ppisar uploaded Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule-0.03.tar.gz for perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule

7f6d0e163711cdf9b155df2057c42eff1d72b4a736dfa4d0c27f1dd6bc4eb45389160201169aa3301463d66822703768f5669b80201d33c5f5afa479d06fb10b Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule-0.03.tar.gz

[Bug 1459138] perl-Dist-Milla-v1.0.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459138 Bug 1459138 depends on bug 1459218, which changed state. Bug 1459218 Summary: Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule - Set the distribution version from your main module's version

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule/ ___ perl-devel

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule/ ___ perl-devel mailing

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule/ ___ perl-devel

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-VersionFromMainModule/ ___ perl-devel

Re: dnf bodhi plugin

On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 16:04 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:48:37AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:44:57AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234930 > > > > > > It's my

Re: F26 Mesa update

On 06/13/2017 06:32 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Hello, Is there a reason for delaying the update for mesa-17.1.2 to F26? We're getting buildroot failures for some F26 packages that depend on mesa (llvm was updated). Thanks, Michael something seems to be messed up. llvm 4.0 should be

[Bug 1460055] perl-Net-CUPS-0.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460055 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

F26 Mesa update

Hello, Is there a reason for delaying the update for mesa-17.1.2 to F26? We're getting buildroot failures for some F26 packages that depend on mesa (llvm was updated). Thanks, Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[Bug 1461219] New: perl-Gearman-2.004.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461219 Bug ID: 1461219 Summary: perl-Gearman-2.004.008 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Gearman Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:31:37PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I know we're already at new-deliverable explosion, but this seems like > > a place where it'd be nice to have Rawhide and Bikeshed (or whatever we > > want to call "tested and believed-to-be basically functional Rawhide"). > (Side

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 04:12:04PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Oh, I see the problem now, though it doesn't explain the '73 weeks > ago': The 73 weeks relates to the state in pkgdb and I should have removed it from the report. It is not useful here. :-/ > > [os-autoinst] >

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

Greetings. Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide composes in a while (13 days as of today). This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now failing composes that don't have all required release blocking

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:52:05AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 03:47:48PM -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > > On 06/12/2017 03:38 PM, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > > lldb airlied, daveisfera, 71 weeks > > > ago > > >

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 03:47:48PM -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > On 06/12/2017 03:38 PM, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > lldb airlied, daveisfera, 71 weeks ago > >jankratochvil, jvcelak, > >

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On 13 June 2017 at 17:28, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 06/13/2017 08:10 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> Greetings. >>> >>> Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide >>> composes in a

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On 06/13/2017 08:43 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:10:58PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now >>> failing composes that don't have all required release blocking items. >> >> Is there a way we can loosen

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On 06/13/2017 08:10 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Greetings. >> >> Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide >> composes in a while (13 days as of today). >> >> This has been due to a variety of bugs

Re: Migrating sub-package to a different package: How to resolve file conflicts

On 06/13/2017 02:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 02:40:27PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > Error: Transaction check error: > file /usr/include/llvm from install of llvm-devel-4.0.0-13.fc27.x86_64 > conflicts with file from package llvm-devel-4.0.0-4.fc27.x86_64

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

Guido Aulisi wrote: > So a dependency on a subpackage is affecting the entire package, > is this true? Yes -- Rex ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Migrating sub-package to a different package: How to resolve file conflicts

On 06/13/2017 02:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 02:40:27PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > Error: Transaction check error: > file /usr/include/llvm from install of llvm-devel-4.0.0-13.fc27.x86_64 > conflicts with file from package llvm-devel-4.0.0-4.fc27.x86_64

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

Il giorno mar, 13/06/2017 alle 19.12 +0200, Till Maas ha scritto: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:14:37AM +0200, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > This is going to break all audio applications in Fedora, because > > jack- > > audio-connection-kit is affected, but I cannot see a dependency on > > efl, > >

Re: Migrating sub-package to a different package: How to resolve file conflicts

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 02:40:27PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > >>> Error: Transaction check error: > >>> file /usr/include/llvm from install of llvm-devel-4.0.0-13.fc27.x86_64 > >>> conflicts with file from package llvm-devel-4.0.0-4.fc27.x86_64 file > >>> /usr/include/llvm-c from install

Re: Migrating sub-package to a different package: How to resolve file conflicts

On 06/13/2017 10:25 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Tom Stellard wrote: >> >>> I'm working on moving the llvm-devel sub-package from the llvm package to >>> a new llvm4.0 package, however, when I upgrade from the llvm sub-package >>> to the llvm4.0 sub-package, I am getting file

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 01:50 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:20:36AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 04:12:04PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 16:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > On Mon,

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:14:37AM +0200, Guido Aulisi wrote: > This is going to break all audio applications in Fedora, because jack- > audio-connection-kit is affected, but I cannot see a dependency on efl, > I've got jack installed with no efl and only libffado, if I try to > install ffado I

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On 06/12/2017 06:38 PM, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > In preparation for the Final Freeze on 2017-06-27 Release > Engineering will retire all packages in Branched with broken dependencies and > all packages depending on these. If you get this e-mail directly this affects > at least one of your

Re: Migrating sub-package to a different package: How to resolve file conflicts

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Tom Stellard wrote: >> >>> I'm working on moving the llvm-devel sub-package from the llvm package to >>> a new llvm4.0 package, however, when I upgrade from the llvm sub-package >>> to the llvm4.0

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

You keep using that word — where for [sic] — I do not think it means what you think it means. (As inconceivable as it may seem.) -- Kaleb ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > I know we're already at new-deliverable explosion, but this seems like > a place where it'd be nice to have Rawhide and Bikeshed (or whatever we > want to call "tested and believed-to-be basically functional Rawhide"). > That doesn't

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:10:58PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now > > failing composes that don't have all required release blocking items. > > Is there a way we can loosen that up for rawhide and have it tightened > down

Re: Migrating sub-package to a different package: How to resolve file conflicts

Rex Dieter wrote: > Tom Stellard wrote: > >> I'm working on moving the llvm-devel sub-package from the llvm package to >> a new llvm4.0 package, however, when I upgrade from the llvm sub-package >> to the llvm4.0 sub-package, I am getting file conflicts. > ... >> Error: Transaction check error:

Re: Migrating sub-package to a different package: How to resolve file conflicts

Tom Stellard wrote: > I'm working on moving the llvm-devel sub-package from the llvm package to > a new llvm4.0 package, however, when I upgrade from the llvm sub-package > to the llvm4.0 sub-package, I am getting file conflicts. ... > Error: Transaction check error: > file /usr/include/llvm

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide > composes in a while (13 days as of today). > > This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now > failing composes

[389-devel] [Review request]: Ticket #49031 - Improve memberof with a cache of group parents

Hi, Ticket - https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49031 Patch - https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/7206a90875d5ef3def52c8a7f1dafb15ecba5b353dce03d4e3828a1bbd501668-0001-Add-performance-tests-for-memberof-plugin.patch Thanks, -Sankar R. ___

Announcing the release of Fedora 26 Beta

The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of Fedora 26 Beta, the next big step on our journey to the exciting Fedora 26 release in July. Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site: * Get Fedora 26 Beta Workstation https://getfedora.org/workstation/prerelease/

[389-devel] Re: Please review: Ticket 49043

On 06/09/2017 09:02 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > Hi everybody, > > here is the result of my work on replication conflicts. I would like > you to review and comment. I know that given the complexity of the > problem and the volume of teh patches this is not an easy task - I'm > sure there is need

[Bug 1459766] perl-Cflow-1.053-33.fc26 FTBFS on 32-bit platforms: Cflow.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459766 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

Greetings. Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide composes in a while (13 days as of today). This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now failing composes that don't have all required release blocking items. Here's a partial list:

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Rsyslog log format change proposal

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > i call your infrastructure scattered around the globe the minority of setups This can be the case for Fedora but it would be not for CentOS and RHEL, where this change should head in too. > "there is a simple way to

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On 06/13/2017 12:38 AM, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote: In preparation for the Final Freeze on 2017-06-27 Release Engineering will retire all packages in Branched with broken dependencies and all packages depending on these. If you get this e-mail directly this affects at least one of your

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:22:57PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > Till, it'd be great if this kind of scary e-mail, affecting quite a > > lot of packagers, would contain more details, hints, etc. It seems >

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Rsyslog log format change proposal

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> When some package will break because someone adjusted format of >> timestamps, the bug is in that package and not in the rsyslog's format > > there is a world outside packages called user scripts That is true. But

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On 2017-06-13, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> vim-syntastic praiskup 38 >> weeks ago > > Please don't remove this set of vim-syntastic* packages, there's > nothing to do about this. Once we have fixed release engineering > processes [1] that

[Bug 1459142] perl-Inline-Python-0.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459142 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-Inline-Python-0.54-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1459142] perl-Inline-Python-0.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459142 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1287256 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1287256=edit [patch] Update to 0.54 (#1459142) -- You are

[Bug 1459142] perl-Inline-Python-0.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459142 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On 06/13/2017 12:47 AM, Josh Stone wrote: > On 06/12/2017 03:38 PM, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote: >> lldb airlied, daveisfera, 71 weeks ago >>jankratochvil, jvcelak, >>

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Rsyslog log format change proposal

Thanks, Stephen, I will update the "Benefit to Fedora" section. > It does not inspire confidence that the person(s) proposing this Change > understand the potential fallout. ... > what packages in Fedora parse the rsyslog output and make sure that they are > capable of handling the change.

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Rsyslog log format change proposal

IMHO it is exactly as Björn replied to you. Between 2010 and 2014 I was working in aerospace where the exact time of an event is of the highest importance. In this field there is deep understanding (based on several hundreds-millions-dollars screwups) how much compliance to standards is

[Bug 1460835] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460835 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker (master). "7.30 bump"

From 072a90bc8559e93f6019d9d6f0729743485c8911 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:57:16 +0200 Subject: 7.30 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec | 7 +-- sources

ppisar uploaded ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.30.tar.gz for perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker

6581335be0891f9032e5d5174599f72014656bb317b9fa49481fec623626af84f330e03b8e29793582e62c668d11ae4988be5fe501de1c1f69cdd559ac9d9448 ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.30.tar.gz

REMINDER: Submission deadline for Changes of Fedora 27 requiring mass rebuild takes effect in one week

Hi everyone! The submission deadline for Changes of Fedora 27 [1], requiring mass rebuild, takes effect in one week on June 20th. All the Changes requiring mass rebuild sent for review after this deadline are going to be moved to Fedora 28 release. The mass rebuild it self is planned on July

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

Il giorno mar, 13/06/2017 alle 11.11 +0100, Peter Robinson ha scritto: > I'm not sure how all those people can be co-maintainers of efl. I'm > not sure how that's meant to be interpreted but given some of the > other responses I think this script as bit rotted some what. > > Peter I think these

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

I'm not sure how all those people can be co-maintainers of efl. I'm not sure how that's meant to be interpreted but given some of the other responses I think this script as bit rotted some what. Peter > Affected (co)maintainers > alexl: efl > ankursinha: lldb, efl > atkac: efl > bpepple: efl >

jplesnik pushed to perl-Config-Model-Itself (master). "2.011 bump"

From 066febdccc3ac5aa1a6b85c0e08d17989678d781 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:57:51 +0200 Subject: 2.011 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Config-Model-Itself.spec | 9 ++--- sources | 2 +-

jplesnik uploaded Config-Model-Itself-2.011.tar.gz for perl-Config-Model-Itself

e0e73f281bd7528244182a6aa91b31f78c7bf25fa86aec99fd80066781db263827bae6a7f987befb8386d9c9498a80a668863b658b3ef12990422ed3bebe90b0 Config-Model-Itself-2.011.tar.gz

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

2017-06-13 0:38 GMT+02:00 : > In preparation for the Final Freeze on 2017-06-27 Release > Engineering will retire all packages in Branched with broken dependencies and > all packages depending on these. If you get this e-mail directly this affects > at least one of your

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On 06/13/2017 12:38 AM, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > thunderbird-enigmail lupinix75 weeks ago > Should be fixed now, new build submitted for updates-testing. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1458962] perl-App-Cme-1.020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458962 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

jplesnik pushed to perl-App-Cme (master). "1.020 bump"

From bfae59eb36cd9c406a444da84a737e8611164596 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:33:11 +0200 Subject: 1.020 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-App-Cme.spec | 10 +++--- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

Il giorno lun, 12/06/2017 alle 22.38 +, t...@fedoraproject.org ha scritto: > In preparation for the Final Freeze on 2017-06-27 Release > Engineering will retire all packages in Branched with broken > dependencies and > all packages depending on these. If you get this e-mail directly this >

Re: btw and Monitoring functionality ? Re: PkgDB search / info functionality

Dne 12.6.2017 v 21:01 Ralph Bean napsal(a): > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:09:28PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> Hello , pkgdb also have Monitoring settings, Koschei integration, >> timeline and Anitya , where do we have this on Pagure over Dist-Git ? > The Koschei integration is going to move

jplesnik pushed to perl-Config-Model (master). "2.1053 bump"

From a2358e98b550f68728bcf6a2dd93dd2513743ae0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:43:32 +0200 Subject: 2.1053 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Config-Model.spec | 9 ++--- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 8

Re: Perl on Reddit

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 07:25:16PM -0400, Dan Book wrote: > Looking at the dependency chain for perl-core, it brings in perl-devel > directly and as a prerequisite for modules such as perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker > and perl-ExtUtils-Miniperl. Assuming perl-devel is what brings in the C > development

recommendations for future Fedora / Perl improvements

Hi, Scott. The people who make up the Fedora Perl SIG are mostly living in Europe and are in the #fedora-perl during CET work hours (FTR, this is UTC+2). If you can't make it on IRC during these hours, you can always send your proposals to perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org and we'll read them

[Bug 1460850] perl-Test-Timer-2.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460850 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

jplesnik pushed to perl-Test-Timer (master). "2.01 bump"

From c194e9eff85f0e5ddfa32ffb76a3161bc921fd58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 09:22:59 +0200 Subject: 2.01 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Test-Timer.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

jplesnik uploaded Test-Timer-2.01.tar.gz for perl-Test-Timer

22ea647ace9a901c4812faa4d6220a8c91db7d9e3ef0b0fa9d7d88adf85c2c89096d5d694d372bcd13175882ad7bc4915b7909c8ea4c4ce2aa45134252b57c49 Test-Timer-2.01.tar.gz

Re: Migrating sub-package to a different package: How to resolve file conflicts

On 06/13/2017 12:49 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: > No plans to do this for gcc, because gcc is only compiler not a library, > like LLVM, though I would like to do this for the clang libraries as well. GCC potentially has similar issues. However, libstdc++ aims at backwards compatibility, and the

Re: Perl on Reddit

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 07:25:16PM -0400, Dan Book wrote: > Sorry I don't have quotes but I was not subscribed to the list yet. > > Looking at the dependency chain for perl-core, it brings in perl-devel > directly and as a prerequisite for modules such as perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker > and

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 12:38:11 AM CEST t...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > In preparation for the Final Freeze on 2017-06-27 Release > Engineering will retire all packages in Branched with broken dependencies and > all packages depending on these. If you get this e-mail directly this affects > at

kalev pushed to perl-GTop (master). "Rebuilt for libgtop2 soname bump"

From 24b4adbee802183a1c3eeb30833cbb5662441974 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kalev Lember Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 08:16:47 +0200 Subject: Rebuilt for libgtop2 soname bump --- perl-GTop.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/perl-GTop.spec