Also this bugzilla was open to let users remove them and not get them
again when the package that recommends them updates, but the dnf team
disagrees:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699672
Maybe it would be time for
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 2:54:57 AM MST Chris Peters wrote:
> PS I won't take this thread any further. The irony of a back and forth in
> the back and forth thread doesn't escape me!
I couldn't disagree with that any more!!!
--
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity
https://splentity.com/
On 8/27/19 8:36 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
Regarding NNTP I've haven't used newsreaders in years and to be honest dealing
with yet another tool isn't something I would want to do
I forgot what email client you use, but all clients I ever used (Emacs
and Thunderbird) also do NNTP. After all,
On 8/29/2019 8:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 -0400, Christopher wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris wrote:
It might be okay to be a GNOME-specific thing, as that's the only spin of
Fedora which is affected by this decision.
The default firewall
I got a warning about not having urls for a couple of files in the
squashfs-tools package from release monitoring.
The bug which has the comment is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747102
These are based on some man pages used in Debian at one time, but do not
track changes in the
Hello testers!
After Flock 2019 this year, it became apparent that there are several folks
who would like to join the testing effort, but do not want to use IRC and
would prefer to communicate over Telegram. Consequently, we have started a
Telegram group that testers can join to communicate with
Is there something odd going on with arch aarch64 -- openmpi builds are
failing on that arch.
On Thursday, August 29, 2019, 04:37:55 AM EDT, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
Packages are now built. Update is submitted for F31
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> 24:00 does not exist? Or to me it makes as little sense as 00:00.
>
You're technically correct, which Futurama taught me is the best kind
of correct. I've seen it to mean "midnight at the end of the day" in
order to distinguish from "midnight
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:27 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 8/26/19 3:43 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:46 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>
> >> We're just over a month away from Hacktoberfest[1], a month-long event
> >> where people can earn a t-shirt by contributing to open
On 8/29/19 11:05 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> 24:00 does not exist? Or to me it makes as little sense as 00:00.
>>
> You're technically correct, which Futurama taught me is the best kind
> of correct. I've seen it to mean "midnight at the end of
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:05 PM Philip Kovacs via devel
wrote:
> Is there something odd going on with arch aarch64 -- openmpi builds are
> failing on that arch.
There sure is. I had the same thing happen with a qd build. Look for
this in your build log:
checking for g++ option to produce
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:51 PM Greg Hellings wrote:
>
> The jenkins pacakge is fearfully out of date and seems unmaintained. Does
> anyone know how to get in touch with the maintainer(s) of the package?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560603
It's not only out of date, but also
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 14:26, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> I got a warning about not having urls for a couple of files in the
> squashfs-tools package from release monitoring.
> The bug which has the comment is:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747102
>
> These are based on some man
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:44 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 8/29/19 11:05 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>
> >> 24:00 does not exist? Or to me it makes as little sense as 00:00.
> >>
> > You're technically correct, which Futurama taught me is the
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:24 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Debian has a permissive firewall
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianFirewall
And Ubuntu, Mint, elementary, MX Linux, Solus, pop!_OS, as well. By
permissive, they all accept everything. Nothing is rejected or
dropped.
Mageia, and openSUSE do
The jenkins pacakge is fearfully out of date and seems unmaintained. Does
anyone know how to get in touch with the maintainer(s) of the package?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560603
--Greg
___
devel mailing list --
Thanks Jerry -- what you describe is exactly what I am seeing in the build.log
Phil
On Thursday, August 29, 2019, 04:20:22 PM EDT, Jerry James
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:05 PM Philip Kovacs via devel
wrote:
> Is there something odd going on with arch aarch64 -- openmpi builds
> On Aug 27, 2019, at 8:01 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> the svnmailer package has recently been orphaned and will be retired if
> nobody picks it up.
>
> The package provides a tool to email emailed notifications of events in
> subversion repositories. It is written in Python (2)
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 11:11:43 AM MST Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:51 PM Greg Hellings
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The jenkins pacakge is fearfully out of date and seems unmaintained. Does
> > anyone know how to get in touch with the maintainer(s) of the package?
>
> >
> >
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746534
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 3:50:19 AM MST Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> Responding to the first message because I'm not interested in further
> discussion. It's clear to me that there will be no agreement in this
> matter unless there are reasonable potential alternatives. Therefore,
> this message is
> On Aug 26, 2019, at 7:57 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>
> It is intended for both py2 and py3 packages to be parallel installed,
> correct?
They are supposed to be entirely distinct binary rpms, even if built from the
same stone. *By convention*, the non-numbered binary is the linked to the
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 5:29:32 PM MST Christopher wrote:
> Workstation is the primary product. Some choose that not for GNOME...
> but because they want to start with the most base product and
> customize from there. If you start with a Spin, you may get something
> pre-configured in a very
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:34:09 AM MST Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> mcatanz...@gnome.org writes:
>
>
> > Well the thing is, blocknig ports tends to break applications that want
> > to use those ports. We're not going to do that, period. It also doesn't
> > really accomplish anything:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:12 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:24 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > Debian has a permissive firewall
> > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianFirewall
>
> And Ubuntu, Mint, elementary, MX Linux, Solus, pop!_OS, as well. By
> permissive, they all accept
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:18 PM Japheth Cleaver wrote:
>
> On 8/29/2019 8:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris wrote:
> >>> It might be okay to be a GNOME-specific thing, as that's the only spin
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:12:22 AM MST Dan Book wrote:
> I would agree, but people do install multiple desktops after installing a
> spin. Such a use case needs to be considered (not sure if it matters,
> though).
This is definitely not the ideal scenario, especially not from the case of the
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 11:17:11 AM MST Japheth Cleaver wrote:
> On 8/29/2019 8:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> It might be okay to be a GNOME-specific
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 1:11:02 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:24 AM Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Debian has a permissive firewall
> > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianFirewall
>
>
> And Ubuntu, Mint, elementary, MX Linux, Solus, pop!_OS, as well. By
>
/me sending the email second time as the first attempt bounced back to me
Hi Greg,
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. The package is, unfortunately,
broken in all supported Fedora releases. The version of the package is the
last stable release from 1.x branch, but upstream is now (and has
On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 10:31:54 PM MST Christopher wrote:
> We're getting off-topic, but really quickly: Yes, you can select
> advanced packaging (at least you could in the past... probably still
> can). You can also use kickstart to automate installs with custom
> package installations and
Debian has a permissive firewall
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianFirewall
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746739
Bug ID: 1746739
Summary: Upgrade perl-Test2-Suite to 0.000126
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test2-Suite
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746739
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746739
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:53 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 03:16, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >
> > Fedora infrastructure has been asked [1] to enable Koschei [2] for
> > EPEL 8. Would this be useful to anyone? If yes, which of build targets
> > (epel8-candidate,
On 29. 08. 19 10:19, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 29. 08. 19 5:25, Scott Talbert wrote:
On 27. 08. 19 22:20, Miro Hrončok wrote:
python27 build in progress.
Will retire python2 later tomorrow or on Friday (in case something is terribly
broken I want to have some maneuvering space).
Hey Miro,
I
On 29. 08. 19 5:25, Scott Talbert wrote:
On 27. 08. 19 22:20, Miro Hrončok wrote:
python27 build in progress.
Will retire python2 later tomorrow or on Friday (in case something is terribly
broken I want to have some maneuvering space).
Hey Miro,
I can't rebuild python-wxpython4 with the new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746534
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746531
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746531
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-BerkeleyDB-0.63-2.el8
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747059
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring@fedoraproject.org's scratch build of
perl-Gtk3-0.036-1.fc29.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37339136
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747079
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring@fedoraproject.org's scratch build of
perl-File-Next-1.18-1.fc29.src.rpm for rawhide completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746993
Bug ID: 1746993
Summary: perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.92 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-WWW-Mechanize
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747059
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1609578
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1609578=edit
[patch] Update to 0.036 (#1747059)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747059
Bug ID: 1747059
Summary: perl-Gtk3-0.036 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Gtk3
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747071
Bug ID: 1747071
Summary: perl-Gtk2-1.24993 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Gtk2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747071
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1609586
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1609586=edit
[patch] Update to 1.24993 (#1747071)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747071
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring@fedoraproject.org's scratch build of
perl-Gtk2-1.24993-1.fc29.src.rpm for rawhide completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747079
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1609592
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1609592=edit
[patch] Update to 1.18 (#1747079)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747079
Bug ID: 1747079
Summary: perl-File-Next-1.18 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-File-Next
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747118
Bug ID: 1747118
Summary: perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.06 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Daemon
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1742782
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740546
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397732
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745562
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-TrailingSpace-0.0302-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743742
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743746
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746993
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jples...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745563
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747071
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747182
Bug ID: 1747182
Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.62 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Locale-Codes
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747170
Bug ID: 1747170
Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.78 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Date-Manip
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743746
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2019 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2019
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743742
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.1 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744692
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744360
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744701
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746531
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746533
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744676
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744361
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
