On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 8:05 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 18.02.2020 22:29, David Sommerseth wrote:
> > We released the OpenVPN 3 Linux v8 beta release early last week [0], with
> > the
> > Fedora Copr repository [1] updated as well. Now things are working so well
> > it
> > is abo
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:01 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 10:35:26 AM MST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It has been a pleasure for me to be a part of and help lead the
> > EPEL steering committee for the last couple of years. It has not
> > always bee
On 18.02.2020 22:29, David Sommerseth wrote:
> We released the OpenVPN 3 Linux v8 beta release early last week [0], with the
> Fedora Copr repository [1] updated as well. Now things are working so well it
> is about time to get this package into the mainline Fedora repositories.
Fedora already ha
Then who is the best person?
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 07:11 John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 10:35:26 AM MST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It has been a pleasure for me to be a part of and help lead the
> > EPEL steering committee for the last couple of years.
On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 10:35:26 AM MST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It has been a pleasure for me to be a part of and help lead the
> EPEL steering committee for the last couple of years. It has not
> always been smooth sailing but I have found it an enjoyable experience.
>
> Howe
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:52 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Since this is an API endpoint of a real system which needs to be
> updated correctly when the release events actually happen, it should
> have the benefits pkgdb used to be (the information should be reliable
> and timely)
Do we have stat
This isn't the first time that this has happened but I have pushed multiple
builds in one bodhi update through the web interface and:
1. It takes forever
2. Only one (or some) updates are created, others are dropped
What gives? It's a PITA to create the same update again...
Thanks,
Richard
_
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 04:41:42PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 02:05:07PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > several of my `koji --scratch --arch-overide=s390x ...` builds have failed
> > with error; reading package header (after the rebuildSRPM)
> >
> > Latest is https://ko
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 5:40 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I wonder if it's some kind of loop in qt5 headers?
>
> So, I'd say try and duplicate it in a i686 mock chroot on a x86_64
> machine and see if you can gather enough info for a c++ or qt5 bug.
Meanwhile, I've got an mscore build running
(https:/
Hi Elliott,
On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 5:48:21 PM PST Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> Hi Erich,
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 12:10, Erich Eickmeyer
> wrote:
> > I have filed bugzilla reports for each one and blocked FE-NEEDSPONSOR for
> > each
one. I'd like to get these sponsored as soon as
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 19:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> So, I'd say try and duplicate it in a i686 mock chroot on a x86_64
> machine and see if you can gather enough info for a c++ or qt5 bug.
>
> Hope that helps.
Thanks Kevin,
Strangely, as I was attempting to try out what you suggested I got a
"bui
Hi Erich,
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 12:10, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> I have filed bugzilla reports for each one and blocked FE-NEEDSPONSOR for each
> one. I'd like to get these sponsored as soon as possible.
>
To clarify, it is not the packages that need to be sponsored, it is *you*.
https://fedorap
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 02:05:07PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> several of my `koji --scratch --arch-overide=s390x ...` builds have failed
> with error; reading package header (after the rebuildSRPM)
>
> Latest is https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41622496
>
> (guess I could
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 06:46:05PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> In an effort to update the fluidsynth library version, which comes
> with a soname bump, in rawhide (F33) I created a side tag
> f33-build-side-19396. All but one dependent packages are rebuilt. The
> last dependent is the muse packag
In an effort to update the fluidsynth library version, which comes
with a soname bump, in rawhide (F33) I created a side tag
f33-build-side-19396. All but one dependent packages are rebuilt. The
last dependent is the muse package.
I tried to rebuild muse in the side tag three times. In all of the
Ronaldo Mercado wrote:
>One way I have seen this solved is to have a #define, say '#define MAIN'
>
>On the header file "header.h" you would have a declaration and a definition
>only if MAIN is defined, e.g.
>
>extern int y; /* declaration */
>#ifdef MAIN
>int y; /* definition */
>#endif
Hi,
We released the OpenVPN 3 Linux v8 beta release early last week [0], with the
Fedora Copr repository [1] updated as well. Now things are working so well it
is about time to get this package into the mainline Fedora repositories.
I'm fairly rusty on the Fedora packaging, but I have opened a
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 08:39, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 01:11, Jerry James wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 10:06 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > > If anyone is interested in pushing this forward, I can review
> > > something in exchange. Note that the koji scratch build fails
several of my `koji --scratch --arch-overide=s390x ...` builds have failed
with error; reading package header (after the rebuildSRPM)
Latest is https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41622496
(guess I could reopen my s390x disk full ticket. Or open a new one.)
--
Kaleb
___
On 2/18/20 1:00 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
The mock in f30 updates-testing mock-2.0-2.fc30.noarch fixed it for me
and I was able to build packages for f32 and rawhide locally.
Ugh. The maintainer used a custom update name and that threw me off. First time I've
seen that used.
___
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 13:55, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> On 2/18/20 8:49 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
> > On 2/18/20 3:44 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >> I am unable to build packages using mock for either f32 or f33 which is
> >> very problematic.
> > Afaik you need mock from updates-testing for the
On 2/18/20 8:49 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 2/18/20 3:44 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I am unable to build packages using mock for either f32 or f33 which is
very problematic.
Afaik you need mock from updates-testing for the new config/keys.
No one has pushed out an update for them besides Rawhide.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 9:36 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It has been a pleasure for me to be a part of and help lead the
> EPEL steering committee for the last couple of years. It has not
> always been smooth sailing but I have found it an enjoyable experience.
>
> However, as you m
Hello everyone,
My name Leonardo (commonly called Leo), I am a software engineer from São
Paulo, Brazil.
I've recently joined the community platform engineering team in Red Hat and
I wanted to go through the process of creating, building and shipping an
RPM package so I decided to create one for
Hi,
It has been a pleasure for me to be a part of and help lead the
EPEL steering committee for the last couple of years. It has not
always been smooth sailing but I have found it an enjoyable experience.
However, as you may know the Fedora project will be moving to a
different data-center later
Hello everyone!
In my efforts to bring over tools from Ubuntu Studio that we've been using, I
noticed we were missing some dependencies of studio-controls. With that in
mind, I have packaged said dependencies (one of which was in UnitedRPMs that I
simply took the .spec from and gave it some Fed
Hello Fedora devel, Jakub,
with gcc10 landing in Fedora rawhide, we got a new failures of build of
above package [1].
The code looks reasonable, we have a possible workaround, but before
implementing that in upstream and downstream, I would like to check
whether it is really something to fix in t
Hello,
Years ago I was managing mail servers and really liked dspam's
accuracy and resource consumption so added it to fedora and maintained
it. Sadly shortly after adding it upstream went through a number of
ownership changes and nothing has been added to it in years. I no
longer use it, upstre
On 17. 02. 20 23:47, Guido Aulisi wrote:
I'm going to retire clalsadrv, it's been deprecated upstream [0] for a
long time and it has been replaced by zita-alsa-pcmi.
Nothing depends on it in rawhide according to this query:
dnf --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo='rawhide' repoquery --whatrequires cl
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 98/158 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200214.n.1):
ID: 522958 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/522958
ID: 522967 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-i
Hi Richard,
On 2/18/20 3:44 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I am unable to build packages using mock for either f32 or f33 which is
> very problematic.
Afaik you need mock from updates-testing for the new config/keys.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing lis
I am unable to build packages using mock for either f32 or f33 which is
very problematic.
warning:
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/var/cache/dnf/fedora-2d95c80a1fa0a67d/packages/gdb-minimal-9.1-3.fc33.x86_64.rpm:
Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 9570ff31: NOKEY
fedora
1.6 MB
I've got a bug report[1] I've been trying to figure out but have not been
able to figure it out.
I keep re-teaching myself SELinux every time I run into a problem but this
one is just too convoluted. For those that don't know BackupPC is perl
based (which doesn't application of selinux contexts) s
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 2:55 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:44:21AM -0500, Michael McLean wrote:
> >That's the fm-orchestrator rest api. The code maintenance has
> transferred
> >from the Factory 2.0 team to the RHEL Build team (i.e. the "Koji
> team").
> >H
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
26 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 101/169 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fe
Thank you guys!
Jakub
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:42 PM Frantisek Zatloukal
wrote:
>
> Got one about a day ago :)
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:17 PM Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
>>
>> I would like to ask you, can anyone with non Red Hat email confirm,
>> that they get the notifications? The subject is
Got one about a day ago :)
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:17 PM Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> I would like to ask you, can anyone with non Red Hat email confirm,
> that they get the notifications? The subject is
>
> > [Copr] upcoming deletion of outdated chroots in your projects
>
>
> Thank you,
> Jakub
>
On 2/18/20 12:15 PM, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> I would like to ask you, can anyone with non Red Hat email confirm,
> that they get the notifications? The subject is
>
>> [Copr] upcoming deletion of outdated chroots in your projects
>
I received the notification. I have a posteo.de email.
Kind re
I would like to ask you, can anyone with non Red Hat email confirm,
that they get the notifications? The subject is
> [Copr] upcoming deletion of outdated chroots in your projects
Thank you,
Jakub
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:21 AM Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> we have just disabled Fedor
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
I'm sorry as I didn't see this downstream patch -
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Gtk3-WebKit/blob/master/f/Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-Port-to-webkitgtk4.patch
.
Then it's fine and sorry for the noise.
Tom
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:14 AM Tomáš Popela wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 6:33 PM Rich
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 6:33 PM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 04:24:22PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > rjones: perl-Digest-SHA3, perl-Gtk3-WebKit
>
No open bugs in perl-Gtk3-WebKit? Please read
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thr
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:53:26 +0100
Reini Urban wrote:
> > $ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires
> > perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS inxi-0:3.0.37-2.fc32.noarch
> > openqa-0:4.6-43.20200205git4861e34.fc33.noarch
> >
>
>
> Oh, interesting. Didn't know it were so many.
> I'm upstream on thi
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 07:41:56AM -, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hm, I'm not seeing these orphaned and I pretty sure I have never maintained
> > them:
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-Timeout
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PerlIO-via-Timeout
> >
> > bug in the s
Dne 18. 02. 20 v 8:41 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
>> Hm, I'm not seeing these orphaned and I pretty sure I have never maintained
>> them:
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-Timeout
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PerlIO-via-Timeout
>>
>> bug in the script?
> They have bee
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
46 matches
Mail list logo
