Re: replace unclutter with unclutter-xfixes?

On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, 06:05 Henrique Martins > the package is not maintained in Fedora anymore and going > > to be removed, soon. Would you be willing to maintain it > > in Fedora? > > Maybe, though I have no idea what's involved ... > It's explained at

Re: replace unclutter with unclutter-xfixes?

> the package is not maintained in Fedora anymore and going > to be removed, soon. Would you be willing to maintain it > in Fedora? Maybe, though I have no idea what's involved ... -- Henrique ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Tracking translation status of a package built in koji

Hi Everyone, At times this could be a requirement to track or know translation status of a package which has (just) built in koji. Transtats could be used for this purpose. We just need to run a job. Steps: 1. Navigate to

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 173 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6 29 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-4b684248e8 drupal7-7.60-2.el6 12

[Bug 1646730] CVE-2018-18311 perl: Integer overflow leading to buffer overflow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646730 --- Comment #8 from Doran Moppert --- Statement: This vulnerability is present in versions of perl included with Red Hat Virtualization Hypervisor and Management Appliance, however it is not exposed in any meaningful way. Perl is only

[Bug 1646730] CVE-2018-18311 perl: Integer overflow leading to buffer overflow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646730 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |high CC|

[Bug 1646738] CVE-2018-18313 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow read in regcomp.c

| Whiteboard|impact=low,public=20181129, |impact=low,public=20181129, |reported=20181105,source=up |reported=20181105,source=up |stream,cvss3=6.5/CVSS:3.0/A |stream,cvss3=6.5/CVSS:3.0/A |V:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/ |V:N/AC:H

[Bug 1646751] CVE-2018-18314 perl: Heap-based buffer overflow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646751 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added CC|bmccl...@redhat.com,|

[Bug 1646734] CVE-2018-18312 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow write / reg_node overrun

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646734 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added CC|bmccl...@redhat.com,|

[Bug 1646730] CVE-2018-18311 perl: Integer overflow leading to buffer overflow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646730 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added CC|bmccl...@redhat.com,|

[Bug 1654923] CVE-2018-18314 perl: Heap-based buffer overflow [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654923 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1646751 (CVE-2018-18314) Referenced

[Bug 1646751] CVE-2018-18314 perl: Heap-based buffer overflow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646751 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1654925, 1654923 --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1646738] CVE-2018-18313 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow read in regcomp.c

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646738 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1654921, 1654924 --- Comment #7 from

[Bug 1654923] CVE-2018-18314 perl: Heap-based buffer overflow [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654923 --- Comment #1 from Doran Moppert --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all

[Bug 1654919] CVE-2018-18312 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow write / reg_node overrun [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654919 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1646734 (CVE-2018-18312) Referenced

[Bug 1654921] CVE-2018-18313 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow read in regcomp.c [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654921 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1646738 (CVE-2018-18313) Referenced

[Bug 1654923] New: CVE-2018-18314 perl: Heap-based buffer overflow [ fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654923 Bug ID: 1654923 Summary: CVE-2018-18314 perl: Heap-based buffer overflow [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 29 Component: perl Keywords: Security,

[Bug 1646734] CVE-2018-18312 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow write / reg_node overrun

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646734 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1654919, 1654922 --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1654918] CVE-2018-18311 perl: Integer overflow leading to buffer overflow [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654918 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1646730 (CVE-2018-18311) Referenced

[Bug 1646730] CVE-2018-18311 perl: Integer overflow leading to buffer overflow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646730 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1654920, 1654918 --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 1654921] New: CVE-2018-18313 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow read in regcomp.c [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654921 Bug ID: 1654921 Summary: CVE-2018-18313 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow read in regcomp.c [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 29 Component: perl Keywords: Security,

[Bug 1654918] New: CVE-2018-18311 perl: Integer overflow leading to buffer overflow [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654918 Bug ID: 1654918 Summary: CVE-2018-18311 perl: Integer overflow leading to buffer overflow [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 29 Component: perl Keywords:

[Bug 1654921] CVE-2018-18313 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow read in regcomp.c [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654921 --- Comment #1 from Doran Moppert --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all

[Bug 1654919] CVE-2018-18312 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow write / reg_node overrun [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654919 --- Comment #1 from Doran Moppert --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all

[Bug 1654919] New: CVE-2018-18312 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow write / reg_node overrun [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654919 Bug ID: 1654919 Summary: CVE-2018-18312 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow write / reg_node overrun [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 29 Component: perl Keywords:

[Bug 1654918] CVE-2018-18311 perl: Integer overflow leading to buffer overflow [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654918 --- Comment #1 from Doran Moppert --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all

[Bug 1646738] CVE-2018-18313 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow read in regcomp.c

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646738 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Comment #1 is|1 |0 private|

[Bug 1646734] CVE-2018-18312 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow write / reg_node overrun

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646734 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Comment #1 is|1 |0 private|

[Bug 1646751] CVE-2018-18314 perl: Heap-based buffer overflow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646751 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Comment #1 is|1 |0 private|

[Bug 1646730] CVE-2018-18311 perl: Integer overflow leading to buffer overflow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646730 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Comment #1 is|1 |0 private|

[Bug 1646751] CVE-2018-18314 perl: Heap-based buffer overflow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646751 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Group|security, qe_staff | CC|

[Bug 1646738] CVE-2018-18313 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow read in regcomp.c

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646738 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Group|security, qe_staff | CC|

[Bug 1646734] CVE-2018-18312 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow write / reg_node overrun

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646734 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Group|security, qe_staff | CC|

[Bug 1646730] CVE-2018-18311 perl: Integer overflow leading to buffer overflow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646730 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Group|security, qe_staff | CC|

[Bug 1651943] Upgrade perl-Module-CoreList to 5.20181120

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651943 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2018 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2018

[Bug 1651941] Upgrade perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases to 3.82

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651941 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.8 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.8

[Bug 1651943] Upgrade perl-Module-CoreList to 5.20181120

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651943 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1651941] Upgrade perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases to 3.82

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651941 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.8 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.8

[Bug 1651941] Upgrade perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases to 3.82

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651941 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

Re: What does delaying F31 mean for packagers/users?

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 12:15:52PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > This is basically the problem I have with the work we're doing in IoT. > The basically will make me re-evaluate if IoT is now worth doing at > all in Fedora or whether I am now better off focusing my efforts > elsewhere. Is there

Re: Fedora Hardware portal

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 04:57:33PM +0300, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote: > https://github.com/linuxhw/hw-probe (various packages are available: > AppImage, Snap, Flatpak, Docker, RPM, etc.). The tool is intended to Have you considered packaging this directly in Fedora? That would make it a lot easier

Re: A smart cache-y proposal for composes

On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 16:01 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote: > "NO" -adamw =) More seriously, to me this is kinda a natural consequence of what we've already talked about quite a bit with associating inputs and outputs. But I dunno if I'd think of it as *caching*, exactly, just more along the

Re: A smart cache-y proposal for composes

"NO" -adamw signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

A smart cache-y proposal for composes

So, I had an idea of one method of attack for composes and lifecycles that I thought I would toss out there to see what others thought of it. Instead of redesigning and reimplementing our current build/compose/test pipeline we improve it by making the current process cache as much of everything

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

On Monday, 26 November 2018 at 23:49, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: [...] > Cleaning the session is perfect example of what can be done with using > Solaris contracts which is kind of grouping attribute for some group > of processes which needs to be treated as the group. When session The Linux

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL6 conntrack-tools-0.9.13-3.el6.x86_64 metadata possibly incorrect

Hello Stephen, What else can I do or provide to move this issue along. Best regards, [cid:image005.jpg@01D24A1F.439697B0] John Griffin | Infrastructure Architect 815 NW 9th Street, Ste 221 | Corvallis, OR 97330 P 541-768-4707 jgrif...@samhealth.org From: John

[Bug 1624360] perl-Redis-1.991-7.fc29 FTBFS: Failed test ' pipeline with embedded error'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624360 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||Github |

Re: What does delaying F31 mean for packagers/users?

Damn!, I thought this was a done deal and booked my six month holiday :-) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Proposal: Move to an annual platform release starting at F30

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 12:42 PM Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le jeudi 29 novembre 2018 à 10:56 -0500, Josh Boyer a écrit : > > > > Of the large number of packages that you maintain, how many of them > > are critical to freeze at a specific version for a given Fedora > > release? Possibly some,

Re: Proposal: Move to an annual platform release starting at F30

Le jeudi 29 novembre 2018 à 10:56 -0500, Josh Boyer a écrit : > > Of the large number of packages that you maintain, how many of them > are critical to freeze at a specific version for a given Fedora > release? Possibly some, but I would think across the distribution it > would not be a huge

Re: Changing nsswitch.conf on a running system (was Re: /etc/nssswitch.conf is supposed to be a symlink now?)

On 11/29/18 8:29 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Ray Strode wrote: (defer until next offline update?) That would be never on many systems. Most users using command-line DNF and all users using plasma-pk-updates or dnfdragora never do offline updates by design. I, being of the old school, still try

Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Migrate Python-based Nautilus extensions to Python 3

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NautilusExtensionsPython3 The Python backend for the nautilus-python extension will be updated from python2 to python3. All Nautilus extensions written in Python will need to be checked for Python 3 compatibility and updated if necessary. Extensions

Re: Proposal: Move to an annual platform release starting at F30

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 11:15 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:57 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:22 AM Paul Frields wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:47 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > > > > > Dne 27. 11. 18 v 17:04 Josh Boyer napsal(a):

Re: Proposal: Move to an annual platform release starting at F30

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:57 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:22 AM Paul Frields wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:47 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > > > Dne 27. 11. 18 v 17:04 Josh Boyer napsal(a): > > > >> In other words, the "technical debt" we are trying to solve

Re: [HEADS UP] tinyxml2 SONAME bump (7.x)

And it's in rawhide. On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:54 AM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I'm going to update tinyxml2 to 7.x later this week. > > Affected packages: > * cppcheck > * dvblinkremote > * fuse > * gazebo > * kodi (rpmfusion) > * libmediainfo > * vdr > > I'm going to rebuild all of

Re: Proposal: Move to an annual platform release starting at F30

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:22 AM Paul Frields wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:47 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > Dne 27. 11. 18 v 17:04 Josh Boyer napsal(a): > > >> In other words, the "technical debt" we are trying to solve here is > > >> not project wide and doesn't justify slowing down

Re: replace unclutter with unclutter-xfixes?

Hi Henrique, On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 08:40:29AM -0800, Henrique Martins wrote: > Unclutter seems to be an orphaned package that keeps being > rebuilt, there even is an fc30 rpm. The URL given in the > fc29 package points to a dead link on MIT. I filed a > bugzilla report on this and no one

Re: Proposal: Move to an annual platform release starting at F30

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 7:43 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > I think the kernel is a bad example here. It's exceedly stable across > releases, so it's probably the one component that's least problematic > to upgrade during a fedora release. The fedora kernel team is already > doing that, and they are

Re: Proposal: Move to an annual platform release starting at F30

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:47 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 27. 11. 18 v 17:04 Josh Boyer napsal(a): > >> In other words, the "technical debt" we are trying to solve here is > >> not project wide and doesn't justify slowing down the whole project > >> permanently. > > I completely disagree.

Re: What does delaying F31 mean for packagers/users?

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 2:58 PM Gerald Henriksen wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:15:52 +, you wrote: > > >From an IoT perspective where we're looking at some features around > >security that could be cross component dependent > >(toolchain/kernel/userspace) to be unable to consume for

Re: What does delaying F31 mean for packagers/users?

On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:15:52 +, you wrote: >From an IoT perspective where we're looking at some features around >security that could be cross component dependent >(toolchain/kernel/userspace) to be unable to consume for possibly an >18 month window, yes we rebase kernels but we need to rebase

Re: compilation of mlt-freeworld-6.12.0 fails

Many thanks, now it works. Martin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines:

Re: compilation of mlt-freeworld-6.12.0 fails

thanks for your answer, but there a new error message: /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mlt-freeworld-6.12.0-1.fc29.x86_64/usr/bin/melt + grep -vP 'mlt/avformat|libmltavformat.so' + find /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mlt-freeworld-6.12.0-1.fc29.x86_64 -type f -print0 + xargs -0 rm rm: cannot

Re: compilation of mlt-freeworld-6.12.0 fails

Oh, and I think the grep will also have to be tweaked with a -z to take the null termination into account: find %{buildroot} -type f -print0 | grep -vPz "mlt/avformat|libmltavformat.so" | xargs -0 rm On 29/11/2018 14:21, J. Randall Owens wrote: > There are spaces in the file names, so it sees

Re: compilation of mlt-freeworld-6.12.0 fails

There are spaces in the file names, so it sees something like "Ut Video" and xargs parses it as meaning "Ut" and "Video". Easiest way to fix it is probably to change the paths to be null-terminated, by adding -print0 to the find and -0 to the xargs, like so: find %{buildroot} -type f -print0 |

compilation of mlt-freeworld-6.12.0 fails

Hi, want to compile new mlt-freeworld-6.12.0 [1], but it fails in the %install section ... %install %make_install #before remove it print it to check with main mlt package find %{buildroot} | grep -vP "mlt/avformat|libmltavformat.so" # remove all execept avformat (ffmpeg part) find %{buildroot}

Fedora Hardware portal

Hi, The Linux-Hardware.org database has been divided recently into a set of databases, one per each Linux distro. The one for Fedora is available at: https://linux-hardware.org/?d=Fedora Everyone can contribute to the database with the help of https://github.com/linuxhw/hw-probe (various

Re: Changing nsswitch.conf on a running system (was Re: /etc/nssswitch.conf is supposed to be a symlink now?)

Ray Strode wrote: > (defer until next offline update?) That would be never on many systems. Most users using command-line DNF and all users using plasma-pk-updates or dnfdragora never do offline updates by design. Kevin Kofler ___ devel

Re: /etc/nssswitch.conf is supposed to be a symlink now?

On 11/28/18 11:22 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote: On 28/11/18 11:48 -0400, Robert Marcano wrote: There is another thing I found wrong. The backed up nsswitch.conf has these lines appended (ckey and incomplete aliases line) after the real end of the original file (aliases: files): aliases:files

Re: /etc/nssswitch.conf is supposed to be a symlink now?

On 11/28/18 3:59 PM, Henrique Martins wrote: My configuration is different, just take as FYI. ... it seems that in Fedora 29 /etc/nssswitch.conf ought to be a symlink. This machine has been upgraded from F28 and this is not the case. AFAIK I have never edited the file. It is still a file

Re: /etc/nssswitch.conf is supposed to be a symlink now?

On 11/28/18 6:35 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 05:02:17PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 28.11.18 um 15:45 schrieb Florian Weimer: * Richard W. M. Jones: Trying to track down a bug in IPP printing (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653276). We're down a

Re: /etc/nssswitch.conf is supposed to be a symlink now?

On 11/29/18 12:59 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: On 11/29/18 7:46 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: On 11/28/18 4:37 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: On 11/28/18 11:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 11/28/18 3:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Richard W. M. Jones: Trying to track down a bug in IPP printing

Re: Improving the compose: leave the current compose in place

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 7:01 PM Paul Frields wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:59 AM Owen Taylor wrote: > > A lot of discussion about improving the compose process seem to end up > > with a "reality check" - that ideas have already been tried but don't > > work because of requirements a) b)

Re: What does delaying F31 mean for packagers/users?

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:39 PM Owen Taylor wrote: > > One of the key parts of making a decision to delay/skip F31 is > figuring out, ahead of the decision, what the expected experience is > for users and packagers. Does F30 have normal stability, or do we try > to keep users happy by moving

Re: /etc/nssswitch.conf is supposed to be a symlink now?

On 11/28/18 3:52 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: On 28/11/2018 14:45, Florian Weimer wrote: * Richard W. M. Jones: Trying to track down a bug in IPP printing (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653276). We're down a rabbit hole where it seems that in Fedora 29 /etc/nssswitch.conf ought to be

Re: What does extended F30 cycle mean for F29?

No, we did NOT do that. A quick search on the devel list archives shows that F19 was released in July 2013: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SSLJL6ZJC7M7TAOPNHJY7UAS7MA66PMR/ ...and EOL'd on in January 2015:

Re: /etc/nssswitch.conf is supposed to be a symlink now?

On 11/29/18 7:46 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: On 11/28/18 4:37 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: On 11/28/18 11:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 11/28/18 3:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Richard W. M. Jones: Trying to track down a bug in IPP printing

Re: /etc/nssswitch.conf is supposed to be a symlink now?

On 11/28/18 4:37 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: On 11/28/18 11:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 11/28/18 3:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Richard W. M. Jones: Trying to track down a bug in IPP printing (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653276). We're down a rabbit hole where it seems

[Bug 1654606] Upgrade perl-Test2-Suite to 0.000116

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654606 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test2-Suite-0.000116-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a9ba31e698 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1654606] Upgrade perl-Test2-Suite to 0.000116

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654606 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1653180] Upgrade perl-SNMP-Info to 3.63

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653180 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-SNMP-Info-3.63-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a777909b9e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1653180] Upgrade perl-SNMP-Info to 3.63

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653180 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Re: Proposal: Move to an annual platform release starting at F30

Dne 27. 11. 18 v 17:04 Josh Boyer napsal(a): >> In other words, the "technical debt" we are trying to solve here is >> not project wide and doesn't justify slowing down the whole project >> permanently. > I completely disagree. Our release process and tooling is built on > heroism and tech debt.

Re: [HEADS UP] Rawhide buildroot now has glibc-minimal-langpack instead

That is huge. Thx a lot. Vít Dne 28. 11. 18 v 20:33 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > Hello, > > the removal of glibc-all-langpacks from the buildroot[0] is done. > Standard buildroot has decreased from 445 to 237 megabytes in > installed size ;) > > Before: > DEBUG util.py:439: Install 146

[Bug 1654606] New: Upgrade perl-Test2-Suite to 0.000116

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654606 Bug ID: 1654606 Summary: Upgrade perl-Test2-Suite to 0.000116 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test2-Suite Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1654605] New: Upgrade perl-HTTP-DAV to 0.49

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654605 Bug ID: 1654605 Summary: Upgrade perl-HTTP-DAV to 0.49 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-HTTP-DAV Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: jples...@redhat.com