[Bug 603249] ocaml-mikmatch-devel does not work because the tophide dependency is missing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603249 Michael Ekstrand mich...@elehack.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mich...@elehack.net --- Comment #2 from Michael Ekstrand mich...@elehack.net 2011-06-06 20:57:35 EDT --- This bug still exists in F15. I don't think tophide is actually needed except in the toplevel, so a preliminary fix that just removes the tophide dependency should work in the near term. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ocaml-devel
Re: hamster applet in gnome-shell
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 21:31 +, Clint Savage wrote: Hi Léon, I'm also an avid user of Hamster Applet and have been using it successfully in Gnome Shell. I suggest you launch it using 'Time Tracker' and then look at the bottom right bar. If you have it setup to let you know an activity is currently running, it will remind you in the bottom middle. Hope that helps. Cheers, Clint For some reason, this doesn't work for me. I have set it to remind me every 5 minutes, but no message is being displayed. Still, i would like it to keep the old functionality. That is, always display the status in a place where it's noticeable (eg. top middle of the screen). Oh well. Maybe the author will find some time and adapt it for gnome-shell in a better way. Thanks for your suggestion though, i appreciate it :) kind regards, Léon -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: FusionInventory Server for GLPI and Agent
On 06/05/2011 11:11 PM, Remi Collet wrote: fusioninventory-agent and perl-Fusion* are ready in my personal repository for some time. I plan to submit it to fedora, as all perl dependencies are now available (in fedora, not in epel, need to fill a lot of bug). Just need to tweak the service script to work correctly with systemd. Wow, thank you so much for this. features. Mainly because some plugins, availalble in the repository, are not available and I don't want to break anything (mainly datainjection) As data_injection is now available (2.0.1-beta), I plan to push glpi 0.78.5 in the repo. (glpi 0.80 is also available, but most of plugins are not yet compatible) I also plan to package the fusioninventory plugin for glpi, but I have only work on the old version for glpi 0.72 (also in my personnal repo). See : http://blog.famillecollet.com/en?q=fusioninventory Remi. Thank you also for this. I really appreciate all you Fedora packagers do. Thank you all! Trever -- Those willing to give up a little liberty for a little security deserve neither security nor liberty. -- Benjamin Franklin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: help needed with packaging kradview : qt related
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 23:49 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Ankur Sinha wrote: I was trying to package kradview[1] for the fedora medical initiative and am running into some errors. Could some qt developer please look into it and tell me how to correct these? [snip] panel2d.cpp:89:70: error: cannot call constructor 'QImage::QImage' directly [-fpermissive] panel2d.cpp:89:70: error: for a function-style cast, remove the redundant '::QImage' [-fpermissive] [snip 7 more of the same] That's a plain C++ issue, not a Qt issue. sed -i -e 's/QImage::QImage/QImage/g' panel2d.cpp Kevin Kofler Hi Kevin, Thank you! That fixed it. Regards, Ankur -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Installing bash-completion by default in F-16
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 01:12:41PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 04.06.2011 12:57, schrieb Ville Skyttä: Looking at what's currently in the @base group in comps-f16.xml.in tells me that there's a *lot* of optional functionality already in it yes, it is currently too much and should be reviewed instead taken as argument to put more stuff there +1 -- # Petr Sabata pgpej6rSj5rcM.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Quick update PPC status
On 06/03/2011 05:32 PM, Robert Knight wrote: On 06/01/2011 12:53 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote: Things have been progressing nicely and we now even have 2 mash trees with install images for testing available for, one for ppc, the other for ppc64: http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/mnt/koji/mash/15/ Those are our current development trees, so things might be broken at times. Also the rpms aren't signed as we're changing stuff to fast and this isn't a release. Greetings. I thank the team for this very large amount of good work. I've tried various installations with the resources mentioned on the pages referenced with mixed success. When I've checked the bugzilla, I do not find any of the problems that I've encountered reported. Is it fruitful to report difficulties with the iso's at the temporary location? I've started with testing on Mac G5's and did not succeed (font problems, followed by a Python crash.) I have succeeded in upgrading a Fedora 12 small installation with the mash rpms, using the standard Fedora yum upgrade, but I needed to install the 64 bit kernel before it would boot. How can I help this valuable effort go forward? Hi Robert. Thank you for your interest and willingness to help. The easiest way to reach the folks working on the PPC support in Fedora is either via the mailinglist[1] or even more direct via IRC on freenode[2]. Keep in mind though that at least Dan Horak, Karsten Hopp, Adrian Reber and Jiri Skala are located in Europe, so depending on your timezone you might have more luck with the mailinglist. We'll be adding tracker bugs for the various secondary archs for which we want to do a release for Fedora 16 in the next few days, so if you find an issue you can then link it to those tracker bugs. Thanks again! Regards, Phil [1] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ppc [2] IRC: #fedora-ppc on irc.freenode.net -- Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470 Supervisor Core Services | Fax.: +49-711-96437-111 Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch pknir...@redhat.com Hauptstaetterstr. 58 | Web: http://www.redhat.com/ D-70178 Stuttgart, Germany -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: BTRFS concerns
On 06/02/2011 08:28 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Maybe I'm not understanding your question correctly, but a filesystem is more general than LVM. You can create directories corresponding to your current VGs and files for your LVs, with the advantage that you can nest directories which you can't do with LVM VGs. If you mean nesting in the sense that an LVM2 LV is used as a PV then the tools support this just fine: # lvcreate -n nested_pv1_lv -L5G bmr_vg1 Logical volume nested_pv1_lv created # pvcreate /dev/bmr_vg1/nested_pv1_lv Physical volume /dev/bmr_vg1/nested_pv1_lv successfully created # vgcreate bmr_nested_vg0 /dev/bmr_vg1/nested_pv1_lv Volume group bmr_nested_vg0 successfully created # lvcreate -n nested_pv2_lv -L5G bmr_nested_vg0 Insufficient free extents (1279) in volume group bmr_nested_vg0: 1280 required # lvcreate -n nested_pv2_lv -l 1279 bmr_nested_vg0 Logical volume nested_pv2_lv created # pvcreate /dev/bmr_nested_vg0/nested_pv2_lv Physical volume /dev/bmr_nested_vg0/nested_pv2_lv successfully created # vgcreate bmr_nested_vg1 /dev/bmr_nested_vg0/nested_pv2_lv Volume group bmr_nested_vg1 successfully created # lvcreate -n l0 -l 1278 bmr_nested_vg1 Logical volume l0 created The 1-extent-per-nesting-level size decrement is to allow for the MDA allocated on each PV. The pvcreates are also strictly speaking unnecessary on recent tool versions since a vgcreate will now label a new device automatically but I'm old-fashioned ;-) You can view the device nesting via dmsetup: # dmsetup ls --tree bmr_nested_vg1-l0 [...] bmr_nested_vg1-l0 (253:10) └─bmr_nested_vg0-nested_pv2_lv (253:9) └─bmr_vg1-nested_pv1_lv (253:8) └─ (9:1) [...] # vgs VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree bmr_nested_vg0 1 1 0 wz--n- 5.00g 0 bmr_nested_vg1 1 1 0 wz--n- 4.99g 0 bmr_vg0 1 4 0 wz--n- 222.82g 25.68g bmr_vg1 1 3 0 wz--n- 19.53g 6.62g If things aren't activating properly on boot/reboot then it's likely an initscripts limitation or bug. Udev based activation should simplify that but you can also work around it depending on your distro via e.g. rc.local. Regards, Bryn. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rawhide report: 20110606 changes
Compose started at Mon Jun 6 08:15:42 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadmsslutil.so.1 389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadminutil.so.1 389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libadmsslutil.so.1()(64bit) 389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libadminutil.so.1()(64bit) 389-dsgw-1.1.6-3.fc16.x86_64 requires libadmsslutil.so.1()(64bit) 389-dsgw-1.1.6-3.fc16.x86_64 requires libadminutil.so.1()(64bit) CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.4.0-2.fc15.i686 requires libvomsapi.so.0 CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.4.0-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libvomsapi.so.0()(64bit) OpenEXR_Viewers-1.0.2-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit) OpenEXR_Viewers-1.0.2-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk_gl.so.1.1()(64bit) SteGUI-0.0.1-17.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk_images.so.1.1()(64bit) SteGUI-0.0.1-17.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit) acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell) alsa-tools-1.0.24.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit) bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit) camcardsync-0.1.1-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit) coda-vcodacon-6.9.5-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit) condor-deltacloud-gahp-7.7.0-0.1.fc16.x86_64 requires libdeltacloud.so.5(LIBDCLOUDAPI_2.0.0)(64bit) condor-deltacloud-gahp-7.7.0-0.1.fc16.x86_64 requires libdeltacloud.so.5(LIBDCLOUDAPI_0.0.0)(64bit) condor-deltacloud-gahp-7.7.0-0.1.fc16.x86_64 requires libdeltacloud.so.5(LIBDCLOUDAPI_1.0.0)(64bit) condor-deltacloud-gahp-7.7.0-0.1.fc16.x86_64 requires libdeltacloud.so.5()(64bit) db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0 deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-applet deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.23()(64bit) dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper ed2k_hash-gui-0.4.0-10.fc13.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.5.3-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libcamel-provider-1.2.so.23()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.5.3-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.23()(64bit) exaile-0.3.2.1-1.fc16.noarch requires hal fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libgraph.so.4 fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libcdt.so.4 fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libgvc.so.5 fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libgraph.so.4()(64bit) fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libcdt.so.4()(64bit) fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libgvc.so.5()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-player-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libgeos-3.2.1.so()(64bit) file-browser-applet-0.6.6-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) fldigi-3.21.7-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libfltk_images.so.1.1()(64bit) fldigi-3.21.7-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit) flpsed-0.5.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit) gedit-valencia-0.3.0-4.fc14.x86_64 requires libvala-0.10.so.0()(64bit) gipfel-0.3.2-8.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk_images.so.1.1()(64bit) gipfel-0.3.2-8.fc15.x86_64 requires libfltk.so.1.1()(64bit) gmediaserver-0.13.0-7.fc15.x86_64 requires libupnp.so.3()(64bit) gmediaserver-0.13.0-7.fc15.x86_64 requires libthreadutil.so.2()(64bit) gnome-applet-bubblemon-2.0.15-1.fc13.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-globalmenu-0.7.9-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-grandr-0.4.1-2.fc12.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-4.fc15.i686 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0 gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-applet-sshmenu-3.18-3.fc15.noarch requires ruby(panelapplet2) gnome-applet-timer-2.1.4-2.fc15.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-applet = 0:2.16 gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.8-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) gnome-device-manager-0.2-6.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit) gnome-device-manager-devel-0.2-6.fc15.i686 requires hal-devel = 0:0.5.10 gnome-device-manager-devel-0.2-6.fc15.i686 requires pkgconfig(hal) gnome-device-manager-devel-0.2-6.fc15.x86_64 requires hal-devel = 0:0.5.10 gnome-device-manager-devel-0.2-6.fc15.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(hal) gnome-device-manager-libs-0.2-6.fc15.i686 requires libhal.so.1 gnome-device-manager-libs-0.2-6.fc15.i686 requires hal = 0:0.5.10 gnome-device-manager-libs-0.2-6.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit) gnome-device-manager-libs-0.2-6.fc15.x86_64 requires hal =
Re: vnstat / network wrong peaks while delete snapshot
2011/6/5 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net: has anybody an idea for which package i should file a bugreport for this? i guess vnstat is only the postman Maybe. I notice that the bad value is 16777216.00 TiB, which is 2**64 ... on a 64-bit machine. A quick look through the vnstat code shows that it is using floating point arithmetic with rounding to print this value, so that's exactly what I would expect to see if somebody managed to stuff -1 (or any other negative value of small magnitude) into an unsigned 64-bit variable. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: vnstat / network wrong peaks while delete snapshot
Am 06.06.2011 17:15, schrieb Jerry James: 2011/6/5 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net: has anybody an idea for which package i should file a bugreport for this? i guess vnstat is only the postman Maybe. I notice that the bad value is 16777216.00 TiB, which is 2**64 ... on a 64-bit machine. A quick look through the vnstat code shows that it is using floating point arithmetic with rounding to print this value, so that's exactly what I would expect to see if somebody managed to stuff -1 (or any other negative value of small magnitude) into an unsigned 64-bit variable. ok - so i should file a bugreport to vnstat if i understand you right? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: vnstat / network wrong peaks while delete snapshot
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: ok - so i should file a bugreport to vnstat if i understand you right? I think so, yes. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
RFC: Fedora Scientific release
Hello: As an effort to avoid installing the same packages (like latex, emacs, gnuplot..) everytime I do a fresh install of a Linux distro, I decided to create a Fedora spin to cater the users who use Linux as their main workstation to help them in their research. I see from [1] that a Fedora Spin for Science is in the Ideas section. However, the SciTech mailng list seems deactivated at the moment and hence I had some discussions on the Release Engineering mailing list [2]. At this point of time, here is what I have (based on the suggestions by Bill Nottingham): An updated 'comps-f16-xml.in' whose current version is at [3] and based on that a possible kickstart script[4]. Any thoughts/comments/suggestions appreciated. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech [2] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/rel-eng/2011-June/012301.html [3] https://bitbucket.org/amitksaha/custom_linux/src/c94686fe43fe/comps-f16.xml.in [4] https://bitbucket.org/amitksaha/custom_linux/src/c94686fe43fe/fedora-live-scientific.ks Cheers, Amit -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: RFC: Fedora Scientific release
On , Amit Saha droid...@gmail.com wrote: Hello: As an effort to avoid installing the same packages (like latex, emacs, gnuplot..) everytime I do a fresh install of a Linux distro, I decided to create a Fedora spin to cater the users who use Linux as their main workstation to help them in their research. I see from [1] that a Fedora Spin for Science is in the Ideas section. However, the SciTech mailng list seems deactivated at the moment and hence I had some discussions on the Release Engineering mailing list [2]. At this point of time, here is what I have (based on the suggestions by Bill Nottingham): An updated 'comps-f16-xml.in' whose current version is at [3] and based on that a possible kickstart script[4]. Any thoughts/comments/suggestions appreciated. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech [2] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/rel-eng/2011-June/012301.html [3] https://bitbucket.org/amitksaha/custom_linux/src/c94686fe43fe/comps-f16.xml.in [4] https://bitbucket.org/amitksaha/custom_linux/src/c94686fe43fe/fedora-live-scientific.ks Cheers, Amit Amit, I would be keen to help with this spin. The SciTech SIG seems to be dead making it a little difficult for scientists to find common ground on the project. Andrew -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: RFC: Fedora Scientific release
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:51 AM, andrewnix...@gmail.com wrote: On , Amit Saha droid...@gmail.com wrote: Hello: As an effort to avoid installing the same packages (like latex, emacs, gnuplot..) everytime I do a fresh install of a Linux distro, I decided to create a Fedora spin to cater the users who use Linux as their main workstation to help them in their research. I see from [1] that a Fedora Spin for Science is in the Ideas section. However, the SciTech mailng list seems deactivated at the moment and hence I had some discussions on the Release Engineering mailing list [2]. At this point of time, here is what I have (based on the suggestions by Bill Nottingham): An updated 'comps-f16-xml.in' whose current version is at [3] and based on that a possible kickstart script[4]. Any thoughts/comments/suggestions appreciated. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech [2] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/rel-eng/2011-June/012301.html [3] https://bitbucket.org/amitksaha/custom_linux/src/c94686fe43fe/comps-f16.xml.in [4] https://bitbucket.org/amitksaha/custom_linux/src/c94686fe43fe/fedora-live-scientific.ks Cheers, Amit Amit, I would be keen to help with this spin. The SciTech SIG seems to be dead making it a little difficult for scientists to find common ground on the project. Thanks Andrew for your interest. It should definitely be an interesting addition to the fedora spin community. -Amit -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Package Reviews Needed
As usual, I will swap reviews or favors (within limits) for reviews on some new packages for me: mono-reflection: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711181 pyrit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894 gambas3: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203 As soon as I clarify the licensing, I will also have gnome-shell-extension-pidgin up for review. ~tom == Fedora Project -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Installing bash-completion by default in F-16
On 06/05/2011 03:46 PM, Alexander Boström wrote: Consider a hypothetical bash-uncompletion which just blacklists tab completion in those cases where it doesn't make sense but never adds any new completion sources. I've suggested that to bash-completion earlier this year; the idea hasn't taken off yet, but I guess it will to some extent sometime. http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/bash-completion-devel/2011-February/003329.html -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Installing bash-completion by default in F-16
On 06/02/2011 05:04 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: Things like bash completion have massive performance implications on network and other slower file systems esp if its used for home directories. Forgot to reply to this earlier, but I'd like to hear more details about this, preferably in a bug report, from anyone who experiences these implications. Do the issues occur at bash-completion load time and/or completion invocation time? If they're at completion invocation time, what are good command/completion examples for reproducing the issue, and how is the behavior different or how is the issue made worse by bash-completion compared to bash's usual filename completion? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Installing bash-completion by default in F-16
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 02:20:56PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: The response thus far seems to be somewhat net negative, but it seems to me that most of the negative feedback is also coming from people who haven't been using bash-completion for a while. FWIW, it's always the default on _my_ installs, but since I have a lot of control over that, I don't really care if it's in the default set or not. -- Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional Research Computing Services Harvard School of Engineering Applied Sciences -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Help needed. Lightining-Thunderbird on Fc14.x86_64.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Trying to Install Mozilla-Lightning on Fedora 2.6.35.13-91.fc14.x86_64 and got the message: lightning could not be installed because it is not compatible with your thunderbird build type ( linux_x86_64-*gcc3*). please contact the author of this item about the problem. I can't belive that they don't have a 64bit version? Anybody has a workaround for this? Thanks in advance, - -- Lucélio Gomes de Freitas ETFCSF- U.G.F.- P.U.C.(RJ) Engº, Analista Suporte(Free Mind). Email: aa.luce...@gmail.com Tel: 55 0XX 21 85964911 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk3tX+8ACgkQENqGaHfBA/ddjwD8C8Rot+GG3UO/o9bxSofMbwRV 7/XjKMh4rtC309ABdUgA/ieIITv/xig/0QFdRTTAuVFCaxnETqGs7cHrK6dVm8j2 =iyWn -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Help needed. Lightining-Thunderbird on Fc14.x86_64.
Am 07.06.2011 01:17, schrieb Lucélio Gomes de Freitas: Hi, Trying to Install Mozilla-Lightning on Fedora 2.6.35.13-91.fc14.x86_64 and got the message: lightning could not be installed because it is not compatible with your thunderbird build type ( linux_x86_64-*gcc3*). please contact the author of this item about the problem. I can't belive that they don't have a 64bit version? Anybody has a workaround for this? who is they? you have a package-managment! Installierte Pakete Name: thunderbird-lightning Arch: x86_64 Version : 1.0 Release : 0.41.b3pre.fc14 Size: 2.9 M Repo: installed From repo : updates-testing Summary : The calendar extension to Thunderbird URL: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/lightning/ License : MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+ Beschreibung : Lightning brings the Sunbird calendar to the popular email client, : Mozilla Thunderbird. Since it's an extension, Lightning is tightly : integrated with Thunderbird, allowing it to easily perform email-related : calendaring tasks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Help needed. Lightining-Thunderbird on Fc14.x86_64.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Reindl Harald, Em 06-06-2011 20:12, Reindl Harald escreveu: Am 07.06.2011 01:17, schrieb Lucélio Gomes de Freitas: Hi, Trying to Install Mozilla-Lightning on Fedora 2.6.35.13-91.fc14.x86_64 and got the message: lightning could not be installed because it is not compatible with your thunderbird build type ( linux_x86_64-*gcc3*). please contact the author of this item about the problem. I can't belive that they don't have a 64bit version? Anybody has a workaround for this? who is they? https://addons.mozilla.org/pt-BR/thunderbird/addon/lightning/reviews/ you have a package-managment! Installierte Pakete Name : thunderbird-lightning Arch : x86_64 Version : 1.0 Release : 0.41.b3pre.fc14 Size : 2.9 M Repo : installed From repo : updates-testing Summary : The calendar extension to Thunderbird URL : http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/lightning/ License : MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+ Beschreibung : Lightning brings the Sunbird calendar to the popular email client, : Mozilla Thunderbird. Since it's an extension, Lightning is tightly : integrated with Thunderbird, allowing it to easily perform email-related : calendaring tasks. Sorry. Don't install lightning from the Extentions site For Fedora users: sudo yum install thunderbird-lightning. It works. Thanks. - -- Lucélio Gomes de Freitas ETFCSF- U.G.F.- P.U.C.(RJ) Engº, Analista Suporte(Free Mind). Email: aa.luce...@gmail.com Tel: 55 0XX 21 85964911 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk3tbpAACgkQENqGaHfBA/cK+QD/YOjbTXYBq/IQfEsL/+6rtS3X wrP/c6QsyrCmu0MxxpcBAJ8ZovmGkUcSzcsRAx1eum6YQnqN3vsRUhdOBBdnfgNH =6KND -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Help needed. Lightining-Thunderbird on Fc14.x86_64.
PLEASE DO NOT POST IN HTML AND NEVER CONVERT PLAIN-MAILS OF A MAILING-LIST TO HTML what client make such a ugly conversion? Am 07.06.2011 02:19, schrieb Lucélio Gomes de Freitas: Hi Reindl Harald, Em 06-06-2011 20:12, Reindl Harald escreveu: Am 07.06.2011 01:17, schrieb Lucélio Gomes de Freitas: Hi, Trying to Install Mozilla-Lightning on Fedora 2.6.35.13-91.fc14.x86_64 and got the message: lightning could not be installed because it is not compatible with your thunderbird build type ( linux_x86_64-*gcc3*). please contact the author of this item about the problem. I can't belive that they don't have a 64bit version? Anybody has a workaround for this? who is they? https://addons.mozilla.org/pt-BR/thunderbird/addon/lightning/reviews/ you have a package-managment! Installierte Pakete Name : thunderbird-lightning Arch : x86_64 Version : 1.0 Release : 0.41.b3pre.fc14 Size : 2.9 M Repo : installed From repo : updates-testing Summary : The calendar extension to Thunderbird URL : http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/lightning/ License : MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+ Beschreibung : Lightning brings the Sunbird calendar to the popular email client, : Mozilla Thunderbird. Since it's an extension, Lightning is tightly : integrated with Thunderbird, allowing it to easily perform email-related : calendaring tasks. Sorry. Don't install lightning from the Extentions site For Fedora users: sudo yum install thunderbird-lightning. It works. Thanks. -- Mit besten Grüßen, Reindl Harald the lounge interactive design GmbH A-1060 Vienna, Hofmühlgasse 17 CTO / software-development / cms-solutions p: +43 (1) 595 3999 33, m: +43 (676) 40 221 40 icq: 154546673, http://www.thelounge.net/ http://www.thelounge.net/signature.asc.what.htm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Self Introduction
Hola Fedora developers, My name is Ryan! Currently i'm a PhD student in computer science theory at dartmouth college. I'm a campus ambassador at dartmouth college. My research interests are in computational applied topology for a brief introduction to field: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topological_data_analysis. I try to contribute to the community as a campus ambassador. I regularly give away install/live media buttons and stickers to just about everyone, and I use them as prizes when I TA computer science classes (which works really well for getting us dartmouth undergrads to contribute). I've just joined this list, and I'm learning now about how to write RPM spec files, with my ultimate goal of maintaining a few packages. I recently got my koji browser certs, and I've been reading the guidelines. I move pretty slowly on my own, if anyone nearby me is interested in helping me advance my packaging 'foo' as they say, i'd be open to the assistance! Cheers, -rhl -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Guidance on hulahop epoch usage
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 02:34:40PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: On 06/03/2011 05:52 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: Anyway, I'll tell Jeremy he'll need to manually remove/update. In my opinion this is a good (or bad?) example how users' life is made harder due to irrational fear of the Epoch. Telling Jeremy won't help people who don't know that the problem exists or don't follow the bug report. Caveat: I don't know a thing about hulahop or if using Epoch with it would be somehow specially problematic, but I'm assuming it wouldn't be because according to my F-14 repoquery there are only two packages in Fedora that depend on it, and neither has a versioned dependency on it. I agree with you but this bug is a bit special in that it is several versions out of date. If this was F14 or even F13, the Epoch bump would be good. But adding a bump for a mistake on a F10 branch seems unnecessary now. Cheers, Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Help needed. Lightining-Thunderbird on Fc14.x86_64.
Le 07/06/2011 02:19, Lucélio Gomes de Freitas a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Reindl Harald, Em 06-06-2011 20:12, Reindl Harald escreveu: Am 07.06.2011 01:17, schrieb Lucélio Gomes de Freitas: Hi, Trying to Install Mozilla-Lightning on Fedora 2.6.35.13-91.fc14.x86_64 and got the message: lightning could not be installed because it is not compatible with your thunderbird build type ( linux_x86_64-*gcc3*). please contact the author of this item about the problem. I can't belive that they don't have a 64bit version? Anybody has a workaround for this? who is they? https://addons.mozilla.org/pt-BR/thunderbird/addon/lightning/reviews/ you have a package-managment! Installierte Pakete Name : thunderbird-lightning Arch : x86_64 Version : 1.0 Release : 0.41.b3pre.fc14 Size : 2.9 M Repo : installed From repo : updates-testing Summary : The calendar extension to Thunderbird URL : http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/lightning/ License : MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+ Beschreibung : Lightning brings the Sunbird calendar to the popular email client, : Mozilla Thunderbird. Since it's an extension, Lightning is tightly : integrated with Thunderbird, allowing it to easily perform email-related : calendaring tasks. Sorry. Don't install lightning from the Extentions site For Fedora users: sudo yum install thunderbird-lightning. It works. Thanks. - -- Lucélio Gomes de Freitas ETFCSF- U.G.F.- P.U.C.(RJ) Engº, Analista Suporte(Free Mind). Email: aa.luce...@gmail.com Tel: 55 0XX 21 85964911 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk3tbpAACgkQENqGaHfBA/cK+QD/YOjbTXYBq/IQfEsL/+6rtS3X wrP/c6QsyrCmu0MxxpcBAJ8ZovmGkUcSzcsRAx1eum6YQnqN3vsRUhdOBBdnfgNH =6KND -END PGP SIGNATURE- The only problem with the fedora version of lightning : the extension is only in english https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504994 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
File Text-Table-1.122.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by mmaslano
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-Table: ffc95b42521b96c5839c18640c8fdc9a Text-Table-1.122.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Text-Table] 1.122 bump
commit b28e0cb813649894e4c39481ea1f995f0091dc67
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 6 07:59:06 2011 +0200
1.122 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Text-Table.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 6ac066d..fcdd0ff 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ Text-Table-1.114.tar.gz
/Text-Table-1.118.tar.gz
/Text-Table-1.120.tar.gz
/Text-Table-1.121.tar.gz
+/Text-Table-1.122.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Text-Table.spec b/perl-Text-Table.spec
index 292e7ce..2e5bd7c 100644
--- a/perl-Text-Table.spec
+++ b/perl-Text-Table.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Text-Table
-Version:1.121
+Version:1.122
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Organize Data in Tables
License:BSD
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {}
2/dev/null \;
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Jun 6 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 1.122-1
+- 1.122 bump
+
* Mon May 30 2011 Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com 1.121-1
- 1.121 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 70a4c29..8b633c3 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-a9818ea90e7b0338bf9cbd4b576b1793 Text-Table-1.121.tar.gz
+ffc95b42521b96c5839c18640c8fdc9a Text-Table-1.122.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 696725] RPM doesn't create /var/run/amavisd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696725 --- Comment #6 from Trever Adams night...@hotmail.com 2011-06-06 01:58:09 EDT --- I never did check clamd.amavisd. It may need a similar fix (although it works without it, just as dspam largely did). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 710725] perl-Text-Table-1.122 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710725 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-06-06 02:07:30 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File ExtUtils-XSpp-0.1602.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ExtUtils-XSpp: 449c8c6d1c2fdd8fd06eb671f94faf4d ExtUtils-XSpp-0.1602.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 710723] perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.1602 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710723 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|mmasl...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-ExtUtils-XSpp] 0.1602 bump
commit b4efbb39ecdc84fdd9933568a682235617de337b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 6 09:04:49 2011 +0200
0.1602 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 3d43875..474765e 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
ExtUtils-XSpp-0.12.tar.gz
/ExtUtils-XSpp-0.15.tar.gz
/ExtUtils-XSpp-0.1601.tar.gz
+/ExtUtils-XSpp-0.1602.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec b/perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec
index e33cf49..d734f33 100644
--- a/perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec
+++ b/perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp
# Use four digits since 0.1601
-Version:0.1601
+Version:0.1602
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:C++ variant of Perl's XS language
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -empty -exec rmdir {} \;
%{_mandir}/man?/*
%changelog
+* Mon Jun 06 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.1602-1
+- 0.1602 bump
+
* Mon Mar 14 2011 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 0.1601-1
- 0.1601 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 086b80e..b5f7ce8 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-c269aa8f0183af1ee1ed82b9005a1655 ExtUtils-XSpp-0.1601.tar.gz
+449c8c6d1c2fdd8fd06eb671f94faf4d ExtUtils-XSpp-0.1602.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-ExtUtils-XSpp] Remove defattr
commit b717a660df2fe39d5e3b8740e56a1a626d41a43c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 6 09:09:49 2011 +0200
Remove defattr
perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec b/perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec
index d734f33..3e56c08 100644
--- a/perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec
+++ b/perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -empty -exec rmdir {} \;
./Build test
%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes README XSP.yp
%{_bindir}/xspp
%{perl_vendorlib}/ExtUtils*
@@ -46,6 +45,7 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -empty -exec rmdir {} \;
%changelog
* Mon Jun 06 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.1602-1
- 0.1602 bump
+- Remove defattr
* Mon Mar 14 2011 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 0.1601-1
- 0.1601 bump
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Perl-Critic-Pulp-61.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp: 6f99fa4f82b9cd8e0ca608faecd28ad7 Perl-Critic-Pulp-61.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 710723] perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.1602 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710723 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.1602-1 ||.fc16 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-06-06 03:16:04 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp] Version 61 bump
commit 2697e833d40791ceaa9a38dddf877f968857fb9f
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 6 09:28:19 2011 +0200
Version 61 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec |8 ++--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 0665616..8a5c304 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@
/Perl-Critic-Pulp-58.tar.gz
/Perl-Critic-Pulp-59.tar.gz
/Perl-Critic-Pulp-60.tar.gz
+/Perl-Critic-Pulp-61.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec b/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec
index a1e8b8b..2dd8e0e 100644
--- a/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec
+++ b/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp
-Version:60
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:61
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Some add-on perlcritic policies
License:GPLv3+
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ Requires: perl(Test::More)
%filter_from_provides
/^perl(Perl::Critic::Pulp::PodMinimumVersionViolation)\s*$/d
%filter_from_provides
/^perl(Perl::Critic::Pulp::PodParser::ProhibitBadAproposMarkup)\s*/d
%filter_from_provides
/^perl(Perl::Critic::Pulp::PodParser::ProhibitParagraphTwoDots)\s*/d
+%filter_from_provides
/^perl(Perl::Critic::Pulp::PodParser::ProhibitUnbalancedParens)\s*/d
%filter_from_provides
/^perl(Perl::Critic::Pulp::PodParser::RequireLinkedURLs)\s*/d
%filter_setup
@@ -91,6 +92,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Jun 06 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 61-1
+- Version 61 bump
+
* Mon May 23 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 60-2
- Remove explicit defattr
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 17a7807..5eee375 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-2f43daf1b2eb1fd73310a1aeda8a38ee Perl-Critic-Pulp-60.tar.gz
+6f99fa4f82b9cd8e0ca608faecd28ad7 Perl-Critic-Pulp-61.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 710724] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-61 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710724 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-61-1. ||fc16 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-06-06 03:36:27 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 711163] New: Picasa doesn't starts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Picasa doesn't starts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711163 Summary: Picasa doesn't starts Product: Fedora Version: 15 Platform: i686 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: unspecified Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail AssignedTo: cw...@alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: myada...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: cw...@alumni.drew.edu, fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Description of problem:'picasa' doesn't starts in F15 and it ends with an AVC denial notification saying that it has been denied mmap access of low memory through preloader.Fixed all suggestions by selinux, but of no help. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):2.7 How reproducible:Install and run picasa 2.7 from google repo. Steps to Reproduce: 1.Download picasa 2.7 rpm from google repo 2.Install it using yum/packagekit 3.Try to run it Actual results:Not executing. Expected results:Must run after successful install Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 711163] Picasa doesn't starts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711163 Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||el...@doom.co.il Resolution||CANTFIX Last Closed||2011-06-06 13:33:52 --- Comment #1 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il 2011-06-06 13:33:52 EDT --- We don't have the source code for picasa, so we can't fix this bug. Closing. (I suggest you'll try shotwell, a free photo manager that is available in fedora's repositories) -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 711233] New: pcsc-perl needs upgrade to work at all
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: pcsc-perl needs upgrade to work at all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711233 Summary: pcsc-perl needs upgrade to work at all Product: Fedora Version: 15 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: pcsc-perl AssignedTo: tm...@redhat.com ReportedBy: hen...@henriknordstrom.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: tm...@redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Description of problem: Any use of pcsc-perl fails with PCSC library does not contain all the required symbols at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Chipcard/PCSC.pm line 259. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pcsc-perl-1.4.10-2.fc15.1.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Try to run pcsc_scan 2. 3. Actual results: Only partially working, reporting lots of errors like the above. Expected results: Fully working Additional info: Current release of pcsc-perl is 1.14.12. http://ludovic.rousseau.free.fr/softwares/pcsc-perl/ This specific error was fixed in 1.14.11 to work with current releases of pcsc-lite. Quote from Changelog: SCardSetTimout is no more present in pcsc-lite 1.6.4 It was a pcsc-lite specific and deprecated function -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 711233] pcsc-perl needs upgrade to work at all
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711233 --- Comment #2 from Henrik Nordström hen...@henriknordstrom.net 2011-06-06 18:24:24 EDT --- Upgrade to 1.4.12 confirmed fixing the problem when running pcsc_scan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 711233] pcsc-perl needs upgrade to work at all
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711233 --- Comment #1 from Henrik Nordström hen...@henriknordstrom.net 2011-06-06 18:21:47 EDT --- Created attachment 503340 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=503340 Updated spec file for 1.4.12 Spec file updated for pcsc-perl 1.4.12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 709269] perl-SOAP-Lite provides bogus perl(LWP::Protocol)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709269 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-07 00:30:10 EDT --- perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-5.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 705308] perlbrew-0.21 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705308 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-07 00:37:06 EDT --- perlbrew-0.22-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 705308] perlbrew-0.21 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705308 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perlbrew-0.22-1.fc15|perlbrew-0.22-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
