Adam Williamson wrote:
> I think it's sensible, yeah. It's not really much bureaucracy; I don't
> think it would ever be a good idea to introduce a new privilege
> escalation mechanism without FESco knowing about it...
Right now we're in a phase where a lot of stuff (system-config-*, several
part
those packages were deprecated, so it should be reopened by cvs admin by you
can take ownership.
regards,
Chen Lei
在2010-01-31?11:48:44，"Victor?Vasilyev"??写道：
>I'm?trying?to?complete?the?step?3?of?the?"Claiming?Ownership?of?an?
>Orphaned?Package?Procedure"?[1]?that?says:
>"3.?Press?the?"Take?
I'm trying to complete the step 3 of the "Claiming Ownership of an
Orphaned Package Procedure" [1] that says:
"3. Press the "Take Ownership" button for each active branch that you
want to maintain."
However, I don't see such buttons associated with the rawhide for all
mentioned packages, i.e. b
Hi All,
The NetBeans 6.8 [1] depends on some Java libraries whose packages have
been marked as orphaned [2].
To resolve the issue and provide the feature in-time I'd like to take
ownership of the following packages:
- bytelist - Review Request #560169 [3]
- jcodings - Review Request #560170 [4]
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:00 -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
> On 01/30/2010 01:53 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 11:36 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> Braden McDaniel wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:48 +0800, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed firefo
On 31.1.2010 01:24, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
> Anyway, the discussion was good and maybe it is useful to other people too.
>
:)
Well, really: if you want to change something, file the bugreport, or
get in touch with relevant maintainers. I'm not a tcl/tk/python expert,
but if you think that yo
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> Le 30/01/2010 18:05, Paulo Cavalcanti a écrit :
> > It is not a pleasant situation when your code does not work because
> > the programming language does not do what it is supposed to.
> >
> > I am not raising any kind of rant here. I am jus
> How far away do we appear to be from having an installable rawhide?
I have created a Fedora 13 x86_64 install DVD from today's rawhide
(Sat.Jan.30), installed it onto a vanilla clone box, and it runs for me.
The installation process clobbered the Master Boot Record even though
I asked it not to.
On 01/30/2010 05:37 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
> Maybe but I agree with Braden: I don't think it's worth it. Seems like
> a lot of extra work for not a lot of gain.
>
I much prefer chrome and use it preferentially now anyway ... I'd
prefer we put any broswer related energy into chromium - it is alre
On 30 January 2010 20:04, Mail Lists wrote:
> On 01/30/2010 02:54 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
>
>> Well there's the Java and Totem plugins at least, but there's a whole
>> slew of apps in Fedora that build against xulrunner:
>
> I think we need to use sun java as green tea is not yet on new api
> anyway
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 08:33 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Please do provide any and all feedback on the proposed policy. if we can
> > get it into a shape which most people on the list would find acceptable,
> > my next step will be to take it back to FESco for them to re
Le 30/01/2010 18:05, Paulo Cavalcanti a écrit :
> It is not a pleasant situation when your code does not work because
> the programming language does not do what it is supposed to.
>
> I am not raising any kind of rant here. I am just pointing that there is
> a problem
> that could have been alrea
On 01/30/2010 02:54 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
> Well there's the Java and Totem plugins at least, but there's a whole
> slew of apps in Fedora that build against xulrunner:
I think we need to use sun java as green tea is not yet on new api
anyway is it?
>
> repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps xulru
On 30 January 2010 19:00, Mail Lists wrote:
> On 01/30/2010 01:53 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 11:36 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Braden McDaniel wrote:
>>>
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:48 +0800, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.
On 30/01/10 08:42, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
> So it doesn't have an official one?
>
Not in F12,
but as has been said.
You can update to 3.6
from Rawhide,
then disable rawhide again.
Which is what I have done,
no problems yet.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
On 30 January 2010 06:48, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time.
> What about 3.5.7 and the recently 3.6? They are even not in koji.
This is because 3.5.7 doesn't affect us. Stability issue is for
Windows people and update notification is pat
On 01/30/2010 01:53 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 11:36 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Braden McDaniel wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:48 +0800, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
Hi,
I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time.
What about 3.5.7 and
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 11:36 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Braden McDaniel wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:48 +0800, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time.
> >> What about 3.5.7 and the recently 3.6? They are even not in koji.
> >
On 28 January 2010 22:58, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Steve Dickson writes:
>
>> I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
>>
>> I have been on both sides of these bugs... So I know (the hard way)
>> when you push something out that breaks existing configurations, its crap!
>
> If you need
I need to orphan ircd-hybrid because i don't use it anymore and i don't
have time to correct open bugs.
Thanks
Eric
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Braden McDaniel wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:48 +0800, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time.
>> What about 3.5.7 and the recently 3.6? They are even not in koji.
>
> xulrunner-1.9.2 breaks API compatibility with 1.9.1, so downstream
Am Samstag, den 30.01.2010, 18:25 +0100 schrieb Christoph Wickert:
> Seems like Fred Guthrie is AWOL.
Of course this should read "John". Sorry Fred!
Regards,
Christoph
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Seems like Fred Guthrie is AWOL. He did not respond to bugs since
2009-07-20: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512660
I started the AWOL procedure already back in October, but it slipped of
my radar: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514882
John owns 18 packages in total:
ht
Compose started at Sat Jan 30 08:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
armstrong-0.2.6-8.fc12.i686 requires libporttime.so.0
doodle-0.6.7-5.fc12.i686 requires libextractor.so.1
easystroke-0.5.2-1.fc13.i686 requires li
On 1/29/2010 4:50 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 01/28/2010 09:32 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
>
>> What is considered the best practice for packaging a program that uses
>> strlcpy()?
>>
> Besides patching it to not use strlcpy? :)
>
Is there a reason (from a programming point of view)
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:48 +0800, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time.
> What about 3.5.7 and the recently 3.6? They are even not in koji.
xulrunner-1.9.2 breaks API compatibility with 1.9.1, so downstream
packages would need patching for
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
> On 30.1.2010 14:29, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
>
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-August/msg00462.html
>>
>> I am not saying the points raised in the above link are not important, but
>> the solution is pretty obvio
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Well, reboot is a one-time operation; if there's only one user logged
> in, they can only affect themselves by rebooting. Adjusting the clock or
> installing new software isn't the same.
Ok, actually "one time" feels like there's a more
Le 30/01/2010 14:29, Paulo Cavalcanti a écrit :
> The first one is python. The GUI provided with python is called tkinter,
> which is based on tk, which, in turn, is based on tcl. Since threads are
> disabled in Fedora's tcl,
> as a consequence, one cannot use python+tkinter+threads.
>
Tkinter is
On 30.1.2010 14:29, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-August/msg00462.html
>
> I am not saying the points raised in the above link are not important, but
> the solution is pretty obvious to me.
Obviously it isn't if you looked at the BZ link in the a
Hi.
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:29:09 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote
> The first one is python. The GUI provided with python is called
> tkinter, which is based on tk, which, in turn, is based on tcl. Since
> threads are disabled in Fedora's tcl,
> as a consequence, one cannot use python+tkinter+thread
I always say one should not blame the system (OS, language, whatever) for
his/her
programming mistakes.
Unfortunately, Fedora has presently two programming languages with
missing features, and the user maybe completely unaware of this.
The first one is python. The GUI provided with python is call
Hi,
This might be a dup, and I'm a bit under the weather so in
no mood to search BZ. Anyways for other people who might hit
this if your mouse and keyb in X in rawhide all of a sudden are
gone, this is due to haldaemon not starting, which is caused
by some selinux issue. Setting selinux to permiss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/30/2010 11:51 AM, Frank Büttner wrote:
> Am 30.01.2010 11:23, schrieb Alexander Kahl:
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> On 01/30/2010 10:59 AM, Frank Büttner wrote:
>>> until bug #479556 is not fixed, I can't build anything.
>>> And the maintainer of mock seem
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 10:52 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 02:27:13PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Please do provide any and all feedback on the proposed policy. if we can
> > get it into a shape which most people on the list would find acceptable,
> > my next step will b
Hi Frank,
As you said using the test machines was not an option because of low uploads of
you ISP, do you need some co-maintainers to help your maintaining packages
before you solve mock problem? Most of your packages now need update for bugfix
since the lastest build submitted by you is from
Am 30.01.2010 11:23, schrieb Alexander Kahl:
> Hi Frank,
>
> On 01/30/2010 10:59 AM, Frank Büttner wrote:
>> until bug #479556 is not fixed, I can't build anything.
>> And the maintainer of mock seem don't do anything to fix it.
>> I don't know why. But for my last post I don't get any response.
>
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Wes Shull wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Liu Yu Fei Eric
wrote:
So it doesn't have an official one?
I've been running the f13 build out of rawhide for a week now, and it's
worked fine for me... not sure about Java though.
yum --enablerepo=rawhide update f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Frank,
On 01/30/2010 10:59 AM, Frank Büttner wrote:
> until bug #479556 is not fixed, I can't build anything.
> And the maintainer of mock seem don't do anything to fix it.
> I don't know why. But for my last post I don't get any response.
why don'
Am 30.01.2010 10:47, schrieb Chen Lei:
> Hi all,
>
> Frank B??ttner seems reluctant to be responsive.
>
> I fixed one FTBFS bug assigned to him in qtiplot.
>
> I posted a non responsive maintainer tracker bug, but he closed soon and was
> reluctant to explain anymore.
> See https://bugzilla.re
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 02:27:13PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Please do provide any and all feedback on the proposed policy. if we can
> get it into a shape which most people on the list would find acceptable,
> my next step will be to take it back to FESco for them to review.
> Thanks.
I do
Hi all,
Frank Büttner seems reluctant to be responsive.
I fixed one FTBFS bug assigned to him in qtiplot.
I posted a non responsive maintainer tracker bug, but he closed soon and was
reluctant to explain anymore.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557424
?And he was total non-resp
I guess I should have known that this would open a can of worms.
I'm NOT trying to advocate that anyone write new software using
strlcpy() etc. I'm NOT trying to claim that these functions are "safe"
or better than the alternatives. I'm only trying to support the porting
of existing BSD packa
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Liu Yu Fei Eric
wrote:
> So it doesn't have an official one?
I've been running the f13 build out of rawhide for a week now, and it's
worked fine for me... not sure about Java though.
yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox
--wes (f12-x86_64)
--
devel mailing
So it doesn't have an official one?
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
> > I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time.
> > What about 3.5.7 and the recently 3.6? They are even not in koji.
>
> http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2010/01/2
45 matches
Mail list logo
