Fwd: glibc gconv package split

[Fixing up my mailing list settings and re-sending] Hello, Apologies for the delayed announcement but as of glibc-2.34.9000-13.fc35, the glibc package has been split to create a new package glibc-gconv-extra to hold most converter modules into a separate package. The common converters such as

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 25 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1f259a45ef openjpeg2-2.3.1-11.el7 25 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9eaea6f65c audacious-plugins-4.0.5-4.el7 fluidsynth-2.1.8-4.el7

[Bug 1974142] perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered-0.021 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974142 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-a208f35688 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1973977] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.018 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973977 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-b58f75f46b has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1973968] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver-4.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973968 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-14dd399ce6 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1974142] perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered-0.021 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974142 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1973977] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.018 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973977 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1973968] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver-4.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973968 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1974136] F35FailsToInstall: perl-Email-Sender

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974136 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Orphaned python-sure

I've orphaned python-sure. I've only maintained it because python-freezegun used it, but the dependency was bogus, see: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-freezegun/pull-request/13 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___

Re: Updating sources file using fedpkg

Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden kirjoitti 21.6.2021 klo 14.50: On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 09:02:12PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: I am a bit confused about this discussion. My fedpkg does not care about the 'sources' file or the lookaside cache at all on 'fedpkg mockbuild'. It simply looks up the

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 10:48 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 11:41:41 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 03:26:52PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > > > Yeah. I'm looking a the original ticket in > > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2228, and I

[Bug 1973319] perl-libwww-perl-6.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973319 --- Comment #1 from Michal Josef Spacek --- Packages created: perl-libwww-perl-6.55-1.fc35 perl-libwww-perl-6.55-1.fc34 perl-libwww-perl-6.55-1.fc33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

ntl soname bump

Just in time to miss the big pile of package rebuilds I did last week for various mathematical packages, ntl 11.5.0 is out and comes with an soname bump. In a few days, I will build the new version of ntl for Rawhide only and rebuild dependent packages: eclib flint giac latte-integrale Macaulay2

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

Yep, removing —enablerepo=local did the trick. Thanks! On 21 Jun 2021, at 13:06, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > OK I was able to replicate it. My apologies I had a 'local' local on > the machine I was 'duplicating' and my laptop had a > [local] > name=local >

F35 Change: Libvirt Modular Daemons (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibvirtModularDaemons == Summary == Historically all libvirt functionality was provided in the monolithic libvirtd daemon. Upstream has developed a new modular architecture for libvirt where each driver is run in its own daemon. Primarily this provides

F35 Change: Libvirt Modular Daemons (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibvirtModularDaemons == Summary == Historically all libvirt functionality was provided in the monolithic libvirtd daemon. Upstream has developed a new modular architecture for libvirt where each driver is run in its own daemon. Primarily this provides

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 7:09 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > With things like [0] (TL;DR: bots submitting broken builds to rawhide) > > becoming a more regular occurrence, I propose that we extend the > > existing Updates Policy [1] to make it explicit that bots are not > > allowed to submit

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

From what I can recall, the local repo was never intended to be used by epel. It was to allow fedora builds to use the existing koji buildroot, but that would never work for epel as we cannot publish all the rhel rpms in the buildroot. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: F35 Change: Build Fedora Cloud Images with Hybrid BIOS+UEFI Boot Support (System-Wide Change)

W dniu 21.06.2021 o 17:43, Chris Murphy pisze: Please make first partition at least 4MB in size. Those Arm/AArch64 systems which store bootloaders on boot media will have a space for it (as some already read from around that area). I'm confused what image(s) you're referring Sorry, my

1974358 – Review Request: fdr - Flight Data Recorder

Hello, Anybody interested in doing a "review swap" or just a review?? Here is my review request [1]. I would like to get this into f35. tia, steved. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974358 ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

OK I was able to replicate it. My apologies I had a 'local' local on the machine I was 'duplicating' and my laptop had a [local] name=local baseurl=https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/epel8-build/latest/$basearch/ cost=2000 enabled=0 skip_if_unavailable=False so the laptop broke while the

[rpms/perl-libwww-perl] PR #4: Bump 6.54 and 6.55

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Bump 6.54 and 6.55 `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/4 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

Funny enough, neither did I. On 21 Jun 2021, at 11:58, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I don't know. > > on my systems I did a find /etc/mock/ -type f -print | xargs grep > infrastructure.fedoraproject.org and did not have any hits. > > On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 10:35, Ron Olson wrote: >> >> Hmm,

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

I don't know. on my systems I did a find /etc/mock/ -type f -print | xargs grep infrastructure.fedoraproject.org and did not have any hits. On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 10:35, Ron Olson wrote: > > Hmm, but why would it be pulling those? I’m merely trying to run mock on my > own machine in a script:

[rpms/perl-libwww-perl] PR #4: Bump 6.54 and 6.55

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you are following: `` Bump 6.54 and 6.55 `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/4 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 2:54 PM Andrew Bauer wrote: > > Looks like jakarta-mail affects quite a few packages. I have taken it. You can transfer jakarta-mail package to me if you like. It's a dependency of Ant which I'm maintainer of . -- Mikolaj Izdebski >

Re: F35 Change: Build Fedora Cloud Images with Hybrid BIOS+UEFI Boot Support (System-Wide Change)

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 9:43 AM Chris Murphy wrote: >I don't think GRUB has exclusivity over this guid, > and was always intended to be generic, I'm just not aware of any > bootloader that uses it. any ^other bootloader -- Chris Murphy ___ devel

Re: F35 Change: Build Fedora Cloud Images with Hybrid BIOS+UEFI Boot Support (System-Wide Change)

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:47 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:53 PM Marcin Juszkiewicz > wrote: > > > > W dniu 03.06.2021 o 22:35, Ben Cotton pisze: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraCloudHybridBoot > > > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > With recent changes in

Re: F35 Change: Broken RPATH will fail rpmbuild (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 5:46 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Hi, the script is failing the glib2 build due to an invalid rpath, but > unless I'm missing something obvious, I think it's valid. Reported: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973304 > > > I've sent an upstream PR for

Re: F35 Change: Broken RPATH will fail rpmbuild (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 5:17 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > On 6/16/21 10:58 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > > On 6/16/21 2:11 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 1:56 AM Tom Stellard > wrote: > >> > >> On 5/7/21 10:48 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: > >>

Re: F35 Change: Build Fedora Cloud Images with Hybrid BIOS+UEFI Boot Support (System-Wide Change)

rch64 > systems which store bootloaders on boot media will have a space for it > (as some already read from around that area). I'm confused what image(s) you're referring to because, e.g. Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20210621.n.0.aarch64.raw has this partition scheme: Number Start (sector

Re: x86_64-v2 in Fedora

On 6/18/21 1:42 AM, Mark Otaris wrote: For Fedora, linux-hardware.org says 78% use EFI and 16% have Secure Boot enabled. Not a very good data set, though Fedora telemetry wouldn’t be either. Of ~ 1K linux boxes in my env -- bare metal & VM, servers & desktops -- ~ 550 are now running fully

Fedora-Rawhide-20210621.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 22/134 (aarch64), 12/199 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in

[Bug 1974142] perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered-0.021 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974142 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-a208f35688 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a208f35688 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1974142] perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered-0.021 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974142 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1c8320e115 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1c8320e115 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1974142] perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered-0.021 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974142 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Fedora-IoT-35-20210621.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210620.0): ID: 913545 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/913545 Old failures (same test

[rpms/perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered] PR #1: Tests

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list

[rpms/perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered] PR #1: Tests

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

Hmm, but why would it be pulling those? I’m merely trying to run mock on my own machine in a script: BUILD=epel-8-x86_64 #echo Cleaning $BUILD #mock -r $BUILD --scrub=all mock --clean -r $BUILD --enablerepo=local --spec=swift-lang.spec --sources=../SOURCES --resultdir=$MYDIR/mock-results

[Bug 1974142] perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered-0.021 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974142 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: [HEADS UP] Moving to sip 5 in Rawhide

On Wed, 16 Jun 2021, Scott Talbert wrote: Just a heads-up, I've been working on converting packages from sip 4 to sip 5 in Rawhide. (sip is the Python bindings generation system used by PyQt and wxPython.) I'm planning on opening pull requests against the affected packages soon. Please DO

python-connection_pool Review Swap

Hello everyone! I was packaging up some deps for a tool which would be useful in NeuroFedora [0]. A package review for python-connection_pool is still pending to proceed further, and I would be happy to swap them with other developers here :D Review:

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Params-ValidationCompiler (rawhide). "Rename .rpmlint ??? perl-Params-ValidationCompiler.rpmlintrc"

Notification time stamped 2021-06-21 12:34:43 UTC From d7ad7a9c8a487c0966ae8c9eef8f20f57d669848 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Jun 21 2021 12:34:25 + Subject: Rename .rpmlint ⇒ perl-Params-ValidationCompiler.rpmlintrc --- diff --git a/.rpmlint b/.rpmlint deleted file

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Looks like jakarta-mail affects quite a few packages. I have taken it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

RE: Self Introduction: Anatoly Vildemanov

Hi, Could you please add me to 'packages' group I will support package process for ucx https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ucx Thanks -Original Message- From: Anatoly Vildemanov Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 10:47 AM To: Development discussions related to Fedora Cc: Vitaly Zaitsev

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210621.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210620.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210621.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 31 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:871.42

Re: intent to orphan notice: python-nss

This has been orphaned. - A ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

Re: Updating sources file using fedpkg

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 09:02:12PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: Ken Dreyer kirjoitti 17.6.2021 klo 19.04: On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 8:33 AM Richard Shaw wrote: On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 7:22 AM Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: To be clear: I don't want to fiddle with the sources file,

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 at 18:25, Ron Olson wrote: > > Hey all- > > I’m trying to run a mock build with EPEL-8 (epel-8-x86_64) and it fails with: > > > [MIRROR] kernel-headers-4.18.0-305.3.1.el8_4.x86_64.rpm: Status code: 403 for >

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 07:34:03AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Bodhi has a config setting ('automatic_updates_blacklist') which can > avoid specific users/bots to automatically create updates. > > If those bots are supposed to only test Koji builds, but not pushing > updates we can

[rpms/perl-libwww-perl] PR #3: 6.54 and 6.55 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 6.54 and 6.55 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/3 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1973977] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.018 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973977 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-b58f75f46b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b58f75f46b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1973977] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.018 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973977 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-2d004ae6b9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2d004ae6b9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1973319] perl-libwww-perl-6.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973319 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

[rpms/perl-libwww-perl] PR #3: 6.54 and 6.55 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you are following: `` 6.54 and 6.55 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/3 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1973977] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.018 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973977 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #4: F33: 0.000140 bump and package tests

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` F33: 0.000140 bump and package tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/4 ___ perl-devel mailing

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 21st June (Today)

Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 21st June (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over: IRC: https://webchat.libera.chat/?channels=#fedora-neuro

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #4: F33: 0.000140 bump and package tests

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you are following: `` F33: 0.000140 bump and package tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/4 ___

[Bug 1974137] F35FailsToInstall: perl-Pinto

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974137 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:50 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 11:41:41 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 03:26:52PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > > > Yeah. I'm looking a the original ticket in > > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2228, and I

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On 21. 06. 21 11:48, Ankur Sinha wrote: I don't think there's a policy against this, but apart from podman, I cannot recall seeing maintainers/dev teams give karma to their own packages' updates. I don't think that works---the idea of Bodhi is to allow ample opportunity for*others* to test the

[Bug 1974288] New: perl-5.34.0-479.fc35 FTBFS with gdbm-devel-1.20-1.fc35: ext/GDBM_File/t/gdbm.t: gdbm_firstkey: Item not found at ../../t/lib/dbmt_common.pl line 52.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974288 Bug ID: 1974288 Summary: perl-5.34.0-479.fc35 FTBFS with gdbm-devel-1.20-1.fc35: ext/GDBM_File/t/gdbm.t: gdbm_firstkey: Item not found at

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 11:41:41 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 03:26:52PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > Yeah. I'm looking a the original ticket in > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2228, and I think this was a mistake. > > We shouldn't have approved a bot

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210621.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210620.0): ID: 913118 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/913118 ID: 913119 Test: x86_64

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #3: 0.000140 bump and package tests

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 0.000140 bump and package tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/3 ___ perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1973968] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver-4.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973968 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodW

[Bug 1973968] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver-4.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973968 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-14dd399ce6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-14dd399ce6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1973968] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver-4.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973968 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #3: 0.000140 bump and package tests

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you are following: `` 0.000140 bump and package tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/3 ___ perl-devel

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver] PR #1: Tests

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing

Re: Updating sources file using fedpkg

Dne 17. 06. 21 v 20:02 Otto Urpelainen napsal(a): Ken Dreyer kirjoitti 17.6.2021 klo 19.04: On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 8:33 AM Richard Shaw wrote: On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 7:22 AM Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: To be clear: I don't want to fiddle with the sources file, hence this email.

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #5: 6.32 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 6.32 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/5 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 12:49:17AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > Given Hans proposal [1] introduced systemd/grub2/Gnome upstream changes > > it beg the question if now would not be the time to stop supporting > > booting in legacy bios mode and move to uefi only

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #5: 6.32 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you are following: `` 6.32 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/5 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1973968] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver-4.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973968 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver] PR #1: Tests

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver/pull-request/1 ___

[Bug 1973889] perl-Throwable-0.200014 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973889 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1973968] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver-4.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973968 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1974137] F35FailsToInstall: perl-Pinto

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974137 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210621.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210620.0): ID: 913108 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

Bodhi has a config setting ('automatic_updates_blacklist') which can avoid specific users/bots to automatically create updates. If those bots are supposed to only test Koji builds, but not pushing updates we can list them out using that setting. Mattia

[Bug 1973623] F35FailsToInstall: perl-RDF-Trine-redland

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973623 --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar --- Obsoleted in fedora-obsolete-packages-35-10. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1967544] perl-SDL-2.548-11.fc35 skips all video tests with sdl12-compat-devel-0.0.1~git.20210602.cc5826a-1.fc35: Failed to init video

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967544 --- Comment #10 from Petr Pisar --- Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-06-21 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/06/21/report-389-ds-base-2.0.5-20210621git59d889ad1.fc34.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to