# Fedora QA Devel Meeting
# Date: 2016-10-24
# Time: 14:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net
I suspect that this is going to be a really short meeting and I'll be
surprised if it takes anywhere near the full hour.
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
595 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
357 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
76
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
473 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
467 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
399
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383673
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-Timer-0.08-1.fc2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387944
Bug ID: 1387944
Summary: perl-Tangerine-0.23 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Tangerine
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385642
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
This commit already existed in another branch.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-MetaCPAN-Client.git/commit/?h=perl-MetaCPAN-Client-1.028002-1.fc26=11dd50bc1ebb9d37b92bafbd887121c06a718009
___
perl-devel mailing list --
From 11dd50bc1ebb9d37b92bafbd887121c06a718009 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:17:17 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.028002
- New upstream release 1.028002
- Remove hard-deps for HTTP::Tiny::Mech and WWW::Mechanize::Cached (GH#50)
-
From e14d041e3a429b54d8389bfe3883b1563132f955 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 20:11:58 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.027000
- New upstream release 1.027000
- Convert values of JSON::PP::Boolean objects in output so they are not
skipped
From 309b1e3bf15b66760a25ee410fc9845fc7bc1745 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:33:31 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.026001
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- New upstream release 1.026001
From 11dd50bc1ebb9d37b92bafbd887121c06a718009 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:17:17 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.028002
- New upstream release 1.028002
- Remove hard-deps for HTTP::Tiny::Mech and WWW::Mechanize::Cached (GH#50)
-
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2016-10-24
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again tomorrow! We still have the validation results
change proposal to kick about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382015
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
# F25 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2016-10-24
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We currently have 2 proposed Final blockers to review. There
are also 11 accepted Final blockers to check in on and 3 proposed Final
freeze exceptions we could also
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:21:25 +, Christopher wrote:
> > Our rules is "leave it to the packager's personal preference" and to
> > "keep what's important".
>
> I'm curious, what *IS* important?
1.) Don't copy upstream changelogs into the spec %changelog.
2.) Mention everything that may affect
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:39:06PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote:
> >> 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I
> >> roll it
> >>
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:37:17AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> In Mageia, we use the VCS log as input to dynamically generate the RPM
> changelog and append it to the spec as part of the SRPM build process
> for the package build.
This would be far better than the current situation IMHO. There's
From 11dd50bc1ebb9d37b92bafbd887121c06a718009 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:17:17 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.028002
- New upstream release 1.028002
- Remove hard-deps for HTTP::Tiny::Mech and WWW::Mechanize::Cached (GH#50)
-
1c6aac5be532f7fa04ae602d985b0c81 MetaCPAN-Client-1.028002.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-MetaCPAN-Client/MetaCPAN-Client-1.028002.tar.gz/md5/1c6aac5be532f7fa04ae602d985b0c81/MetaCPAN-Client-1.028002.tar.gz
___
On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 16:31 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > SUSE has a %changelog RPM macro that fixes this by
> > moving the changelog into a .changes file stored in the same
> directory.
> > Every SUSE package uses it. Probably we should too?
>
> No. That said, I personally consider SUSE's
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:35 AM Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/23/2016 04:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote:
> >> 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I
> >> roll it
> >> over when I update to
From d82f094aea47dd8c6b6995c26a51add253dbf18c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:51:15 +0200
Subject: Update to 7.09
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6
8a059ba9bd14da2e4859b4242aaed5d4 Mojolicious-7.09.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Mojolicious/Mojolicious-7.09.tar.gz/md5/8a059ba9bd14da2e4859b4242aaed5d4/Mojolicious-7.09.tar.gz
___
perl-devel mailing list --
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/101 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 43302 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/43302
ID: 43318 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default
URL:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote:
>>> 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I
>>>
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote:
>> 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I
>> roll it
>> over when I update to the latest upstream? It seems the changelog
>> could
>>
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote:
>> 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I
>> roll it
>> over when I update to the latest upstream? It seems the changelog
>> could
On 10/23/2016 04:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote:
2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I
roll it
over when I update to the latest upstream? It seems the changelog
could
easily become the bulk of a package if
OLD: Fedora-25-20161022.n.0
NEW: Fedora-25-20161023.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 71
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 245.68 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size
On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 03:49 +, Christopher wrote:
> 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I
> roll it
> over when I update to the latest upstream? It seems the changelog
> could
> easily become the bulk of a package if everything is preserved, and
> I'd
> think git
> = Proposed Self Contained Change:Blivet-GUI in Anaconda =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AnacondaBlivetGUI
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Martin Kolman * Vojtěch Trefný
>
> Add blivet-gui as an alternative option for storage configuration in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387903
Bug ID: 1387903
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-7.09 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 19:48 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:51:25AM +0200, Julien Enselme wrote:
>
> >
> > I guess that in this case you mean the (co)maintainer of the
> > retired
> > package not its dependencies. Can I ask what permissions on the
> > package
> > are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386537
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387066
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387075
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
From fac0e5016c2545bb3614f7f3909c685b2bf8109a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:07:24 +0200
Subject: Update to 0.08
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Math-Random-Secure.spec | 12 +++-
sources |
9c02a5d331b8e7335b1a709716a24253 Math-Random-Secure-0.08.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Math-Random-Secure/Math-Random-Secure-0.08.tar.gz/md5/9c02a5d331b8e7335b1a709716a24253/Math-Random-Secure-0.08.tar.gz
___
From 811ca648e04a6da2703ce60933b1d028c90579e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:33:04 +0200
Subject: Update to 0.26
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML.spec | 12
sources
6ac235a88b2db0a5abf17fd9a5836c88 HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML-0.26.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML/HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML-0.26.tar.gz/md5/6ac235a88b2db0a5abf17fd9a5836c88/HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML-0.26.tar.gz
From 2207c063471804a7ebecf26475b01146505c0891 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 10:22:09 +0200
Subject: Update to 0.40067
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-HTML-FormHandler.spec | 7 +--
sources| 2 +-
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383672
--- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
eseyman's perl-Dancer2-0.204001-1.fc26 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=811983
--
You are receiving this mail
e8f1898495ba1ea8cbcc783f069bc9c6 HTML-FormHandler-0.40067.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-HTML-FormHandler/HTML-FormHandler-0.40067.tar.gz/md5/e8f1898495ba1ea8cbcc783f069bc9c6/HTML-FormHandler-0.40067.tar.gz
___
From db3851a9a61160d2c8a8969e5655af1470166861 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:57:40 +0200
Subject: Update to 0.204001
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Dancer2.spec | 6 +-
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7
71318d219ef1fbc55f02cd617e5318f0 Dancer2-0.204001.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Dancer2/Dancer2-0.204001.tar.gz/md5/71318d219ef1fbc55f02cd617e5318f0/Dancer2-0.204001.tar.gz
___
perl-devel mailing list --
45 matches
Mail list logo