[Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Rawhide 20191129.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 32 Rawhide 20191129.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

CPE Weekly: 2019-11-29

Hi everyone, Welcome to the CPE team weekly project update mail! Background: The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep core servers and services running and maintained, build releases, and

Review swap: bcftools

* Review Request: bcftools - Tools for genomic variant calling and manipulating VCF/BCF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774741 Bio science tool. C language. No sub package. This new package is necessary to upgrade current samtools 0.1 to 1.9. Because some functions in

libqalculate soname change

libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.6.0. The following packages are affected - plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I will rebuild all the packages on rawhide. Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: Fedora-Rawhide-20191129.n.0 compose check report

On Fri, 2019-11-29 at 15:46 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! > 10 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing > openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** > below > > Failed

Re: do not remove arpack package from Fedora

Fabio Valentini wrote: > I'm not really sure what you want to say here. There's a pretty strict > policy about what changes provenpackagers are "allowed" to make to > "foreign" packages, and it doesn't include pushing minor improvements. Well, in practice, a provenpackager can usually get away

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2019-12-02 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for Monday. I don't have any urgent business. We have a couple of open proposals (Pat's test case proposal and Kamil's asynchronous blocker process proposal) but I think it makes sense to kick those around on the list for a bit longer before

Re: Orphaning owncloud and nextcloud

Yes i'm going to update it to the newest version this weekend thanks for following up! On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 5:12 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 10. 19 14:28, Ivan Chavero wrote: > > I can take over nextcloud > > Hello Ivan. I appreciate that you have taken nextcloud. However, do you >

Re: do not remove arpack package from Fedora

Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler said: > Well, in practice, a provenpackager can usually get away with just pushing > stuff as long as nobody complains, and in particular with just pushing > pretty much anything to effectively unmaintained packages. :-) And I don't > really see a problem with

Fedora-Cloud-30-20191130.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: couldn't compile vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.147 on rawhide - python: Command not found

for the moment i have solved it by this line in the spec file. %if 0%{?fedora} >= 31 sed -i -e 's|PYTHON ?= python|PYTHON ?= python3|' Make.config %endif Thanks for your answer. Regards Martin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: do not remove arpack package from Fedora

On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 11:40 AM Felix Schwarz wrote: Hi Felix! > Am 29.11.19 um 11:18 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > > My effort is to raise the awareness about he failure. Despite my large > > effort, > > I cannot possibly fix all the build failures in Fedora. > > I just wanted to mention that I

Re: Orphaning owncloud and nextcloud

On 31. 10. 19 14:28, Ivan Chavero wrote: I can take over nextcloud Hello Ivan. I appreciate that you have taken nextcloud. However, do you actually plan to update it? There is: nextcloud-17.0.1 is available (but we have 10.0.4) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640558 Nextcloud

Looking for co-maintainers for blueman

Some time ago I adopted blueman, as it has been orphaned and I, being a user, wanted to keep it around. Unfortunately I know very little Python (which blueman is written in) and even less about the Bluetooth stack on Linux, and as a result the bug reports for blueman have been piling up. As

Re: Looking for co-maintainers for blueman

Hi Artur, Am 29.11.19 um 12:35 schrieb Artur Iwicki: > Some time ago I adopted blueman, as it has been orphaned and I, being a user, > wanted to keep it around. > > Unfortunately I know very little Python (which blueman is written in) and > even less about the Bluetooth stack on Linux, and as

Re: couldn't compile vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.147 on rawhide - python: Command not found

On 29. 11. 19 12:44, Artur Iwicki wrote: You'll need to either edit the Makefile so it explicitly calls python3, or add a BuildRequires: for "python-unversioned-command". The second is forbidden in the Python guidelines.

Re: couldn't compile vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.147 on rawhide - python: Command not found

On 29. 11. 19 14:02, Martin Gansser wrote: for the moment i have solved it by this line in the spec file. %if 0%{?fedora} >= 31 sed -i -e 's|PYTHON ?= python|PYTHON ?= python3|' Make.config %endif Maybe exporting the environment variable PYTHON=%{python3} would do as well. -- Miro Hrončok --

Re: do not remove arpack package from Fedora

Am 29.11.19 um 11:18 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > My effort is to raise the awareness about he failure. Despite my large effort, > I cannot possibly fix all the build failures in Fedora. I just wanted to mention that I appreciate your efforts. I think the "fallout" from retired packages may be a

couldn't compile vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.147 on rawhide - python: Command not found

Hi, the package vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.147 doesn't compile on rawhide see build.log [1] In the file Make.config the python 3 conditions already included. I'm not sure if python 3.8 is the problem. How can i solve this issue ? [1]

Re: couldn't compile vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.147 on rawhide - python: Command not found

You'll need to either edit the Makefile so it explicitly calls python3, or add a BuildRequires: for "python-unversioned-command". ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)

On 29. 11. 19 0:38, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 08:05, Miro Hrončok wrote: golang-gopkg-sourcemapeclipseo, go-sig, jchaloup Fedora 28 This is obsoleted by golang-gopkg-sourcemap-1, has a dead.package, and should be retired already.

Re: do not remove arpack package from Fedora

Le 2019-11-29 11:39, Felix Schwarz a écrit : Am 29.11.19 um 11:18 schrieb Miro Hrončok: My effort is to raise the awareness about he failure. Despite my large effort, I cannot possibly fix all the build failures in Fedora. I just wanted to mention that I appreciate your efforts. I think the

Fedora-Cloud-31-20191129.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: do not remove arpack package from Fedora

On 29. 11. 19 2:53, Conrad Sand wrote: Hi Miro, Please _do not_ remove arpack and arpack-devel. Sure, please rebuilt it. Orion has started to work on it in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/arpack/pull-request/1 A lot of other packages depend on that. At least 49 according to the

Fedora-Rawhide-20191129.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 10 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 26/161 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191129.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191128.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191129.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 11 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 115 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 5.30 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Fedora Release page on wiki not created?

On 11/20/19 2:22 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019, 19:00 Carlos O'Donell > wrote: > > The Fedora change template here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EmptyTemplate > > Says you should reference the "Targeted release" in the status. > > For

[Bug 1774799] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774799 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1774785] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20191120 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774785 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1774799] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774799 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.2

[Bug 1774785] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20191120 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774785 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2019 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2019

[Bug 1744690] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Plack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744690 Bug 1744690 depends on bug 1771717, which changed state. Bug 1771717 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771717 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1772356] perl-GnuPG-Interface EPEL 8 package

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772356 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1777953] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9180 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1777953 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1778199] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9902 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778199 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1772356] perl-GnuPG-Interface EPEL 8 package

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772356 Bug 1772356 depends on bug 1772395, which changed state. Bug 1772395 Summary: perl-MooX-late for EL8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772395 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1771711] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-LWP-Protocol-http10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771711 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1771715] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Stream-Buffered

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771715 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1744690] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Plack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744690 Bug 1744690 depends on bug 1771702, which changed state. Bug 1771702 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Cookie-Baker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771702 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1744690] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Plack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744690 Bug 1744690 depends on bug 1771707, which changed state. Bug 1771707 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-PSGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771707 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1771705] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-HTTP-Entity-Parser

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771705 Bug 1771705 depends on bug 1771715, which changed state. Bug 1771715 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Stream-Buffered https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771715 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1772395] perl-MooX-late for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772395 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1771707] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-PSGI

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771707 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1744690] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Plack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744690 Bug 1744690 depends on bug 1771711, which changed state. Bug 1771711 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-LWP-Protocol-http10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771711 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1771717] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771717 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1771702] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Cookie-Baker

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771702 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1771705] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-HTTP-Entity-Parser

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771705 Bug 1771705 depends on bug 1771717, which changed state. Bug 1771717 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771717 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1744690] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Plack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744690 Bug 1744690 depends on bug 1771715, which changed state. Bug 1771715 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Stream-Buffered https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771715 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1771703] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Devel-StackTrace-AsHTML

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771703 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1744690] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Plack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744690 Bug 1744690 depends on bug 1771703, which changed state. Bug 1771703 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Devel-StackTrace-AsHTML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771703 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1778302] New: please build perl-Glib for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778302 Bug ID: 1778302 Summary: please build perl-Glib for EPEL8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Glib Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com

[Bug 1777953] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9180 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1777953 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1777953] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9180 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1777953 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-914c4cf918 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-914c4cf918 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1777953] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9180 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1777953 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1778199] New: perl-CPANPLUS-0.9902 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778199 Bug ID: 1778199 Summary: perl-CPANPLUS-0.9902 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CPANPLUS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1778199] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9902 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778199 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1744690] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Plack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744690 --- Comment #11 from Xavier Bachelot --- (In reply to Emmanuel Seyman from comment #10) > (In reply to Xavier Bachelot from comment #8) > > lighttpd and lighttpd-fastcgi deps should be ok now. I've added dependencies > > on their related

[Bug 1778199] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9902 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778199 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|