On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:55:58PM -0400, langdon wrote:
> On 06/26/2017 01:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On 06/26/2017 11:04 AM, Langdon White wrote:
> >
> > > We talked about this with the server wg and decided for F27 server we
> > > would
> > > try to avoid an "everything else" module and fig
On 01/26/2016 09:33 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 26/01/16 14:10, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
>> pencil
>>
> pencil did not had any release for a longer time (although they directly
> recommend downloading a fedora 19 package, the latest build made by the
> package maintainer was 2 years ago for f2
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 00:01 +, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://
Hi all,
Today, June 27th 2017, is an important day on the Fedora 26
schedule [1], with significant cut-offs.
Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages
which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be
marked as 'stable' and included in the Final compose
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2017-06-27 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00
US/Eastern
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Work
Hi,
my taking python-cryptography was a mistake. I am really not
interested in that package anymore and it seems that other
people are stalled by my inactivity (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408730). Could
somebody who cares more about it, take the package from me,
please?
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 09:32:15PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> This has been tried by AltLinux, they were using Group tag to organize
> packages into small repositories and after all they went back for one
> big repository because of cross-dependencies, questions where to put
> what and probably
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:19:42PM -0400, langdon wrote:
> On 06/26/2017 01:44 PM, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:29:08AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On 06/26/2017 11:04 AM, Langdon White wrote:
> > >
> > > > We talked about this with the server wg and decided for F27 server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 14:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:55:58PM -0400, langdon wrote:
> > Apologies, but I was talking about "available in the Fedora Server
> > repo". Specifically, we have a lofty goal that everything i
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:30:20PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> That can be done by:
[...]
Ugh, got distracted and sent before really done. Are there other ways
we're looking at? Which of these are the Modularity and Server WGs
thinking?
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
Hello Everyone,
I back ported the function pretransaction into dnf plugin from fedora 25,
because
I’ don’t wanna break the current system.
Source can be found at
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andybe/BtrfsF25/
dnf-1.1.10-7.fc25.src.rpm
dnf-plugins-extras-0.0.12-6.fc25.src.rpm
0001-d
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:55:58PM -0400, langdon wrote:
> Apologies, but I was talking about "available in the Fedora Server
> repo". Specifically, we have a lofty goal that everything in that
> repo would have a module wrapped around it. We may not get there
> which triggers the choices above.
A
On 06/26/2017 01:44 PM, Petr Šabata wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:29:08AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 06/26/2017 11:04 AM, Langdon White wrote:
We talked about this with the server wg and decided for F27 server we would
try to avoid an "everything else" module and figure out how to solve
On 26 June 2017 at 13:55, langdon wrote:
> On 06/26/2017 01:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> On 06/26/2017 11:04 AM, Langdon White wrote:
>>
>>> We talked about this with the server wg and decided for F27 server we
>>> would
>>> try to avoid an "everything else" module and figure out how to solve t
On 06/26/2017 01:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 06/26/2017 11:04 AM, Langdon White wrote:
We talked about this with the server wg and decided for F27 server we would
try to avoid an "everything else" module and figure out how to solve this
problem more nicely between now and release. We have mult
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:29:08AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 06/26/2017 11:04 AM, Langdon White wrote:
>
> > We talked about this with the server wg and decided for F27 server we would
> > try to avoid an "everything else" module and figure out how to solve this
> > problem more nicely betwee
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:33 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Unrelated question: We will still be making the server repo and
> netinstall so people can install the legacy server setup with rpms, right?
>
>
I don't know if we'll bother creating an actual Fedora Server netinstall,
but we'll certainly still
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 20/128 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170625.n.0):
ID: 113193 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.o
On 06/26/2017 11:04 AM, Langdon White wrote:
> We talked about this with the server wg and decided for F27 server we would
> try to avoid an "everything else" module and figure out how to solve this
> problem more nicely between now and release. We have multiple options here
> including : generati
Hans,
can you check if the permissions in this spec file are correctly set, please?
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/5CP27jxdYtG9DY2FXO6X0A/raw
Scratch builds: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20188500
___
devel mailing list --
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 12:06 Ben Rosser wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Petr Šabata wrote:
> >
> > The modular release is effectively a separate distro.
> >
> > While using single RPMs from traditional Fedora might work in
> > most cases, I wouldn't recommend enabling the entire reposit
There will be an outage starting at 2017-06-26 21:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-06-26 21:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
We will be applying updates and rebo
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:55:42PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> Creating logical modules would be the best approach here.
> >> Containers are also an option but someone needs to make them, too.
> > So, would a "Random Command-Line Tools" module make sense? Sort of like
> > the old "system-tool
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Petr Šabata wrote:
>
> The modular release is effectively a separate distro.
>
> While using single RPMs from traditional Fedora might work in
> most cases, I wouldn't recommend enabling the entire repository
> which also provides packages conflicting with (and pos
= Proposed System Wide Change: Modular Server =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Modular_Server
Change owner(s):
* Langdon White
The Modularity Working Group, Factory 2.0, Base Runtime, and Server
Working Group would like to propose using the modular infrastructure
for creating and deliver
= Proposed System Wide Change: Host and Platform =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Host_and_Platform
Change owner(s):
* Petr Šabata
Host and Platform is an evolution of the Base Runtime module concept
introduced in Fedora 26 Boltron, splitting the minimal system further
into independent
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:06:18PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
>> > Hmmm, so, if I want some random utility (let's say gcal, which I don't
>> > package, or calc, which I do) on my server, what are my options? Can I
> [...]
>> The modular relea
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:06:18PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > Hmmm, so, if I want some random utility (let's say gcal, which I don't
> > package, or calc, which I do) on my server, what are my options? Can I
[...]
> The modular release is effectively a separate distro.
>
> While using single RP
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Silvia Sanchez wrote:
>
> Where is the the Blocker review meeting?
>
See the *other* email in test-announce :-)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.
On 26.06.2017 09:02, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
qgis volter, bruno, daveisfera, 162 weeks ago
orion, rezso
I've launched new qgis builds for rawhide and f26 disabling parallel
build as a quick workaround for the build failure.
_
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 09:42:39AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 01:44:43PM -0400, langdon wrote:
> > - Although modularity allows for lifecycle changes, there is no
> > plan for anything besides the normal 13 month lifecycle at this
> > point.
>
> So, this basically giv
Hi packagers,
rawhide rpmbuild contains various debuginfo improvements that hopefully
will make various hacks in spec files redundant.
If you have your own way of handling debuginfo packages, calling
find-debuginfo.sh directly, need hacks for working around debugedit
limitations or split your deb
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 01:44:43PM -0400, langdon wrote:
> - Although modularity allows for lifecycle changes, there is no
> plan for anything besides the normal 13 month lifecycle at this
> point.
So, this basically gives until November 2018 to figure out a way to
handle longer lifecycles. :)
= Proposed System Wide Change: Modular Release =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularRelease
Change owner(s):
* Ralph Bean < rbean AT redhat DOT com >
The build, release, distribution, and update changes associated with
and required for the [Changes/Modular_Server] and
[Changes/Host_and
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 03:19:52PM +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> I would like to initiate the non-responsive maintainer process [1] for
> Christopher Aillon [2]. A long time ago, he used to be part of the
> Fedora and Red Hat desktop teams. He is no longer around. He left
> software development and
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 08:56:20AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 07:02:25AM +, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > libguestfs (maintained by: rjones, agk, group::virtmaint-sig, mdbooth,
> > ptoscano)
> > libguestfs-1.36.4-1.fc26.src requires java-1.8.
Dne 26.6.2017 v 11:56 Petr Šabata napsal(a):
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:40:25AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> Dne 22.6.2017 v 17:15 Petr Šabata napsal(a):
>>> While playing with Base Runtime container base images we noticed
>>> that some packages couldn't be installed with coreutils-single
>>
Am 26.06.2017 um 09:02 schrieb t...@fedoraproject.org:
htmlcleaner (maintained by: marcindulak, besser82, java-sig)
htmlcleaner-2.2.1-6.fc21.noarch requires java-headless = 1:1.8.0
htmlcleaner-2.2.1-6.fc21.src requires java-devel = 1:1.8.0
htmlcleaner has
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:40:25AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 22.6.2017 v 17:15 Petr Šabata napsal(a):
> > While playing with Base Runtime container base images we noticed
> > that some packages couldn't be installed with coreutils-single
> > due to their /bin file dependencies. Unlike
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 09:09:15AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 07:02:25AM +, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> >> libguestfs (maintained by: rjones, agk, group::virtmaint-sig,
> >> mdbooth, ptoscano)
From e4f5e2142bff0b1807654df42e400219c5f0ca3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:51:58 +0200
Subject: 0.900 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-App-cpm.spec | 9 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
Where is the the Blocker review meeting?
Cheers,
Sylvia
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 17:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow.
> There's nothing in particular to discuss at a meeting right now, so
> far
> as I know. If you're aware of anything, pl
Hi!
I'm looking for new maintainers for proguard which I don't use myself
anymore and for which I'm not the best maintainer!
proguard
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/proguard/
I just orphaned the package, feel free to take it! It will require some
work as it does not currently
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 07:02:25AM +, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>> libguestfs (maintained by: rjones, agk, group::virtmaint-sig, mdbooth,
>> ptoscano)
>> libguestfs-1.36.4-1.fc26.src requires java-1.8.0-openj
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 07:02:25AM +, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> libguestfs (maintained by: rjones, agk, group::virtmaint-sig, mdbooth,
> ptoscano)
> libguestfs-1.36.4-1.fc26.src requires java-1.8.0-openjdk =
> 1:1.8.0.131-5.b12.fc26, java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel = 1:1.8.
I'm fairly sure we don't have any setuid binaries written in OCaml.
However I've no idea how we would go about mechanically checking this,
hence why I'm asking here.
OCaml 4.04.2 (23 Jun 2017):
---
### Security fix:
- PR#7557: Local privilege escalation issue with
OVERVIEW
As the modularity work starts to enter Fedora with the Fedora 27
release, a typical Change Proposal did not seem to do justice on
capturing the moving parts and dependencies for the work to successfully
land. As a result, this document attempts to capture, at a high level,
the g
47 matches
Mail list logo
