No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210312.0):
ID: 812503 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812503
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938401
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
ack-3.5.0-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63679698
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938401
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1763116
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1763116=edit
[patch] Update to 3.5.0 (#1938401)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938401
Bug ID: 1938401
Summary: ack-3.5.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: ack
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/13/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210313gitd5fdea905.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:13 PM Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:21:18 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >I would put it this way: this change _helps recognize_ that Fedora is more
> >than its main product. This isn't new; EPEL has been part of Fedora since
> >the beginning, and CoreOS has
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938396
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been
automatically reported. Sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938396
Bug ID: 1938396
Summary: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.106 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938391
Bug ID: 1938391
Summary: perl-App-Cmd-0.332 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-App-Cmd
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:21:18 -0500, you wrote:
>I would put it this way: this change _helps recognize_ that Fedora is more
>than its main product. This isn't new; EPEL has been part of Fedora since
>the beginning, and CoreOS has been since it replaced Project Atomic.
You want this change to do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-6ea87879a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-8fadb4aed9 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7333ebbdac has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-bc3f221973 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-8ad5d5b268 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938334
Bug ID: 1938334
Summary: perl-PDL-2.029 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PDL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838000
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1938330
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837988
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1938329
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837975
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1938328
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
=
#fedora-meeting: ELN (2021-03-12)
=
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:07:34 UTC. The full logs are available
at
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 01:18:29PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Here is a quick and dirty for the last week separated out by age group. I
> don't remember what they 'mean' other than 1 is less than a week and 4 is
> over 4 months?.
1 = first week
2 = first month (2-4 weeks)
3 = six
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 12:51, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:10:50AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> > It may also have something to do with what Marius said about Fedora
> possibly
> > running on Pinephone and other devices, which apparently need bleeding
> edge stuff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938300
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been
automatically reported. Sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938300
Bug ID: 1938300
Summary: perl-WWW-Shorten-3.094 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-WWW-Shorten
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
We have a number of people interested in rebooting the Websites team, and
taking ownership of some of the webapps that help the Fedora community
function. (This started around working on Møte, the meeting-log site, but
has grown from there.)
At a meeting today, we decided that this team will
On 3/12/21 6:50 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
If both client and server are OpenSSH 7.2 or later, and an ssh-rsa key
is involved, then one of the newer signature schemes rsa-sha2-256 and
rsa-sha2-512 will be used, and you won't have any trouble.
Unless it's OpenSSH server 7.4 (as in Debian 9).
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 01:32:53PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> It is already here: https://release-monitoring.org/project/53453/
I'm not sure what you mean by 'hyperkitty project' ?
There's a group of folks working on the packaging in Fedora.
mailman3 is already packaged up, I'm not
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:10:50AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> It may also have something to do with what Marius said about Fedora possibly
> running on Pinephone and other devices, which apparently need bleeding edge
> stuff that's only in Rawhide.
>
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:21:45AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> AIUI end users are typing in these URLs and we download them on
> demand.
>
> (I only wrote a very low-level component in this huge stack of cloud
> stuff so I don't have the full picture, but the additional
> complication I
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/118 (aarch64), 6/187 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210311.n.0):
ID: 810978 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810978
ID: 810984 Test: aarch64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938015
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Mojolicious-9.07 is|perl-Mojolicious-9.08 is
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 26/187 (x86_64), 43/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
Just one blocker not in VERIFIED state today. The next go/no-go
meeting is Thursday for a target release date of 23 March.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. systemd — systemd-resolved: stub resolver is not following CNAME
for resolution — NEW
ACTION:
On 11/03/2021 23:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 03:50:57PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/03/2021 12:13, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>>>
I really hope we don't remove the ability to connect to old servers
(eg. running RHEL 5). At the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-bc3f221973 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-bc3f221973
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210311.0):
ID: 811302 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811302
ID: 811311 Test:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-6ea87879a8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6ea87879a8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-50861bdb62 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-50861bdb62
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-re-engine-RE2` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-re-engine-RE2/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-re-engine-RE2` that
you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-re-engine-RE2/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210311.0):
ID: 811191 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811191
ID:
On 09/03/21 09:15 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
Some time ago gcc, binutils IIRC received an update for ac 2.71 so at least
those two should be by now off-the-table (Am I right?).
No. GCC has a hard requirement on autoconf-2.69, but the Fedora
package doesn't need to run autoconf for it (that
V Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:34:30AM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman napsal(a):
> I've just orphaned the perl-re-engine-RE2 package. If someone wishes to
> take it up, it's yours.
>
I took it.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
perl-devel
V Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:34:30AM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman napsal(a):
> I've just orphaned the perl-re-engine-RE2 package. If someone wishes to
> take it up, it's yours.
>
I took it.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing
Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:53:01AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> > Do I understand it correctly that soon, I will have trouble connecting to
> >
> > $(grep ssh-rsa ~/.ssh/known_hosts | cut -f1 -d' ')
> >
> > hosts?
> > Should I regenerate the ssh key there? What is the
OLD: Fedora-34-20210311.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210312.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 10
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 78
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 593.59 MiB
Size of dropped packages:213.01 KiB
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210311.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210312.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 6
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:9
Upgraded packages: 75
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 3.28 MiB
Size of dropped packages
It is already here: https://release-monitoring.org/project/53453/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|emman...@seyman.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7333ebbdac has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7333ebbdac
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-8ad5d5b268 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8ad5d5b268
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-8fadb4aed9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8fadb4aed9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-677512a77b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-677512a77b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-PostgreSQL` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-PostgreSQL/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras and EPEL ≥ 8.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing
ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-PostgreSQL`
that you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-PostgreSQL/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Czkawka [1] is a program that can be used to find and remove duplicate files.
It is written in Rust and offers a GTK3 interface.
I looked briefly into packaging this myself, since I already have two Rust
packages under my belt, but czkawka is split into three parts: core [2], cli
[3], and gui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
It may also have something to do with what Marius said about Fedora possibly
running on Pinephone and other devices, which apparently need bleeding edge
stuff that's only in Rawhide.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172
Bug ID: 1938172
Summary: perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-PostgreSQL
Keywords: FutureFeature,
V Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:53:01AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> Do I understand it correctly that soon, I will have trouble connecting to
>
> $(grep ssh-rsa ~/.ssh/known_hosts | cut -f1 -d' ')
>
> hosts?
> Should I regenerate the ssh key there? What is the prefered crypto nowadays?
>
No.
Due to side-tags, Rawhide is much better place to live then it used to be.
Vít
Dne 11. 03. 21 v 18:14 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
I’m looking at the mirror statistics, and in addition to the general
positive upward trend, I noticed something interesting. Rawhide was,
relatively speaking, at
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:00:44PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 05:06:30PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/33/Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-33-1.2.x86_64.raw.xz
> >
> > You probably won't be able
Dne 10. 03. 21 v 18:58 Daniel Pocock napsal(a):
- did anybody already write any wiki page, FAQ or guide for Fedora users
to navigate the SHA-1 issue in SSH?
+1
I do not follow this issue and I would welcome nice HOWTO document.
Do I understand it correctly that soon, I will have trouble
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210311.0):
ID: 810435 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
70 matches
Mail list logo
