Maxwell G via devel kirjoitti 12.10.2021 klo 6.44:
Hi everyone,
I am Maxwell G or @gotmax23 on FAS and Github. I am relatively new to
Linux but after trying different distros, I settled on Fedora. I don't
have a lot of time between school and having chronic pain, but I'd like
to give back and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|w3c-markup-validator-21.9.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461
--- Comment #29 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['rpmbuild',
'-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
'/var/tmp/thn-s4eh3jkc/w3c-markup-validator.spec'] returned 1:
Hi everyone,
I am Maxwell G or @gotmax23 on FAS and Github. I am relatively new to
Linux but after trying different distros, I settled on Fedora. I don't
have a lot of time between school and having chronic pain, but I'd like
to give back and contribute as much as I can.
I created a package for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013055
Bug ID: 2013055
Summary: perl-Return-MultiLevel-0.06 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Return-MultiLevel
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013055
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['rpmbuild',
'-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
'/var/tmp/thn-v1akskcl/perl-Return-MultiLevel.spec'] returned 1:
Could someone with sufficient permissions please get httpd package
unstuck in bodhi?
It's been sitting there for a few days, waiting to get to stable, but
it keeps getting kicked out, because some automated tests did not pass.
The package contains security fixes.
Thanks,
--
Bojan
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-dd446b153c
libopenmpt-0.5.12-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
eccodes-2.23.0-1.el8
lpf-0.3-1.el8
Details
The ELN package builds for the recent OCaml 4.13 update have mostly
been failing, over and over. I finally took a look at some today;
they're going to keep failing until a human intervenes. Rebuilding
against Rawhide packages was supposed to fix this issue, but it
doesn't fix the problem we're
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
24 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f005e1b879
debmirror-2.35-1.el7
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1c90472b95
libopenmpt-0.5.12-1.el7
0
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:06 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yeah, I was asked to untag that after untagging the latest python3.10
> package.
>
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012513
>
> This is what failed rawhide composes from 20211006 to 20211009.
Got it. Thanks for satisfying my
Hi Endi,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:58 AM Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
> Hi, some of JAXB packages failed to build possibly due to Maven/Ant changes
> earlier this year, and since there has been no solution we decided to drop
> JAXB dependency from Dogtag. We just barely managed to complete the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009986
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.49 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.49
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.48 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.48
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482813
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2 |perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009986
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482813
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2 |perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 09:45:59PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
>
> Sure, making people aware of all the tooling that is available is good. But
> the volume of messages in those lists is so large that I cannot believe it
> is a good idea to subscribe, unless some kind of automatic processing is
On 11. 10. 21 21:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 2:49 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
I've checked the status quo.
Package "reproducer_reversed" starts supplementing package "rpm". "rpm" is
installed, but "reproducer_reversed" is
On 11. 10. 21 21:41, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 08:17:36PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 11. 10. 21 20:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 08:21:51AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 07. 10. 21 v 18:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
When
Otto Urpelainen kirjoitti 11.10.2021 klo 21.45:
Kevin Fenzi kirjoitti 10.10.2021 klo 23.49:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 02:14:06PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
Hello,
Package Maintainer Docs currently recommend joining the package-announce
mailing list in two places [1,2], describing it as
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 08:17:36PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11. 10. 21 20:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 08:21:51AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >>Dne 07. 10. 21 v 18:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >>>When are you supposed to run remove-retired-packages?
>
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-10-11/fesco.2021-10-11-19.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-10-11/fesco.2021-10-11-19.00.txt
Log:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 2:49 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>> I've checked the status quo.
>>
>> Package "reproducer_reversed" starts supplementing package "rpm". "rpm" is
>> installed, but "reproducer_reversed" is not.
>>
>> 1. dnf upgarde, no
Kevin Fenzi kirjoitti 10.10.2021 klo 23.49:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 02:14:06PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
Hello,
Package Maintainer Docs currently recommend joining the package-announce
mailing list in two places [1,2], describing it as follows:
You should also consider joining the
On 11. 10. 21 20:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 08:21:51AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 07. 10. 21 v 18:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
When are you supposed to run remove-retired-packages?
After the upgrade.
If you run remove-retired-packages after the
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 08:21:51AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 07. 10. 21 v 18:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >When are you supposed to run remove-retired-packages?
> After the upgrade.
> >
> >If you run remove-retired-packages after the upgrade, you already
> >managed to upgrade and nothing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012019
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-32acd0148a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/204 (x86_64), 2/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211010.n.0):
ID: 1023890 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1023890
ID: 1023905 Test: x86_64
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:37:41PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Jerry James wrote on 2021/10/11 23:26:
> > On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 7:26 AM Fedora Rawhide Report
> > wrote:
> > > = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
> > > Package: python-pip-21.2.3-2.fc36
> > > Old package:
Hi, some of JAXB packages failed to build possibly due to Maven/Ant changes
earlier this year, and since there has been no solution we decided to drop JAXB
dependency from Dogtag. We just barely managed to complete the work recently,
so unfortunately this could not be done much earlier before
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211010.0):
ID: 1023585 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1023585
ID:
Jerry James wrote on 2021/10/11 23:26:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 7:26 AM Fedora Rawhide Report
wrote:
= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
Package: python-pip-21.2.3-2.fc36
Old package: python-pip-21.2.3-4.fc36
Summary: A tool for installing and managing Python packages
RPMs:
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 8/206 (x86_64), 11/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 7:26 AM Fedora Rawhide Report
wrote:
> = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
> Package: python-pip-21.2.3-2.fc36
> Old package: python-pip-21.2.3-4.fc36
> Summary: A tool for installing and managing Python packages
> RPMs: python-pip-doc python-pip-wheel
On 10/9/21 5:33 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 5:03 AM Tom Stellard wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to start packaging LLVM 13.0.0-final for rawhide and f35. The
13.0.0-final release has a different ABI than 13.0.0-rc1, so I will be
rebuilding the following packages as part of the
OLD: Fedora-35-20211010.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211011.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 5:21 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 06. 10. 21 v 9:44 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 09:39:46AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Dne 05. 10. 21 v 18:04 Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
> >>> On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 11:28, Matthew Miller
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012875
Bug ID: 2012875
Summary: perl-Graphics-TIFF-17 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Graphics-TIFF
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:46 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> Hello packagers,
>
> I'm glad to announce that now it's possible to move a package back from
> a module to a nonmodular repository.
>
This is awesome! Thank you so much for this! :)
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
I think if you jump more than 2 versions at a time the packages obsoleted
by fedora-obsolete-packages might not be picked up properly because it only
holds packages for about 2 versions before they are removed from it. So
jumping from F26 to F33 directly might miss the obsoletes from F27-F31ish.
Dear all,
I plan to update the eccodes package for EPEL 7/8 soon from version
2.18.0 to version 2.23.0. This is needed since ECMWF will be starting
to generate data files soon that can only be accessed using this
version. See also BZ 2012783 and ECMWF Confluence page
On 11/10/2021 13:48, JT wrote:
Nice. I did an update from F26-F33 last year doing one version at time
instead of jumping more than one version... and had no major issues. I
wonder how far back its possible to start from and walk through the
version updates.
I recently did F15-F34 though I
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-10-11 19:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Nice. I did an update from F26-F33 last year doing one version at time
instead of jumping more than one version... and had no major issues. I
wonder how far back its possible to start from and walk through the version
updates.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 3:55 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Hello good
Hello packagers,
I'm glad to announce that now it's possible to move a package back from
a module to a nonmodular repository.
Motivation
==
In the past there was a problem that once a package was added into a module,
there was to way to return it back.
Let's say you have a
On 10/11/21 12:28, Petr Pisar wrote:
V Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 09:55:05AM +0200, Jiri Vanek napsal(a):
f30-> f34 died again on python stack.. (yah, dnf and freinds should stop
using that or keep embedded interpreter)
DNF 5 is going be written in C++ without any Python.
with all its pros
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211010.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211011.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 28
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
V Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 09:55:05AM +0200, Jiri Vanek napsal(a):
> f30-> f34 died again on python stack.. (yah, dnf and freinds should stop
> using that or keep embedded interpreter)
DNF 5 is going be written in C++ without any Python.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi all.
Even Kalzium (new release) is rebuilt against openbabel3
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F
GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/
OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 10:34 +0200, Casper wrote:
> Happy to read this :)
>
> Congrats, man :)
>
> I will do soon an f33 - f34 - f35 journey
F33 -> F35 should work (update) directly
> Jiri Vanek a écrit :
> > Hello good people!
> >
> > I would like to thanx to everybody for amazing work in
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211010.0):
ID: 1023220 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 11th
October (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat) or
Matrix. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to
attend. You can join us over:
Matrix:
Happy to read this :)
Congrats, man :)
I will do soon an f33 - f34 - f35 journey
Jiri Vanek a écrit :
> Hello good people!
>
> I would like to thanx to everybody for amazing work in fedora, for keeping it
> alive, and updatable.
>
> In friday I had found an old laptop running f22 and decided
Hello good people!
I would like to thanx to everybody for amazing work in fedora, for keeping it
alive, and updatable.
In friday I had found an old laptop running f22 and decided to try a leap update to f34.
It was not just default inntall, there was vlc and much more "unknown"
comonents.
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211010.0):
ID: 1022972 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012019
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
58 matches
Mail list logo
