Re: Tox automation in packaging macros

2020-01-12 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 07 January 2020 at 14:32, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 07. 01. 20 14:06, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > - python / pypi works great for %build and %install, but until testing > > > with tox is automated in packaging macros,

Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)

2020-01-12 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le samedi 11 janvier 2020 à 13:09 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > The only reason I mentioned it is because since we distro-sync > between > releases, it doesn't actually matter as much as it used to. rawhide does not distro-sync (and some may say that rawhide does not matter, but early problem

Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)

2020-01-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 4:03 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le samedi 11 janvier 2020 à 13:09 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > > > The only reason I mentioned it is because since we distro-sync > > between > > releases, it doesn't actually matter as much as it used to. > > rawhide does

Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!

2020-01-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 06:25:31AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:47 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 02:17:40PM -0500, John Florian wrote: > > > desired impact, but we should practice what we preach, at minimum: > > > make Fedora a selection for

Using pantheon as a standalone de

2020-01-12 Thread Harsh Jain
Whenever I install pantheon using the terminal , a gnome session is always installed with it . Also pantheon doesn't install lightdm properly because if i remove all other de's and then install pantheon i only get started in a tty and have no way to access it .I would like to help solve these

[Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200112.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2020-01-12 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200112.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Upgrading libffi

2020-01-12 Thread Anthony Green
Kevin Fenzi writes: > Sounds good to me. If you run into any issues let me know. I've run three kinds of problems so far... * programs that link against both libffi and other libraries that link to libffi (eg. glib2, gobject-introspection). We need to push new versions of these libraries

Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem

2020-01-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 3:53 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 1/7/20 11:16 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Chris Murphy wrote: > >> Stacked images on the same media functionality is in the kernel, it's > >> not complicated, it's well tested, doesn't require any gymnastics in > >> the initramfs - your

Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)

2020-01-12 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 10.01.2020 17:36, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Do we want to drop release and changelog from our spec file? YES. Changelogs can be automatically generated from Fedora Git SCM commits. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel

Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)

2020-01-12 Thread Marius Schwarz
Am 10.01.20 um 17:36 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon: > Good Morning Everyone, > > This is not a new idea, it has been presented at flock last year and spoken > about on this very list this fall, so I'd like to push it a little further. > > Do we want to drop release and changelog from our spec file?

dnf autoremove by default on upgrades

2020-01-12 Thread Chris Murphy
Hi, This might be a bad idea. But I'm looking for better ideas than status quo. A known problem is upgraded systems get crusty over time. Maybe folks should clean install more often, yet they don't. If there's a new good idea, but it's a short term solution, the fact it'll live forever acts as

Re: dnf autoremove by default on upgrades

2020-01-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 07:15:39PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > Hi, > > This might be a bad idea. But I'm looking for better ideas than status quo. > > A known problem is upgraded systems get crusty over time. Maybe folks > should clean install more often, yet they don't. > > If there's a new

Re: dnf autoremove by default on upgrades

2020-01-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:39 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 07:15:39PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This might be a bad idea. But I'm looking for better ideas than status quo. > > > > A known problem is upgraded systems get crusty over time. Maybe folks > > should

Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)

2020-01-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 01. 20 22:19, Marius Schwarz wrote: Am 10.01.20 um 17:36 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon: Good Morning Everyone, This is not a new idea, it has been presented at flock last year and spoken about on this very list this fall, so I'd like to push it a little further. Do we want to drop release

Re: dnf autoremove by default on upgrades

2020-01-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:16 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > Hi, > > This might be a bad idea. But I'm looking for better ideas than status quo. > > A known problem is upgraded systems get crusty over time. Maybe folks should > clean install more often, yet they don't. > > If there's a new good idea,

Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem

2020-01-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:45 AM Bohdan Khomutskyi wrote: > Hello, > > I posted more benchmark results in this article: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Changes/OptimizeSquashFS > Cool! Do you have any tests to compare plain squashfs xz with zstd? The nested ext4 stuff is really

Re: Tox automation in packaging macros

2020-01-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 01. 20 16:47, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 10:02 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Tuesday, 07 January 2020 at 14:32, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 07. 01. 20 14:06, Fabio Valentini wrote: - python / pypi

Re: Upgrading libffi

2020-01-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 01. 20 13:38, Anthony Green wrote: * I can't get any python to mockbuild, even without the new libffi. There's an error in the %install process. Known problem? What does "any python" mean? python26, python27, python3, python39, python37, python36, python35, python34, pypy, pypy3

Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem

2020-01-12 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 1/7/20 11:16 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Chris Murphy wrote: Stacked images on the same media functionality is in the kernel, it's not complicated, it's well tested, doesn't require any gymnastics in the initramfs - your bootloader entries can each point to different root=UUIDs and image

Re: Tox automation in packaging macros

2020-01-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 01. 20 10:02, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Tuesday, 07 January 2020 at 14:32, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 07. 01. 20 14:06, Fabio Valentini wrote: - python / pypi works great for %build and %install, but until testing with

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

2020-01-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
Dear maintainers. Based on the latest fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching (February 2020). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The

Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)

2020-01-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 4:20 PM Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Am 10.01.20 um 17:36 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > This is not a new idea, it has been presented at flock last year and spoken > > about on this very list this fall, so I'd like to push it a little further.

Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)

2020-01-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 10. 01. 20 17:36, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Is there a different approach, e.g. by using towncrier[1] or something comparable, to track changes outside the spec file? Is the idea of using annotated git tags abandoned altogether? We could even create a tool that would "prefill" a template

Re: Lagging system with latest kernels

2020-01-12 Thread Chris Murphy
When his happens, I see 100% kswapd in top; but no change in swap pagein/pageout at all. In fact, minimal I/O. That lead me to this bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110501 And also to this recent kernel work, not yet landed and which may not be related (since there's not much I/O

Re: Upgrading libffi

2020-01-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 07:38:01AM -0500, Anthony Green wrote: > Kevin Fenzi writes: > > Sounds good to me. If you run into any issues let me know. > > I've run three kinds of problems so far... > > * programs that link against both libffi and other libraries that link > to libffi (eg.

Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem

2020-01-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 05:44:33PM +0100, Bohdan Khomutskyi wrote: > Hello, > > I posted more benchmark results in this article: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Changes/OptimizeSquashFS > > In short, bigger block size and higher compression ratio does not increase > the installation

Re: Orphaning exciting

2020-01-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 04:54:00PM -, Marcin Dulak wrote: > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/exciting > > Have not received upstream response about build problems: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741509 I'd suggest adding the note that was added to that bug to the

Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)

2020-01-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 04:38:55AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 4:03 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel > wrote: > > > > Le samedi 11 janvier 2020 à 13:09 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > > > > > The only reason I mentioned it is because since we distro-sync > > > between > > >

Re: Review swaps for odoc

2020-01-12 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On Sunday, 12 January 2020 06:40:41 CET Jerry James wrote: > Greetings all, > > Dan Čermák and I have been talking about getting Facebook's Infer tool > into Fedora. Infer is a static code analyzer for C, C#, C++, and > Java. I've put together package reviews for a batch of dependencies. > The

Fedora-Rawhide-20200112.n.0 compose check report

2020-01-12 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 4/155 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200112.n.0 changes

2020-01-12 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200111.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200112.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 36 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 5.81 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem

2020-01-12 Thread Bohdan Khomutskyi
Hello, I posted more benchmark results in this article: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Changes/OptimizeSquashFS In short, bigger block size and higher compression ratio does not increase the installation time for Fedora Workstation. I saw the opposite effect. The Zstd compression

Orphaning htmlcleaner

2020-01-12 Thread Marcin Dulak
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/htmlcleaner Have not maintained it for a time long enough. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Orphaning exciting

2020-01-12 Thread Marcin Dulak
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/exciting Have not received upstream response about build problems: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741509 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Orphaning htmlcleaner

2020-01-12 Thread Raphael Groner
What about BeautifulSoup as an alternative? https://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/bs4/doc/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: New packager: girst

2020-01-12 Thread Raphael Groner
Cool. I hope to have given him some useful and first hints by PM in IRC to join as packager. Thanks for all the coaching, everyone begins with a small intention. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Tox automation in packaging macros

2020-01-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 10:02 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 07 January 2020 at 14:32, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 07. 01. 20 14:06, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > - python / pypi works great for %build and

Re: Lagging system with latest kernels

2020-01-12 Thread Hans Ulrich Niedermann
On Thu, 09 Jan 2020 16:51:36 +0100 Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > Le 2020-01-09 15:02, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit : > > > I have seen something like this happen in the past. I think it was > > around Fedora 18? kernel time frame.. on certain Lenovo T440? if you > > did a dd to a usb key,

[Bug 1790306] New: perl-Log-Any-1.708 is available

2020-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790306 Bug ID: 1790306 Summary: perl-Log-Any-1.708 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Log-Any Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1789918] please build perl-Font-TTF-1.06 for EPEL 8

2020-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789918 Sergio Monteiro Basto changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-01-13 - 95% PASS

2020-01-12 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/01/13/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.0-20200113git49ccb4d.fc31.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1729976] Add perl-LWP-Protocol-connect to EPEL-7

2020-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1729976 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client --- This package has changed maintainer in the Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1790228] New: perl-App-Cme-1.031 is available

2020-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790228 Bug ID: 1790228 Summary: perl-App-Cme-1.031 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-App-Cme Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1729976] Add perl-LWP-Protocol-connect to EPEL-7

2020-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1729976 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client --- This package has changed maintainer in the Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[EPEL-devel] Re: Software Collection packages for EPEL

2020-01-12 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 12:13, Dmitry Butskoy wrote: > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >>> OK we are now syncing to rhel-7-server-devtools-rpms and those have > >>> the needed rust-toolset, llvm-toolset and other tools which someone > >>> needing to rebuild chromium or seamonkey. Please test and let me