Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Runtime/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31895
Modified Files:
perl-Catalyst-Runtime.spec
Log Message:
* Fri Jul 9 2010 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 5.80021-3
- 590961 add missing BR
On 07/08/2010 05:55 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/08/2010 05:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Author: mmaslano
Index: perl.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl/devel/perl.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.273
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:23:40PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:28 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings Fedora developers...
c) Just leave them open and let people pick pick pick away at them a
few at a time? We might be done by Fedora20. Or perhaps not.
Does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/08/2010 06:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
So I'd package up stuff, do a koji build, download it, run my
representative test suite, upload the result and do another build.
As Roland wrote, if you cannot provide a self-contained RPM build
process
On 07/09/2010 03:41 AM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
I started doing merge reviews in late 2008, so far I've finished 24 of
them and have 8 reviews currently still open. The biggest problem so far
has been the lack of maintainer interest, often nothing has happened
after my comments. For the major
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 17:51 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
That's not so easy to generalize. As Jakub wrote, you need some form of
workload. After the binaries are built this workload has to be
executed. How to do that cannot really be summarized. Some packages
might need to be installed to
On 07/07/2010 10:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[harald] dracut: dracut-tools-006-2.fc14.noarch
[harald] udev: libudev-158-2.fc14.x86_64
What's the problem with these?
$ rpm -ql dracut-tools |grep COPYING
/usr/share/doc/dracut-tools-006/COPYING
$ rpm -q --requires dracut-tools |grep dracut
$
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/rt3/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8514
Modified Files:
rt3.spec
Log Message:
* Thu Jul 08 2010 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 3.8.8-3
- Add COPYING to rt3-mailgate.
Index: rt3.spec
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 14:28:13 -0600, Kevin wrote:
So, here we are today with 242 still open merge reviews:
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/MERGE.html
(Plus a few that were closed when they shouldn't have been).
Dumb question first: Where could I have found the URL of that page?
Hi,
I have two new packages for review:
teal:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612384
ghc-feldspar-language:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612076
Anyone interested in review swap?
Thanks!
SK
--
Shakthi Kannan
http://www.shakthimaan.com
--
devel mailing list
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-DateTime - Request for EL-6 branch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612864
Summary: perl-DateTime - Request for EL-6 branch
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Class-C3 FTBFS : BuildRequires Self!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612875
Summary: perl-Class-C3 FTBFS : BuildRequires Self!
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have two new packages for review:
teal:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612384
ghc-feldspar-language:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612076
Anyone interested in review swap?
I'm
On Wednesday 07 of July 2010 22:29:01 Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
fixing, then email me and let me know which ones you checked/fixed.
Thanks!
~spot
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Math-Pari:
6077c6db56fdd32e39a06a9bf320e1f7 pari-2.3.5.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon
perl-DBI-Dumper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
On i386:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Math-Pari/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5117
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Math-Pari.spec sources
Log Message:
* Fri Jul 9 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 2.010806-7
- Rebuild with pari 2.3.5
- Tweak
Hi all,
I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm confused
with which package name will be more appropiate.
[1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610794
[2]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610842
The packager is determined to package meego 1.0 packages for
ons 2010-07-07 klockan 16:29 -0400 skrev Tom spot Callaway:
Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
fixing, then email me and let me know which ones you checked/fixed.
Thanks!
~spot
Compose started at Fri Jul 9 08:15:22 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
GtkAda-devel-2.14.0-5.fc14.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686
Dan Horák píše v Čt 01. 07. 2010 v 14:40 +0200:
Hello,
I will rebuild wxGTK without the internal crash handler for the the
devel/F14 branch so we can use ABRT to report crashes from wxGTK-based
apps. This will mean a rebuild of wxGTK with --disable-catch_segvs and
this change affects all
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571192
Joel Uckelman uckel...@nomic.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hi Chen,
As I'm the MeeGo maintainer let me outline my thoughts and reasoning
behind my MeeGo strategy.
I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm confused
with which package name will be more appropiate.
[1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610794
Hello:
I hope this is the proper place for this post.
I do not have access to DSL )-;
Because of this I would like to make a suggestion.
When a new Distribution is released I get the DVD with everything on it.
The problem is after the install and upgrade the new Distribution looks
to the
Hi Chen,
As I'm the MeeGo maintainer let me outline my thoughts and reasoning
behind my MeeGo strategy.
I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm confused
with which package name will be more appropiate.
[1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610794
2010/7/9 pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com:
Hi Chen,
As I'm the MeeGo maintainer let me outline my thoughts and reasoning
behind my MeeGo strategy.
I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm confused
with which package name will be more appropiate.
On 07/09/2010 01:19 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:23:40PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:28 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings Fedora developers...
c) Just leave them open and let people pick pick pick away at them a
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/9 pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com:
Hi Chen,
As I'm the MeeGo maintainer let me outline my thoughts and reasoning
behind my MeeGo strategy.
I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
fixing, then email me and let me know which ones you checked/fixed.
Thanks!
openoffice.org:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 23:39 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 20:02 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
Here's where we are on Python 2.7 for Fedora 14: [1]
I've updated my python src.rpm to 2.7 final (rather than the 2.7rc2 I
had previously):
On 07/08/2010 05:35 PM, Paul wrote:
Hi,
[pfj] xmms: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-11.20071117cvs.fc14.x86_64
Unless something very odd is going on here, xmms-libs does have the
COPYING file included (just checked the spec file).
Could it be that there is a problem with the build sys on x86_64
On 07/09/2010 10:25 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
fixing, then email me and let me know which
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:25 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/08/2010 05:35 PM, Paul wrote:
Hi,
[pfj] xmms: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-11.20071117cvs.fc14.x86_64
Unless something very odd is going on here, xmms-libs does have the
COPYING file included (just checked the spec file).
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 00:00 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/08/2010 06:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
So I'd package up stuff, do a koji build, download it, run my
representative test suite, upload the result and do another build.
As Roland
On 07/07/2010 10:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[twoerner] system-config-firewall:
system-config-firewall-base-1.2.25-1.fc14.noarch
system-config-firewall and system-config-firewall-tui both require
system-config-firewall-base.
system-config-firewall-base provides the COPYING file. Therefore
Author: steve
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv1188
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime.spec sources
Removed Files:
perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-004_locale_defaults.patch
Log
On 07/09/2010 11:32 AM, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:25 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/08/2010 05:35 PM, Paul wrote:
Hi,
[pfj] xmms: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-11.20071117cvs.fc14.x86_64
Unless something very odd is going on here, xmms-libs does have the
COPYING file included
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:36:04AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
Python has a benchmarking suite that tries to reflect real-world
workloads, and I've filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613045
RFE: Add profile guided optimization to our builds of Python 2
and
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 05:50:24PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:36:04AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
Python has a benchmarking suite that tries to reflect real-world
workloads, and I've filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613045
RFE: Add profile
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 08:48:24 -0400
Fred Walker fastf...@intrstar.net wrote:
Hello:
I hope this is the proper place for this post.
I do not have access to DSL )-;
Because of this I would like to make a suggestion.
When a new Distribution is released I get the DVD with everything on
it. The
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:47:41 -0400
Jeff Garzik jgar...@pobox.com wrote:
Cute re-ordering of events, there. No, after repeated experiences
with seeking reviews, including this most recent one mentioned
elsewhere on this list, and seeing others on this list repeating
review requests, I was
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:19:14 +0200
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 14:28:13 -0600, Kevin wrote:
So, here we are today with 242 still open merge reviews:
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/MERGE.html
(Plus a few that were closed when they shouldn't
Hello Chen,
Thursday, July 8, 2010, 12:05:43 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
2010/7/8 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
Generally, much better speedup can be achieved by using PGO
(-fprofile-generate, run on some testsuite, -fprofile-use).
GCC itself is built that way for several years, but it would be
Hello Chen,
Thursday, July 8, 2010, 12:05:43 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2010/7/8 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
Generally, much better speedup can be achieved by using PGO
(-fprofile-generate, run on some testsuite, -fprofile-use).
GCC itself is built that way for several years, but it would
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 12:28:46 -0400
Al Dunsmuir al.dunsm...@sympatico.ca wrote:
...snip...
- All programs measured under the Phoronix benchmarks. If we don't,
all we do is guarantee easy ways for other distributions to beat us.
Sadly, I don't think there are many phoronix benchmarks where
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:47 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/09/2010 11:32 AM, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:25 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/08/2010 05:35 PM, Paul wrote:
Hi,
[pfj] xmms: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-11.20071117cvs.fc14.x86_64
Unless something very
I got to thinking (uh oh) after reading a few threads on devel about
there being far too many review requests and not enough packagers
interested in reviews. I know that one thing that makes package reviews
bearable for me is a checklist to go through. I use this one:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 01:32:53PM -0400, Ian Weller wrote:
interested in reviews. I know that one thing that makes package reviews
bearable for me is a checklist to go through. I use this one:
http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/review.txt
It's a derivative of somebody else's. I forgot whose.
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 17:51 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
Perhaps the best that can done is providing an example but I guess every
package needs to have its own way implemented.
FWIW, fired up with enthusiasm I splatted a double-build
profile-generate and profile-use into hunspell as an example.
Dear Fedora members!
I'm happy to announce myself as the new owner of the QGIS package.
A re-review is available: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605373
Volker Fröhlich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 13:32:53 -0400
Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org wrote:
I got to thinking (uh oh) after reading a few threads on devel about
there being far too many review requests and not enough packagers
interested in reviews. I know that one thing that makes package
reviews bearable for me
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 21:19:05 +0200,
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at wrote:
Dear Fedora members!
I'm happy to announce myself as the new owner of the QGIS package.
Thanks. I wanted to play with that a bit to see if I could use it for RPG
maps, but the package does a lot more.
--
devel
I get Empathy crashes all the time, duplicates of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531464, but this bug is in
WONTFIX status. Anyone know why?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/7/7 Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com:
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 13:59 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder about the maintainer ship of epiphany. The ownership of it is
gecko-maint but in none of the current versions of
Unresolved regressions
--
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353
Subject : 2.6.35 regression
Submitter : Zeev Tarantov zeev.taran...@gmail.com
Date: 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old)
Message-ID :
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 12:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/09/2010 03:41 AM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
I started doing merge reviews in late 2008, so far I've finished 24 of
them and have 8 reviews currently still open. The biggest problem so far
has been the lack of maintainer interest,
Hello,
I have noticed that the latest version of python-webpy package in fedora
14 rawhide is still 0.32-4.f12 while the latest upstream version is:
0.34 [1]
is there any plan to update the package ?
the current maintainer is:
Ray Van Dolson ra...@fedoraproject.org
[1]
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 23:27 +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
I get Empathy crashes all the time, duplicates of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531464, but this bug is in
WONTFIX status. Anyone know why?
Look at the history. Carl G. marked it WONTFIX on 2010-06-28 without an
explanatory
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 23:27 +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
I get Empathy crashes all the time, duplicates of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531464, but this bug is in
WONTFIX status. Anyone know why?
Look
So It seems Carl G. has been closing several bugs across multiple
components without comment recently. Hmm.Not cool.
-jef
I gave the reason why i closed it.
Also, RHBZ number you are referring to?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Carl Gaudreault
carl.gaudrea...@gmail.com wrote:
So It seems Carl G. has been closing several bugs across multiple
components without comment recently. Hmm. Not cool.
-jef
I gave the reason why i closed it.
Are you saying that you comment in 27 requesting
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 16:00 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Carl Gaudreault
carl.gaudrea...@gmail.com wrote:
So It seems Carl G. has been closing several bugs across multiple
components without comment recently. Hmm.Not cool.
-jef
I gave the reason why i
Jeff Garzik (jgar...@pobox.com) said:
Cute re-ordering of events, there. No, after repeated experiences
with seeking reviews, including this most recent one mentioned
elsewhere on this list, and seeing others on this list repeating
review requests, I was inspired to poke around to see why
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430072
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430072
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2010-07-09 12:23:55 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430072
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2010-07-09 12:46:18 EDT ---
68 matches
Mail list logo
