Hi,
just a minor suggestion:
On November 15, 2021 7:15:49 PM UTC, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
>Overall arm32 is generally waning with generally few new ARMv7 devices
>added to Fedora in recent releases.
Remove one of the two generally/general.
>== Contingency Plan ==
>
>Continue on as before with
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 7:16 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7
>
I cannot recall the last time I tried to run a full armv7 desktop
(which, I would guess, generate a significant percentage of
the large app build failures since the "desktop" apps are,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2023554
Bug ID: 2023554
Summary: perl-Test2-Suite-0.000142 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test2-Suite
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2023516
Bug ID: 2023516
Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.86 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Date-Manip
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022400
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On 11/15/21 18:28, Aleksei Bavshin wrote:
On 11/15/21 08:45, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 11/15/21 17:38, Aleksei Bavshin wrote:
On 11/12/21 00:37, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi folks,
I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I put some info
https://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/phoronix/latest-phoronix-articles/1291136-fedora-drafts-plans-for-retiring-armv7-support
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi everyone,
Now that we've released F35, I'd like to share the first semi-annual
release retrospective survey:
https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/231354
I kept it intentionally short and open-ended. It should only take a
few moments of your time. If you have any questions, please let me
know.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 8:42 PM Major Hayden wrote:
>
> Hey there,
>
> As much as I try not to, I sometimes forget to backport a package that I
> manage.
>
> For example, Google's Python SDK updates rather frequently and I usually
> bring those changes into rawhide fairly quickly. The SDK is made
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2021-11-15)
===
Meeting started by StephenGallagher at 19:00:10 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-11-15/fesco.2021-11-15-19.00.log.html
.
Meeting
Am 12.11.21 um 09:37 schrieb Martin Stransky:
Hi folks,
I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I put some info at wiki at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox_Hardware_acceleration
Hope it helps.
Martin
For VP9 on AMD the
Hey there,
As much as I try not to, I sometimes forget to backport a package that I
manage.
For example, Google's Python SDK updates rather frequently and I usually
bring those changes into rawhide fairly quickly. The SDK is made up of
plenty of different packages that release at different
Thanks. Will push when i be on my computer.
Envoyé depuis ProtonMail mobile
\ Message d'origine
Le 15 nov. 2021, 13 h 43, Fabio Valentini < decatho...@gmail.com > a écrit :
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 5:47 PM Rémi Lauzier via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for that. I
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 12:13:19PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> > with somehting that errors out (fails the build) if any relocatable
> > object files (.o) or static archives (.a) by default, and stop producing
> > object code by default, only LTO representation. If a special
> > redhat-rpm-config
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]]
* Email:
== Detailed Description ==
The ARMv7 arm architecture was the second variant of the arm
architecture that Fedora has supported, the first was ARMv5, the third
is aarch64. The
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveWirelessExtensions
== Summary ==
The legacy wireless extensions interface was replaced by the new
mac80211/cfg80211 interface in 2007. The legacy Wireless Extensions
support has been long deprecated and only supports long EOL WiFi
encryption like WEP
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveWirelessExtensions
== Summary ==
The legacy wireless extensions interface was replaced by the new
mac80211/cfg80211 interface in 2007. The legacy Wireless Extensions
support has been long deprecated and only supports long EOL WiFi
encryption like WEP
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]]
* Email:
== Detailed Description ==
The ARMv7 arm architecture was the second variant of the arm
architecture that Fedora has supported, the first was ARMv5, the third
is aarch64. The
On 11/15/2021 6:06 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
In the future, we might want to switch GCC not to generate both object
code and LTO representation during the build process. For most
packages, dual generation is not necessary because no relocatable object
files for static linking are included in
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 5:47 PM Rémi Lauzier via devel
wrote:
>
> Sorry for that. I don't have access to rust-system-deps so somebody else will
> have to do it.
Builds of rust-system-deps with cfg-expr bumped from 0.8 to 0.9 have
finished for all three side tags, so you can create the bodhi
Video decoding on NVIDIA
Please buy some real Linux hardware.
This doesn't really help at all. Is it supposed to be funny, or is it
just cynical resignation?
After trying to configure HW acceleration on 9xx series GPU, I'll just take
that as a serious response.
Consider following points:
*
On 11/15/21 08:45, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 11/15/21 17:38, Aleksei Bavshin wrote:
On 11/12/21 00:37, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi folks,
I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I put some info at wiki at:
Le lun. 15 nov. 2021 à 17:25, Aleksei Bavshin
a écrit :
>
...
> After trying to configure HW acceleration on 9xx series GPU, I'll just
> take that as a serious response.
> Consider following points:
> * VDPAU is not compatible with Wayland, our main desktop scenario.
True.
Still I have raised
* Tom Stellard:
> On 11/15/21 05:06, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> In the future, we might want to switch GCC not to generate both object
>> code and LTO representation during the build process. For most
>> packages, dual generation is not necessary because no relocatable object
>> files for static
Sorry for that. I don't have access to rust-system-deps so somebody else will
have to do it.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
Le lundi 15 novembre 2021 à 06:42, Fabio Valentini a
écrit:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 7:09 AM Rémi Lauzier via devel
>
>
On 11/15/21 17:38, Aleksei Bavshin wrote:
On 11/12/21 00:37, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi folks,
I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I put some info at wiki at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox_Hardware_acceleration
Hope it
On 11/12/21 00:37, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi folks,
I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I put some info at wiki at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox_Hardware_acceleration
Hope it helps.
Martin
Intel section fails to
On 11/15/21 05:06, Florian Weimer wrote:
In the future, we might want to switch GCC not to generate both object
code and LTO representation during the build process. For most
packages, dual generation is not necessary because no relocatable object
files for static linking are included in the
On 11/15/21 04:34, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 9:37 AM Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi folks,
I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I put some info at wiki at:
Hello,
On Monday, November 15, 2021 11:02:08 AM EST Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le lun. 15 nov. 2021 à 16:06, Steve Grubb a écrit :
> ...
>
> > I use the negativio repository only because I need the whole cuda stack
> > including cudnn.
>
> Totally undeeded, you can get rpmfusion+nvidia-cuda
Le lun. 15 nov. 2021 à 16:06, Steve Grubb a écrit :
...
> I use the negativio repository only because I need the whole cuda stack
> including cudnn.
Totally undeeded, you can get rpmfusion+nvidia-cuda repository
directly and avoid incompatible repository.
https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/CUDA
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:33 AM Luca Boccassi
> Please mention RPMCoW directly.
Mentioned and also linked the mailing list post you linked above as a
reference, let me know if there's other changes I can do.
___
devel mailing list --
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:33 AM Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:18 AM Luca Boccassi > wrote:
> >
> > Huh, I guess it was. :/
>
> Does that paragraph address your concerns? If so, I can update it to mention
> RPMCoW directly, for future reference.
Please mention RPMCoW
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:18 AM Luca Boccassi
> Huh, I guess it was. :/
Does that paragraph address your concerns? If so, I can update it to mention
RPMCoW directly, for future reference.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 11/15/21 16:06, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Monday, November 15, 2021 8:23:59 AM EST Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
Well, nVidia refuses to support VA-API like Intel and AMD do and the
VA-API-to-VDPAU won't help because dmabuf support is still required.
So... tough luck:
I can confirm
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 06:51:23PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Aleksei Bavshin:
On 11/4/21 09:17, Florian Weimer wrote:
Why is this VERIFY? The patch was generated as if by “git show”, and I
do not see anything wrong with it.
rpminspect thinks that the patch is suspiciously large and
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:18 AM Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 2:06 PM David Cantrell > wrote:
> >
> > Last cycle, I brought up the problem that it being part of the ELF
> > data destroys a lot of the value of the RPMCoW change[1] that is also
> > in development for this
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 2:06 PM David Cantrell wrote:
>
> Last cycle, I brought up the problem that it being part of the ELF
> data destroys a lot of the value of the RPMCoW change[1] that is also
> in development for this release. I'm disappointed that the Change
> authors didn't care to
On Monday, November 15, 2021 8:23:59 AM EST Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> Well, nVidia refuses to support VA-API like Intel and AMD do and the
> VA-API-to-VDPAU won't help because dmabuf support is still required.
> So... tough luck:
I can confirm that nvidia acceleration works fine on
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 2:06 PM David Cantrell wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:30:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >On Do, 28.10.21 12:10, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for revising the change proposal and filling in more details.
> >> After reading
On 11/15/21 13:34, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 9:37 AM Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi folks,
I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I put some info at wiki at:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-11-15 19:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 5/206 (x86_64), 7/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-2024.n.0):
ID: 1064902 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login
URL:
On 11/15/21 15:25, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 2:20 PM Martin Stransky wrote:
On 11/12/21 17:07, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi folks,
I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 2:20 PM Martin Stransky wrote:
>
> On 11/12/21 17:07, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Nov 2021, Martin Stransky wrote:
> >
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
> >> acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I put some info at
Hi
I'll be updating to OpenSceneGraph 3.6.5 and osgearth 3.2 in rawhide in
the f36-build-side-47862 side tag, and I'll also rebuild the following
packages:
fgrun-2016.3.1-45.fc36.src.rpm
FlightGear-2020.3.11-1.fc36.src.rpm
scribus-1.5.7-6.fc36.src.rpm
SimGear-2020.3.11-1.fc36.src.rpm
On 11/12/21 17:07, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi folks,
I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I put some info at wiki at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox_Hardware_acceleration
Along
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unit_Names_in_Systemd_Messages
== Summary ==
The default format of messages printed by systemd to the console and
the journal is changed from "Starting Frobnicating Daemon..." /
"Started Frobnicating Daemon" to "Starting frobnicator.service —
Frobnicating
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unit_Names_in_Systemd_Messages
== Summary ==
The default format of messages printed by systemd to the console and
the journal is changed from "Starting Frobnicating Daemon..." /
"Started Frobnicating Daemon" to "Starting frobnicator.service —
Frobnicating
All,
There will be a planned outage this week as outlined below:
Planned Outage - server update/reboots - 2021-11-17 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2021-11-17 21:00UTC,
which will last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
All,
There will be a planned outage this week as outlined below:
Planned Outage - server update/reboots - 2021-11-17 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2021-11-17 21:00UTC,
which will last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
On Monday, 15 November 2021 at 13:34, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 9:37 AM Martin Stransky wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
> > acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I put some info at wiki at:
> >
> >
In the future, we might want to switch GCC not to generate both object
code and LTO representation during the build process. For most
packages, dual generation is not necessary because no relocatable object
files for static linking are included in the RPM (neither as separate
ET_REL .o files, nor
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 9:37 AM Martin Stransky wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
> acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I put some info at wiki at:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox_Hardware_acceleration
>
> Hope it helps.
> Martin
I
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-2024.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-2025.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 31
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.42 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 7:09 AM Rémi Lauzier via devel
wrote:
>
> I everyone! I am updating rust-cfg-expr to version 0.9.0. I will push the
> side-tag in two weeks unless there is an objection. The only dependant
> package is rust-system-deps.
>
> f36-build-side-47814
> f35-build-side-47816
>
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:37:26 +0100
Martin Stransky wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
> acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I put some info at wiki at:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox_Hardware_acceleration
>
> Hope it helps.
it
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-2021.0):
ID: 1064824 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hey All,
I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 5.15
Test week is happening from 2021-11-14 to 2021-11-21. It's
fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the
test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your
results.
As usual,
59 matches
Mail list logo
