On 5/29/20 1:59 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
orion Mayavi paraview python-AppTools python-Traits python-envisage
python-pyface python-scikit-image python-traitsui python-x2go
paraview was fixed by besser82 - build in progress (thanks!)
I've resolved the bootstrap loop between python-Traits and
On 20-05-30 21:02:11, Chris Murphy wrote:
...
Full disk encryption doesn't adequately secure the hibernation image
either. Authenticated encryption (signing as well as encryption) is
needed to verify the image hasn't been tampered.
What can an attacker do other than corrupt the data? It is en
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 5:46 PM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Am 30.05.20 um 09:36 schrieb Chris Murphy:
> >
> > It's a security risk that is incompatible with having UEFI Secure Boot
> > enabled.
> >
> > The entire point of UEFI Secure Boot is to ensure cryptographic
> > verification that the kernel
Am 30.05.20 um 09:36 schrieb Chris Murphy:
>
> It's a security risk that is incompatible with having UEFI Secure Boot
> enabled.
>
> The entire point of UEFI Secure Boot is to ensure cryptographic
> verification that the kernel you're running is in fact a Fedora built
> and signed kernel. Since re
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 4:23 pm, Chris Murphy
wrote:
I only see it in the "Power Button Action" menu.
OK... I stand corrected.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.or
On 30. 05. 20 1:17, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 21:59 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello.
As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side tag,
despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise
between having the side tag open f
On 30. 05. 20 9:18, Przemo Firszt wrote:
W dniu pią, 29.05.2020 o godzinie 23∶10 +0200, użytkownik Miro Hrončok
napisał:
[..]
When will python3 in the rawhide buildroot be 3.9?
It is.
Note that the component name is python3.9, but the binary package is
still
python3. The python3 component
On 30. 05. 20 17:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:01:50AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm working on updating FreeCAD both for Python 3.9 and coming VTK 9.0 and
I noticed that something is pulling in a lot of texlive packages but I am
not BR'ing any.
I'm seeing
On 30. 05. 20 23:10, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 29/05/20 16:17 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild
in a side tag.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9
If you see a "Rebui
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 8:53 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:36 am, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> > I don't know whether or when there will be any changes to UI. I think
> > it's already conditional now. The option to hibernate appears in the
> > GUI on my test system that can
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2020, 18:36 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser:
> The rebuilds have been finished successfully so far, except:
>
> * domoticz [1], and
> * polybar [2],
>
> which I have filed FTBFS bugs [1,2] for.
I've fixed those FTBFS in the mean time, as they were easy fixes to b
On 29/05/20 16:17 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated
rebuild in a side tag.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9
If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in you
OK, thanks, it works with %{qmake_qt5} but not with %_qt5_qmake ...
Thanks a lot
I see that qmake_qt5 macro call _qt5_qmake with some flags ...
I found the macro via rpm --showrc | grep qmake and I choose the wrong result.
- Mail original -
De: "Vascom"
À: "Development discussions re
Also
Macro forms of system executables SHOULD NOT be used except when there
is a need to allow the location of those executables to be
configurable. For example, rm should be used in preference to %{__rm},
but %{__python3} is acceptable.
сб, 30 мая 2020 г. в 22:51, :
>
> Yes, you're right :)
>
> H
Yes, you're right :)
Here is a link to a build with the %global debug_package %{nil} :
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ycollet/linuxmao/fedora-32-x86_64/01415804-jamulus/
- Mail original -
De: "Björn 'besser82' Esser"
À: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
En
First you should use this macro %{qmake_qt5} and remove %{set_build_flags}.
And show your spec or give srpm.
сб, 30 мая 2020 г. в 22:21, :
>
> Hello,
>
> I've got a problem with a package.
> I am trying to clean up a spec file before sending it to review and I've got
> an error:
>
> erreur : Emp
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2020, 21:20 +0200 schrieb
ycollette.nos...@free.fr:
> Hello,
>
> I've got a problem with a package.
> I am trying to clean up a spec file before sending it to review and
> I've got an error:
>
> erreur : Empty %files file /home/artelys/rpmbuild/BUILD/jamulus-
> c6b6e3ab02d7e
Hello,
I've got a problem with a package.
I am trying to clean up a spec file before sending it to review and I've got an
error:
erreur : Empty %files file
/home/artelys/rpmbuild/BUILD/jamulus-c6b6e3ab02d7ec1e93edeeb8042a89a561924826/debugsourcefiles.list
The code is Qt-5 / c++. It's an applic
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:47 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Folks -
>
> I'm afraid the new FailsToInstall bugs may be a bit much for me.
> Often it seems:
>
> - There is already a FTBFS bug against the package which is the root
> cause of the FTI.
> - There was a soname bump in rawide and the bu
Hi
I suspect there might be some issue with file triggers not executed when
installing texlive packages on rawhide. Example: I get
I can't find file `ecrm1000'
To which the solution appears to be to install
texlive-collection-fontsrecommended. Doing so initially does not help,
but after rei
On 5/29/20 8:02 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Hello there,
There is an update to opencv 4.3.0 in preparation for rawhide.
This will be handled in a side tag along with the rebuild of the all
dependencies.
(fedpkg build --target=f33-build-side-24026)
This was evaluated ahead,so it should lead to is
Folks -
I'm afraid the new FailsToInstall bugs may be a bit much for me.
Often it seems:
- There is already a FTBFS bug against the package which is the root
cause of the FTI.
- There was a soname bump in rawide and the builds didn't manage to
complete before the next rawhide compose. I
On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 21:59 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> mlt martinkg sergiomb
I built mlt in opencv-4 side tag
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> -1
> I had phase of life when I worked on these archaeologic tickets. I even
> managed to process eight years old ticket!
> Yes, for most tickets it was: Ping! Wait one month. Than one more gentle
> Ping! And if submitter does n
On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 14:02 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> There is an update to opencv 4.3.0 in preparation for rawhide.
> This will be handled in a side tag along with the rebuild of the all
> dependencies.
> (fedpkg build --target=f33-build-side-24026)
>
> This was evaluated
On Sat, May 30, 2020 12:07:35 +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> On 30/05/2020 12:00, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> > However, the License that the Oxford University has released it under
> > has certain clauses that make me unsure if it is OK for inclusion in
> > Fedora. Could someone please have a lo
Hi Samuel o/
On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 13:36, Nasir Hussain
wrote:
> Hey Samuel,
>
> Welcome to Fedora,
>
> I would like you to check the Fedora Join SiG out [
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-join/] It's a Special
> interest group focused on introducing newcomers to fedora to become
>
If I understand correctly, the sudden disappearance of llvm7.0 means that
now ghc is in danger as a package, because it's missing the toolchain
needed to build & package it?
I did a quick `dnf search llvm` and I see the following on my main Fedora
32 box:
llvm5.0.i686 : The Low Level Virtual Machi
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2020, 12:13 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser:
> Hello,
>
> I'm going to update jsoncpp to v1.9.3 in Rawhide, which implies a so-
> name bump from jsoncpp.so.22 to jsoncpp.so.24, during today.
>
> I will take care of rebuilding all its consumers, which are:
>
> * cmake
/cc maintainer
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:33:26AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:31 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:01:50AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > I'm working on updating FreeCAD both for Python 3.9 a
Il giorno ven, 29/05/2020 alle 21.59 +0200, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
> Hello.
Hello,
> As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9
> side tag,
> despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some
> compromise
> between having the side tag open for too long
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:31 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:01:50AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I'm working on updating FreeCAD both for Python 3.9 and coming VTK 9.0
> and
> > I noticed that something is pulling in a lot of texlive pack
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:01:50AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm working on updating FreeCAD both for Python 3.9 and coming VTK 9.0 and
> I noticed that something is pulling in a lot of texlive packages but I am
> not BR'ing any.
I'm seeing this too, with ~100 texlive packages pulled in on upgr
On Sat, 30 May 2020 16:11:16 +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Most probably something that provides documentation, e.g. on pdf.
docbook-utils-pdf is a likely candidate.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an emai
On Saturday, 30 May 2020 16.01.50 WEST Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm working on updating FreeCAD both for Python 3.9 and coming VTK 9.0 and I
> noticed that something is pulling in a lot of texlive packages but I am not
> BR'ing any.
>
> First, how do I figure out which package is doing it? There's no
I'm working on updating FreeCAD both for Python 3.9 and coming VTK 9.0 and
I noticed that something is pulling in a lot of texlive packages but I am
not BR'ing any.
First, how do I figure out which package is doing it? There's not enough
info in root.log AFAIKT.
Second, once I find the package, h
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:36 am, Chris Murphy
wrote:
I don't know whether or when there will be any changes to UI. I think
it's already conditional now. The option to hibernate appears in the
GUI on my test system that can hibernate and doesn't appear on the
systems it's not supported on.
I th
On 30.05.2020 15:04, Barry Scott wrote:
> I use the KDE respin and it hangs at the same place.
> I waited over an hour to see if will continue.
>
> How can I help debug this?
I think that your problem is definitely related to this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830896
You can inst
> On 24 May 2020, at 13:21, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
>
> On 24.05.2020 11:47, Barry Scott wrote:
>> I have tested with both the Workstation image and
>> the KDE spin image. Both get stuck at the same place.
>
> Can you check latest respins[1]?
>
> [1]: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/
Hey Samuel,
Welcome to Fedora,
I would like you to check the Fedora Join SiG out [
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-join/] It's a Special interest
group focused on introducing newcomers to fedora to become contributors.
You can join #fedora-join on Freenode IRC & can open a ticket for
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:05:52PM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> Welcome Sam, hope to see you around!
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020, 20:30 Samuel Jacob Feifer
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone. I am currently a second year computer science student at
> > Vanderbilt and would love to garner some experience t
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Passed openQA tests: 11/11 (x86_64)
New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200526.0):
ID: 608022 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/608022
ID: 608024 Test: x86_64 IoT-d
On 30.05.2020 12:50, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Well, yes, how do you expect that to possibly ever work?
TPM chip maybe.
> If your swap is in a luks partition with a static passphrase (and
> secureboot is disabled) then hibernate works just fine.
Great. The Fedora installer must create an encry
On 30/05/2020 12:00, Ankur Sinha wrote:
However, the License that the Oxford University has released it under
has certain clauses that make me unsure if it is OK for inclusion in
Fedora. Could someone please have a look?
https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/Licence
The "solely for non-comme
On Sat, May 30, 2020 12:00:39 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We were looking at packaging FSL for NeuroFedora. It's a very commonly
> used tool in NeuroImaging.
>
> However, the License that the Oxford University has released it under
> has certain clauses that make me unsure if it is OK
Hello,
We were looking at packaging FSL for NeuroFedora. It's a very commonly
used tool in NeuroImaging.
However, the License that the Oxford University has released it under
has certain clauses that make me unsure if it is OK for inclusion in
Fedora. Could someone please have a look?
https://fs
On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 12:57, Dominique Martinet wrote:
>
> Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote on Sat, May 30, 2020:
> > On 30.05.2020 11:51, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > > What are the issues? I have full-disk encryption and
> > > suspend-then-hibernate enabled (with secure boot disabled, of course),
> > >
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote on Sat, May 30, 2020:
> On 30.05.2020 11:51, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > What are the issues? I have full-disk encryption and
> > suspend-then-hibernate enabled (with secure boot disabled, of course),
> > and it resumes from hibernation without issues.
>
> Do you have encr
On 30.05.2020 11:51, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> What are the issues? I have full-disk encryption and
> suspend-then-hibernate enabled (with secure boot disabled, of course),
> and it resumes from hibernation without issues.
Do you have encrypted by LUKS swap partition?
Fedora cannot resume from encrypte
Hello,
I'm going to update jsoncpp to v1.9.3 in Rawhide, which implies a so-
name bump from jsoncpp.so.22 to jsoncpp.so.24, during today.
I will take care of rebuilding all its consumers, which are:
* cmake
* domoticz
* guayadeque
* libjson-rpc-cpp
* minetest
* oomd
* orthanc
* p
Ahoj,
som trocha zmateny z tych hlaseni. Je skoda, ze bugzilla priamo neobsahuje
link na failed build. Musim si ho pohladat sam. Skusal som rebuildnut tak
ako si mi vravel, teda cez mock s konfiguraciou copr repo, ale neviem preco,
tak ten build zbehne teraz bez problemov. Ale ked dam build pria
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 11:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 03:53:26PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Detailed Description ==
> > By default php-fpm is used for a few versions. mod_php is not
> > supported for threaded modules. mod_php usage also increases secu
On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 11:32, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 30.05.2020 00:58, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > We will support an install time means of enabling hibernation retained
> > via Custom partitioning. If the user chooses to create a swap
> > partition, the installer will include a resume
On Sat, 30 May 2020 00:58:26 +0200, Chris Murphy wrote:
> The Fedora Workstation working group recognizes hibernation can be
> useful, but due to impediments it's currently not practical to support
> it.
TL;DR let's go the s2idle way as that is the only one which may work. But for
me it resumes im
On 30.05.2020 00:58, Chris Murphy wrote:
> We will support an install time means of enabling hibernation retained
> via Custom partitioning. If the user chooses to create a swap
> partition, the installer will include a resume=UUID kernel parameter
> hint so that the kernel can find the hibernation
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 608010 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/608010
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.i
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 03:53:26PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Detailed Description ==
> By default php-fpm is used for a few versions. mod_php is not
> supported for threaded modules. mod_php usage also increases security
> risk, sharing the same process than httpd.
>
> Drop mod_php from php bu
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 08:56:26AM -0700, Robert Relyea wrote:
> Oops, this reply was supposed to be a "reply list" rather than a "reply".
>
> I've incorporated most of your feedback into the Change page now.
Thanks. Nevertheless, I still find the page hard to grok. I don't have
any specific comm
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 9:12 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Friday, May 29, 2020 5:25:23 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 6:06 PM John M. Harris Jr
> > >You can test hibernation right
> > > now, and it will work. When you boot back up, it'll have everything just
> > > a
W dniu pią, 29.05.2020 o godzinie 23∶10 +0200, użytkownik Miro Hrončok
napisał:
> [..]
> > >
> > When will python3 in the rawhide buildroot be 3.9?
>
> It is.
>
> Note that the component name is python3.9, but the binary package is
> still
> python3. The python3 component is retired.
>
Hi Miro
61 matches
Mail list logo