Re: Packaging of github cli?

On 2/14/20 12:36 PM, Joe Doss wrote: > I will see what it takes to get this submitted for review this weekend. Here we go https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803302 If anyone has any some time to give these package a review that would be great. Joe -- Joe Doss j...@solidadmin.com

Re: URGENT: users prompted to upgrade to F32

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 05:14:57PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 18:37 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Users are being prompted to upgrade to F32. Anyone who knows how to fix > > this, please help with > >

[Bug 1802968] EPEL8 Build

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802968 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1798643] perl-Shell-Config-Generate-0.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798643 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Shell-Config-Generate- |perl-Shell-Config-Generate-

[Bug 1795119] Upgrade perl-Time-Local to 1.30

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795119 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Time-Local-1.300-1.fc3 |perl-Time-Local-1.300-1.fc3

[Test-Announce] 2020-02-17 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2020-02-17 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's been a couple of weeks, so let's meet on Monday to check in on Fedora 32 status and a few other

[Test-Announce] 2020-02-17 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 32 Blocker Review Meeting

# F32 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2020-02-17 # Time: 17:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 2 proposed Beta blockers, 1 proposed Beta freeze exception, and 1 proposed Final blocker to review, so let's have a Fedora 32 blocker review meeting on

[Bug 1798643] perl-Shell-Config-Generate-0.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798643 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1802773] perl-Sys-Mmap-0.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802773 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

Re: URGENT: users prompted to upgrade to F32

On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 18:37 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, > > Users are being prompted to upgrade to F32. Anyone who knows how to fix > this, please help with > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8652 ASAP. We fixed it several hours ago, but people are likely hitting copies

Re: deduplicating noarch subpackages

Josh Stone wrote: > On 2/13/20 7:26 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> built only on one of them.) As far as I know, this was implemented that >> way to make QEMU firmwares work (which are built on and for a specific >> architecture, and then shipped as noarch packages for all of them so that >> the

URGENT: users prompted to upgrade to F32

Hi, Users are being prompted to upgrade to F32. Anyone who knows how to fix this, please help with https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8652 ASAP. Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

David Cantrell wrote: >> On 1/30/20 8:32 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: […] I have not actually written the lines you quoted, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala has. Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora-32-20200214.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 98/158 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200213.n.0): ID: 521482 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/521482 ID: 521514 Test: x86_64

[Bug 1792699] perl-CDB_File-1.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792699 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CDB_File-1.00-1.fc32 |perl-CDB_File-1.00-1.fc32

[Bug 1795181] Add perl-WWW-Curl to EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795181 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: infrastructure problem: koji and bodhi responding very slow / dl with 80kb/s

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 06:21:34PM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Am 14.02.20 um 17:57 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 08:07:19AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 06:21, Leigh Griffin wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:59 AM Artem Tim

Re: Invalid body, keys: sls missing

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:00:36AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > I'm trying to get an f32 branch for a newly created package. Branch > creation has failed twice now with the error in $SUBJECT: > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/22127 > > Can I get a human to look at that

Re: dnf exit code

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 07:42:45AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:29:47AM +0100, Daniel Mach wrote: > > There seem to be 2 related problems: > > 1) Only the image on docker.io doesn't work. If you use > > registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide, it works as expected. >

Re: Fonts packaging policy rewrite proposal

Le mardi 12 novembre 2019 à 09:00 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > A fonts packaging policy rewrite proposal has been pushed to FPC > today: > https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/934 > > It should be clearer, more opinionated, and take into account: > – updates of The OpenType

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposed official change to EPEL guidelines: modules and RHEL

Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi said: > Does this mean if there's a package foo that is a rhel package, but not > in a module, that it can be overlapped with a foo package thats in a > epel non default module? ie, does it only mean the modular case or does > it mean any rpm? As a consumer of EPEL,

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposed official change to EPEL guidelines: modules and RHEL

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 07:54:24AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > I've been saying this for a while as if it's fact, but of course it's not > actually fact until approved, so I'm puting this to the EPEL team to > hopefully do so. > > The current guidelines * say: > >EPEL packages should only

[EPEL-devel] Re: Can we enable some "-devel" modules from CBR in the EPEL8 buildroot?

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:23:52AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello EPEL. > > It seems that we have a python38-devel module in the RHEL 8.2 Beta Code > Ready Builder repository. It has only one stream but it is not a default > stream due to some technical limitations. > > Can we please enable

Fedora-Rawhide-20200214.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 26 of 43 required tests failed, 9 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 104/169 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in

Re: Signal 4 (ILL) caught by ps in mock

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:37 AM Dan Horák wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:28:10 -0700 > Christoph Junghans wrote: > > > >> > > >> In your case procps-ng package seems to be miscompiled (or run on > > >> an incopatible hardware). I recommend getting a shell in the mock > > >> enviroment (mock

[Bug 1802968] EPEL8 Build

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802968 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-02-17)

Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-02-17) Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date

Re: How to get proper nsswitch.conf?

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 7:13 pm, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Why don't we have mymachines here? Next question, I have: passwd: sss files systemd shadow: files sss group: sss files systemd The difference is that authselect doesn't write the shadow line [1], that one is coming from our glibc

Re: Packaging of github cli?

On 2/14/20 10:23 AM, Joe Doss wrote: > On 2/14/20 9:56 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> Anyone working on packaging github's CLI? >> >> https://github.com/cli/cli  >> >> I've never packaged a GO application before... > > I have a spec I am working on right now. I will try to get it up on my > Copr this

Re: Any plans to include kotlin in Fedora

So I suppose if someone takes on Gradle again, it would be possible to add Kotlin to Fedora. But overall, it seems rather complicated. -Mehdi On Thu, Feb 13, 2020, 19:03 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > I think it boils down to having people to do the work, which is > >

[Bug 1802968] EPEL8 Build

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802968 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

CPE Weekly: 2020-02-14

# CPE Weekly: 2020-02-14 Background: The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep core servers and services running and maintained, build releases, and other strategic tasks that need more dedicated

Re: Signal 4 (ILL) caught by ps in mock

On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:28:10 -0700 Christoph Junghans wrote: > >> > >> In your case procps-ng package seems to be miscompiled (or run on > >> an incopatible hardware). I recommend getting a shell in the mock > >> enviroment (mock --shell) and investigeting whether the ps program > >> works

Re: Signal 4 (ILL) caught by ps in mock

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 6:38 AM Christoph Junghans wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, 00:16 Petr Pisar wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 07:48:22PM -0700, Christoph Junghans wrote: >> > when running "mock -r fedora-rawhide-ppc64le --no-clean >> > gromacs-2019.5-2.fc32.1.src.rpm" >> > I am

Re: infrastructure problem: koji and bodhi responding very slow / dl with 80kb/s

Am 14.02.20 um 17:57 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 08:07:19AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 06:21, Leigh Griffin wrote: >> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:59 AM Artem Tim wrote: >>> Same here. I am waiting several minutes for every my

Re: infrastructure problem: koji and bodhi responding very slow / dl with 80kb/s

Am 14.02.20 um 17:57 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > > Also, it might help if people noted the exact time of day (UTC) they are > accessing things? > > I suspect it may be backup slowness (which happens after 00:00UTC +- > 2hours) > it was around 12AM CET (+100), so the backup is off the hook. unfortune

Re: infrastructure problem: koji and bodhi responding very slow / dl with 80kb/s

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 08:07:19AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 06:21, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:59 AM Artem Tim wrote: > > > >> Same here. I am waiting several minutes for every my action. This is very > >> unproductive. > >> >

Re: koji build fails on arch armv7hl

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 07:42:40AM -, Martin Gansser wrote: > always same behaviour > > [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41489282 > [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41489285 This looks a lot like: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9226 I'm hoping

Re: Packaging of github cli?

On 2/14/20 9:56 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Anyone working on packaging github's CLI? > > https://github.com/cli/cli  > > I've never packaged a GO application before... I have a spec I am working on right now. I will try to get it up on my Copr this weekend. Joe -- Joe Doss

Packaging of github cli?

Anyone working on packaging github's CLI? https://github.com/cli/cli I've never packaged a GO application before... Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1803121] Impossible to install perl-Monitoring-Plugin

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803121 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC|

[Bug 1803121] New: Impossible to install perl-Monitoring-Plugin

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803121 Bug ID: 1803121 Summary: Impossible to install perl-Monitoring-Plugin Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Monitoring-Plugin Assignee:

Re: Signal 4 (ILL) caught by ps in mock

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, 00:16 Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 07:48:22PM -0700, Christoph Junghans wrote: > > when running "mock -r fedora-rawhide-ppc64le --no-clean > > gromacs-2019.5-2.fc32.1.src.rpm" > > I am getting the following error: > > Signal 4 (ILL) caught by ps (3.3.15). > >

Re: infrastructure problem: koji and bodhi responding very slow / dl with 80kb/s

On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 06:21, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:59 AM Artem Tim wrote: > >> Same here. I am waiting several minutes for every my action. This is very >> unproductive. >> > > Log it as a ticket and I can get the CPE folks to investigate it and see > if there

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200214.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

On 14. 02. 20 12:45, Ankur Sinha wrote: So, I'll focus on converting Gradle projects to Maven as the short-term solution. I'll start a new thread for that to see how other maintainers currently go about it. Thanks for doing this! You rock. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Converting Gradle project files to Maven for packaging

Hello, Could the maintainers that have converted the Gradle project files to Maven for packaging in Fedora please share how they've gone about it? - is it a process of manually reading the Gradle files and writing Maven poms? - is there an automated way of doing it (like this:

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

Hi Mario, On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 11:39:31 +0100, Mario Torre wrote: > The problem with Gradle as far as I'm aware is that it's a moving > target. It insist on updating itself when you have an incompatible > version and versions tend to break compatibility a lot, with new > features added often,

Re: infrastructure problem: koji and bodhi responding very slow / dl with 80kb/s

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:59 AM Artem Tim wrote: > Same here. I am waiting several minutes for every my action. This is very > unproductive. > Log it as a ticket and I can get the CPE folks to investigate it and see if there is an obvious problem that we can help with. >

Failed to open file “build/gresource.xml”: No such file or directory

Hi, tried to compile helia [1] on fc31, but this fails with this error messages: rogram data/desktop.sh found: YES (/bin/sh /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/Helia-14.0/data/desktop.sh) Program data/gen-gres.sh found: YES (/bin/sh /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/Helia-14.0/data/gen-gres.sh) Found

[Bug 1802999] New: Upgrade perl-Pegex to 0.75

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802999 Bug ID: 1802999 Summary: Upgrade perl-Pegex to 0.75 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Pegex Assignee: g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de

[Bug 1802968] EPEL8 Build

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802968 Timothée Floure changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1756117 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1802968] New: EPEL8 Build

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802968 Bug ID: 1802968 Summary: EPEL8 Build Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: