[Bug 1927563] perl-Test-Output-1.033 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927563 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Attempting to allow for a source of truth for Fedora release cycle information: releasestream

On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 08:16 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:27 PM Debarshi Ray wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > I wanted to respond earlier, but it totally slipped my mind. > > > > We'd totally use releasestream in Toolbox for mapping the string > > "rawhide" to a

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210211.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210210.0): ID: 774384 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Packages conflict in /usr/lib/.build-id/

Hello. I'm facing a problem with a conflict between two packages from non-fedora repositories. I'm using vscodium and rememberthemilk apps for a long time but now I cannot update both because there is a conflict in /usr/lib/.build-id/. Error: Transaction test error:   file

[Bug 1927623] New: perl-Workflow-1.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927623 Bug ID: 1927623 Summary: perl-Workflow-1.52 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Workflow Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1927563] perl-Test-Output-1.033 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927563 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: Attempting to allow for a source of truth for Fedora release cycle information: releasestream

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:27 PM Debarshi Ray wrote: > Hey, > > I wanted to respond earlier, but it totally slipped my mind. > > We'd totally use releasestream in Toolbox for mapping the string > "rawhide" to a numeric version: > https://github.com/containers/toolbox/issues/646 > > Cheers, >

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Jeff, thank you for your offer, I will gladly use your tester. What information/RPMs/SRPMs do you need from me? Miro, maybe it could be a system-wide change. If you think so, I can change it. About the absolute numbers, as you said, not all FTBFS are necessarily caused by autoconf, but I did

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-02-11 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/02/11/report-389-ds-base-2.0.2-20210211git137db8058.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora-Rawhide-20210210.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 11 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 42/183 (x86_64), 30/124

[Bug 1926738] perl-Graphics-TIFF-8 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926738 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-45a4f1130e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1926738] perl-Graphics-TIFF-8 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926738 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from

[Bug 1923845] perl-Tree-Simple-VisitorFactory-0.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923845 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1923810] perl-Tree-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923810 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Tree-1.15-1.fc34 |perl-Tree-1.15-1.fc34

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 55 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4a9fc09599 openjpeg2-2.3.1-10.el7 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5ecfbfc6f6 pngcheck-2.4.0-7.el7 8

[Bug 1923810] perl-Tree-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923810 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1927563] New: perl-Test-Output-1.033 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927563 Bug ID: 1927563 Summary: perl-Test-Output-1.033 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-Output Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Update on Modular Obsoletes and EOL change

Hi Martin, Martin Curlej writes: [snip] > It would be great if we could start a discussion about how modular > obsoletes will be used in Fedora? Where will be they stored? Who will be > able to change them? Just a couple of questions to get the discussion > started. Any involvement of the

Re: Attempting to allow for a source of truth for Fedora release cycle information: releasestream

Hey, I wanted to respond earlier, but it totally slipped my mind. We'd totally use releasestream in Toolbox for mapping the string "rawhide" to a numeric version: https://github.com/containers/toolbox/issues/646 Cheers, Rishi ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Fwd: Orphaning some packages (C++/Gtkmm)

I have picked up cairomm. I might pick up more later, if others do not. Many thanks for your efforts thus far, and best wishes for your health. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage

Rex Dieter wrote: > Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> I can't compile IceCat on Fedora 33+ since some days because of these >> errors: >> >> ... >> /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage > > This is impacting plasma-discover and flatpak, the

Re: git push permission denied

Tony Breeds wrote: > One annoying gotcha I hit after adding the new key to my agent was that > many places now failed to auth as it tried each key in my agent and > exceeded the MaxAuthTries in sshd The IdentitiesOnly option to ssh is useful for that. From ssh_config(1): Specifies that

glib2 2.67.3-2 seems to cause crashes with pipewire and pulse

BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927491 If 2.67.3 is installed, and audio settings get changed, after a few changes, mostly on the input devices, phosh is crashing. Crashing started 2 days ago, which is exactly the time, that package came on the system. Downgrading glib2

Re: Help wanted: Multiple packages with different ver-rel from one spec

On 2/4/21 11:19 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > I am aware of at least three (?) other "noteworthy" packages that have > to deal with this (or at least, had to do something like this in the > past): > > - ruby (with the gems that are bundled with the interpreter), > - perl (with the modules that are

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 14:48, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10. 02. 21 20:24, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 14:19, Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > On 10. 02. 21 19:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > fedpkg-minimal > > >

[Bug 1927466] New: perl-Graphics-TIFF-9 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927466 Bug ID: 1927466 Summary: perl-Graphics-TIFF-9 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Graphics-TIFF Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On 10. 02. 21 20:24, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 14:19, Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 10. 02. 21 19:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > fedpkg-minimal > epel-release > epel-rpm-macros Those make perfect sense to me. >

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 2/10/21 11:00 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10. 02. 21 18:47, Ben Cotton wrote: >> == Upgrade/compatibility impact == >> Problems during build can appear in multiple packages what can lead to >> build failure, as multiple packages require autoconf-2.69 as their >> upstream dependency. These

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 14:24, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 14:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 10. 02. 21 19:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> > fedpkg-minimal >> > epel-release >> > epel-rpm-macros >> >> >> Those make perfect sense to me. >> >> > fedpkg >> > koji >>

Re: git push permission denied

also, you need to start the sshd service ... systemctl start sshd.service systemctl status sshd.service ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 14:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10. 02. 21 19:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > fedpkg-minimal > > epel-release > > epel-rpm-macros > > > Those make perfect sense to me. > > > fedpkg > > koji > > bodhi > > But I don't understand why those are required. What am I missing?

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On 10. 02. 21 19:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: fedpkg-minimal epel-release epel-rpm-macros Those make perfect sense to me. fedpkg koji bodhi But I don't understand why those are required. What am I missing? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 at 17:36, Troy Dawson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:50 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 08:19:24AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > There is a little nuance here. In order to get the repository going, > we had > > > to 'mass-branch' about 40

Re: ocamlx() deps changed by mass rebuild

Since the OCaml 4.12.0 release is near, I thought I would report on a few changes from my previous message. On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 9:08 AM Jerry James wrote: > Thanks for handling the rebuilds. I want to note that there be a few > dragons lurking in wait for the ocaml 4.12.0 release. I

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 10. 02. 21 18:47, Ben Cotton wrote: == Upgrade/compatibility impact == Problems during build can appear in multiple packages what can lead to build failure, as multiple packages require autoconf-2.69 as their upstream dependency. These problems have to be resolved before adding autoconf-2.71

Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 == Summary == Autoconf upgrade from version 2.69 to the last upstream version 2.71 in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:odubaj| Ondrej Dubaj]] * Email: odu...@redhat.com == Detailed Description == Upgrading autoconf from version 2.69 to

Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 == Summary == Autoconf upgrade from version 2.69 to the last upstream version 2.71 in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:odubaj| Ondrej Dubaj]] * Email: odu...@redhat.com == Detailed Description == Upgrading autoconf from version 2.69 to

License field corrections: agenda, appeditor, dippi, harvey, notejot, sequeler, gaupol

The license for agenda has been corrected from “GPLv3” to “GPLv3+ and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and CC0”. The license for appeditor has been corrected from “LGPLv2+” to “GPLv3 and LGPLv2+ and CC0”. The license for dippi has been corrected from “GPLv3” to “GPLv3+ and GPLv2+ and CC0”. The license for

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 12:24:34PM +0100, Michal Schorm wrote: > I checked out https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main > > And in the section "Phase2" I wanted to check out the scripts in > "Release engineering:" sub-section. > Surprisingly (not surprisingly) the links are

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 05:19:15PM +, Ian McInerney wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:04 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:59:24AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:50:06PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > This is something we

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:04 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:59:24AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:50:06PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > This is something we explicitly did not want on the git level, which > > > is why there is a main

Re: /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage

Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > Hi all. > > I can't compile IceCat on Fedora 33+ since some days because of these > errors: > > ... > /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage This is impacting plasma-discover and flatpak, the latter's flatpak.h header will need to

Re: Fwd: Orphaning some packages (C++/Gtkmm)

Le mer. 10 févr. 2021 à 18:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit : > > Hi, > > In case you didn't see bcotton's mail about pp status, please do. > > Zbyszek I did, it helped deciding to actively reduce the scope. Regards, H. ___ devel mailing list

Re: Fwd: Orphaning some packages (C++/Gtkmm)

Hi, In case you didn't see bcotton's mail about pp status, please do. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Fwd: Orphaning some packages (C++/Gtkmm)

Hello, due to long-standing health issues, I'd like to focus on a smaller set of packages and continue mentoring new packagers which helped me to stay afloat during grim times. Here's a list of packages that have no co-maintainers and are required for other projects. - cairomm - gconfmm26 -

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:59:24AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:50:06PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > This is something we explicitly did not want on the git level, which > > is why there is a main → rawhide link, but no master → rawhide link. > > But it could

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 17:48 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Yes, you'll need two side tags and build everything twice. f34 and > f35/rawhide are separate now. > I can also use my provenpackager powers to help you with that, if > needed. Hi, okay, thanks a lot. I'll let you know if I face

[Bug 1927271] perl-DBD-CSV-0.58 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927271 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:42 PM Milan Crha wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 15:53 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:32 PM Milan Crha wrote: > > > I'll create the side tag on Friday, ... > > Hi, > this might be a stupid question, but I'll ask anyway: since there

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 15:53 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:32 PM Milan Crha wrote: > > I'll create the side tag on Friday, ... Hi, this might be a stupid question, but I'll ask anyway: since there are f34 branches created already, should I create two side tags,

Re: Fedora 34 Mass Branching

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:03:40AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > I'll forward this link to Ben as Fedora Program Manager so he can update the > > termionology in the schedule. > Already done a release or two ago. I guess it was me who didn't notice. :) I suppose it'll catch on more over time. --

Stale provenpackagers to be removed from group

In accordance with the new FESCo policy[1] the following provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you believe you should still have provenpackager status.

Stale provenpackagers to be removed from group

In accordance with the new FESCo policy[1] the following provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you believe you should still have provenpackager status.

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2021-02-10)

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-02-10/fesco.2021-02-10-15.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-02-10/fesco.2021-02-10-15.00.txt Log:

Re: [F34] wait-repo task has been opened for approx 2 hours

On 10. 02. 21 16:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: You need a buildroot override, but the bodhi CLI will tell you: "Invalid build.  It must be tagged as either candidate or testing." But the web UI allows it :/ Correction. This part is not true, I had a typo in the build NEVR. -- Miro Hrončok --

Re: [F34] wait-repo task has been opened for approx 2 hours

On 10. 02. 21 9:09, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: Hi all, I have started foomatic-db+foomatic chainbuild this morning for F34 and it has been opened for 2 hours till now. Is it expected? IIUC I don't need a buildroot override yet, since F34 hasn't been enabled in bodhi. So the process should be the

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 15:53 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > I'll build elementary-calendar + wingpanel-indicator-datetime once > the side tag is ready, if you want. Hi, it'll help, yes. Thanks. > Do you expect any of the listed packages to break because of the > aforementioned API

Re: Fedora 34 Mass Branching

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 9:59 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > I'll forward this link to Ben as Fedora Program Manager so he can update the > termionology in the schedule. > Already done a release or two ago. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:50:06PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > This is something we explicitly did not want on the git level, which > is why there is a main → rawhide link, but no master → rawhide link. > But it could possibly be done on the HTTP level in pagure, with a redirect? Yeah, if not

Re: Fedora 34 Mass Branching

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:41:42AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > This has been discussed at lengths and already solved. This is the research scientist's definition of "already solved". :) > Updates-testing Activation > See >

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:32 PM Milan Crha wrote: > > Hello, > the upcoming 3.39.2 release of the evolution-data-server contains a > soname version bump for its libedataserver-1.2 and libedataserverui-1.2 > libraries due to API and ABI changes. The release is planned for this > Friday.

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:03 PM Ian McInerney wrote: > > I notice now that this change has broken web links to items in the master > branch of a repo - since there seems to be no forwarding to the rawhide > branch on the web UI. This is slightly annoying because sometimes links to > spec files

Re: dropping php-imap (was Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

On 2/10/21 5:00 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Joe Orton wrote: In my view it makes sense to drop it from Fedora 35+ and take the pain of disabling functionality until the various upstreams switch to alternatives. Hopefully Remi can comment on alternatives. I guess

[heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

Hello, the upcoming 3.39.2 release of the evolution-data-server contains a soname version bump for its libedataserver-1.2 and libedataserverui-1.2 libraries due to API and ABI changes. The release is planned for this Friday. I'll build as many packages as I have commit rights to in a side

Re: /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage

* Kevin Kofler via devel: > Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> Note that wrapping the header include in an extern declaration violates >> C++ standard requirements. ("A translation unit shall include a header >> only outside of any declaration or definition", [using.headers]/3) > > Yet, it is absolutely

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

I notice now that this change has broken web links to items in the master branch of a repo - since there seems to be no forwarding to the rawhide branch on the web UI. This is slightly annoying because sometimes links to spec files are added in bug reports, and now those links end up on a page

Re: dropping php-imap (was Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

Joe Orton wrote: > In my view it makes sense to drop it from Fedora 35+ and take the pain > of disabling functionality until the various upstreams switch to > alternatives. Hopefully Remi can comment on alternatives. I guess https://dev.horde.org/imap_client/ would be the obvious alternative,

Re: /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage

Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Note that wrapping the header include in an extern declaration violates > C++ standard requirements. ("A translation unit shall include a header > only outside of any declaration or definition", [using.headers]/3) Yet, it is absolutely necessary for many C library

Re: Fedora 34 Mass Branching

On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 12:29:51 AM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 06:19:41PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:18 PM Petr Menšík wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I were unable to find time in the schedule, at which the new F35 GPG key > > > would

Re: Fedora 34 Mass Branching

Hi All, Fedora 34 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder rawhide/f35 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so this means that anything you do for f34 you also have to do in the rawhide branch and do a

[Bug 1927271] New: perl-DBD-CSV-0.58 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927271 Bug ID: 1927271 Summary: perl-DBD-CSV-0.58 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DBD-CSV Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: mesa 21.0.0-rc3 making rawhide really unstable?

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 9:00 AM Milan Crha wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 16:17 +1000, David Airlie wrote: > > Has anyone got a backtrace they could put in a bug? I'm not seeing a > > crash with X.org here in my test VMs. > > Hi, > I do not see any crash as such, Xorg simply fails to

Re: New memory tester application potentially to replace memtest86+: PCMemTest

* Florian Weimer: > * Neal Gompa: > >> None of this had to be this way. It is so by our own inaction, not by >> the action of Microsoft. > > I agree. No one but Microsoft stepped up and was willing to control the > key material. > > I still wish we went the way of documenting how to disable

Re: New memory tester application potentially to replace memtest86+: PCMemTest

* Neal Gompa: > None of this had to be this way. It is so by our own inaction, not by > the action of Microsoft. I agree. No one but Microsoft stepped up and was willing to control the key material. I still wish we went the way of documenting how to disable Secure Boot in commonly used

Fedora-34-20210210.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 104/183 (x86_64), 66/124 (aarch64) ID: 772844 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/772844 ID: 772846 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso

ACTION NEEDED: A regression was found and fixed in pyproject-rpm-macros wrt %pyproject_save_files

Hello Pythonistas. Unfortunately, we have found a regression in pyproject-rpm-macros wrt %pyproject_save_files. The nested __pycache__ directories were not properly owned. E.g.: /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/rope /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/rope/__pycache__ - NOT OWNED

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210210.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210209.0): ID: 773373 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: our containers with alias vim=vi

Hi, just note - the functionality has been removed in the recent Vim package for 2 reasons: 1) making it default breaks a default vim alias - vimdiff == vim -d , because diff functionality is not a part of small set of features 'vi' is compiled with 2) making it optional via an environment

[Test-Announce] Fedora 34 Branched 20210210.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 34 Branched 20210210.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

[F34] wait-repo task has been opened for approx 2 hours

Hi all, I have started foomatic-db+foomatic chainbuild this morning for F34 and it has been opened for 2 hours till now. Is it expected? IIUC I don't need a buildroot override yet, since F34 hasn't been enabled in bodhi. So the process should be the same as in rawhide. Does anyone know what's