Fedora-Cloud-33-20210313.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210312.0): ID: 812503 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812503 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210312.0): ID: 812500 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812500 ID: 812507 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812507 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 5/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938401] ack-3.5.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938401 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of ack-3.5.0-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63679698 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938401] ack-3.5.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938401 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1763116 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1763116=edit [patch] Update to 3.5.0 (#1938401) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938401] New: ack-3.5.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938401 Bug ID: 1938401 Summary: ack-3.5.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: ack Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: robinlee.s...@gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, robinlee.s...@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 3.5.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.4.0-2.fc34 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/ack/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/15/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-03-13 - 95% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/13/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210313gitd5fdea905.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:13 PM Gerald Henriksen wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:21:18 -0500, you wrote: > > >I would put it this way: this change _helps recognize_ that Fedora is more > >than its main product. This isn't new; EPEL has been part of Fedora since > >the beginning, and CoreOS has been since it replaced Project Atomic. > > You want this change to do that, it will fail to do that. > > You aren't going to change not just the 15+ year habits of how people > refer to Fedora, but the even longer habits of how people call Linux > distributions. > > Regardless of what their official titles are the public all refer to > them by their simple names - Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, Suse, Red Hat, > Centos, etc. And why they spell it "RedHat". rather than "Red Hat Enterprise Linux" and "CentOS". ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938396] perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.106 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938396 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been automatically reported. Sorry! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938396] New: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.106 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938396 Bug ID: 1938396 Summary: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.106 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: p...@city-fan.org Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.106 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.105-4.fc34 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Getopt-Long-Descriptive Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7110/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938391] New: perl-App-Cmd-0.332 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938391 Bug ID: 1938391 Summary: perl-App-Cmd-0.332 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-App-Cmd Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.332 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.331-15.fc34 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-Cmd/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7401/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:21:18 -0500, you wrote: >I would put it this way: this change _helps recognize_ that Fedora is more >than its main product. This isn't new; EPEL has been part of Fedora since >the beginning, and CoreOS has been since it replaced Project Atomic. You want this change to do that, it will fail to do that. You aren't going to change not just the 15+ year habits of how people refer to Fedora, but the even longer habits of how people call Linux distributions. Regardless of what their official titles are the public all refer to them by their simple names - Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, Suse, Red Hat, Centos, etc. You can change the website, but you won't change how the public names Fedora. Which means it won't achieve your stated goal. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922811] perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6ea87879a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-6ea87879a8` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6ea87879a8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938172] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-8fadb4aed9 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-8fadb4aed9` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8fadb4aed9 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938172] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7333ebbdac has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7333ebbdac See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922811] perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-bc3f221973 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-bc3f221973` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-bc3f221973 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938172] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-8ad5d5b268 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-8ad5d5b268` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8ad5d5b268 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938334] New: perl-PDL-2.029 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938334 Bug ID: 1938334 Summary: perl-PDL-2.029 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-PDL Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproj...@gmail.com, jakub.jedel...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, lkund...@v3.sk, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, rhug...@redhat.com, rstr...@redhat.com, sandm...@redhat.com, tjczep...@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 2.029 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.28.0-1.fc35 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PDL/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3205/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1838000] CVE-2020-12723 perl: corruption of intermediate language state of compiled regular expression due to recursive S_study_chunk() calls leads to DoS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838000 Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1938330 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1837988] CVE-2020-10878 perl: corruption of intermediate language state of compiled regular expression due to integer overflow leads to DoS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837988 Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1938329 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1837975] CVE-2020-10543 perl: heap-based buffer overflow in regular expression compiler leads to DoS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837975 Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1938328 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922811] perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-50861bdb62 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-50861bdb62` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-50861bdb62 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938172] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-677512a77b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-677512a77b` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-677512a77b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: ELN SIG First Meeting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 = #fedora-meeting: ELN (2021-03-12) = Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:07:34 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-03-12/eln.2021-03-12-17.07.log.html . Meeting summary - --- * Welcome to the inaugural meeting of the ELN Special Interest Group! (sgallagh, 17:07:35) * Init Process (sgallagh, 17:07:35) * Populate the initial SIG membership (sgallagh, 17:08:56) * tstellard is also a member of the SIG, though he cannot be in attendance today (sgallagh, 17:09:52) * Agenda (sgallagh, 17:10:31) * Agenda Item: Membership Rules (sgallagh, 17:10:52) * Agenda Item: Future Meeting Plans (sgallagh, 17:11:04) * Agenda Item: Identify a Documentation Czar (sgallagh, 17:11:22) * Agenda Item: Relationship of ELN and EPEL (sgallagh, 17:11:41) * Agenda Item: ELN mirroring and distribution (sgallagh, 17:12:35) * Membership Rules (sgallagh, 17:13:31) * Proposal: Anyone may join the SIG by asking to become a member. If no existing SIG member *opposes* that request within a week, they're in. If an existing SIG member opposes, we hold a regular vote at the next scheduled meeting as described above. (sgallagh, 17:15:14) * AGREED: Anyone may join the SIG by asking to become a member. If no existing SIG member *opposes* that request within a week, they're in. If an existing SIG member opposes, we hold a regular vote at the next scheduled meeting as described above. (+7, 0, -0) (sgallagh, 17:17:51) * The first vote of the ELN SIG involved unanimous consent. This is a good beginning! (sgallagh, 17:18:16) * Future Meeting Plans (sgallagh, 17:26:03) * Proposal: ELN SIG Meeting will be held biweekly on Fridays at noon Eastern Time (sgallagh, 17:31:56) * AGREED: ELN SIG Meeting will be held biweekly on Fridays at noon Eastern Time (+7, 0, -0) (sgallagh, 17:32:10) * Landing Page, Documentation and Ownership Thereof (sgallagh, 17:33:31) * LINK: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/eln/ (bookwar, 17:34:22) * Meetings are scheduled for one hour (sgallagh, 17:34:32) * LINK: https://github.com/fedora-eln/ (sgallagh, 17:35:11) * LINK: https://github.com/fedora-eln/eln is specifically the issue tracker. I propose using tags there to establish the agenda. (sgallagh, 17:35:35) * Proposal: ELN SIG will continue to use https://github.com/fedora-eln/eln for issue tracking and agenda tagging. (sgallagh, 17:38:25) * Proposal: ELN SIG will continue to use https://github.com/fedora-eln/eln for issue tracking and agenda tagging. SIG members will be added to the Github organization. (sgallagh, 17:40:38) * AGREED: ELN SIG will continue to use https://github.com/fedora-eln/eln for issue tracking and agenda tagging. SIG members will be added to the Github organization. (+7, 0, -0) (sgallagh, 17:41:55) * Proposal: The ELN SIG landing page will continue to be at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/eln/. (sgallagh, 17:43:35) * AGREED: The ELN SIG landing page will continue to be at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/eln/ (+7, 0, -0) (sgallagh, 17:45:48) * The sources to that page are located at https://github.com/fedora-eln/eln-docs (sgallagh, 17:45:48) * Relationship between ELN and EPEL (sgallagh, 17:55:55) * ACTION: dcavalca to create a first-pass at a starter set of EPELN packages. (sgallagh, 18:18:14) * ACTION: Everyone on the SIG to email sgallagh their Github IDs over the next few days. (sgallagh, 18:25:34) * ACTION: sgallagh will update the landing page and github org with the new members (sgallagh, 18:25:48) Meeting ended at 18:27:32 UTC. Action Items - * dcavalca to create a first-pass at a starter set of EPELN packages. * Everyone on the SIG to email sgallagh their Github IDs over the next few days. * sgallagh will update the landing page and github org with the new members Action Items, by person - --- * dcavalca * dcavalca to create a first-pass at a starter set of EPELN packages. * sgallagh * Everyone on the SIG to email sgallagh their Github IDs over the next few days. * sgallagh will update the landing page and github org with the new members * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) - --- * sgallagh (146) * Eighth_Doctor (72) * bookwar (56) * dcavalca (40) * michel_slm (30) * zodbot (22) * cyberpear (14) * jforbes (13) * carlwgeorge (3) * Conan_Kudo (1) * Southern_Gentlem (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQGzBAEBCAAdFiEEhQqd0dvyrMxvxJSRRduFpWgobREFAmBLstcACgkQRduFpWgo bREvjwwAniiuQ3PCNL554+98pa/88y4tvyZcZNAEUvb+7G7dgsr4z8CjkUnkjdF7
Re: Interesting growth trend in Rawhide
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 01:18:29PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Here is a quick and dirty for the last week separated out by age group. I > don't remember what they 'mean' other than 1 is less than a week and 4 is > over 4 months?. 1 = first week 2 = first month (2-4 weeks) 3 = six months (5-24 weeks) 4 = more than six months (> 24 weeks). This is documented in dnf.conf, btw. My "brontosaurusifier" script also does a look-back thing where it splits the historical group 1 entries into 1 (first week, but also matches an increase in category 2 systems the next week, so is are "persistent" systems) and 0 (first week, but exceeds the number of new systems in category 2 the next week, so are "ephemeral" systems). That's not perfect, but gives us a better view into CI, builders, temporary test systems, etc., vs real new installs. This is in a pagure repo at https://pagure.io/brontosaurusifier/ but not really yet ready for other people to look at. You (and by "you", I mean "anyone") can get the summarized (that is, aggregated counts by week) at https://data-analysis.fedoraproject.org/csv-reports/countme/, updated... Wednesdays, I think. (However it's done changes the file date daily but actual data only changes once a week.) And Will Woods has documented how to work with this at: https://github.com/wgwoods/fedora-countme-data/ -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Interesting growth trend in Rawhide
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 12:51, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:10:50AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > > It may also have something to do with what Marius said about Fedora > possibly > > running on Pinephone and other devices, which apparently need bleeding > edge stuff that's only in Rawhide. > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q6T4DSBQ2IXRAF7EAZ6QYXBZKMPYM5AB/ > > Well, sure, but I doubt it. None of the pinephone editions has shipped > with Fedora, so it would take people seeking it out and installing it, > so I don't know that there would be too much increase just from this. > > That said, it might be interesting to look at the arch for those rawhide > users? mostly x86_64? or aarch64? > > Here is a quick and dirty for the last week separated out by age group. I don't remember what they 'mean' other than 1 is less than a week and 4 is over 4 months?. | START DATE | DISTRO | Age>0 | Age>1 | Age>2 | Age>3 | Age==1 | Age==2 | Age==3 | Age==4 | | 2021-03-01 | Fedora | 12962 | 2602 | 1609 | 585 | 10360 | 993 | 1024 | 585 | | 2021-03-01 | cinnamon | 13 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 0 | | 2021-03-01 | cloud | 5390 | 347 | 334 | 27 | 5043 | 13 | 307 | 27 | | 2021-03-01 | compneuro | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 2021-03-01 | container | 1724 | 112 | 68 | 3 | 1612 | 44 | 65 | 3 | | 2021-03-01 | coreos | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 2021-03-01 | designsuite | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | | 2021-03-01 | eln | 9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | | 2021-03-01 | generic | 2974 | 1043 | 471 | 249 | 1931 | 572 | 222 | 249 | | 2021-03-01 | iot | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 2021-03-01 | kde | 265 | 59 | 35 | 8 | 206 | 24 | 27 | 8 | | 2021-03-01 | matecompiz | 50 | 28 | 26 | 14 | 22 | 2 | 12 | 14 | | 2021-03-01 | server | 425 | 194 | 152 | 61 | 231 | 42 | 91 | 61 | | 2021-03-01 | silverblue | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 2021-03-01 | soas | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | | 2021-03-01 | workstation | 2052 | 782 | 494 | 211 | 1270 | 288 | 283 | 211 | | 2021-03-01 | xfce | 55 | 24 | 16 | 7 | 31 | 8 | 9 | 7 | | 2021-03-01 | x86_64 | 12053 | 2511 | 1548 | 558 | 9542 | 963 | 990 | 558 | | 2021-03-01 | aarch64 | 466 | 79 | 49 | 17 | 387 | 30 | 32 | 17 | | 2021-03-01 | ppc64le | 429 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 420 | 0 | 2 | 7 | | 2021-03-01 | armhfp | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | | 2021-03-01 | s390x | 9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Going from that, I would say that there are mostly x86_64 and mostly being used as CI/CD of some sort as the weeks number for the previous number also had a large number with Age =1 | START DATE | DISTRO | Age>0 | Age>1 | Age>2 | Age>3 | Age==1 | Age==2 | Age==3 | Age==4 | | 2021-02-22 | Fedora | 15188 | 3073 | 1694 | 725 | 12115 | 1379 | 969 | 725 | > kevin > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938300] perl-WWW-Shorten-3.094 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938300 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been automatically reported. Sorry! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938300] New: perl-WWW-Shorten-3.094 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938300 Bug ID: 1938300 Summary: perl-WWW-Shorten-3.094 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-WWW-Shorten Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jd...@aquezada.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: andrea.v...@gmail.com, jd...@aquezada.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 3.094 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.093-16.fc34 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-Shorten/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3509/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Planning meeting for Websites & Apps Team reboot
We have a number of people interested in rebooting the Websites team, and taking ownership of some of the webapps that help the Fedora community function. (This started around working on Møte, the meeting-log site, but has grown from there.) At a meeting today, we decided that this team will officially be the Websites and Apps Team, revitalizing the existing but mostly dormant Websites Team and expanding the scope so it's clear that apps are included rather than just static content. We are exploring the idea of a Fedora Council Objective to support the successful launch of this team. As a first step, we're going to have a planning meeting to talk about goals and outcomes, and work back from there. This will be a Jitsi video meeting (channel to be announced), and it'll be from 14:00-15:30 UTC a week from now (Friday, March 19th). All who are interested are invited. As "homework", I'd like to ask you to bring ideas for a mission statement for the team and a vision for what a 12-18 month objective would accomplish. We'll start from there and work down to specifics. (Note also: if you'd like to be involved but are more interested in concrete actions than high-level planning, that's cool too... you may be more interested in future meetings!) I personally see three goals for the initiative: * First and simply, we need a more active websites team, and many of our apps (møte, fedocal, badges, elections, ...) could _really_ use some love. * Second, we often have new folks showing up in Fedora Design who want to help with coding projects. We don't have a good place to point them. Often, we end up saying "well, you could package stuff?", or point people at the wall of 'easyfix' bugs with no real guidance. This team can be that landing spot. * And third and at not least, we've got a lot of energy and enthusiasm from some relatively new folks (hi, Akashdeep and Ramya!) who didn't let the above stop them. I want to make sure they feel empowered to help with the things they're interested in, and get the full support of the project in doing so. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: OpenSSH SHA-1 deprecation, developing FAQ, etc
On 3/12/21 6:50 AM, Björn Persson wrote: If both client and server are OpenSSH 7.2 or later, and an ssh-rsa key is involved, then one of the newer signature schemes rsa-sha2-256 and rsa-sha2-512 will be used, and you won't have any trouble. Unless it's OpenSSH server 7.4 (as in Debian 9). Fedora's ssh client includes a patch to fix that, though. (bz#1881301) At least that's how I understand it. It's very confusing, because users usually only see "ssh-rsa" as a key type, but the release notes assume that the reader knows about signature schemes in the SSH protocol. Inconsistent terminology certainly doesn't help. The release notes seem to use "signature scheme" and "signature algorithm" interchangeably, and the manual uses "host key algorithms" and "key types" when it seems to actually be talking about signature schemes. The 8.5 release last week includes a change renaming PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes to PubkeyAcceptedAlgorithms and HostbasedKeyTypes/HostbasedAcceptedKeyTypes to HostbasedAcceptedAlgorithms, which I think is an improvement, there. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Make a hyperkitty project so we can keep fedora hyperkitty up to date?
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 01:32:53PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > It is already here: https://release-monitoring.org/project/53453/ I'm not sure what you mean by 'hyperkitty project' ? There's a group of folks working on the packaging in Fedora. mailman3 is already packaged up, I'm not sure the status of hyperkitty. https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455 has some discussion and a place folks can chime in if they want to help! kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Interesting growth trend in Rawhide
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:10:50AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > It may also have something to do with what Marius said about Fedora possibly > running on Pinephone and other devices, which apparently need bleeding edge > stuff that's only in Rawhide. > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q6T4DSBQ2IXRAF7EAZ6QYXBZKMPYM5AB/ Well, sure, but I doubt it. None of the pinephone editions has shipped with Fedora, so it would take people seeking it out and installing it, so I don't know that there would be too much increase just from this. That said, it might be interesting to look at the arch for those rawhide users? mostly x86_64? or aarch64? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora mirrors, some returning 404
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:21:45AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > AIUI end users are typing in these URLs and we download them on > demand. > > (I only wrote a very low-level component in this huge stack of cloud > stuff so I don't have the full picture, but the additional > complication I didn't mention is that we're using libcurl to download > ranges of the file, and it seems to get redirected to different > mirrors on every range, so it can still fail even if the first range > succeeded.) Fun. ;( ...snip... > > I'm not sure I understand the cloudfront URL there. Is that a > permanent thing? - It looks temporary. Why does it redirect to > dl.fp.org? Cloudfront is a caching / CDN type product made by amazon. We have it setup to use the master mirrors (dl.fedoraproject.org) as it's origin and cache access to that content. Currently we are only using it for Fedora instances in aws (mirrormanager gives them that for mirrors, which means they get a close/fast/cache of content. However, it's available from outside amazon too, so it should work to fetch other content without putting undue load on the master mirrors. The jumble of hostname there is how they make the distributions so they are unique. We could make a cname of it for more ease. Hopefully that makes sense. I am not sure we have a good story for your usecase, but at least that gives you some options... kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-34-20210312.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 14/118 (aarch64), 6/187 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210311.n.0): ID: 810978 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810978 ID: 810984 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810984 ID: 810993 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810993 ID: 811012 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811012 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-34-20210311.n.0): ID: 810927 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810927 ID: 810936 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810936 ID: 810947 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810947 ID: 810973 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810973 ID: 810974 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810974 ID: 810975 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810975 ID: 810976 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810976 ID: 810987 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810987 ID: 811030 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811030 ID: 811046 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811046 ID: 811094 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811094 ID: 811095 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811095 ID: 811123 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811123 ID: 811157 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811157 ID: 811162 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811162 ID: 811312 Test: aarch64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811312 Soft failed openQA tests: 54/118 (aarch64), 89/187 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-34-20210311.n.0): ID: 810977 Test: aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810977 ID: 810992 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810992 ID: 811142 Test: aarch64 universal install_with_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811142 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-34-20210311.n.0): ID: 810859 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810859 ID: 810860 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810860 ID: 810862 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810862 ID: 810865 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810865 ID: 810866 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810866 ID: 810867 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810867 ID: 810868 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810868 ID: 810869 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810869 ID: 810870 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810870 ID: 810871 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810871 ID: 810872 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810872 ID: 810873 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810873 ID: 810874 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810874 ID: 810875 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL:
[Bug 1938015] perl-Mojolicious-9.08 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938015 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Mojolicious-9.07 is|perl-Mojolicious-9.08 is |available |available --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Latest upstream release: 9.08 Current version/release in rawhide: 9.03-1.fc35 URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Mojolicious Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5966/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20210312.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 6 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 26/187 (x86_64), 43/126 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210311.n.0): ID: 810582 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810582 ID: 810583 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810583 ID: 810586 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810586 ID: 810589 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810589 ID: 810590 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810590 ID: 810594 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810594 ID: 810595 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810595 ID: 810603 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810603 ID: 810605 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810605 ID: 810613 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810613 ID: 810616 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_terminal **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810616 ID: 810618 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810618 ID: 810692 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810692 ID: 810693 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810693 ID: 810696 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810696 ID: 810699 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810699 ID: 810700 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810700 ID: 810702 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810702 ID: 810705 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810705 ID: 810706 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810706 ID: 810801 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810801 ID: 810811 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810811 ID: 810814 Test: aarch64 universal support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810814 ID: 810830 Test: aarch64 universal install_iscsi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810830 ID: 810852 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810852 ID: 810855 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810855 ID: 810857 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810857 ID: 810858 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810858 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210311.n.0): ID: 810579 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810579 ID: 810588 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810588 ID: 810660 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810660 ID: 810661 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810661 ID: 810662 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810662 ID: 810663 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810663 ID: 810674 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810674 ID: 810698 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810698 ID: 810709 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL:
Fedora Linux 34 Beta blocker review email #5
Just one blocker not in VERIFIED state today. The next go/no-go meeting is Thursday for a target release date of 23 March. Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. systemd — systemd-resolved: stub resolver is not following CNAME for resolution — NEW ACTION: systemd maintainers to diagnose and fix issue Bug-by-bug detail = Accepted blockers - 1. systemd — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933433 — NEW systemd-resolved: stub resolver is not following CNAME for resolution FESCo blocker. Hosts with chained CNAMEs did not resolve with systemd-248. systemdd-248~rc2-3 contains a candidate fix for this, however the stub resolver still has failures. OpenQA fails to resolve a round-robin A record entry (no CNAMEs) frequently, which does not happen with previous releases. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: OpenSSH SHA-1 deprecation, developing FAQ, etc
On 11/03/2021 23:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 03:50:57PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> >> On 11/03/2021 12:13, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> * Richard W. M. Jones: >>> I really hope we don't remove the ability to connect to old servers (eg. running RHEL 5). At the moment you have to opt-in by setting the crypto-policy to LEGACY and running update-crypto-policies(8), which is bearable. >>> >>> In the past (long, long ago), I had to enable Telnet on target devices >>> to work around incompatible cryptography policies. I hope we are not >>> going to return to that. >> >> Giving people an option to use broken crypto on-demand may appear >> reasonable at first glance. In practice, there are sites where people >> turn it on to meet a deadline or end a service outage and then they >> never go back to remove it. > > Yeah. ;( > However, a command line version might be ok... at least then it's pretty > clear what you are doing and you want it to go away so you don't have to > type as much. :) > >> Nonetheless, all I'm really looking at in this thread is to parse what >> the OpenSSH releases say into specific advice for current and recent >> Fedora releases. > > I think we will need to wait for the openssh maintainers here. > Ultimately it's their call how much we diverge from upstream, but I > suspect the answer will be 'as little as possible'. :) One piece of advice that we could put on a wiki about OpenSSH: recommending that people familiarize themselves with the Fedora security announcements, etc https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SecurityBasics#Subscribing_to_Security_Announcement_Services This always makes sense for any distribution. Based on the thread here and on the other list, I think it is safe to put some basic facts on a wiki page too: - the values stored on disk are only keys and not hashes. Therefore, only the minimum key size (e.g. RSA 2048) is a concern for existing keys on disk. The hash issues are not a concern for the values in known_hosts. - SHA1 in Key exchange is not the same as HMAC-SHA1 message authentication. The former is a concern, the latter is not. People don't need to change MACs - people who want to remove SHA1 on their server need to change KexAlgorithms in /etc/ssh/sshd_config (??) and be aware that legacy clients will no longer connect - people who want to disable SHA1 from their client can do so in ~/.config/ssh or /etc/ssh/ssh_config as they prefer, modifying KexAlgorithms (??) and be aware that they can no longer connect to really old servers and appliances, unless they workaround (next point) - people who want to enable SHA1 for a single client connection attempt can do so on the command line (example) - Fedora (34? 35?) will have OpenSSH with "UpdateHostKeys yes" by default - people on any older Fedora who want to proactively update the known_hosts entries on their clients can do so in ~/.config/ssh or /etc/ssh/ssh_config as they prefer - maybe a sample script to poll all the servers in known_hosts - sample ssh client command with debug output ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922811] perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-bc3f221973 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-bc3f221973 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-34-20210312.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210311.0): ID: 811302 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811302 ID: 811311 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811311 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210311.0): ID: 811289 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811289 ID: 811298 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811298 ID: 811305 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811305 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210311.0): ID: 811281 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811281 ID: 811282 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811282 ID: 811283 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811283 ID: 811297 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811297 Passed openQA tests: 12/16 (x86_64), 10/15 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922811] perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6ea87879a8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6ea87879a8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922811] perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-50861bdb62 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-50861bdb62 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922811] perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14-1.f ||c35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-re-engine-RE2] PR #1: Tests
ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-re-engine-RE2` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-re-engine-RE2/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922811] perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|extras-orphan@fedoraproject |ppi...@redhat.com |.org| Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-re-engine-RE2] PR #1: Tests
ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-re-engine-RE2` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-re-engine-RE2/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-35-20210312.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210311.0): ID: 811191 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811191 ID: 811195 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811195 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210311.0): ID: 811188 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811188 ID: 811197 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811197 ID: 811199 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811199 ID: 811204 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811204 ID: 811207 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811207 ID: 811208 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811208 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210311.0): ID: 811182 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811182 Passed openQA tests: 12/16 (x86_64), 10/15 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210311.0): ID: 811180 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811180 ID: 811181 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811181 ID: 811196 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811196 Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: 1 services(s) removed since previous compose: getty@tty6.service System load changed from 0.10 to 0.46 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/809262#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811180#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload: 1 services(s) removed since previous compose: getty@tty6.service System load changed from 0.16 to 0.32 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/809263#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811181#downloads Installed system changes in test aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi: 1 services(s) removed since previous compose: getty@tty6.service System load changed from 0.16 to 0.61 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/809278#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811196#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)
On 09/03/21 09:15 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: Some time ago gcc, binutils IIRC received an update for ac 2.71 so at least those two should be by now off-the-table (Am I right?). No. GCC has a hard requirement on autoconf-2.69, but the Fedora package doesn't need to run autoconf for it (that happens when upstream creates the snapshot tarball). I'm not sure about binutils, but I would be very surprised if it is different from GCC. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Orphaning perl-re-engine-RE2
V Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:34:30AM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman napsal(a): > I've just orphaned the perl-re-engine-RE2 package. If someone wishes to > take it up, it's yours. > I took it. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Orphaning perl-re-engine-RE2
V Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:34:30AM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman napsal(a): > I've just orphaned the perl-re-engine-RE2 package. If someone wishes to > take it up, it's yours. > I took it. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: OpenSSH SHA-1 deprecation, developing FAQ, etc
Petr Pisar wrote: > V Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:53:01AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > > Do I understand it correctly that soon, I will have trouble connecting to > > > > $(grep ssh-rsa ~/.ssh/known_hosts | cut -f1 -d' ') > > > > hosts? > > Should I regenerate the ssh key there? What is the prefered crypto nowadays? > > > No. Your keys do not use SHA at all. SSH protocol when performing > authenticated key exchange can use SHA. It's a matter of SSH server and SSH > client. To expand on this, "ssh-rsa" seems to mean two things. It's a key type, and also a signature scheme. ssh-rsa keys are still good (if they're long enough). The signature scheme ssh-rsa, on the other hand, uses SHA-1 and therefore needs to be replaced. If both client and server are OpenSSH 7.2 or later, and an ssh-rsa key is involved, then one of the newer signature schemes rsa-sha2-256 and rsa-sha2-512 will be used, and you won't have any trouble. If both client and server are OpenSSH 6.5 or later, but one is older than 7.2, then you may need an ssh-ed25519 key so that the signature scheme ssh-ed25519 can be used. At least that's how I understand it. It's very confusing, because users usually only see "ssh-rsa" as a key type, but the release notes assume that the reader knows about signature schemes in the SSH protocol. Inconsistent terminology certainly doesn't help. The release notes seem to use "signature scheme" and "signature algorithm" interchangeably, and the manual uses "host key algorithms" and "key types" when it seems to actually be talking about signature schemes. Björn Persson pgpueXa4thwTm.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatur ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora 34 compose report: 20210312.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-34-20210311.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210312.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 10 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:6 Upgraded packages: 78 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 593.59 MiB Size of dropped packages:213.01 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 3.82 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 316.99 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Server raw-xz aarch64 Path: Server/aarch64/images/Fedora-Server-34-20210311.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz Image: SoaS raw-xz aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-SoaS-34-20210311.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz Image: SoaS raw-xz armhfp Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-SoaS-34-20210311.n.0.armhfp.raw.xz Image: Container_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-34-20210311.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Everything boot s390x Path: Everything/s390x/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-s390x-34-20210311.n.0.iso Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-34-20210311.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Server boot s390x Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-s390x-34-20210311.n.0.iso Image: Server dvd s390x Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-s390x-34-20210311.n.0.iso Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-34-20210311.n.0.s390x.qcow2 Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-34-20210311.n.0.s390x.raw.xz = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: clang11-11.1.0-0.6.rc2.fc34 Summary: A C language family front-end for LLVM RPMs:clang11-devel clang11-libs clang11-resource-filesystem Size:140.41 MiB Package: llvm11-11.1.0-0.1.rc2.fc34 Summary: The Low Level Virtual Machine RPMs:llvm11 llvm11-devel llvm11-doc llvm11-libs llvm11-static Size:453.18 MiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: trac-batchmodify-plugin-0.8.0-20151237svn11791.fc34 Summary: Batch modification of tickets RPMs:trac-batchmodify-plugin Size:20.44 KiB Package: trac-navadd-plugin-0.9.0.1-20111240svn11020.fc34 Summary: Allows the addition of custom items RPMs:trac-navadd-plugin Size:11.13 KiB Package: trac-themeengine-plugin-2.0.1-20120330svn11382.fc34 Summary: Simple API and GUI for packaging and configuring Trac themes RPMs:trac-themeengine-plugin Size:54.27 KiB Package: trac-tocmacro-plugin-0.11.0.0.3-20111243svn11062.fc34 Summary: Trac plugin table of content macro RPMs:trac-tocmacro-plugin Size:15.55 KiB Package: trac-vatar-plugin-1.9-15.fc34 Summary: Add gravatar icons to various points around trac RPMs:trac-vatar-plugin Size:18.73 KiB Package: trac-workflowadmin-plugin-0.12-20120647svn11062.fc34 Summary: Web interface for workflow administration for Trac RPMs:trac-workflowadmin-plugin Size:92.89 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: 0ad-0.0.24b-2.fc34 Old package: 0ad-0.0.23b-24.fc34 Summary: Cross-Platform RTS Game of Ancient Warfare RPMs: 0ad Size: 32.68 MiB Size change: 13.04 MiB Changelog: * Mon Feb 22 2021 pcpa - 0.0.24b-1 - Update to 0.0.24b * Sat Feb 27 2021 Kalev Lember - 0.0.24b-2 - Use set_build_flags macro to set CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS/LDFLAGS - Disable LTO to fix self test failures Package: 0ad-data-0.0.24b-1.fc34 Old package: 0ad-data-0.0.23b-6.fc34 Summary: The Data Files for 0 AD RPMs: 0ad-data Size: 884.18 MiB Size change: 150.63 MiB Changelog: * Tue Feb 23 2021 pcpa - 0.0.24b-1 - Update to 0.0.24b Package: american-fuzzy-lop-2.57b-1.fc34 Old package: american-fuzzy-lop-2.56b-6.fc34 Summary: Practical, instrumentation-driven fuzzer for binary formats RPMs: american-fuzzy-lop american-fuzzy-lop-clang american-fuzzy-lop-clang-fast Size: 854.54 KiB Size change: 2.47 KiB Changelog: * Tue Feb 23 2021 Richard W.M. Jones - 2.57b-1 - New upstream version 2.57b. - Clang 12 in Fedora 34+ (RHBZ#1932050). Package: anaconda-34.24.5-5.fc34 Old package: anaconda-34.24.5-3.fc34 Summary: Graphical system installer RPMs: anaconda anaconda-core anaconda-dracut anaconda-gui anaconda-install-env-deps anaconda-install-img-deps anaconda-live anaconda-tui anaconda-widgets anaconda-widgets-devel Size: 22.23 MiB Size change: -102.43 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 09 2021 Adam Williamson - 34.24.5-4 - Backport #3230 to try and fix #1933454 * Wed Mar 10 2021 Martin Kolman - 34.24.5-5 - Use the volume UUID to search for the GRUB config in btrfs partitions (#1930567) (vponcova) Package: authselect-1.2.2-6.fc34 Old package: authselect-1.2.2-2.fc34 Summary: Configures authentication and identity sources from supported profiles RPMs: authselect authselect-compat authselect-devel authselect-libs Size: 2.09 MiB Size change: 5.58 KiB Changelog: * Fri Feb 19 2021 Pavel B??ezina - 1.2.2-3
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210312.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210311.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210312.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 12 Dropped packages:9 Upgraded packages: 75 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 3.28 MiB Size of dropped packages:2.43 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 5.88 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 706.73 KiB Size change of upgraded packages: -176.71 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 8.06 KiB = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Container_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20210311.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz Image: Container_Base docker aarch64 Path: Container/aarch64/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20210311.n.0.aarch64.tar.xz Image: Container_Base docker armhfp Path: Container/armhfp/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20210311.n.0.armhfp.tar.xz Image: Container_Base docker x86_64 Path: Container/x86_64/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20210311.n.0.x86_64.tar.xz Image: Container_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20210311.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Server dvd s390x Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-s390x-Rawhide-20210311.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: elementary-settings-daemon-1.0.0-0.1.20210219git7c8d748.fc35 Summary: Settings Daemon for Pantheon RPMs:elementary-settings-daemon Size:233.38 KiB Package: golang-github-nathanaelle-syslog5424-2-2.0.5-2.fc35 Summary: Log.Logger-friendly RFC-5424 syslog library RPMs:golang-github-nathanaelle-syslog5424-2-devel Size:39.48 KiB Package: js-jquery-ui-1.12.1-1.fc35 Summary: jQuery user interface RPMs:js-jquery-ui Size:185.35 KiB Package: nativejit-0.1-1.fc35 Summary: Library for high-performance just-in-time compilation RPMs:nativejit nativejit-devel Size:140.24 KiB Package: perl-IO-stringy-2.113-5.module_f35+11614+23b781aa Summary: I/O on in-core objects like strings and arrays for Perl RPMs:perl-IO-stringy Size:132.23 KiB Package: php-friendsofphp-proxy-manager-lts-1.0.3-2.fc35 Summary: OOP proxy wrappers utilities RPMs:php-friendsofphp-proxy-manager-lts Size:64.29 KiB Package: php-laminas-code4-4.0.0-1.fc35 Summary: Laminas Framework Code component RPMs:php-laminas-code4 Size:57.49 KiB Package: php-phpmyadmin-shapefile3-3.0.1-1.fc35 Summary: ESRI ShapeFile library for PHP, version 3 RPMs:php-phpmyadmin-shapefile3 Size:26.35 KiB Package: python-pyte-0.8.0-4.fc35 Summary: In memory VT-compatible terminal emulator RPMs:python3-pyte python3-pyte-docs Size:246.28 KiB Package: rsms-inter-fonts-3.15-1.fc35 Summary: The Inter font family RPMs:rsms-inter-fonts Size:1.54 MiB Package: rubygem-red-colors-0.1.1-1.fc35 Summary: Red Colors provides a wide array of features for dealing with colors RPMs:rubygem-red-colors rubygem-red-colors-doc Size:271.25 KiB Package: wyhash-final1-1.20210311gitfinal.fc35 Summary: No hash function is perfect, but some are useful RPMs:wyhash-devel wyhash-doc Size:390.93 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: lcm-1.4.0-1.fc33 Summary: Utilities for lightweight communications and marshaling RPMs:lcm lcm-devel lcm-java lcm-javadoc python3-lcm Size:1.84 MiB Package: puppetlabs-stdlib-4.25.1-7.fc34 Summary: Puppet Labs Standard Library RPMs:puppetlabs-stdlib Size:210.26 KiB Package: trac-batchmodify-plugin-0.8.0-20151237svn11791.fc34 Summary: Batch modification of tickets RPMs:trac-batchmodify-plugin Size:20.44 KiB Package: trac-navadd-plugin-0.9.0.1-20111240svn11020.fc34 Summary: Allows the addition of custom items RPMs:trac-navadd-plugin Size:11.13 KiB Package: trac-themeengine-plugin-2.0.1-20120330svn11382.fc34 Summary: Simple API and GUI for packaging and configuring Trac themes RPMs:trac-themeengine-plugin Size:54.27 KiB Package: trac-tocmacro-plugin-0.11.0.0.3-20111243svn11062.fc34 Summary: Trac plugin table of content macro RPMs:trac-tocmacro-plugin Size:15.55 KiB Package: trac-vatar-plugin-1.9-15.fc34 Summary: Add gravatar icons to various points around trac RPMs:trac-vatar-plugin Size:18.73 KiB Package: trac-workflowadmin-plugin-0.12-20120647svn11062.fc34 Summary: Web interface for workflow administration for Trac RPMs:trac-workflowadmin-plugin Size:92.89 KiB Package: xmonad-log-applet-2.1.0-21.fc33 Summary: Panel applet to display Xmonad log information RPMs:xmonad-log-applet-mate xmonad-log-applet-xfce Size:190.32 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: R-gamlss.dist-5.3.2-1.fc35 Old package: R-gamlss.dist-5.1.7-3.fc34 Summary: Distributions for Generalized Additive Models for Location Scale and Shape RPMs: R-gamlss.dist Size: 16.19 MiB Size change: 8.64 KiB Changelog: * Wed Mar 10 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 5.3.2-1 - Update to latest version (#1936954) Package: R-isoband-0.2.4-1.fc35
Make a hyperkitty project so we can keep fedora hyperkitty up to date?
It is already here: https://release-monitoring.org/project/53453/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922811] perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922811 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|emman...@seyman.fr |extras-orphan@fedoraproject ||.org --- Comment #1 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938172] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7333ebbdac has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7333ebbdac -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938172] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-8ad5d5b268 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8ad5d5b268 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938172] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-8fadb4aed9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8fadb4aed9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938172] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-677512a77b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-677512a77b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938172] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28-1 ||.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-Test-PostgreSQL] PR #1: Tests
ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-PostgreSQL` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-PostgreSQL/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938172] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras and EPEL ≥ 8. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-Test-PostgreSQL] PR #1: Tests
ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-PostgreSQL` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-PostgreSQL/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Request to package: czkawka (duplicate file finder, Rust + GTK3)
Czkawka [1] is a program that can be used to find and remove duplicate files. It is written in Rust and offers a GTK3 interface. I looked briefly into packaging this myself, since I already have two Rust packages under my belt, but czkawka is split into three parts: core [2], cli [3], and gui [4], and I don't have enough experience with Rust packaging to know how to handle this properly. Thanks in advance to anyone willing to take this on. [1] https://github.com/qarmin/czkawka [2] https://crates.io/crates/czkawka_core [3] https://crates.io/crates/czkawka_cli [4] https://crates.io/crates/czkawka_gui ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938172] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ppi...@redhat.com | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Interesting growth trend in Rawhide
It may also have something to do with what Marius said about Fedora possibly running on Pinephone and other devices, which apparently need bleeding edge stuff that's only in Rawhide. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q6T4DSBQ2IXRAF7EAZ6QYXBZKMPYM5AB/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938172] New: perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938172 Bug ID: 1938172 Summary: perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.28 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-PostgreSQL Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.28 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.27-9.fc34 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-PostgreSQL/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5748/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: OpenSSH SHA-1 deprecation, developing FAQ, etc
V Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:53:01AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > Do I understand it correctly that soon, I will have trouble connecting to > > $(grep ssh-rsa ~/.ssh/known_hosts | cut -f1 -d' ') > > hosts? > Should I regenerate the ssh key there? What is the prefered crypto nowadays? > No. Your keys do not use SHA at all. SSH protocol when performing authenticated key exchange can use SHA. It's a matter of SSH server and SSH client. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Interesting growth trend in Rawhide
Due to side-tags, Rawhide is much better place to live then it used to be. Vít Dne 11. 03. 21 v 18:14 Matthew Miller napsal(a): I’m looking at the mirror statistics, and in addition to the general positive upward trend, I noticed something interesting. Rawhide was, relatively speaking, at its peak in the early days — up to about 2010. From there, it slowly declines to almost nothing by 2012, and has stayed flat like that … until this last year, where there’s a lot more of it. It’s still small as a fraction, but definitely growing. This is still using the “old” mirror IP counting system; I haven’t done this for DNF Better Counting yet, but that’s my next little project. I’m definitely curious what percentage of these are long-running systems and which are ephemeral test or build systems. (A version of this post with inline graphics is at https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/interesting-growth-trend-in-rawhide/27879?u=mattdm) OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora mirrors, some returning 404
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:00:44PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 05:06:30PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/33/Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-33-1.2.x86_64.raw.xz > > > > You probably won't be able to observe this easily, but if you > > repeatedly download this file (or ideally, just do a HEAD request) > > then occasionally you'll hit a mirror that returns a 404. > > Yep. > > > At the time of writing mirror.genesisadaptive.com was offered as a > > redirect, but it does not have the file. > > (https://mirror.genesisadaptive.com/fedora/releases/33/Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-33-1.2.x86_64.raw.xz) > > Right. > mirrormanager has a list of mirrors that are 'up to date' and redirects > you to one of those. However, it doesn't know if that mirror has every > single file or image on it. :( > > > This is a problem for some cloud software we're writing that would > > like to pull the image on demand when people request a Fedora 33 VM. > > Well, if you are getting the f33 release image, it's never ever going to > change. You could store it locally? AIUI end users are typing in these URLs and we download them on demand. (I only wrote a very low-level component in this huge stack of cloud stuff so I don't have the full picture, but the additional complication I didn't mention is that we're using libcurl to download ranges of the file, and it seems to get redirected to different mirrors on every range, so it can still fail even if the first range succeeded.) > > It breaks unpredictably, and telling the "occasional 404" case from > > the "the URL is wrong" case is hard. > > Yeah. ;( > > > Is there anything that can be done so the mirrors which don't have the > > file are not offered up as redirects? > > Not easily I don't think. That would require mirrormanager to look at > every single file on the entire mirror and store them for every mirror. > ;( > > You could file a RFE on mirrormanager about this if you like. I thought > we had one, but I can't seem to find it. I guess > https://github.com/fedora-infra/mirrormanager2/issues/166 is close. Thanks, will read through it. > We also have a cloudfront cache: > https://d2lzkl7pfhq30w.cloudfront.net/ you could use... > or there is the master mirror at dl.fedoraproject.org, but I don't think > we want everyone to use that. :) I'm not sure I understand the cloudfront URL there. Is that a permanent thing? - It looks temporary. Why does it redirect to dl.fp.org? Rich. > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: OpenSSH SHA-1 deprecation, developing FAQ, etc
Dne 10. 03. 21 v 18:58 Daniel Pocock napsal(a): - did anybody already write any wiki page, FAQ or guide for Fedora users to navigate the SHA-1 issue in SSH? +1 I do not follow this issue and I would welcome nice HOWTO document. Do I understand it correctly that soon, I will have trouble connecting to $(grep ssh-rsa ~/.ssh/known_hosts | cut -f1 -d' ') hosts? Should I regenerate the ssh key there? What is the prefered crypto nowadays? -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager, Community Packaging Tools, #brno, #fedora-buildsys ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-32-20210312.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210311.0): ID: 810435 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810435 ID: 810442 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/810442 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
