I've been using LXQT on my rasp3+ since f33 and even forgot
I successfully upgraded to f34 on 03/24/21, but can't find
an f34 image. Is there an image available for f34 and will
one be made available for f35?
Joe
___
devel mailing list --
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-37aab93b64
libss7-2.0.1-1.el7
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-bf4abce815
libopenmpt-0.5.11-1.el7
The following builds have been
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-dd64ecd715
libss7-2.0.1-1.el8
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-55bfc8fcbf
libopenmpt-0.5.11-1.el8
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-9958e15ab2 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-55d19d8816 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 6:38 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 3:38 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2021-08-31 at 17:25 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > ntfs-3g 2021.8.22 was released yesterday to resolve multiple CVEs[1].
> > > With permission from
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 3:38 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-08-31 at 17:25 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > ntfs-3g 2021.8.22 was released yesterday to resolve multiple CVEs[1].
> > With permission from Tom Callaway (the ntfs-3g maintainer), I am
> > preparing updates for
On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 16:38 +, Nils K wrote:
> 7 years later I find this and was surprised after switching from
> Debian/Ubuntu.
> I cannot find the source or any licensing information for current
> versions however there are several alternatives.
> One which is already in the repos is
On 9/2/21 1:04 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:46:09PM -0500, Zebediah Figura (she/her) wrote:
Sorry for double-posting, my mail client helpfully removed everything from
CC for me :-(
On 9/2/21 12:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:11:43PM
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 11:23 AM Leigh Griffin wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Just a quick mail to let folks know that from October 1st, the CPE team
> will be working towards supporting the EPEL community. We just posted a
> quick comm blog on it [1] and wanted to raise wider awareness on the devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976778
--- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-SNMP-Info-3.75-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75019836
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976778
--- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1820160
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1820160=edit
[patch] Update to 3.75 (#1976778)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976778
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-SNMP-Info-3.74 is |perl-SNMP-Info-3.75 is
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 9:13 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 4:08 PM Leigh Griffin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 8:40 PM Adam Williamson <
>> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 13:54 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Sep 2 2021 at
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 4:08 PM Leigh Griffin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 8:40 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 13:54 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 2 2021 at 07:49:29 PM +0100, Leigh Griffin
>> > wrote:
>> > > Gating is optional so it shouldn't
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 8:40 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 13:54 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 2 2021 at 07:49:29 PM +0100, Leigh Griffin
> > wrote:
> > > Gating is optional so it shouldn't be causing an issue directly for
> > > those who haven't opted in
>
On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 13:54 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2 2021 at 07:49:29 PM +0100, Leigh Griffin
> wrote:
> > Gating is optional so it shouldn't be causing an issue directly for
> > those who haven't opted in
>
> I believe this is incorrect, it's now required for critical
On Tue, 2021-08-31 at 17:25 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> ntfs-3g 2021.8.22 was released yesterday to resolve multiple CVEs[1].
> With permission from Tom Callaway (the ntfs-3g maintainer), I am
> preparing updates for Fedora and EPEL now for Tom.
>
> As part of this, I'll rebuild all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461
--- Comment #27 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['rpmbuild',
'-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
'/var/tmp/thn-s8tobrhk/w3c-markup-validator.spec'] returned 1:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|w3c-markup-validator-21.7.1
On Thu, Sep 2 2021 at 07:49:29 PM +0100, Leigh Griffin
wrote:
Gating is optional so it shouldn't be causing an issue directly for
those who haven't opted in
I believe this is incorrect, it's now required for critical path
packages. Otherwise it wouldn't be running at all, because I don't
On Thu 2 Sep 2021, 18:27 Michael Catanzaro, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7558b7e7fc I
> received a message from bodhi:
>
> """
> This update's test gating status has been changed to 'failed'.
> """
>
> However, no tests actually failed yet, and the
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:46:09PM -0500, Zebediah Figura (she/her) wrote:
> Sorry for double-posting, my mail client helpfully removed everything from
> CC for me :-(
>
> On 9/2/21 12:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:11:43PM -0500, Zebediah Figura (she/her) wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000702
Bug ID: 2000702
Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-7.7.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sys-Virt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Sorry for double-posting, my mail client helpfully removed everything
from CC for me :-(
On 9/2/21 12:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:11:43PM -0500, Zebediah Figura (she/her) wrote:
On 9/2/21 12:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Zebediah Figura:
(2) If we use
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:11:43PM -0500, Zebediah Figura (she/her) wrote:
> On 9/2/21 12:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Zebediah Figura:
> >
> > > (2) If we use dynamic libraries, should dependencies be included in
> > > the main wine package, or packaged separately?
> >
> > Aren't many of
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:11:43PM -0500, Zebediah Figura (she/her) wrote:
> On 9/2/21 12:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Zebediah Figura:
> >
> > > (2) If we use dynamic libraries, should dependencies be included in
> > > the main wine package, or packaged separately?
> >
> > Aren't many of
On 9/2/21 11:54 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 12:42, Zebediah Figura wrote:
Hello all,
I'm a contributor to the Wine project. To summarize the following mail,
Wine needs special versions of some of its normal dependencies, such as
libfreetype and libgnutls, built
Hi,
In https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7558b7e7fc I
received a message from bodhi:
"""
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'failed'.
"""
However, no tests actually failed yet, and the gating status is
adjusted to "waiting" immediately after.
This is a
On 9/2/21 12:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Zebediah Figura:
(2) If we use dynamic libraries, should dependencies be included in
the main wine package, or packaged separately?
Aren't many of them already packages separately? For example
mingw32-libpng and mingw32-gnutls?
Thanks, I wasn't
* Zebediah Figura:
> (2) If we use dynamic libraries, should dependencies be included in
> the main wine package, or packaged separately?
Aren't many of them already packages separately? For example
mingw32-libpng and mingw32-gnutls?
Thanks,
Florian
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210901.0):
ID: 966786 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/966786
ID: 966788 Test: aarch64
On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 12:42, Zebediah Figura wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm a contributor to the Wine project. To summarize the following mail,
> Wine needs special versions of some of its normal dependencies, such as
> libfreetype and libgnutls, built using the MinGW cross-compiler, and I'm
>
Hello all,
I'm a contributor to the Wine project. To summarize the following mail,
Wine needs special versions of some of its normal dependencies, such as
libfreetype and libgnutls, built using the MinGW cross-compiler, and I'm
sending out a mail to major distributions in order to get some
7 years later I find this and was surprised after switching from Debian/Ubuntu.
I cannot find the source or any licensing information for current versions
however there are several alternatives.
One which is already in the repos is pdf-stapler which is good for the basics
but lacks some of the
I found the origin of this change to be the following commit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/c/b65f9ed036fca30c0684bfc6fe72d72a53e9867a?branch=f21
(which is a revert of a revert to remove the kernel-doc subpackage).
The commit also suggest that the package might be a candidate for a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975580
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 12/205 (x86_64), 8/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210831.n.1):
ID: 966456 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/966456
ID: 966468 Test: x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000561
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
Hey!
Will try to attend and download the Beta when its out when i am home from
Prague and London
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:46 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 11:39 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9923/
>
> The correct link is
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 11:39 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9923/
The correct link is https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/meeting/10064/
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
Hi everyone,
It's that time already! The Fedora Linux 35 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting
is scheduled for Thursday 9 September at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
At this time, we will determine the status of the F35 Beta for the 14
September early target date[2]. For more information about the
Go/No-Go
Hi everyone,
It's that time already! The Fedora Linux 35 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting
is scheduled for Thursday 9 September at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
At this time, we will determine the status of the F35 Beta for the 14
September early target date[2]. For more information about the
Go/No-Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980931
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2000555
Referenced Bugs:
Hey everyone,
Just a quick mail to let folks know that from October 1st, the CPE team
will be working towards supporting the EPEL community. We just posted a
quick comm blog on it [1] and wanted to raise wider awareness on the devel
list. More good things to follow in the coming weeks and I will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975580
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-aec41e4b2b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-aec41e4b2b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975580
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-XXX-0.38-1.fc36
On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 09:29, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> We are pleased to announce that Red Hat is establishing a small team
> directly responsible for participating in EPEL activities. Their job
> isn't to displace the EPEL community, but rather to support it
> full-time. We expect many beneficial
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000615
Bug ID: 2000615
Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.68 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Locale-Codes
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
OLD: Fedora-35-20210831.n.1
NEW: Fedora-35-20210902.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:357.54 KiB
Size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000561
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-0fdef4a660 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0fdef4a660
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000561
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-String-Formatter`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-String-Formatter/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
We are pleased to announce that Red Hat is establishing a small team
directly responsible for participating in EPEL activities. Their job
isn't to displace the EPEL community, but rather to support it
full-time. We expect many beneficial effects, among those better EPEL
readiness for a RHEL major
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-String-Formatter`
that you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-String-Formatter/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud
Failed openQA
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 8:49 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 02/09/2021 14:03, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I was not actually aware there was a flatpak, I used the steam package
> > from RPM Fusion and obviously it does link with Fedora libraries:
>
> Steam uses its own Steam Runtime, based
On 02/09/2021 14:03, Richard Shaw wrote:
I was not actually aware there was a flatpak, I used the steam package
from RPM Fusion and obviously it does link with Fedora libraries:
Steam uses its own Steam Runtime, based on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS libraries.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 4:14 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
>
> However: Do we actually need multilib for anything (other than maybe
> wine)? For example, I am running Steam on my workstation, and some
> Linux-native games, but I still have *zero* .i686 arch packages
> installed on my system. The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000561
Bug ID: 2000561
Summary: perl-String-Formatter-1.234 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-String-Formatter
Keywords: FutureFeature,
On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four
dependencies reviewed:
- python-mkdocs-redirects:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2000347
- python-pyyaml_env_tag:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Digest-1.20-1.fc36
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-59f14a752a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-59f14a752a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-9958e15ab2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9958e15ab2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Digest` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Digest/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210901.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210902.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 149
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 15.19 MiB
Size of dropped packages
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Digest` that you
are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Digest/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
Bug ID: 2000524
Summary: Upgrade perl-Digest to 1.20
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Digest
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-CGI-Fast-2.16-1.fc36
--
On 31. 08. 21 18:53, Matthew Miller wrote:
This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we
build stuff like libreoffice for i686, but then (mostly) don't ship it.
This seems like a waste of resources and time.
I know it's somewhat complicated (for example, there's
On 02.09.21 11:43, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 11:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 11:31, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 11:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210901.0):
ID: 965874 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 02. 09. 21 11:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 11:31, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 11:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd
On Di, 2021-08-31 at 23:13 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> However: Do we actually need multilib for anything (other than maybe
> wine)? For example, I am running Steam on my workstation, and some
> Linux-native games, but I still have *zero* .i686 arch packages
> installed on my system. The Steam
On 02. 09. 21 11:31, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 11:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four
dependencies reviewed:
On 02.09.21 11:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four
dependencies reviewed:
- python-mkdocs-redirects:
On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hmm in the case of python-pyyaml_env_tag
See also
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_library_naming
...The Fedora package’s name SHOULD contain the Canonical project name.
If possible, the project name SHOULD be the
On 02. 09. 21 10:14, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four dependencies
reviewed:
- python-mkdocs-redirects:
On 02.09.21 02:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four
dependencies reviewed:
- python-mkdocs-redirects:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2000347
- python-pyyaml_env_tag:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-CGI-Fast` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CGI-Fast/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210901.0):
ID: 965858 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-CGI-Fast` that
you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CGI-Fast/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Iago Rubio wrote on 2021/08/31 15:52:
Looks like a linker error due to missing exception functions.
Does link with --fno-exceptions helps?
Here -fno-expections on armv7hl helps.
Note that now wine builds wine-preloader also on armv7hl, so some
modification for wine.spec is needed.
88 matches
Mail list logo
