Am 09.04.2013 00:00, schrieb Jeffrey Bastian:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 04:03:47PM -0500, Jeffrey Bastian wrote:
I removed my initramfs-0-rescue-* file because I didn't know what it was
and no rpm claimed to own it. How do I get it back? I've tried running
dracut with various options and it
Using PackageKit and yum on the command line is often painful as we
have to always download metadata unless it's less than a few hours
old. Being able to update the metadata once a week would be awesome
(with the possible exception of security updates) so that we could
schedule the 20Mb+ metadata
On 9 April 2013 10:21, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
metadata_expire=7d
From a package manager point of view, this happens:
1 check expire timeout, all okay
2 depsolve update set
3 download
4 package not found!
5 download needed metadata based on some heuristic
6 goto 2
Richard
Compose started at Tue Apr 9 09:15:14 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
[alexandria]
alexandria-0.6.9-4.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) =
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:10:26AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
I'm wondering what the interest would be in keeping packages
referenced in metadata on the mirrors for say a month? We'd probably
need a separate fedora-security repo too that's designed to be kept
small enough so that metadata
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:48:40PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
depends often on the workload and currect jobs and the cirtical
apllication wheer a bug will hurt you much may change from project
to project
As I understand it, you'll be able to opt for an all-updates track. In fact,
that will be
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/* scripts are called by new-kernel-pkg, which is called
in the kernel.spec, when you install a kernel.
new-kernel-pkg uses grubby to generate a grub config.
grub2-mkconfig destroys anything grubby has setup.
Well, we could patch grub2-mkconfig to recognize the
- Original Message -
Hi folks! Time for the first blocker status mail of the Fedora 19 cycle.
The tl;dr summary:
Hi Adam,
thanks for summary. Updates follows.
Input needed from blocker voters and developers on:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947142
Three more are
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 19:51:15 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Hello all,
Can anyone help me make sense of the following broken-dep message?
springlobby has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On i386:
Am 09.04.2013 11:10, schrieb Richard Hughes:
Using PackageKit and yum on the command line is often painful as we
have to always download metadata unless it's less than a few hours
old. Being able to update the metadata once a week would be awesome
(with the possible exception of security
Am 09.04.2013 14:27, schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:10:26AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
I'm wondering what the interest would be in keeping packages
referenced in metadata on the mirrors for say a month? We'd probably
need a separate fedora-security repo too that's
On 9 April 2013 13:48, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
if i want monthly pacthdays i use Microsoft or Oracle
Not at all. Patchdays make perfect sense for planning
reboots/downtime/maintenance and that kind of thing.
you can hardly classify which bug is for which user critical!
Hi,
Am 09.04.2013 14:27, schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:10:26AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
I'm wondering what the interest would be in keeping packages
referenced in metadata on the mirrors for say a month? We'd probably
need a separate fedora-security repo too that's
On 9 April 2013 16:16, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
them new packages after upstream bug-fix releases. Lumping these all
together in a single day in the month just does not feel like a Fedora thing
to do.
You can't QA a trickle. If packages are small and self-contained then
sure,
commit b177230d9a1d764faf4402a4a1e29b16818b2392
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Apr 9 16:44:54 2013 +0200
Sub-package Sys-Syslog
perl.spec | 31 +--
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index
Hi
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Ravindra Kumar ravindraku...@vmware.comwrote:
Hi all,
I work for VMware. My Fedora account name is ravindrakumar.
I would like to contribute open-vm-tools package to ongoing development of
Fedora 19. For more details about open-vm-tools project, please
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Getopt-Long:
84c8643de29faade9491c56d72afdba0 Getopt-Long-2.39.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a4ab06b5cbfcde1ccbc321ea888233ceb9f34f9d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Apr 9 17:33:40 2013 +0200
Import
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Getopt-Long.spec | 59 +
sources |1 +
3 files changed,
On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:38:53 +0200
Honza Horak hho...@redhat.com wrote:
...snip...
How do we get push access to the git repo? It would be great to get
5.6 in before the test day on April 30.
To get involved, just follow standard process as described on Fedora
wiki:
Richard Hughes (hughsi...@gmail.com) said:
Using PackageKit and yum on the command line is often painful as we
have to always download metadata unless it's less than a few hours
old. Being able to update the metadata once a week would be awesome
(with the possible exception of security
On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 11:52 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
If you wanted to keep more versions on the mirrors, you have the following
options:
1) Have mash create everything, and then run a script that prunes versions
older than X, and re-runs createrepo.
[... snip ...]
2) Have mash try and
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:16:45PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
I've heard of a plan in development about batching non-critical updates into
monthly sets. It seems like these two things could go together
I'm sorry, but that is a very bad idea. When users report bugs, and I mean
real bugs here,
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 17:16 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
Am 09.04.2013 14:27, schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:10:26AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
I'm wondering what the interest would be in keeping packages
referenced in metadata on the mirrors for say a month?
The new 389-ds-base-1.3.1 branch has been created. Commits for 1.3.1
will have to be checked into master first, then cherry-picked to 1.3.1
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 00:05:45 +0800,
Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The current behaviour would be obtained by setting it to 1, and
setting it to 2 would already be a positive change as it would allow
downgrading a package if the update went wrong.
I don't think that is
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:09 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:16:45PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
I've heard of a plan in development about batching non-critical updates into
monthly sets. It seems like these two things could go together
I'm sorry, but that is a very
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:18:54 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 00:05:45 +0800,
Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The current behaviour would be obtained by setting it to 1, and
setting it to 2 would already be a positive change as it would
Thanks Rahul.
Given that Simone has already accepted existing bug for review, I will create a
new bug if he is ok with that.
Does that sound ok?
Thanks,
Ravindra
- Original Message -
From: Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Hi
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Ravindra Kumar ravindraku...@vmware.comwrote:
Thanks Rahul.
Given that Simone has already accepted existing bug for review, I will
create a new bug if he is ok with that.
Does that sound ok?
Sure. That was just FYI since some of the report
Hello everyone,
We are glad to announce that the L10N Test day for Fedora 19 is
scheduled for 11th April (Thursday) [1]. Translators all around the
world are kindly invited to test their languages and file bugs if
necessary, thus contributing to make the Fedora desktop one of the best
2013/4/9 Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org
*IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3, TC4, and TC5 are over
their size targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE
and Live SoaS).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now
Once upon a time, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com said:
So, needless to say, I'd suggest anyone interested in this to look at option
#3. Note that enabling something like that on rawhide would have a large
effect on the repository creation time - there's only so many ways to speed
up
On 09/04/13 10:41 AM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
I tried the live image on two computers and could not get into GDM. Is
this a known bug or should I report it?
It's hard to tell with no more details than that, but there are no known
general showstopper bugs in the GDM/GNOME path of RC1, no. there's
On Tuesday 09 April 2013 16:02:14 Richard Hughes wrote:
now for F18 are really not important at all. Spec file fixups, new
versions without bugfixes, updated artwork; that can all wait until a
certain point in the month.
Security-critical updates are already tagged as such, aren't they? So
I was trying to do a test build for aarch64 by adding autoreconf to the
spec file. I was getting an error that it doesn't exist.
When I tried to mock chroot for Rawhide I got the following:
# autoreconf
Can't locate Carp.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/share/autoconf
/usr/local/lib64/perl5
The lightweight tag 'perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-XS-0.01-3.el5' was created
pointing to:
84d6cc4... Drop redundant explicit dependency on perl(XSLoader) (#9284
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-XS-0.01-3.el6' was created
pointing to:
84d6cc4... Drop redundant explicit dependency on perl(XSLoader) (#9284
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-XS-0.01-3.fc17' was created
pointing to:
84d6cc4... Drop redundant explicit dependency on perl(XSLoader) (#9284
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-XS-0.01-3.fc19' was created
pointing to:
84d6cc4... Drop redundant explicit dependency on perl(XSLoader) (#9284
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-XS-0.01-3.fc18' was created
pointing to:
84d6cc4... Drop redundant explicit dependency on perl(XSLoader) (#9284
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-XS-0.01-3.fc20' was created
pointing to:
84d6cc4... Drop redundant explicit dependency on perl(XSLoader) (#9284
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 14:39:56 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I was trying to do a test build for aarch64 by adding autoreconf to the
spec file. I was getting an error that it doesn't exist.
The error output tells you something different:
When I tried to mock chroot for Rawhide I got the following:
On Ter, 2013-04-09 at 22:09 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 14:39:56 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I was trying to do a test build for aarch64 by adding autoreconf to the
spec file. I was getting an error that it doesn't exist.
The error output tells you something
On 04/09/2013 01:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I was trying to do a test build for aarch64 by adding autoreconf to the spec
file. I was getting an error that it doesn't exist.
When I tried to mock chroot for Rawhide I got the following:
# autoreconf
Can't locate Carp.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
perl Carp was broken for a while - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**
show_bug.cgi?id=924938https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938
You might need to go backwards (distro-sync)
Don't really help me for koji
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:37:32 -0500
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
wrote:
perl Carp was broken for a while - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**
show_bug.cgi?id=924938https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938
*IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3 through RC1 are over their
size targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE and Live
SoaS).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
perl-Math-Clipper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.x86_64 requires
libpolyclipping.so.5()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.i686 requires libpolyclipping.so.5
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve this
perl-Math-Clipper has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.x86_64 requires
libpolyclipping.so.5()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.i686 requires libpolyclipping.so.5
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950017
Bug ID: 950017
Summary: Unable to use LOG_EMERG level in Sys::Syslog
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: perl
Keywords: Regression
Severity: medium
Summary of changes:
778fb47... Initial import (perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-XS-0.01-2) (*)
84d6cc4... Drop redundant explicit dependency on perl(XSLoader) (#9284 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Summary of changes:
778fb47... Initial import (perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-XS-0.01-2) (*)
84d6cc4... Drop redundant explicit dependency on perl(XSLoader) (#9284 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Summary of changes:
778fb47... Initial import (perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-XS-0.01-2) (*)
84d6cc4... Drop redundant explicit dependency on perl(XSLoader) (#9284 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Summary of changes:
778fb47... Initial import (perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-XS-0.01-2) (*)
84d6cc4... Drop redundant explicit dependency on perl(XSLoader) (#9284 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927999
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927999
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-BZ-Client-1.04-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927999
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-BZ-Client-1.04-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47315
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47315/0001-Ticket-47315-filter-option-in-fixup-memberof-require.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47320/0004-Ticket-47320-put-conn-on-work_q-not-poll-list-if-con.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/608
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/608/0001-Ticket-608-Posix-Winsync-plugin-throws-posix_winsync.patch
Bug description: When a task posixWinsyncCreateMemberOfTask is
already running, another same task request is received, the
Posix Winsync
64 matches
Mail list logo
