Re: Texlive missing dependency

2016-10-01 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/01/2016 08:37 AM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: While building one of my packages I got this error: DEBUG util.py:421: Error: nothing provides tex-texlve-common needed by texlive-collection-basic-5:svn41149-3.20160520.fc26.1.noarch. DEBUG util.py:421: nothing provides tex-texlve-common needed

Re: Assistance to build LuxRender 1.6

2016-10-01 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 09/30/2016 11:21 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Removing these lines from the spec file below # -DBoost_INCLUDE_DIR=%{_includedir} \ # -DLUXRAYS_DISABLE_OPENCL:BOOL=OFF \ # -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -DLUXRAYS_DISABLE_OPENCL=0" \ #

Re: Assistance to build LuxRender 1.6

2016-10-01 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/01/2016 09:30 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Now hitting an issue related to the %build part, this time failing on make section. The scratch build is available for viewing to see where might be the problem:

Re: rpmlint dir-or-file-in-var-run error help

2016-10-01 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/01/2016 02:00 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote: Hi, I'm just looking at the rpmlint errors for the xpra package, and one I am stuck on is this: xpra.x86_64: E: dir-or-file-in-var-run /var/run/xpra The package drops a file in /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d which causes the creation of /var/run/xpra

Re: Assistance to build LuxRender 1.6

2016-10-01 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Now hitting an issue related to the %build part, this time failing on make section. The scratch build is available for viewing to see where might be the problem: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15902022 I cleaned the spec file

[Bug 1380983] New: Package metadata for perl-Gtk2-Unique lists the wrong URL.

2016-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380983 Bug ID: 1380983 Summary: Package metadata for perl-Gtk2-Unique lists the wrong URL. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Gtk2-Unique Assignee:

[Bug 1380983] Package metadata for perl-Gtk2-Unique lists the wrong URL, and the package itself is apparently deprecated.

2016-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380983 terrycloth changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Package metadata for|Package metadata for

[Test-Announce] 2016-10-03 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 25 Blocker Review

2016-10-01 Thread Adam Williamson
# F25 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2016-10-03 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We currently have 2 proposed Beta blockers and 3 proposed Final blockers to review. There are also 3 accepted Beta blockers to check in on. If you have time this

Orphaned: emacs-common-ebib

2016-10-01 Thread Jonathan Underwood
Hi, I have orphaned the emacs-common-ebib package on all branches. The package builds fine, but is very outdated cf upstream. Updating to the latest upstream version would require packaging a number of dependencies which I don't have the time to do currently. Cheers, Jonathan

Re: Retiring python-slimit in Rawhide

2016-10-01 Thread Jonathan Underwood
On 1 October 2016 at 21:32, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 20 July 2016 at 15:40, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> Upstream is dead (website is gone), it hasn't seen a release in over three >> years >> and nothing in Fedora relies on it anymore. > >

Re: Retiring python-slimit in Rawhide

2016-10-01 Thread Jonathan Underwood
On 20 July 2016 at 15:40, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Upstream is dead (website is gone), it hasn't seen a release in over three > years > and nothing in Fedora relies on it anymore. Actually, the package js-web-socket-js depended on this during build. Yeah, I only just

rpmlint dir-or-file-in-var-run error help

2016-10-01 Thread Jonathan Underwood
Hi, I'm just looking at the rpmlint errors for the xpra package, and one I am stuck on is this: xpra.x86_64: E: dir-or-file-in-var-run /var/run/xpra The package drops a file in /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d which causes the creation of /var/run/xpra when needed. The package has this in %{files}: %ghost

Re: Was perl removed from buildsys-build?

2016-10-01 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sáb, 2016-10-01 at 09:25 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 11:09:44AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones > com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > In the RISC-V mass rebuild, some packages fail because Perl

Fedora 25-20161001.n.0 compose check report

2016-10-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 4/102 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160930.n.0): ID: 37794 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL:

Fedora Rawhide-20161001.n.0 compose check report

2016-10-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 49/80 (x86_64), 13/15 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160930.n.2): ID: 37727 Test: x86_64 universal

Texlive missing dependency

2016-10-01 Thread Gianluca Sforna
While building one of my packages I got this error: DEBUG util.py:421: Error: nothing provides tex-texlve-common needed by texlive-collection-basic-5:svn41149-3.20160520.fc26.1.noarch. DEBUG util.py:421: nothing provides tex-texlve-common needed by

FAS name change

2016-10-01 Thread Athos Coimbra Ribeiro
Hello, As I am getting more involved in Fedora, I decided to go for a FAS name change to better represent my presence on mailing lists and IRC. My old FAS name was ribeiro The new one is athoscr nb helped me with the migration, approving me from all the other FAS groups. I also informed my

Re: Was perl removed from buildsys-build?

2016-10-01 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Saturday, October 1, 2016 11:09:44 AM CDT Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > In the RISC-V mass rebuild, some packages fail because Perl is > > missing. However they don't have 'BuildRequires: perl'. > >

Re: Triaging RH Bugzilla and forwarding bugs upstream (Was: F24, small backward steps)

2016-10-01 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 09:42:07AM -0700, stan wrote: Wouldn't it make more sense to have a way for package maintainers to decide if a bug was local or upstream, and a button they could push to automatically send it upstream? I really like Stan's idea. The root of this problem lies in the

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

2016-10-01 Thread buildsys
perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-1.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

2016-10-01 Thread buildsys
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires

[Bug 1380152] perl-HTTP-Tiny 0.068 pulls in lots of new dependencies including Xorg

2016-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380152 --- Comment #10 from Paul Howarth --- (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #9) > (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #7) > > However, in my opinion, the biggest problem is Business::ISBN requiring GD > > what

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160930.n.2 compose check report

2016-10-01 Thread Igor Gnatenko
Pull Request sent: https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/51 On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > File > "/usr/lib64/python3.5/site-packages/pyanaconda/packaging/dnfpayload.py", > line 537, in _select_group > self._base.group_install(grp.id,

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160930.n.2 compose check report

2016-10-01 Thread Igor Gnatenko
File "/usr/lib64/python3.5/site-packages/pyanaconda/packaging/dnfpayload.py", line 537, in _select_group self._base.group_install(grp.id, types, exclude=exclude) File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 1359, in group_install return self._add_comps_trans(trans)

Fedora Rawhide-20160930.n.2 compose check report

2016-10-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 49/80 (x86_64), 14/15 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160929.n.1): ID: 37588 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso

Re: Was perl removed from buildsys-build?

2016-10-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 11:09:44AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > In the RISC-V mass rebuild, some packages fail because Perl is > > missing. However they don't have 'BuildRequires: perl'. > >

Re: Was perl removed from buildsys-build?

2016-10-01 Thread Igor Gnatenko
I remember that perl-generators were removed from deps of rpm-build. On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > In the RISC-V mass rebuild, some packages fail because Perl is > missing. However they don't have 'BuildRequires: perl'. > > One example is

Re: Was perl removed from buildsys-build?

2016-10-01 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > In the RISC-V mass rebuild, some packages fail because Perl is > missing. However they don't have 'BuildRequires: perl'. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Build_Root_Without_Perl > If so I will add a BR:

Re: Was perl removed from buildsys-build?

2016-10-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Never mind, I found the right page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Build_Root_Without_Perl So I'll go ahead and add 'BuildRequires: perl-generators' where that is necessary. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and

Was perl removed from buildsys-build?

2016-10-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
In the RISC-V mass rebuild, some packages fail because Perl is missing. However they don't have 'BuildRequires: perl'. One example is 'telnet': https://fedorapeople.org/groups/risc-v/logs/telnet/0.17-65.fc24/build.log /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ksu80z: line 36: perl: command not found error: Bad

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

2016-10-01 Thread buildsys
perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-1.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

2016-10-01 Thread buildsys
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires