[389-devel] Please review: 49975 rpmlint

2018-10-13 Thread William Brown
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49975 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49977 -- Sincerely, William ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Cannot Boot After Doing system-upgrade

2018-10-13 Thread Jon Burgess
On Sat, 2018-10-13 at 17:34 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Garry T. Williams < > gtwilli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > By the way, from the journal during the dnf system-upgrade reboot: > > > > ... > > Sep 30 10:02:28 vfr dnf[831]: shim-x64.x86_64 15-5 > > > > And

Re: Installation image layout

2018-10-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 8:17 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 5:26 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki > wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 03:44:38PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > >> mkfs.btrfs has --rootdir and --shrink features to pre-allocate a > >> volume with files at mkfs

Re: Cannot Boot After Doing system-upgrade

2018-10-13 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote: > On Saturday, October 13, 2018 7:34:44 PM EDT Chris Murphy wrote: >> Good catch. It's vaguely possible there's a bug in either shim 15-5 >> or grub2-efi 2.02-58 as it relates to your firmware, that caused >> it to silently fail, and the

Re: Installation image layout

2018-10-13 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 5:26 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 03:44:38PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> mkfs.btrfs has --rootdir and --shrink features to pre-allocate a >> volume with files at mkfs time; I have no idea to what degree it >> depends on kernel code. >

[Test-Announce] 2018-10-15 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 29 Blocker Review Meeting

2018-10-13 Thread Adam Williamson
# F29 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2018-10-15 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 7 proposed Final blockers and 2 proposed Final freeze exceptions to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday. We have GNOME and dnf bugs, and one

[EPEL-devel] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Virtual FAD for Python3

2018-10-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 8:00 PM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Virtual FAD for Python3 on 2018-10-16 from 00:00:00 to 00:00:00 UTC >At freenode@epel > > The meeting will be about: > This will be a virtual activity day to update all python packages ot the

Re: Cannot Boot After Doing system-upgrade

2018-10-13 Thread Garry T. Williams
On Saturday, October 13, 2018 7:34:44 PM EDT Chris Murphy wrote: > Good catch. It's vaguely possible there's a bug in either shim 15-5 > or grub2-efi 2.02-58 as it relates to your firmware, that caused > it to silently fail, and the firmware did a fallback to the 2nd > BootOrder, which is the

Re: Cannot Boot After Doing system-upgrade

2018-10-13 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote: > By the way, from the journal during the dnf system-upgrade reboot: > > Sep 30 10:02:27 vfr dnf[831]: grub2-common.noarch 1:2.02-58.fc29 > Sep 30 10:02:27 vfr dnf[831]: grub2-efi-x64.x86_64 1:2.02-58.fc29 > Sep 30 10:02:27 vfr

Re: Cannot Boot After Doing system-upgrade

2018-10-13 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote: > On Saturday, October 13, 2018 5:42:15 PM EDT Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Garry T. Williams >> wrote: >> > On Saturday, October 13, 2018 3:12:44 PM EDT Samuel Sieb wrote: >> >> On 10/13/18 10:39 AM, Garry T.

Re: Cannot Boot After Doing system-upgrade

2018-10-13 Thread Garry T. Williams
By the way, from the journal during the dnf system-upgrade reboot: Sep 30 10:02:27 vfr dnf[831]: grub2-common.noarch 1:2.02-58.fc29 Sep 30 10:02:27 vfr dnf[831]: grub2-efi-x64.x86_64 1:2.02-58.fc29 Sep 30 10:02:27 vfr dnf[831]: grub2-pc.x86_64 1:2.02-58.fc29 Sep 30 10:02:27 vfr dnf[831]:

Re: Cannot Boot After Doing system-upgrade

2018-10-13 Thread Garry T. Williams
On Saturday, October 13, 2018 5:42:15 PM EDT Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Garry T. Williams > wrote: > > On Saturday, October 13, 2018 3:12:44 PM EDT Samuel Sieb wrote: > >> On 10/13/18 10:39 AM, Garry T. Williams wrote: > >> > >> > What am I doing wrong here that I

Re: Redis modules license change and the 'GoodFORM' project

2018-10-13 Thread Gavin Henry
Great work! On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 at 08:04, Nathan Scott wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a general notice about the 'Apache Commons Clause' license > change affecting several Redis Labs modules. In Fedora today the > 'rejson' and 'rebloom' packages are affected. >

Fedora 29-20181013.n.0 compose check report

2018-10-13 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 6/133 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) ID: 295158 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/295158 ID: 295179 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL:

[Bug 1638230] Upgrade perl-File-Slurp to 9999.21

2018-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638230 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

Re: What to do about sagemath

2018-10-13 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12.10.2018 22:13, Jerry James wrote: This is from Includes/cpython/longintrepr.pxd in Cython 0.28.4, which does not trigger the above error: ctypedef struct PyLongObject: digit* ob_digit This is from the same file in Cython 0.29~rc2-1, which does trigger the above error:

Re: Yet another gargantuan mathematical software update

2018-10-13 Thread Till Hofmann
On 10/12/18 9:14 PM, Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 7:33 AM Till Hofmann > wrote: >> FYI: gazebo is currently FTBFS because player is FTBFS. I looked into >> player and fixed two smaller issues [1], but it's still FTBFS [2]. It >> looks like it's still requiring python2 but uses

Fedora 29 compose report: 20181013.n.0 changes

2018-10-13 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-29-20181012.n.0 NEW: Fedora-29-20181013.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 3 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

[Bug 1638230] Upgrade perl-File-Slurp to 9999.21

2018-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638230 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 1638230] Upgrade perl-File-Slurp to 9999.21

2018-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638230 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Slurp-.21-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-73bf152903 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1638230] Upgrade perl-File-Slurp to 9999.21

2018-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638230 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Slurp-.21-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f8bbc4a096 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

Re: Fedora 29 Final Go/No-Go meeting

2018-10-13 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 10/12/2018 10:08 PM, Trever L. Adams wrote: > On 10/12/18 9:27 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 29 Final release will be held on >> Thursday, 2018-10-18 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more >> information, see:

[rpms/perl-File-Slurp] New Commits To "rpms/perl-File-Slurp" (f27)

2018-10-13 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-File-Slurp on branch f27, which you are following: a58b37268a94de8b3ea0b5d377e392a5b88235bdRalf CorsépiusCleanup merger. 7911a88a91d5841e2cd2c2dbc2d9a7e36324aed9Ralf CorsépiusCleanup merger.

[rpms/perl-File-Slurp] New Commits To "rpms/perl-File-Slurp" (f28)

2018-10-13 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-File-Slurp on branch f28, which you are following: 7911a88a91d5841e2cd2c2dbc2d9a7e36324aed9Ralf CorsépiusCleanup merger. 66bea19432a5858fe79ca901d3a35c63faa1aa51Ralf CorsépiusUpdate to .21-1. Rework BRs. Drop xt-test.

[rpms/perl-File-Slurp] New Commits To "rpms/perl-File-Slurp" (f29)

2018-10-13 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-File-Slurp on branch f29, which you are following: 66bea19432a5858fe79ca901d3a35c63faa1aa51Ralf CorsépiusUpdate to .21-1. Rework BRs. Drop xt-test. Spec file cosmetics. To view more about the commits, visit:

Re: package downgrades from f28 to f29

2018-10-13 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Wednesday, 10 October 2018 21.34.47 WEST David Timms wrote: > Given Fedora runs on community power, have you tried rebuilding the > packages that interest you under f29 to see/fix any problems that arise ? Yes. As long as the time that I available allows. > You can also use the web tools to

Review swaps

2018-10-13 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
Hello, I'd like to ask your assistance to review some packages, in exchange of yours. 2 C++ packages recently featured in FedoraMagazine: https://fedoramagazine.org/better-image-upscaling-waifu2x/ - Review Request: waifu2x-converter-cpp - Image Super-Resolution for Anime-style art using

Re: Fedora 29 Final Go/No-Go meeting

2018-10-13 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 08:08:20PM -0600, Trever L. Adams wrote: > I am not part of the groups that are at these meetings. Please, consider > Bug #1636811 about FreeRadius. It is a simple fix. Hi Trever. I'm not sure this violates any of our release criteria, and may be more appropriate to just

[rpms/perl-File-Slurp] New Commits To "rpms/perl-File-Slurp" (master)

2018-10-13 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-File-Slurp on branch master, which you are following: 66bea19432a5858fe79ca901d3a35c63faa1aa51Ralf CorsépiusUpdate to .21-1. Rework BRs. Drop xt-test. Spec file cosmetics. To view more about the commits, visit: