On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102443065
>
> I don't see what the error is ...
Mock appears to have failed to install the builddeps, for unknown
reasons. I would just re-try the build in hope that it is
Hi all,
This mail is just a heads up on go-sig delicate current status.
After a "non-responsive" process for one of the go-sig members[1], a
lot of go-sig packages become orphans. This maintainer has been
working for years creating hundreds of packages and updating them.
The orphaning process
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:02:13AM +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 10:57 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 22. 06. 23 v 10:40 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
> > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023, at 6:32 PM, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> But is Red Hat still commited to open source and to the freedom of software?
>
> I feel no and feel cheated and betrayed.
Hey Ralf,
why do you feel that way? The sources are still available both upstream
(CentOS) and downstream (albeit
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 12:14:28 PM EDT Aoife Moloney wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibuserDeprecation
>
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
> == Detailed Description ==
> As a first pass, the 'inst.sdboot' option already in anaconda should
> work. As it stands, that replaces grub+shim with the systemd-boot
> loader, and moves the kernel + initrd to the EFI system
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 11:48:18 AM CDT Othman Madjoudj wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the message.
>
> Best regards
> -Othman
>
>
> rpms/aria2
> rpms/hydra
> rpms/libmodsecurity
> rpms/lynis
> rpms/mod_limitipconn
> rpms/mod_qos
>
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 04:59:38PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This
Hi,
On 6/22/23 11:21, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 04:59:38PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order
Hi,
On 6/22/23 12:28, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
== Detailed Description ==
As a first pass, the 'inst.sdboot' option already in anaconda should
work. As it stands, that replaces grub+shim with the systemd-boot
loader,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 7:57 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have switched to F38 and find a couple items annoying. I have a workflow
> that
> checks things I develop out of github, rolls it up into an rpm, builds it,
> and runs the results through annocheck.
>
> If there is a warning I'd
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ibus-anthy_1.5.15
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibuserDeprecation
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/sericea-xorgless
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
Hello,
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 11:01:28 AM EDT Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > 2. systemd provides users and groups that are actually owned by the setup
> > package. As rpm is now turning non-root file ownership into dependencies,
> > systemd could end up pulled in where setup is needed
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 05:28:41PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > It doesn't attempt to create unified kernel images, so the
> > existing `dnf update`, `kdumpctl`, and `make install` in a kernel
> > source directory should all work.
>
> Nitpick: 'make install' invokes
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 4:26 PM Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:06:40 +0100, you wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Obviously many will have seen:
> >
> >https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream
> >
> >and see, where EL (contributors like you of fedora/EPEL)
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 5:46 PM Philip Wyett wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 17:39 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 5:09 PM Philip Wyett
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It has much to do. Fedora is a community apparently Red Hat no longer
> > > needs. The now ELN
> > > backend
> > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoCustomQtThemingForWorkstation
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireModularity
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
Hello,
I have switched to F38 and find a couple items annoying. I have a workflow that
checks things I develop out of github, rolls it up into an rpm, builds it,
and runs the results through annocheck.
If there is a warning I'd like to investigate, I cd into the build directory.
But oops, now
Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said:
> I was hoping we would be make the dependency on setup optional.
> It is a fairly heavyweight package (700+ kb) and with lots of
> not-that-useful-on-a-typical-modern-installation stuff (mail alias support,
> csh profile, /etc/hosts, nfs
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.21
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_Extension_Flags_Reduction
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
I've heard a couple of folks report that they tried updating a Rawhide
system or container and it failed with:
Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected
packages: dnf
The problem seems to be caused by doing the upgrade with an older dnf
installed. dnf-4.15.1-1.fc39
I've taken lynis and python-paramiko.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, June 22nd, 2023 at 11:48
Dear Steve,
I usually use smth like
RPM_ARCH=1 RPM_PACKAGE_RELEASE=2 RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION=3 RPM_PACKAGE_NAME=4 make
in this situation and have never got any problem yet.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 7:58 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have switched to F38 and find a couple items annoying. I
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 5:02 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> >> ELN is a build of (some) Fedora packages with EL-specific options, so
> >> it requires Fedora.
> > ELN can exist off an internal non fedora tree. Just depends who is
> > updating the tree.
>
> Sure, but... that's the _opposite_ of the
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 13:56 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have switched to F38 and find a couple items annoying. I have a
> workflow that
> checks things I develop out of github, rolls it up into an rpm,
> builds it,
> and runs the results through annocheck.
>
> If there is a
Am 22.06.23 um 16:08 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 4:26 PM Gerald Henriksen wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:06:40 +0100, you wrote:
Hi all,
Obviously many will have seen:
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream
and see, where EL
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ibus-anthy_1.5.15
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
On 21/06/2023 19:33, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
If you'll add me as admin/owner on the packages I'll continue to
maintain them. FAS jonathanspw
Especially interested in remmina since I use it nearly every day.
Hi Jonathan,
If you want help with remmina, you can add me as a
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 01:18:27PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Now that the initial hurdle of getting rpm 4.19 into rawhide is over, it's
> time to start looking towards enabling the sysusers integration:
>
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:42 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> == Open Questions ==
> 1) For the "canary" Fedora ELN rebuild, we have two choices on how to
> select the git hash to be built for each package in the ELN list:
>
> Approach 1 (Rawhide-style):
> 1. Clone each package
> 2. Check for the
Hello,
Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the message.
Best regards
-Othman
rpms/aria2
rpms/hydra
rpms/libmodsecurity
rpms/lynis
rpms/mod_limitipconn
rpms/mod_qos
rpms/mod_ruid2
rpms/mod_security3
rpms/mod_security_crs
rpms/python-paramiko
rpms/thc-ipv6
Dne 22. 06. 23 v 0:11 Philip Wyett napsal(a):
One mage saying Download/Signup
One image when you click on download at no cost and you need to login or create
an account.
Beauty of using clean VM's
https://pasteboard.co/eCfDDb13IIOL.png
https://pasteboard.co/AXwSb6XWmeTN.png
So you create
Dne 22. 06. 23 v 10:40 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102443065
I don't see what the error is ...
Mock appears to have failed to install the builddeps, for unknown
reasons. I
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:46:26AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I don't think there's a formal change filed yet.
>
> Matthew: Did you want to do that? Or would you like me or someone else
> to do so?
I would love someone else to do so, but if no one else wants to, I can. :)
--
Matthew Miller
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 11:02 +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 10:57 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 22. 06. 23 v 10:40 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
> > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > >
>> ELN is a build of (some) Fedora packages with EL-specific options, so
>> it requires Fedora.
> ELN can exist off an internal non fedora tree. Just depends who is
> updating the tree.
Sure, but... that's the _opposite_ of the direction things are going.
Previously, what happened to make a major
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 10:57 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 22. 06. 23 v 10:40 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102443065
> > >
> > > I don't see what the error is ...
Hi,
a few more issues appeared:
1. Testing PRs via Zuul is broken due to missing feature in dnf5
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/549
No ETA for fixing this one
2. Packit's sanity copr installation test fails due to to dnf5-plugins
needed for copr plugin.
Dne 22. 06. 23 v 10:44 Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
In each case, the way it was done and communicated was literally begging for
bad press.
...
So, the signal is either "we don't care about our upstream" or "we do not understand
upstream's importance and concerns".
None of the last two. It
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102443065
I don't see what the error is ...
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual
On 22/06/2023 10:11, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Nothing described in that blog post above changes this process, so
what's written there doesn't have any direct impact on Fedora.
Yet.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 08:44:13AM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> In the specific case of RHEL srpms, it makes life harder for EPEL
> packagers because you can't look at the source easily when they are
> problems between RHEL and EPEL packages. It matches well with RH's
> standard of shipping
I'm a Red Hat employed engineer, working on all Fedora, CentOS Stream and RHEL.
This is what each means for me in particular (but should also be
applicable in general) in practice:
* RHEL - only when I'm bound by some legal requirement (embargo, etc.)
I do work 'RHEL only' (not visible in CentOS
> On 6/22/23 06:21, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> That's how I understand it well and I'm a bit confused what's the
> "fuss" about. The git.centos.org mirrored sources that were used to build
> CentOS. Since CentOS is no longer supported, and we have the CentOS Stream,
> the same is
> true - the
On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 18:28 +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks! So, as per https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3011 , we plan to
> enable gating of Rawhide updates on openQA test results on Wednesday.
This is now enabled! Please let me and/or releng know if it causes any
terrible consequences,
On 6/22/23 06:21, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 2023-06-21 13:06, Philip Wyett wrote:
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream
...
I see an impasse here. Why contribute to fedora when Red Hat will lock it down
in other products?
I don't think this is a major change from
On 6/22/23 11:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102443065
I don't see what the error is ...
Rich.
Towards the end:
DEBUG util.py:539: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q',
'-M', '03701d048e03484c80696e05b2d9f2fe', '-D',
Hey all,
Now that the initial hurdle of getting rpm 4.19 into rawhide is over,
it's time to start looking towards enabling the sysusers integration:
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/users_and_groups.html
We (as in rpm-team) are not pushing for doing all this in Fedora 39,
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2023-06-23 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
* x86_64-v3 baseline and dropping i686 multilib
* Plans for the next 3-6 months
Source:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 04:26:35PM -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:06:40 +0100, you wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Obviously many will have seen:
> >
> >https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream
> >
> >and see, where EL (contributors like you of
On 6/21/23 22:26, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:06:40 +0100, you wrote:
Hi all,
Obviously many will have seen:
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream
and see, where EL (contributors like you of fedora/EPEL) have been knocked down:
Hi,
A small update, Zuul testing is still blocked, please use the results
`Fedora CI - dist-git test` in the PR testing.
The upstream bug that will need to be fixed to unblock Zuul testing:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/549
Other problems are hopefully resolved.
Best
22/06/23 11:06, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 08:44:13AM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
In the specific case of RHEL srpms, it makes life harder for EPEL
packagers because you can't look at the source easily when they are
problems between RHEL and EPEL packages. It matches well
To mitigate errors, I am proposing to disable Rawhide testing via Zull in
dist-git PRs:
https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs-config/pull-request/180
/M
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:19 PM Miroslav Vadkerti
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A small update, Zuul testing is still blocked, please use the results
>
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 2:11:45 PM EDT Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> I usually use smth like
> RPM_ARCH=1 RPM_PACKAGE_RELEASE=2 RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION=3 RPM_PACKAGE_NAME=4
> make in this situation and have never got any problem yet.
Dmitry, you are a saint. :-) I cannot accept this as the new
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 2:14:22 PM EDT Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 7:57 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> > I have switched to F38 and find a couple items annoying. I have a
> > workflow that checks things I develop out of github, rolls it up into
> > an rpm, builds it, and runs the
I've taken aria2 and thc-ipv6.
Thank you for your contributions, Othman!
--Neil
On 22.06.2023 18:48, Othman Madjoudj wrote:
Hello,
Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the message.
Best regards
-Othman
rpms/aria2
rpms/hydra
rpms/libmodsecurity
rpms/lynis
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230621.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230622.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:13
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 82
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 14.85 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216582
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom`
that you are following:
``
1.23 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Devel-CheckLib` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Requires: redhat-rpm-config for tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Devel-CheckLib/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibuserDeprecation
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoCustomQtThemingForWorkstation
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.21
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216784
Bug ID: 2216784
Summary: perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.086 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Tiny
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Devel-CheckLib`
that you are following:
``
Requires: redhat-rpm-config for tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Devel-CheckLib/pull-request/3
___
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable` that you are following:
``
Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_Extension_Flags_Reduction
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireModularity
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/sericea-xorgless
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ibus-anthy_1.5.15
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
1.23 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing
Hello,
Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the message.
Best regards
-Othman
rpms/aria2
rpms/hydra
rpms/libmodsecurity
rpms/lynis
rpms/mod_limitipconn
rpms/mod_qos
rpms/mod_ruid2
rpms/mod_security3
rpms/mod_security_crs
rpms/python-paramiko
rpms/thc-ipv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216352
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.71 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/49
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216582
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-MCE-1.888-1.fc39
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that
you are following:
``
6.71 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/49
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216352
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
I've taken aria2 and thc-ipv6.
Thank you for your contributions, Othman!
--Neil
On 22.06.2023 18:48, Othman Madjoudj wrote:
Hello,
Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the message.
Best regards
-Othman
rpms/aria2
rpms/hydra
rpms/libmodsecurity
rpms/lynis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213444
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210861
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Array-Unique-0.09-1.fc
88 matches
Mail list logo
