No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210307.0):
ID: 803053 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hey All,
Fedora is a community-driven project which means a lot of our users
use Fedora in multiple languages. The i18n Test day[0] is scheduled to
test changes that are coming in F34 along with
testing the regular GNOME apps in a multi-lingual environment.
This test day will also benefit from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935378
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-70c4f053b6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-70c4f053b6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935378
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/08/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210308gite9b4eb594.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918130
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-450fd7 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933843
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918130
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f1324fb461 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918130
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-5dac05f9c8 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936227
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210306.0):
ID: 803024 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803024
ID: 803033 Test: aarch64
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 16/187 (x86_64), 21/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/187 (x86_64), 27/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210306.n.0):
ID: 802427 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802427
ID: 802438 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936241
Bug ID: 1936241
Summary: Compiled @INC in 5.32 No longer Includes Suitable Path
For Custom System-Wide Modules
Product: Fedora
Version: 33
Hardware: All
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-PDF-API2` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PDF-API2/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933843
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210306.0):
ID: 803008 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_system_logging@uefi
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936227
Bug ID: 1936227
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-9.03 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210305.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210307.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 58
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.49 MiB
Size of dropped packages
OLD: Fedora-34-20210306.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210307.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Dnia Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 12:55:21PM -0500, Matthew Miller napisał(a):
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:26:50AM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> > > It can, but most people don't have a good setup for even local mail
> > > delivery. Out of the box, we don't really do anything useful.
> > It wouldn't take
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936221
Bug ID: 1936221
Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.53 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-libwww-perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2021-03-08
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We didn't meet for a couple of weeks, so let's meet up tomorrow and
check in on F34 progress and
# F34 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2021-03-08
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 1 proposed Beta blocker, 8 proposed freeze exception
issues, and 2 proposed Final blockers to review (as of now), so we'll
have a Fedora 34 blocker review
*drush
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
On 07/03/2021 17:53, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 07.03.21 16:30, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Sandro Mani wrote:
I'll rebuild the following dependent packages:
gdal
merkaartor
FYI, your merkaartor build failed because merkaartor depends on gdal
(it is
used to import external reference data such
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:26:50AM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> > It can, but most people don't have a good setup for even local mail
> > delivery. Out of the box, we don't really do anything useful.
> It wouldn't take much. Install Postfix, and when Anaconda creates the
> first user account,
On 07.03.21 16:30, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Sandro Mani wrote:
I'll rebuild the following dependent packages:
gdal
merkaartor
FYI, your merkaartor build failed because merkaartor depends on gdal (it is
used to import external reference data such as OGD in file formats that are
not
Thoughts?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918130
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f1324fb461 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f1324fb461
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918130
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-5dac05f9c8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-5dac05f9c8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918130
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-450fd7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-450fd7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:00:56AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > running commands to look back in the logs for problems is a common
> > diagnostic step. This could be better, of course.
> But for MCE exceptions, specifically ECC errors I would expect the kernel to
> log these
> through dmesg
Sandro Mani wrote:
> I'll rebuild the following dependent packages:
>
> gdal
> merkaartor
FYI, your merkaartor build failed because merkaartor depends on gdal (it is
used to import external reference data such as OGD in file formats that are
not natively supported), so you need to rebuild gdal
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-71d1af6aca
isync-1.4.1-1.el8
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-fedb6fa69d
python-aiohttp-3.7.4-1.el8
4
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9ec8ceb857
ansible-2.9.18-1.el7
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-0859a9d61e
x11vnc-0.9.13-12.el7
4
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:28 am, Björn Persson
wrote:
Do the ECC-less Intel processors also lack
all other MCE support?
No, ABRT used to regularly warn me about thermal events from MCE when I
didn't have a good enough CPU fan. That was an Intel machine. I fixed
it by replacing the CPU
Hey All,
I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 5.11
Test week, which is happening from 2021-03-08 to 2021-03-16. It's
fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in details about the
test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your
results.
As
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-71d1af6aca
isync-1.4.1-1.el8
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-fedb6fa69d
python-aiohttp-3.7.4-1.el8
4
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:00:56AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/5/21 4:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:05:00PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>> mcelog.service loaded active running
> >>> Machine Check Exception Logging
On 06.03.2021 21:09, Sandro Mani wrote:
It's a pretty trivial package. Happy to review in exchange.
Done. No reviews needed.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hans de Goede wrote:
> But for MCE exceptions, specifically ECC errors I would expect the kernel to
> log these
> through dmesg anyways and then the mcelog service has very little added value
> IMHO
> (I have no experience with machines with ECC RAM).
>
> Esp. given that ECC RAM is something
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210306.0):
ID: 802342 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:12:34PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > smartd even sends emails – that's how I was informed
> > about one of my disks dying, few weeks ago,
I thought it would send email, but then I noticed that it's started
with "--capabilities", which breaks
Hi,
On 3/5/21 4:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:05:00PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> mcelog.service loaded active running
>>> Machine Check Exception Logging Daemon
>> This is another one for which it is questionable to have it
45 matches
Mail list logo
