Call for testing: more Fedora 28 Beta blocker-fixing updates

Hey folks! Just a note that there are some more F28 Beta blocker-fixing updates that could use some testing and feedback: 1. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2c066076a2 This is an anaconda update that fixes a bug in recent versions: if you did a live install and both created

Re: Link error in F28 (but not Rawhide)

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Agreed. I think someone just needs to sit down and try and figure out > why this is. I am not convinced (without evidence) that it's annobin or > mini debuginfo (but of course I could be wrong). I think there's a lot more than one or two factors at play, but if each new

Self Introduction: Arsenick - René Jr Purcell

Hi everyone, I'm sending an email as suggested in the package maintainer documentation. The first time I installed Linux was in 1998, since then it always has been in my life. I started working as a tech guy in 2000 goes to shool and started my professional career as a linux sysadmin in 2005. I'm

[Bug 1551252] perl-SNMP-Info-3.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551252 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1558293] New: perl-Test-Harness-3.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558293 Bug ID: 1558293 Summary: perl-Test-Harness-3.42 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Harness Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1558276] New: perl-DBI-1.641 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558276 Bug ID: 1558276 Summary: perl-DBI-1.641 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DBI Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1558274] New: perl-App-find2perl-1.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558274 Bug ID: 1558274 Summary: perl-App-find2perl-1.004 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-App-find2perl Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 49109 - nsDS5ReplicaTransportInfo should accept StartTLS as an option

Hi team, please, review: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49109 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49613 Thanks, Simon ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG (once every two weeks)

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2018-03-20 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group. More information available at: [Modularity

Re: Lorax has changed groups on github: rhinstaller -> weldr

Congrats on a successful migration and thank you for supporting https on the documentation https://weldr.io/lorax/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1106 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 869 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 451

Lorax has changed groups on github: rhinstaller -> weldr

I've just completed moving Lorax over to the weldr group on github.com The new location is: https://github.com/weldr/lorax (github will forward you to the new location if you visit the rhinstaller one) All issues and PRs have be preserved in the move. You can update git to point to the new

Should python3-foo obsolete python2-foo (when python2-foo is removed)?

Discussion about $subject happening at [1]. [1] https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/754 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Using the Fedora infra for crypto-mining

Yeah kevin, not much of it even seems possible let alone plausible. Github: https://github.com/Sadin | Pagure: https://pagure.io/user/sadin | Twitter: https://twitter.com/sadinzs | Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@sadinzs On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

Re: Using the Fedora infra for crypto-mining

On 03/19/2018 01:08 PM, Zachary Snyder wrote: > I feel like if this were going on there are multiple eyes on the machines > that support FAS and the infra. > Personally I don't think it is a concern. CPU hashing doesn't even report > successes because of > blockchain difficultly, In any coin that

Re: Using the Fedora infra for crypto-mining

I feel like if this were going on there are multiple eyes on the machines that support FAS and the infra. Personally I don't think it is a concern. CPU hashing doesn't even report successes because of blockchain difficultly, In any coin that matters. Not a bad thing to bring up though, so that

Re: Using the Fedora infra for crypto-mining

> To be completely clear here, crypto-mining is not a valid use of Fedora > Project resources. Hopefully our community realizes and respects this. To be completely clear here (just in case it was misinterpreted=) I was expressing my concern. I'm not worried about our community but it is my

Fedora 28-20180319.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 207446 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/207446 ID: 207482 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL:

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 15:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:41:15PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:06:56 +0100 > > Dan Horák wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:25:31 +0100 > > > Fabio Valentini wrote: >

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 10:58 +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > > On Mon 19 Mar 2018 09:38:58 AM GMT Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > So you think having to send a request to a web service instead of just > > >

[Bug 1557712] perl-Mango-1.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557712 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mango-1.30-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 979 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 869 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 840

[Bug 1557561] Please add: perl-Authen-Radius to EPEL 6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557561 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: Using the Fedora infra for crypto-mining

On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 18:16 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 19/03/18 16:38 +0100, Michal Novotny wrote: > > Builds are being automatically terminated if not finished in 18 hours. > > The virtual machines that builds run on are also not particularly strong > > so if anyone tried to mine

Re: Using the Fedora infra for crypto-mining

On 19/03/18 16:38 +0100, Michal Novotny wrote: Builds are being automatically terminated if not finished in 18 hours. The virtual machines that builds run on are also not particularly strong so if anyone tried to mine something by this method, he wouldn't get particularly rich :). *Any* return

Re: new section for 'Join the package collection maintainers'

On 17/03/18 16:51 +0100, René Genz wrote: Thanks to Jonathan, Athos, and Tom for the discussion. I added one of Tom's links and pushed the text: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#One-off_contributions Thanks! ___

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

W dniu 19.03.2018 o 15:57, Pierre-Yves Chibon pisze: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:41:15PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:06:56 +0100 >> Dan Horák wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:25:31 +0100 >>> Fabio Valentini wrote: >>> On Sun,

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 2018-02-18 11:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to > random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by analyzing > hundreds of

Fedora 28 compose report: 20180319.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-28-20180318.n.0 NEW: Fedora-28-20180319.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 17:18 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 08:43 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > What if I just want to write a tool that parses fedmsgs about module > > builds in Koji and does something that depends on module names, > > streams > > and versions? (e.g.

Re: Using the Fedora infra for crypto-mining

On 03/19/2018 08:38 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Hello Dridi, > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune > wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> Since I work on a project that uses the Coverity Scan free plan for >> open source software it came to my attention today

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 08:43 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > What if I just want to write a tool that parses fedmsgs about module > builds in Koji and does something that depends on module names, > streams > and versions? (e.g. some sort of changelog thing) I haven't looked at actual fedmsgs

Re: Request for testing: dbus-broker as system and user bus

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:42:57AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > I would like to test it, but as long as it keeps the original dbus on my > system, I won't install it. I don't want two dbus implementations on my > system. That's a bit harsh, especially in the testing phase. /usr/bin/dbus-daemon is

Re: Link error in F28 (but not Rawhide)

On 03/16/2018 05:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The compile error is fixed, but the packages didn't magically get > smaller. > > I really kinda agree with Kevin, FWIW. The images have got > *significantly* bigger across the last few releases and we're just > sorta shrugging and going 'ok,

Fedora Rawhide-20180319.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 16/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 207283 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/207283 ID: 207312 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 10:58 +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > On Mon 19 Mar 2018 09:38:58 AM GMT Fabio Valentini wrote: > > So you think having to send a request to a web service instead of just > > parsing a string locally with one line of code is a good trade-off for > > allowing dashes? > >

Re: Using the Fedora infra for crypto-mining

Hello Dridi, On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Hello list, > > Since I work on a project that uses the Coverity Scan free plan for > open source software it came to my attention today that free scans > were put on hold and resumed recently

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 09:27 +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: > This, AFAIK, only affects what you see in some parts of the > build and update system (and on the bus). That's a very important parenthesis, as we as a project do a lot of work with fedmsg messages. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:41:15PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:06:56 +0100 > Dan Horák wrote: > > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:25:31 +0100 > > Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Michael Cronenworth > > >

[Bug 1557975] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557975 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1557712] perl-Mango-1.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557712 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:06:56 +0100 Dan Horák wrote: > On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:25:31 +0100 > Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Michael Cronenworth > > wrote: > > > On 03/18/2018 01:02 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180319.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180318.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180319.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 42 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: Best way to handle sub-package conflicts

On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 12:44:37 -0400, Digimer wrote: > I think "Conflict" is the way to go. However, given how much the guide > urges not to use 'Conflicts', I worry that will make it > harder/impossible later to have the package accepted into Fedora. > > Would a use-case like this be an

[Bug 1558011] perl-XML-Simple-2.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558011 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-XML-Simple-2.25-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c4b7ee1753 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1558011] perl-XML-Simple-2.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558011 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1557561] Please add: perl-Authen-Radius to EPEL 6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557561 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Authen-Radius-0.24-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-648849bf40 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1558011] perl-XML-Simple-2.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558011 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1557975] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557975 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.34-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f43ed9fdbb -- You are receiving

[Bug 1557975] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557975 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:25:31 +0100 Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Michael Cronenworth > wrote: > > On 03/18/2018 01:02 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> > >> I've looked at waiverdb-cli too, but since no tests seem to have > >> run

[Bug 1558011] New: perl-XML-Simple-2.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558011 Bug ID: 1558011 Summary: perl-XML-Simple-2.25 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-XML-Simple Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1557975] New: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557975 Bug ID: 1557975 Summary: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.34 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1557667] perl - Config_heavy.pl uses redhat-hardened-cc1 without depending on redhat-rpm-config

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557667 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- Config refers to many external tools, like gcc, groff, libdb etc. It was decided that it does not make sense to require their providers just only because perl knows about them. It's a

[Bug 1557712] perl-Mango-1.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557712 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mango-1.30-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c8e8a0db5d -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1557712] perl-Mango-1.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557712 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mango-1.30-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-eb97f71227 -- You are receiving this mail

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:10:23AM +0100, Jan Kaluza wrote: >If something does not support modules and it should support modules and >*needs* to work with Koji content-generator imported builds for some >reason, it needs to updated to support modules and as part of this update, >it

[Bug 1557712] perl-Mango-1.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557712 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

Re: Request for testing: dbus-broker as system and user bus

I would like to test it, but as long as it keeps the original dbus on my system, I won't install it. I don't want two dbus implementations on my system. Vít Dne 13.3.2018 v 15:04 Tom Gundersen napsal(a): > Hi, > > dbus-broker is a new DBus message bus implementation. We are proposing > it as

[Bug 1557667] perl - Config_heavy.pl uses redhat-hardened-cc1 without depending on redhat-rpm-config

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557667 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Mon 19 Mar 2018 09:38:58 AM GMT Fabio Valentini wrote: > So you think having to send a request to a web service instead of just > parsing a string locally with one line of code is a good trade-off for > allowing dashes? This has been mentioned several times in this thread and I think there's a

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 10:20 Petr Šabata wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 08:57:08AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 09:27:30AM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 07:09:23PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote:

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 08:57:08AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 09:27:30AM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 07:09:23PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:14:27PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > > > >

Using the Fedora infra for crypto-mining

Hello list, Since I work on a project that uses the Coverity Scan free plan for open source software it came to my attention today that free scans were put on hold and resumed recently because people were abusing it for crypto mining. Since I couldn't find any discussion on this list around this

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk < puiterw...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Don't be afraid of koji. :) > > I couldn't agree more, Koji's a pretty nice project to work on. > It might seems scary for newcomers because of all the ingrained knowledge > and assumptions, but

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 09:27:30AM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 07:09:23PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:14:27PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > > > On 03/16/2018 04:04 PM, Dennis Gregorovic wrote: > > > > modules are not RPMs.  I

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

(a repost from the infra list) Please note that modules (and therefore module builds) may reference to multiple RPM builds. Also, the module name doesn't need to match any RPM name. Therefore getting package names from the module build name would not be possible anyway. As an exapmple, see the

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 07:09:23PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:14:27PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > > On 03/16/2018 04:04 PM, Dennis Gregorovic wrote: > > > modules are not RPMs.  I would not expect them to necessarily use the > > > same format as RPMs. 

Fedora-Atomic 27-20180319.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to