[Bug 1764730] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Data-Dump-Color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764730 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1764975 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764975 [Bug 1764975] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Scalar-Util-LooksLikeNumber -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764975] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Scalar-Util-LooksLikeNumber
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764975 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1764730 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764730 [Bug 1764730] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Data-Dump-Color -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764730] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Data-Dump-Color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764730 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Depends On|1764975 | --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/18713 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/18714 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764975 [Bug 1764975] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Scalar-Util-LooksLikeNumber -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764975] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Scalar-Util-LooksLikeNumber
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764975 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1764730 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764730 [Bug 1764730] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Data-Dump-Color -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764975] New: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Scalar-Util-LooksLikeNumber
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764975 Bug ID: 1764975 Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Scalar-Util-LooksLikeNumber Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Scalar-Util-LooksLikeNumber Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: emman...@seyman.fr QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 1764730 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Please consider putting this package in EPEL 8. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764730 [Bug 1764730] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Data-Dump-Color -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764730] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Data-Dump-Color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764730 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1764975 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764975 [Bug 1764975] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Scalar-Util-LooksLikeNumber -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: A new workflow for newcomers
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019, 7:01 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > > [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Welcome > > can we get this onto the docs site? > Sure. In which section does it need to be? Maybe here? https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/join/ A. > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764909] New: perl-HTTP-Cookies-6.05 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764909 Bug ID: 1764909 Summary: perl-HTTP-Cookies-6.05 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-HTTP-Cookies Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 6.05 Current version/release in rawhide: 6.04-7.fc31 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Cookies/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2974/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-10-24 - 96% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/10/24/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.2-20191023gitabc6f16.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-31-20191023.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/153 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) ID: 475203 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/475203 ID: 475236 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/475236 ID: 475265 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/475265 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/153 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 475242 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/475242 ID: 475257 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/475257 ID: 475321 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/475321 Passed openQA tests: 148/153 (x86_64) Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 1 of 155 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
Proc tu i libdasm nejsem napsanej jako puvodni vlastnik? Tenhle list jsem rozhodne videl v souvislosti s impacketem, ale libdasm jsem si nevsiml. -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Miro Hrončok Komu: Development discussions related to Fedora , devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Datum: 16. 9. 2019 12:01:28 Předmět: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers "The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will be retired when the affected package gets retired. Request package ownership via releng issues: https://pagure.io/releng/issues Full report available at: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-09-16.txt grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. Package (co)maintainers Status Change 7kaa orphan 7 weeks ago PyRTF orphan 1 weeks ago R-ALL orphan 3 weeks ago R-AnnotationDbi orphan 3 weeks ago R-BSgenome orphan 3 weeks ago R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 orphan 3 weeks ago R-Biobase orphan 3 weeks ago R-BiocGenerics orphan 3 weeks ago R-Biostrings orphan 3 weeks ago R-BufferedMatrix orphan 3 weeks ago R-BufferedMatrixMethods orphan 3 weeks ago R-DynDoc orphan 3 weeks ago R-GenomicFeatures orphan 3 weeks ago R-GenomicRanges orphan 3 weeks ago R-IRanges orphan 3 weeks ago R-ROC orphan 3 weeks ago R-affy orphan 3 weeks ago R-affydata orphan 3 weeks ago R-affyio orphan 3 weeks ago R-fibroEset orphan 3 weeks ago R-hgu133acdf orphan 3 weeks ago R-hgu95av2cdf orphan 3 weeks ago R-hgu95av2probe orphan 3 weeks ago R-maanova orphan 3 weeks ago R-multtest alexlan, orphan 3 weeks ago R-pls orphan 3 weeks ago R-preprocessCore orphan 3 weeks ago R-statmod orphan 3 weeks ago R-tkWidgets orphan 3 weeks ago R-widgetTools orphan 3 weeks ago RackTables orphan 1 weeks ago TeXamator orphan 1 weeks ago XmlSchema msimacek, orphan 1 weeks ago Xnee orphan 4 weeks ago access-modifier-annotation mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago accumulo ctubbsii, milleruntime, 4 weeks ago mizdebsk, orphan acegisecurity mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago adapta-backgrounds orphan 0 weeks ago adapta-gtk-theme orphan 0 weeks ago adevs orphan 4 weeks ago akuma orphan 2 weeks ago alacarte alexl, caillon, caolanm, 0 weeks ago johnp, mbarnes, orphan, rhughes, ssp annotation-indexer mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago anyremote orphan 1 weeks ago apache-commons-csv mizdebsk, orphan, spike 2 weeks ago apache-commons-discovery lkundrak, mizdebsk, orphan, 2 weeks ago spike apache-commons-el fnasser, mizdebsk, orphan, 2 weeks ago spike apache-commons-launcher orphan 1 weeks ago apache-mina orphan 2 weeks ago apache-poi gil, lef, orphan 6 weeks ago apache-sshd gil, orphan 2 weeks ago arptools jhrozek, orphan 2 weeks ago asterisk-gui orphan 4 weeks ago audio-convert-mod orphan 0 weeks ago b43-tools orphan 1 weeks ago batti orphan 0 weeks ago belier orphan 3 weeks ago bing orphan 5 weeks ago bios_extract orphan 1 weeks ago bitlyclip orphan, ralph 6 weeks ago boxes jhrozek, orphan 2 weeks ago bridge-method-injector mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago bundling-detection-java mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago bytecode-compatibility- mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago transformer c3p0 orphan 2 weeks ago captcp orphan 1 weeks ago cassandra acaringi, hhorak, jjanco, 1 weeks ago orphan certmaster alikins, orphan, robert, 1 weeks ago wakko666 cfv dfateyev, orphan 2 weeks ago check-mk orphan 1 weeks ago checkdns orphan 4 weeks ago chm2pdf orphan 0 weeks ago comedilib orphan 1 weeks ago concurrentunit orphan 1 weeks ago constant-pool-scanner mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago curator ctubbsii, milleruntime, 4 weeks ago orphan, tstclair dfish orphan 4 weeks ago dia-CMOS orphan 0 weeks ago dia-Digital orphan 0 weeks ago dia-electric2 orphan 0 weeks ago dia-electronic orphan 0 weeks ago disper orphan 3 weeks ago drobo-utils imntreal, orphan 1 weeks ago dwdiff jhrozek, orphan 2 weeks ago easybashgui orphan 4 weeks ago emma orphan 2 weeks ago enunciate orphan, pahuang 7 weeks ago epydoc orphan, thias 1 weeks ago espresso-ab orphan 0 weeks ago euca2ools orphan 0 weeks ago ezmorph gil, lkundrak, orphan 6 weeks ago felix-main orphan 1 weeks ago fishpoll marionline, orphan 1 weeks ago fluxbox dchen, orphan 0 weeks ago freenx-server orphan 1 weeks ago fsniper jhrozek, orphan 2 weeks ago func alikins, orphan, robert, 0 weeks ago wakko666 fuse-python moezroy, orphan 1 weeks ago gadget orphan 1 weeks ago gcc-python-plugin jakub, orphan 0 weeks ago geronimo-jaspic-spec mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago ginfo orphan,
[Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate RC-1.9 Available Now!
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 31 Candidate RC-1.9 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/31 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_31_RC_1.9_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_31_RC_1.9_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_31_RC_1.9_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_31_RC_1.9_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_31_RC_1.9_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_31_RC_1.9_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_31_RC_1.9_Security_Lab All RC priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the RC Release Criteria [3]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-31/f-31-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_RC_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/t...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711098] Segmentation Fault in UUlib.so (ScanData) used in perl-Convert-UUlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711098 --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck --- Thank you very much for the long report, I've asked upstream to have a look to it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 01:38:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10. 09. 19 13:35, Peter Robinson wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >>On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >>>efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then > >>>unretired and they still fail to build from source. > >>> > >>>Following the policy: > >>>https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ > >>> > >>> > >>>I kindly ask the maintainers to rebuild them or orphan them if they cannot > >>>take > >>>care of them. > >>> > >>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674840 > >>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675403 > >> > >>I kindly ask the maintainers after 3 weeks of no further response to > >>rebuild the > >>packages. > > > >Peter Jones, added to email, is working on a new version to land, he > >is currently focused on RHEL-8 deliverables which are taking his > >priority ATM. He says he will have it fixed by the time Fedora 31 goes > >to final freeze. > > Thanks for the update. We're in final freeze now. Any progress? Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:56:41PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > However, I also have a pretty strong bias towards people who showed up to > do the work, and the decisions they've made. That doesn't mean we're stuck > and can't adjust -- in fact, adjusting as we've gone along is a lot of why > we're where we are now. But unless someone shows up with people-power and > funding to do it, I take kind of a skeptical view of proposals to start a > whole new approach from scratch. Sure, people who show up to do the work get to choose what happens. But we can't take it to an extreme: there must always be an option to back out of an idea. Every Change page is required to fill out a Contingency Plan, and yes, we do occasionally execute those. There are decisions which need to be implemented for us to see all the benefits and drawbacks, and in those cases a lot of work is wasted when the contingency plan is enacted. See for example recent proposal by Ben Cotton to use Taiga: it was 90% implemented before some drawbacks became visible, and Ben and Manas took the high road and yanked it. In fact, the amount of work that has gone into a project is not a reason to keep trying. If anything, the opposite is true — the more person-hours have been "consumed" the more that indicates that the idea is not workable. As we learn from the implementation, we understand our goals and limitations better, and sometimes we need to take a hard look and say the expected *remaining* amount of work is too big. The fact that people showed up and put in work is not the final consideration. > > > Because this keeps coming up, we talked about this at the Fedora Council > > > meeting today. Our goals for modularity are: > > > 2. Those alternate streams should be able to have different lifecycles. > > > > Hmm, it sounds like the Council hasn't taken into account the constraints > > on lifecycle of modules that we have slowly discovered during the last > > two years, constraints that are now part of FESCo-approved policy. > > > > Essentially, modules in Fedora are only allowed to EOL at EOL of Fedora > > release. And to preserve stability for users, a.k.a. following the Update > > Policy, modules should only change to new major version at Fedora > > releases. This is exactly the same as for "normal" rpms. > > This seems appropriate for default steams, but modules should be able to > have alternate, opt-in streams which either a) update on a rolling or other > cadence or b) choose to keep building the older version across the release > boundary. > > The tooling should make this clear to the users. Yes, default streams, but also streams that other streams or packages depend on. Having rolling updates or updates with independent cadence is OK if you are a leaf module and the users opt-in into those changes. But as soon as people try to build other packages on top, or try to use such modules in production as dependencies of other things, this breaks down. The general rule in Fedora is that you get version bumps and non-backwards-compat behaviour changes between releases, giving users and other packagers a clear point in time to expect this. Packages (and streams) can also only be retired at Fedora release EOL. This is a policy choice, not a technical matter. If modules became more popular, and the dependencies between modules grew, we'd need to settle on similar rules, where bigger changes are done with a certain cadence. This is why I think that the "independent lifecycles for modules" are illusory, made possible by current scarcity of modules. (Or to look at this from another POV: if we want to give users access to a rolling version of some package, we can do it just as well without modules. In fact, we already do, with the kernel, with firefox, and probably a bunch of other packages where this makes sense. For leaf packages this works. If we want to give users e.g. rolling postgresql, we could provide postgresql-rolling package. Maybe we should.) Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764854] New: perl-CPAN-FindDependencies-2.49 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764854 Bug ID: 1764854 Summary: perl-CPAN-FindDependencies-2.49 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CPAN-FindDependencies Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: i...@cicku.me, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 2.49 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.48-4.fc31 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-FindDependencies/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2729/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764833] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Function-Parameters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764833 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1764828 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764828 [Bug 1764828] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Dir-Self -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764833] New: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Function-Parameters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764833 Bug ID: 1764833 Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Function-Parameters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Function-Parameters Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: p...@city-fan.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora All dependencies (apart from perl-Dir-Self, Bug #1764828) are built and should have overrides in place until 7th November. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764828] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Dir-Self
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764828 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1764833 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764833 [Bug 1764833] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Function-Parameters -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764828] New: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Dir-Self
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764828 Bug ID: 1764828 Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Dir-Self Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Dir-Self Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: p...@city-fan.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is needed for perl-Function-Parameters. It builds OK in EPEL-8. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764823] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Test-Trap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764823 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1764822 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764822 [Bug 1764822] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Test-Refcount -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764822] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Test-Refcount
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764822 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1764823 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764823 [Bug 1764823] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Test-Trap -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764823] New: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Test-Trap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764823 Bug ID: 1764823 Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Test-Trap Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-Trap Assignee: lkund...@v3.sk Reporter: p...@city-fan.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, lkund...@v3.sk, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is needed for perl-MooseX-Getopt. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764822] New: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Test-Refcount
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764822 Bug ID: 1764822 Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Test-Refcount Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-Refcount Assignee: kwiz...@gmail.com Reporter: p...@city-fan.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, kwiz...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is needed for perl-Test-Trap. It builds OK if the BuildRequires on perl(Devel::Refcount) is removed, which is OK because the module now uses B instead of Devel::Refcount. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764817] New: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764817 Bug ID: 1764817 Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized Assignee: andrea.v...@gmail.com Reporter: p...@city-fan.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: andrea.v...@gmail.com, emman...@seyman.fr, iarn...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora All dependency packages are already built and overrides are set until 7th November. This is needed for perl-MooseX-Getopt. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1678632] Review Request: apt - Main commandline package manager for Debian and its derivatives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678632 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Alias|apt-dpkg| Last Closed||2019-10-23 19:28:02 --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Replaced by bug 1764813. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1764813 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1757009] perl-Qt 4.14.3 missing for EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757009 Troy Dawson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tdaw...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Troy Dawson --- Fedora 30 had the last build. perl-Qt is now retired from Fedora with this comment "A build-required smokeqt is broken, abandonded by upstream" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676813 Also, you have that backwards. RHEL8 does not provide an *old* enough Qt, which is Qt4. There is no Qt4 in RHEL8. As far as I know, there is nobody planning on putting any qt4 libraries in epel8, only QT5. I am not the package owner, so I'm not going to say "No, I won't provide it" ... but if it were me, that's what I would say. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Outstanding package requests for EPEL-8
Add txt2man, it got filed against el6 for some reason. I just fixed it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741795 Thanks, Richard ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764730] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Data-Dump-Color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764730 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||emman...@seyman.fr, ||jples...@redhat.com, ||ppi...@redhat.com Component|perl-Data-Dump |perl-Data-Dump-Color Version|epel8 |rawhide Assignee|p...@city-fan.org |emman...@seyman.fr Product|Fedora EPEL |Fedora Summary|Please consider building an |[RFE] EPEL-8 branch for |RPM for Data::Dump::Color |perl-Data-Dump-Color -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Outstanding package requests for EPEL-8
So this came up in the last EPEL meeting:
bugzilla query -s NEW -t 'epel8' --outputformat "%{id}: %{component}:
%{summary}" | sort | less
Most of these are package requests but some are other types.
1739162: libxml++: libxml++ for EPEL8
1739163: libffado: libffado for EPEL8
1741523: mod_auth_cas: mod_auth_cas for EPEL8
1741654: dash: RFE: dash for EPEL8
1744341: jq: RFE: jq for EPEL8
1744343: nagios-plugins-openmanage: RFE: nagios-plugins-openmanage for EPEL8
1744699: perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of
perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler
1744700: perl-Authen-Passphrase: [RFE] EPEL8 branch perl-Authen-Passphrase
1744704: perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of
perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd
1744705: perl-Authen-Passphrase: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Authen-Simple
1744712: perl-IO-Handle-Util: [RFE] EPEL8 branch for perl-IO-Handle-Util
1744782: perl-Crypt-SSLeay: (RFE) EPEL8 branch of perl-Crypt-SSLeay
1744785: perl-Proc-Daemon: (RFE) EPEL8 branch of perl-Proc-Daemon
1745727: apcupsd: [RFE] apcupsd: epel8 build request
1749146: lxqt-session: Build LXQt in EPEL8
1749780: genders: please build for epel8
1750404: php-phpmailer6: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of php-phpmailer6
1753203: weechat: Can you please make a package in EPEL8 with new
Weechat version?
1753397: scons: Build for EPEL8
1753401: perl-Class-Accessor-Lite: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of
perl-Class-Accessor-Lite
1754155: quazip: Create EPEL8 branc
1755034: python-passlib: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of python-passlib
1755264: dnf-plugins-extras: Please release the snapper plug-in for epel8 also.
1755345: python-mysql: Request to build python3-mysql for EPEL8
1755761: clementine: [RFE] : clementine : epel8 build request
1755789: pidgin-otr: [RFE] : pidgin-otr epel8 build request
1755791: powerline: [RFE] : powerline : epel8 build request
1755793: autossh: [RFE] : autossh epel8 build request
1755809: cross-binutils: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of cross-binutils
1755816: simple-scan: [RFE] : simple-scan : epel8 build request
1755945: bats: [RFE] bats: epel8 build request
1755960: liblastfm: Please provide EPEL8 package
1755963: libmygpo-qt: Please provide EPEL8 package
1755964: libprojectM: Please provide EPEL8 package
1755965: qca: Please provide EPEL8 package
1755966: udisks: Please provide EPEL8 package
1755968: sha2: Please provide EPEL8 package
1755975: phonon: Please provide EPEL8 package
1756036: perl-XML-TreePP: [RFE] perl-XML-TreePP build for epel8
1756170: libcec: [RFE] libcec build for epel8
1756171: perl-Net-UPnP: [RFE] perl-Net-UPnP build for epel8
1756941: kid3: [RFE] : kid3 : epel8 build request
1756942: pylast: [RFE] : pylast : epel8 build request
1756976: gtk-murrine-engine: [RFE] : gtk-murrine-engine : epel8 build request
1757000: xmlstarlet: xmlstarlet missing in EPEL8
1757002: docbook2X: docbook-utils-pdf missing in RHEL8/CentOS-8: need
it in EPEL8
1757009: perl-Qt: perl-Qt 4.14.3 missing for EPEL8
1757016: ntfsprogs: ntfsprogs is missing for EPEL8
1757645: python-urlgrabber: [RFE] python3-urlgrabber build for epel8
1757682: thunderbird-enigmail: [RFE] : thunderbird-enigmail : epel8
build request
1757868: uboot-tools: Package uboot-tools is not available in EPEL8
1758005: xlockmore: build xlockmore for epel8
1758271: ipython: Branch request: python3-ipython for epel8
1758311: nova-agent: build nova-agent for epel8
1758329: python-requests-cache: [RFE] python-requests-cache for epel8
1758340: python-oauth: [RFE] python-oauth build for epel8
1758778: fmt: fmt not packaged for epel8
1758779: xalan-c: xalan-c not packaged for epel8
1758780: spdlog: spdlog not packaged for epel8
1758822: python-funcsigs: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of python-funcsigs
1759107: python-celery: Branch request: python-celery for epel8
1759108: python-markdown2: Branch request: python-markdown2 for epel8
1759109: python-aiohttp: Branch request: python-aiohttp for epel8
1759112: python-requests-mock: Branch request: python-requests-mock for epel8
1759114: python-cached_property: Branch request:
python-cached_property for epel8
1759116: python-xmlsec: Branch request: python-xmlsec for epel8
1759121: python-zeep: Branch request: python-zeep for epel8
1759124: python-XStatic-Patternfly: Branch request:
python-XStatic-Patternfly for epel8
1759129: nodejs-typeahead.js: Branch request: nodejs-typeahead.js for epel8
1759130: python-flask-openid: Branch request: python-flask-openid for epel8
1759132: python-flask-wtf: Branch request: python-flask-wtf for epel8
1759133: python-flask-sqlalchemy: Branch request:
python-flask-sqlalchemy for epel8
1759136: nodejs-moment: Branch request: nodejs-moment for epel8
1759459: phpMyAdmin: Please build phpMyAdmin for EPEL8
1759571: python-setproctitle: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of python3-setproctitle
1759572: python-tinycss: [RFE] Can python-tinycss be branched for EPEL8
1759573: python-pam: [RFE] Can python-pam be branched for EPEL8
1759581: libcryptui: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of libcryptui
1759587: mathjax: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of mathjax
1759732:
Re: EPEL-8 branches requests being rejected
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 13:03, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 09:12:41AM +0200, Jakub Jelen wrote: > > I think this is a problem that the rsh package is in normal RHEL8 (not > > sure in which stream) and if I am right, packages in rhel can not be in > > epel too. > > > When we get modularity up and working for EPEL-8, we'll need to figure out > how to handle that, as we want to be able to provide alternate versions as > non-default streams. > I hope so. I think the decisions are made by the PDC which is going to be tricky. > > On another note: rsh? Really? :) Turns out some amount embedded hardware only works with rsh. The we put it in 10 years ago and we aren't getting a new bridge anytime soon so it works with what its got kind of hardware. > -- > Matthew Miller > > Fedora Project Leader > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: EPEL-8 branches requests being rejected
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 09:12:41AM +0200, Jakub Jelen wrote: > I think this is a problem that the rsh package is in normal RHEL8 (not > sure in which stream) and if I am right, packages in rhel can not be in > epel too. When we get modularity up and working for EPEL-8, we'll need to figure out how to handle that, as we want to be able to provide alternate versions as non-default streams. On another note: rsh? Really? :) -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: A new workflow for newcomers
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:17:26AM +0200, alcir...@gmail.com wrote: > [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Welcome can we get this onto the docs site? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Recommending proprietary software in Fedora
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 07:09:50PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > But it leads to the strange situation that we can recommend to install > > ffmpeg if it is bundled with some proprietary software, but cannot do so > > if it is part of a free software repository. > Considering that FFmpeg is LGPL-licensed, I think recommending proprietary > software that uses FFmpeg exposes us to significant legal risk, because, as > far as I can tell, the LGPL is incompatible with proprietary patent > licenses. So I do not see how that proprietary software can be complying at > the same time with the LGPL and the patent license. Let's please not speculate what may or may not expose us to risk. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Modularity and all the things
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:44:06PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 14:41 +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > > We currently don’t have any other proposal that would fulfill the vision > > of our Objective and the needs of our users. > How do the proposals I've mentioned not fulfill the goals? Are you proposing to _do_ those things, or proposing that someone else oughta? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:47:15AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > In general, yes. If the package versions have incompatibilities and/or > user-visible changes, a different stream is needed for each Fedora > release. There was a subthread about this recently, starting at In this case, of course, there needs to be a good way for users to be moved from stream to stream at upgrade time in a non-disruptive way. I know work is in progress on that. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 09:07:27AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Because this keeps coming up, we talked about this at the Fedora Council > > meeting today. Our goals for modularity are: > > 2. Those alternate streams should be able to have different lifecycles. > > Hmm, it sounds like the Council hasn't taken into account the constraints > on lifecycle of modules that we have slowly discovered during the last > two years, constraints that are now part of FESCo-approved policy. > > Essentially, modules in Fedora are only allowed to EOL at EOL of Fedora > release. And to preserve stability for users, a.k.a. following the Update > Policy, modules should only change to new major version at Fedora > releases. This is exactly the same as for "normal" rpms. This seems appropriate for default steams, but modules should be able to have alternate, opt-in streams which either a) update on a rolling or other cadence or b) choose to keep building the older version across the release boundary. The tooling should make this clear to the users. > The lifecycle of modules in Fedora must be the same as lifecycle of > Fedora releases, so no "different lifecycle" is possible. > > > 1. Users should have alternate streams of software available. > > 3. Packaging an individual stream for multiple outputs should be easier > > than before. > > Those *are* useful goals, but they should not be tied to specific technology, > we should only care about the end-result. Yes, that's true from a Council point of view. However, I also have a pretty strong bias towards people who showed up to do the work, and the decisions they've made. That doesn't mean we're stuck and can't adjust -- in fact, adjusting as we've gone along is a lot of why we're where we are now. But unless someone shows up with people-power and funding to do it, I take kind of a skeptical view of proposals to start a whole new approach from scratch. > Thus, please replace "Our goals for modularity are" with "What we hope > to achieve with modularity" or even "Our goal is for users to be able to". I don't really see a meaningful difference there. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unresponsive maintainer: smooge Fwd: [Bug 1451148] libmaxminddb-1.3.2 is available
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:46:41AM -0400, Jason Taylor wrote: > I am interested in this package as well, I can help maintain it (fas: > jtaylor) Is there an easy command-line query tool for this package, like there was for the old db version? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Modularity and all the things
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 14:41 +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > We > currently don’t have any other proposal that would fulfill the vision > of our Objective and the needs of our users. How do the proposals I've mentioned not fulfill the goals? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764730] New: Please consider building an RPM for Data::Dump::Color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764730 Bug ID: 1764730 Summary: Please consider building an RPM for Data::Dump::Color Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Data-Dump Assignee: p...@city-fan.org Reporter: sc...@perturb.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Fedora has a package for Data::Dump::Color but it's not available via EPEL. Please consider putting this package in EPEL 8. Name : perl-Data-Dump-Color Version : 0.241 Release : 2.fc30 Architecture : noarch Size : 56 k Source : perl-Data-Dump-Color-0.241-2.fc30.src.rpm Repository : @System From repo: fedora Summary : Like Data::Dump, but with color URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Data-Dump-Color License : GPL+ or Artistic Description : This module aims to be a drop-in replacement for Data::Dump. It adds colors : to dumps. For more information, see Data::Dump. This documentation explains : what's different between this module and Data::Dump. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 31 compose report: 20191023.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-31-20191021.n.0 NEW: Fedora-31-20191023.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 3 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 98.31 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 36.93 MiB Size change of upgraded packages: 12.66 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 8.58 KiB = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: gnome-software-3.34.1-6.fc31 Old package: gnome-software-3.34.1-5.fc31 Summary: A software center for GNOME RPMs: gnome-software gnome-software-devel gnome-software-editor gnome-software-rpm-ostree Size: 33.67 MiB Size change: 5.61 KiB Changelog: * Fri Oct 18 2019 Kalev Lember - 3.34.1-6 - Backport patches to fix a crash in gs_flatpak_get_installation (#1762689) Package: rpm-4.15.0-3.fc31 Old package: rpm-4.15.0-2.fc31 Summary: The RPM package management system RPMs: python2-rpm python3-rpm rpm rpm-apidocs rpm-build rpm-build-libs rpm-cron rpm-devel rpm-libs rpm-plugin-audit rpm-plugin-ima rpm-plugin-prioreset rpm-plugin-selinux rpm-plugin-syslog rpm-plugin-systemd-inhibit rpm-sign rpm-sign-libs Size: 8.48 MiB Size change: 6.12 KiB Changelog: * Fri Oct 18 2019 Panu Matilainen - 4.15.0-3 - Revert problematic sub-variants of armv8 (#1691430) Package: systemd-243-4.gitef67743.fc31 Old package: systemd-243-2.gitfab6f01.fc31 Summary: System and Service Manager RPMs: systemd systemd-container systemd-devel systemd-journal-remote systemd-libs systemd-pam systemd-rpm-macros systemd-tests systemd-udev Size: 56.16 MiB Size change: 960 B Changelog: * Thu Oct 10 2019 Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek - 243-3.gitef67743 - Various minor documentation and error message cleanups - Do not use cgroup v1 hierarchy in nspawn on groups v2 (#1756143) * Fri Oct 18 2019 Adam Williamson - 243-4.gitef67743 - Backport PR #13792 to fix nomodeset+BIOS CanGraphical bug (#1728240) = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = Package: grub2-1:2.02-98.fc31 Old package: grub2-1:2.02-100.fc31 Summary: Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more RPMs: grub2-common grub2-efi-aa64 grub2-efi-aa64-cdboot grub2-efi-aa64-modules grub2-efi-arm grub2-efi-arm-cdboot grub2-efi-arm-modules grub2-efi-ia32 grub2-efi-ia32-cdboot grub2-efi-ia32-modules grub2-efi-x64 grub2-efi-x64-cdboot grub2-efi-x64-modules grub2-emu grub2-emu-modules grub2-pc grub2-pc-modules grub2-ppc64le grub2-ppc64le-modules grub2-tools grub2-tools-efi grub2-tools-extra grub2-tools-minimal Size: 36.93 MiB Size change: 8.58 KiB ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1760397] perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99024 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760397 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99.024-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-26a9a11288 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764422] perl-Test-Compile-2.3.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764422 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Compile-2.3.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-af95b484ba -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764217] perl-SQL-Interp-1.25 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764217 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-SQL-Interp-1.25-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e96dc23d23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763924] perl-Sys-Syslog-0.36 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763924 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Sys-Syslog-0.36-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6a3e3fcaef -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1744784] (RFE) EPEL8 branch of perl-Net-SNMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744784 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2019-9f66578df5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-9f66578df5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-31-20191023.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/153 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-31-20191021.n.0): ID: 474813 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474813 ID: 474875 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474875 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/153 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-31-20191021.n.0): ID: 474852 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474852 ID: 474931 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474931 Passed openQA tests: 150/153 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-31-20191021.n.0): ID: 474927 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474927 Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 1 of 155 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default: System load changed from 0.48 to 0.07 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/473195#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474842#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.39 to 0.57 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/473199#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474846#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload: System load changed from 1.24 to 1.52 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/473212#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474859#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi: Used mem changed from 918 MiB to 727 MiB 1 services(s) removed since previous compose: pcscd.service Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/473214#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474861#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: Mount /run contents changed to 143.0613961% of previous size Used swap changed from 5 MiB to 7 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/473232#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474879#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
REMINDER: Fedora 31 Final Go/No-Go meeting Thursday
This is your reminder that the Go/No-Go meeting for Fedora 31 is Thursday 24 October at 1400 UTC in #fedora-meeting Note that this is different than the usual time and channel. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1760397] perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99024 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760397 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-26a9a11288 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-26a9a11288 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Test-Announce] REMINDER: Fedora 31 Final Go/No-Go meeting Thursday
This is your reminder that the Go/No-Go meeting for Fedora 31 is Thursday 24 October at 1400 UTC in #fedora-meeting Note that this is different than the usual time and channel. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do you Remove packages from the distro?
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:42 AM Daniel Walsh wrote: > > On 10/23/19 10:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:40 AM Daniel Walsh wrote: > >> How do I go about removing packages from Fedora Distro. I want to drop > >> oci-systemd-hook and oci-register-machine? I would love to remove them > >> from f31 but it might be too late. > > I think we need more information on what you mean by "drop", because > > there are a lot of ways to interpret that. > > > > Do you mean: > > > > 1) I don't want to maintain these packages anymore, but someone else might. > > 2) These packages are no longer useful and there's no reason to keep > > updating them from here onwards. > Option 2, I retired both of them. > > 3) These packages are being replaced by other software or are actively > > harmful and should not remain on an end-user's system. > > oci-systemd-hook features are now embeded in Podman, and we not accepted > into the moby project. You should probably add `Obsoletes: oci-systemd-hook < 0.2.0-3` to the podman package so that it will remove oci-systemd-hook as a separate package from users' systems. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do you Remove packages from the distro?
On 10/23/19 10:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:40 AM Daniel Walsh wrote: >> How do I go about removing packages from Fedora Distro. I want to drop >> oci-systemd-hook and oci-register-machine? I would love to remove them >> from f31 but it might be too late. > I think we need more information on what you mean by "drop", because > there are a lot of ways to interpret that. > > Do you mean: > > 1) I don't want to maintain these packages anymore, but someone else might. > 2) These packages are no longer useful and there's no reason to keep > updating them from here onwards. Option 2, I retired both of them. > 3) These packages are being replaced by other software or are actively > harmful and should not remain on an end-user's system. oci-systemd-hook features are now embeded in Podman, and we not accepted into the moby project. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: EPEL-8 branches requests being rejected
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 03:36, Michal Ruprich wrote: > > Hi Jakube, > > yes the package was there in the early RHEL-8.0.0 branch but has been > removed. So technically it is not in RHEL-8 even though there are some > builds from very long time ago. So perhaps I need to make sure these > disappear too? > So some information that Red Hat provides that we import into pdc says they are still there. I am not sure exactly where that comes from (I think it is in the repodata you download from access) but I will work with Pierre on how to fix -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
utf8cpp major update
Hello, new utf8cpp maintainer here (thanks to Jamie for packaging it
and maintaining so far).
It appears that the project moved from SourceForge to GitHub a couple of
years ago and made quite a few releases since then. I've already
submitted an update from 2.3.4 to 2.3.6 in F30+, but I would like to
update to the latest 3.1 release in rawhide only, too.
As this is a header-only package, no rebuilds are required immediately.
I did try to rebuild all dependent packages in COPR[1]. It looks like
there are 7 consumers and 5 of them rebuilt with no issues. termy-qt was
FTBFS already due to an unrelated issue, but should be OK once that's
resolved. Only one (ledger) requires some porting as it's using a
deprecated method which got dropped in utf8cpp-3.0.
dnf repoquery --queryformat '%{name}' --disablerepo=\*
--enablerepo=fedora-source,rpmfusion-*-source --releasever=32 --whatrequires
utf8cpp-devel
ledger OK (but really FAIL) [1]
libebml OK
libosmium FAIL (built OK locally, fails in COPR due to sqlite update, but
correct deps are in koji)
mkvtoolnix OK
termy-qt FAIL [2]
termy-server OK
xoreos-tools OK
Now, I'm going to give the a week or two before actually doing
the build in rawhide and I'll work on submitting a PR for ledger
to fix building with the latest utf8cpp.
Affected maintainers have been Bcc'd.
Regards,
Dominik
[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rathann/utf8cpp3/
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764254
[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1736904
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Rawhide-20191023.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED: compose.cloud.all MISSING: fedora.Workstation-boot-iso.x86_64.64bit - compose.install_default MISSING: fedora.Workstation-boot-iso.x86_64.uefi - compose.install_default Failed openQA tests: 14/153 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) ID: 474621 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474621 ID: 474635 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474635 ID: 474662 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474662 ID: 474663 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_background URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474663 ID: 474665 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474665 ID: 474670 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474670 ID: 474679 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474679 ID: 474681 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474681 ID: 474683 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474683 ID: 474693 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474693 ID: 474733 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474733 ID: 474739 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474739 ID: 474763 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474763 ID: 474764 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474764 ID: 474765 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474765 Soft failed openQA tests: 67/153 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 474617 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474617 ID: 474619 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474619 ID: 474630 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474630 ID: 474632 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474632 ID: 474640 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474640 ID: 474645 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474645 ID: 474648 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474648 ID: 474649 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfsiso_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474649 ID: 474660 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474660 ID: 474695 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474695 ID: 474696 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474696 ID: 474697 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474697 ID: 474698 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474698 ID: 474699 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474699 ID: 474700 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474700 ID: 474701 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474701 ID: 474702 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474702 ID: 474703 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474703 ID: 474704 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474704 ID: 474705 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474705 ID: 474708 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474708 ID: 474709 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474709 ID: 474710 Test: x86_64 universal
Re: How do you Remove packages from the distro?
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:40 AM Daniel Walsh wrote: > > How do I go about removing packages from Fedora Distro. I want to drop > oci-systemd-hook and oci-register-machine? I would love to remove them > from f31 but it might be too late. I think we need more information on what you mean by "drop", because there are a lot of ways to interpret that. Do you mean: 1) I don't want to maintain these packages anymore, but someone else might. 2) These packages are no longer useful and there's no reason to keep updating them from here onwards. 3) These packages are being replaced by other software or are actively harmful and should not remain on an end-user's system. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do you Remove packages from the distro?
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 3:47 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh wrote: > > > > How do I go about removing packages from Fedora Distro. I want to drop > > oci-systemd-hook and oci-register-machine? I would love to remove them > > from f31 but it might be too late. > > Too late for Fedora 31, but you can retire them from Rawhide for F32 onward. > > Alternatively, you may choose to orphan it so that someone else can > take it over, and if nobody does, it'll be auto-retired. > > The process for orphaning/retiring is manual right now, but I believe > that will be fixed with the next Pagure upgrade. For now, you need to > file a releng ticket. You're probably confusing this with un-orphaning and un-retirement. To orphan a package, just go to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/PACKAGE/settings#giveproject-tab for the PACKAGE you want to orphan, and give it to the "orphan" user. To retire a package, just run $ fedpkg retire 'REASON REASON REASON' in the package's git repo with the REASON for the retirement. However, to revert both processes, manual intervention from releng is required. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Fabio > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do you Remove packages from the distro?
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh wrote: > > How do I go about removing packages from Fedora Distro. I want to drop > oci-systemd-hook and oci-register-machine? I would love to remove them > from f31 but it might be too late. Too late for Fedora 31, but you can retire them from Rawhide for F32 onward. Alternatively, you may choose to orphan it so that someone else can take it over, and if nobody does, it'll be auto-retired. The process for orphaning/retiring is manual right now, but I believe that will be fixed with the next Pagure upgrade. For now, you need to file a releng ticket. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
How do you Remove packages from the distro?
How do I go about removing packages from Fedora Distro. I want to drop oci-systemd-hook and oci-register-machine? I would love to remove them from f31 but it might be too late. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Modularity and all the things
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 08:43, Petr Šabata wrote: > > I do believe we all intend the best, even if we sometimes disagree. We > currently don’t have any other proposal that would fulfill the vision > of our Objective and the needs of our users. The input here helps us > re-focus on the most acute pain points but the manpower and control we > have is also rather limited. If you want to and can help with the > implementation, I’d like to encourage you to do so. > One of the reasons why a lot of the complaints have been narrow comes down to a modified saying 'it is hard to remember that you were originally trying to cross a swamp for a party when you are up to your neck in alligators and snakes." [I am avoiding the original to try to escape derailing the conversation on apropos of it etc.] Basically, it isn't clear what the Objective or why it is important to anyone outside of the snake bites and crocodile lunges we are dealing with the tools. 1. Not everyone agrees that they want to go to the party. 2. Not everyone remembers there was a party or what it is? 3. Not everyone is sure this is actually heading towards the party and not to the swamp monsters lair 4. Everyone is tired of the constant snakes, swamp fungus, and each other when they were safe back at home 2-3 releases ago. So what is the party? Why is this party important that we all have to go? Why aren't we going the long way to the party? etc. I know that the leaders of the expedition are tired of telling us this, but it needs to be done.. but a distribution is a social agreement between people. Communicating between members why we think we want to get to the party is important. -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned some leaf Java packages
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 12:47 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hello packagers, > > I have identified that the Stewardship SIG owned some packages that > have now become leaf packages in fedora, since their last dependent > packages were recently removed or updated to no longer require them. > > Because there's no point in maintaining leaf packages that aren't > useful on their own, we have orphaned these packages: > > - extra166y > - felix-osgi-foundation > - jcsp > - multiverse > - plexus-cli With the latest state of rawhide, `apache-mime4j` is now also a leaf package in fedora. I have orphaned it as well. Fabio > I did some repoqueries and see no reason why they shouldn't get safely > retired after 6 weeks. > > Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764596] perl-DBD-Mock-1.51 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764596 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||jples...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||perl-DBD-Mock-1.51-1.fc32 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com |jples...@redhat.com Last Closed||2019-10-23 13:02:19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Modularity and all the things
Starting a new thread since the old one is hard to navigate at this point. Modularity is a distribution-level change and requires some mindset shift from packagers and users alike. I understand the concerns some people have, feeling it’s something new and half-baked that is being forced on them. We’re an open source community and in order to drive innovation, we need to be able to try new approaches and technologies in the open, not develop them without any input and hands-on experience behind closed doors, later serving them on a silver plate. The feedback we’re getting is extremely valuable, but some of it is too narrowly focused on one specific problem area and not taking into account the other aspects, requirements, or goals that we’re pursuing. Our objective is still to deliver multiple versions, or variants, of our content across releases or even distributions (think EPEL or CentOS). And it’s a good one. The concept of default streams was introduced to make modularity invisible to anyone who has no interest in alternatives and wants the system to operate as it historically has. Whether a specific package is delivered via a module or not shouldn’t matter. (This does not mean it should be hidden, just that it should have no practical difference to the system.) This applies to both buildroots and runtime, leaving the choice of whether to modularize or not to the maintainer. Obviously, the implementation is falling short in this regard right now, but we have solutions in development or under design. This includes making the default streams available in the non-modular buildroot via Ursa Prime or tracking the module enablement intent in our software management stack, as Stephen suggested in the original post. While these issues are being resolved, we are considering temporarily disallowing default streams in Fedora. I don’t want to abandon the idea completely, as doing so reduces the motivation to actually build modules and reap the benefits they might provide. Yes, modularity still has some additional development ahead. We need to improve the software management stack experience; we need to revisit our release engineering SOPs; we need to stabilize and boost performance of our infrastructure; and last but not least, we need to improve the packager experience, providing more features to make the creation of modules easier, as well as guidance, best practices and policies that make it easy to collaborate. These changes are similar to those for other useful but disruptive technologies that Fedora has successfully introduced in the past. I do believe we all intend the best, even if we sometimes disagree. We currently don’t have any other proposal that would fulfill the vision of our Objective and the needs of our users. The input here helps us re-focus on the most acute pain points but the manpower and control we have is also rather limited. If you want to and can help with the implementation, I’d like to encourage you to do so. P ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764596] perl-DBD-Mock-1.51 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764596 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been automatically reported. Sorry! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764596] New: perl-DBD-Mock-1.51 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764596 Bug ID: 1764596 Summary: perl-DBD-Mock-1.51 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DBD-Mock Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jan.pra...@gmail.com, lkund...@v3.sk, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.51 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.49-1.fc32 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBD-Mock/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2805/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764346] perl-DBD-Mock-1.50 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764346 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-DBD-Mock-1.50-1.fc32 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-10-23 12:19:08 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764422] perl-Test-Compile-2.3.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764422 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-af95b484ba has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-af95b484ba -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764346] perl-DBD-Mock-1.50 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764346 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com |jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763497] [RFE] EPEL-6 and EPEL-7 branches for perl-Feed-Find
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763497 --- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth --- Status update: perl-Feed-Find appears to be blocked for EPEL-6: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8923 No idea why this should be. It's not in EL-6 proper. Maybe it used to be? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764422] perl-Test-Compile-2.3.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764422 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Compile-2.3.1-1.f ||c32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763664] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-MooseX-AttributeHelpers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763664 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[RFe] EPEL-8 branch for |[RFE] EPEL-8 branch for |perl-MooseX-AttributeHelper |perl-MooseX-AttributeHelper |s |s --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth --- I am happy to do this build myself if you are not interested in EPEL-8. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1744842] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-PerlIO-buffersize
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744842 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2019-024535cd5f has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-024535cd5f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: EPEL-8 branches requests being rejected
Hi Jakube, yes the package was there in the early RHEL-8.0.0 branch but has been removed. So technically it is not in RHEL-8 even though there are some builds from very long time ago. So perhaps I need to make sure these disappear too? On 10/23/19 9:12 AM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 08:45 +0200, Michal Ruprich wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to request epel-8 branch for rsh package but the request >> is >> always closed as invalid with this explanation: "The branch in PDC >> already exists". I have no idea what that means. I simply cannot find >> the epel-8 branch anywhere. Could anyone explain this and ideally >> point >> me in the right direction as to where I can find the branch? >> >> Thanks and regards. > Hello, > > I think this is a problem that the rsh package is in normal RHEL8 (not > sure in which stream) and if I am right, packages in rhel can not be in > epel too. > > I can see at least few builds for RHEL8 in brew as well as the rsh as a > bugzilla component. > > Regards, -- Michal Ruprich Software Engineer Email: mrupr...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: EPEL-8 branches requests being rejected
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 08:45 +0200, Michal Ruprich wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to request epel-8 branch for rsh package but the request > is > always closed as invalid with this explanation: "The branch in PDC > already exists". I have no idea what that means. I simply cannot find > the epel-8 branch anywhere. Could anyone explain this and ideally > point > me in the right direction as to where I can find the branch? > > Thanks and regards. Hello, I think this is a problem that the rsh package is in normal RHEL8 (not sure in which stream) and if I am right, packages in rhel can not be in epel too. I can see at least few builds for RHEL8 in brew as well as the rsh as a bugzilla component. Regards, -- Jakub Jelen Senior Software Engineer Security Technologies Red Hat, Inc. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: EPEL-8 branches requests being rejected
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:45:36AM +0200, Michal Ruprich wrote: >Hi, > >I am trying to request epel-8 branch for rsh package but the request is >always closed as invalid with this explanation: "The branch in PDC already >exists". I have no idea what that means. I simply cannot find the epel-8 >branch anywhere. Could anyone explain this and ideally point me in the >right direction as to where I can find the branch? So the branch exists in PDC means that you can create the git branch yourself. Simply: git checkout -b epel8 && git push -u origin epel8 If the push fails, you may have enabled the git hook preventing the creation of new git branches, if so, you'll need to temporarily (or permanently, up to you) disable this hook in the settings of the project. We really ought to improve the message posted to the request here... Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763668] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-MouseX-Foreign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763668 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2019-50ffbeed25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-50ffbeed25 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
EPEL-8 branches requests being rejected
Hi, I am trying to request epel-8 branch for rsh package but the request is always closed as invalid with this explanation: "The branch in PDC already exists". I have no idea what that means. I simply cannot find the epel-8 branch anywhere. Could anyone explain this and ideally point me in the right direction as to where I can find the branch? Thanks and regards. -- Michal Ruprich Software Engineer Email: mrupr...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
