Stephen Snow kirjoitti 5.10.2021 klo 15.39:
we were initially discussing that it could be useful to have some
package one can experiment with without being too much worried about
the
result.
However, discussing this back and forth, we figured that it might
also
where new coming package
Hi folks,
@Matthew Miller Are you still trying to save Fedora
from packaging the ocean? :)
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 9:10 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 8:49 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 03:09:08PM +0200, Mario Torre wrote:
> > > I'm not sure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204
Bug ID: 204
Summary: perl-Encode-3.13 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Encode
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a50497600b
chromium-94.0.4606.61-1.el8
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d146456623
dr_libs-0-0.7.20211002gitf13cbcf.el8
The
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021, at 3:08 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> But then you're back to *exactly how Fedora packages for Java projects
> already work* - only with the added complication that distributing
> those build artifacts as plain JARs instead of RPMs now makes them
> impossible to consume as
Hi All,
Tomorrow we will be holding a video meeting for the Fedora CoreOS community.
Harshal Patil will be joining us to give a brief overview of how Fedora CoreOS
is used
for the e2e node tests in upstream Kubernetes.
https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/984
We'll also be
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211004.0):
ID: 1015053 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1015053
ID: 1015067 Test: x86_64
> Am 04.10.2021 um 21:08 schrieb Fabio Valentini :
>
>
> But then you're back to *exactly how Fedora packages for Java projects
> already work* - only with the added complication that distributing
> those build artifacts as plain JARs instead of RPMs now makes them
> impossible to consume as
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-37d56e6b48
Just to let everyone know that OCaml 4.13.1 has been pushed to Fedora
Rawhide. There should be no major changes or surprises in this
release since it's small incremental change[1] towards OCaml 5. But if
you find problems let me
Formal greetings everyone!! :)
My name is Gregory Cohen.
I am looking for developers to work on this new project with me.
I have recently joined certain mailing lists, and I am looking to get the
word out. There is no readme file yet, but I explain everything here, so
don't get mad :)
Feel
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 11:27 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:17:30PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > >Is this really necessary?
> >
> > Yes. Because anyone can add something like this:
> > %post
> > rm -rf /
> >
> > And it will destroy the installed system or
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-10-06 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@libera.chat
>
> More information available at:
>
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/204 (x86_64), 13/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211004.n.0):
ID: 1014349 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1014349
ID: 1014390 Test: x86_64
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 11:28, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:17:30PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > >Is this really necessary?
> >
> > Yes. Because anyone can add something like this:
> > %post
> > rm -rf /
> >
> > And it will destroy the installed system or even
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-10-06 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 10:13 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:07 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 01:03:27PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > Hi all! I just got back from Open Source Summit, several of the talks I
> > > found interesting were on RISC-V --
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:17:30PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> >Is this really necessary?
>
> Yes. Because anyone can add something like this:
> %post
> rm -rf /
>
> And it will destroy the installed system or even the hardware.
Yeah, but... that's not going get through the PR
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 10:47:14PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Personally speaking I think the real barrier is someone with a large
> > colourful hat putting up the money to hire a full time developer to
> > work on the project.
> Also, I think one of the pre-requisites to
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 12:08, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 04.10.2021 um 15:07 schrieb Mat Booth :
>
> Like many Open Source projects, Fedora is a "do-ocracy“ — ….
>
> A nice phrase with a decent connotation. And it’s true without doubt.
>
> And at the same time it is also true, Fedora as many
OLD: Fedora-35-20211004.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211005.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:11
Upgraded packages: 26
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:16.46 MiB
Size
Hi all,
Today, Oct 5th 2021, is an important day on the Fedora 35
schedule [1], with significant cut-offs.
Today we have the Final Freeze [2] which starts at 14:00 UTC. This
means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze
exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and
Hello Pythonistas,
since Fedora 27, we have been patching Python to install packages to
/usr/local/lib(64)/python3.X/site-packages if not in rpmbuild:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Making_sudo_pip_safe
The patch was a pragmatic hack in the distutils module that proved to be
working
Hi all,
Today, Oct 5th 2021, is an important day on the Fedora 35
schedule [1], with significant cut-offs.
Today we have the Final Freeze [2] which starts at 14:00 UTC. This
means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze
exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and
> Am 05.10.2021 um 14:56 schrieb Stephen Snow :
>
> Hello,
>
> (snip)
>
> So are the meetings being held with the java-sig? When are they? All of
> us interested java community members should attend I think if we want
> to offer an opinion or even just have something to say.
If you search
On Tuesday, 05 October 2021 at 00:20, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Looking through the packages I own there's a bunch I no longer use.
> I've tried to group these, from memory, where I own something because
> it's a dependency of something else. I was going to ask people if they
> were interested in
> (snip)
> You also need people who are good at documentation which frankly many
> developers are not. Be it a history of 'the only true documentation
> is
> the code' to 'look its simple why didn't you just no one would think of and impossible to document without knowing why
> it was chosen or
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:11 PM Blaise Pabon wrote:
> I have been wanting to take over a package for the past few years and this
> seems like a good opportunity. I may need to refresh some of my access
> tokens.
>
I'll share the same response as before :)
Sweet. Onuralp replied via
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 8/206 (x86_64), 17/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211004.n.0):
ID: 1013991 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso
Hello,
(snip)
> However, we lack concepts on how to proceed after removing java-
> maint-sig. What consequences do we draw from the analyses?
>
> Emmanuel Seyman has made some suggestions, about 16 posts back.
> Thoughts on those? I posted on the java list some ideas some time ago
>
Hello Vit,
I was one of those potential packagers who started a conversation here
regarding the apparent dificulies experienced by some to varying
degrees. In my simple non-packager perspective, There needs to be some
tool used to help sponsors feel comfortable with the potential
packagers
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 12:28:03PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
> I like the idea.
>
> I think we can even setup tests namespace repo for it, which would
> ensure all content in this package is %doc only. It does not contain
> %post scripts and no executable, unless strictly predefined content.
>
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 07:26, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 04.10.2021 um 15:29 schrieb Mikolaj Izdebski :
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 2:08 PM Peter Boy wrote:
> >> However, we lack concepts on how to proceed after removing java-maint-sig.
> >> What consequences do we draw from the analyses?
Ohh, thanks Miro.
I didn't see that :)
Em ter, 5 de out de 2021 08:21, Miro Hrončok escreveu:
> On 05. 10. 21 13:13, Geraldo Simião Kutz wrote:
> > Good morning/afternoon everyone,
> >
> > I'm having this dependency problem, is this correct?
> >
> > If i use dnf up --best --allowerasing it will
All dependencies have been rebuilt. A few packages needed patching to deal
with some small architectural changes in OIIO.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-61d474b674
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list --
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211004.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211005.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 117
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.76 MiB
Size of dropped packages
> Am 04.10.2021 um 15:29 schrieb Mikolaj Izdebski :
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 2:08 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>> However, we lack concepts on how to proceed after removing java-maint-sig.
>> What consequences do we draw from the analyses?
>
> … If you want
> to improve docs, just do it. And so on.
On 05. 10. 21 13:13, Geraldo Simião Kutz wrote:
Good morning/afternoon everyone,
I'm having this dependency problem, is this correct?
If i use dnf up --best --allowerasing it will naturally remove
python3-jwt+crypto
Will this be normalyzed by the end of freeze?
#
Good morning/afternoon everyone,
I'm having this dependency problem, is this correct?
If i use dnf up --best --allowerasing it will naturally remove
python3-jwt+crypto
Will this be normalyzed by the end of freeze?
#
Problema: pacote
I have been wanting to take over a package for the past few years and this
seems like a good opportunity. I may need to refresh some of my access
tokens.
Blaise
On Wed, May 5, 2021, 6:02 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I added python-mailmerge to Fedora Linux as it was super
> Am 04.10.2021 um 15:07 schrieb Mat Booth :
>
> Like many Open Source projects, Fedora is a "do-ocracy“ — ….
A nice phrase with a decent connotation. And it’s true without doubt.
And at the same time it is also true, Fedora as many other Open Source projects
is as well about coordination
I like the idea.
I think we can even setup tests namespace repo for it, which would
ensure all content in this package is %doc only. It does not contain
%post scripts and no executable, unless strictly predefined content.
That CI repo would have more strict access to ensure newcomers cannot
avoid
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 10:47:14PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 04 October 2021 at 22:39, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> [...]
> > Personally speaking I think the real barrier is someone with a large
> > colourful hat putting up the money to hire a full time developer to
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211004.0):
ID: 1013871 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 7:04 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> I think the primary problem here is that koji does support neither
> external builders nor building on top of qemu emulation.
> However, COPR *does* support building on emulated architectures
> (that's how its armv7 and s390x support
When opening a Buzilla, these common issues popped up:
java-11-openjdk-headless RPM does not provide java-headless capability
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797054
- "Hi. This is intentional. It will be added once jdk8 will stop to be the
system JDK."
javapackages-tools: wrong
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211004.0):
ID: 1013797 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Dne 04. 10. 21 v 16:22 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel napsal(a):
On 04/10/2021 10:57, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Recently, there have been a lot of discussions on this list as well
as we have internally about onboarding. During our internal
brainstorming, we were initially discussing that it could be
Hello Mike,
I thought (!) I read somewhere that this difference between java-headless and
java-11-headless was intentional (or at least I understood it that way).
Let me open a Bugzilla against Java 11.
How did others tackle this issue in the past/currently though? I can't be the
first one
48 matches
Mail list logo
