On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 7:45 PM Akira TAGOH wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 11:07 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
> > Another case is the math symbols: Should the default sans-serif math font be
> > changed to Noto Sans Math? STIX is a serif font, so it probably makes sense
> > to keep as the
On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 21:52 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> > I already cited one upthread - openvswitch integration. And possibly
> > ifup-pre , I haven't found a NetworkManager equivalent to that
> > mechanism yet, but I might be missing it.
>
> Do you mean
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 05:05:26PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF36
>
> == Summary ==
> Update the Fedora 36 GNU Toolchain to gcc 12 and glibc 2.35.
>
> The gcc 12 is currently under development and will be included in
> Fedora 36 upon release. The
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> I already cited one upthread - openvswitch integration. And possibly
> ifup-pre , I haven't found a NetworkManager equivalent to that
> mechanism yet, but I might be missing it.
Do you mean /sbin/ifup-pre-local? If so, is there a difference between
that
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 05:36:56PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
... snip ...
> So, my question is...do other Rawhide users have this problem, or is my
> system an outlier for some reason? I have not been able to figure out
> *what* created the problematic directories on my system. An earlier
> sys
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 1:08 AM Neal Becker wrote:
>
> After seeing this proposal I tried playing with Noto Sans Mono. I
> find that while it comes with many weights, none look right to me.
> Language is English.
>
> I'm testing in emacs. My usual default is Source code sans semibold
> and I fin
On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 18:21 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:19 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
> >
> > On 1/5/22 17:43, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > > On 1/5/22 2:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > I'd say we want to get rid of both;)
> > >
> > > There are us
Hey folks! So I looked into an interesting bug today where with systemd
250, kernel-install started installing kernels and config snippets to
the wrong place.
The bug happened on my system because it had, for some reason, these
directories:
/boot/efi/loader/entries
/boot/efi/(machine_id)
where (
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:28:08PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> So ... something like:
>
> - create a ticketing system for idea / text submissions (project with
> issue tracker on pagure?)
> - there, Fedora contributors can propose their cool new features /
> packages for inclusion in the next
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 4:28:19 PM CST Inglis, Malcolm via devel wrote:
> I have two outstanding PRs that I think are hanging on uploading new sources
> to the Lookaside Cache
I have experienced this issue myself and seen it happen to other newcomers
several times. It nullifies the purpose
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:19 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
> On 1/5/22 17:43, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On 1/5/22 2:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> I'd say we want to get rid of both;)
> >
> > There are use-cases that NetworkManager just doesn't support that
> > network-script
On 1/5/22 17:43, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 1/5/22 2:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> I'd say we want to get rid of both;)
>
> There are use-cases that NetworkManager just doesn't support that
> network-scripts
> does. If network-scripts is orphaned I'll probably pick it up.
Wh
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:18 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:29 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > - create a ticketing system for idea / text submissions (project with
> > issue tracker on pagure?)
> > - there, Fedora contributors can propose their cool new features /
> > packag
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 102/228 (x86_64), 63/159 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in
On 1/5/22 2:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
I'd say we want to get rid of both;)
There are use-cases that NetworkManager just doesn't support that network-scripts
does. If network-scripts is orphaned I'll probably pick it up.
I have raised the use cases with upstream, but they have
On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 7:33 PM stan via devel
wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 02:00:34 +0100
> Pawel Veselov wrote:
> > Greetings!
> > I've been banging my head against this wall for a while now, and would
> > really appreciate some pointers.
> >
> > I can no longer record Google Meet meetings using
Is someone willing to sponsor me into the `packager` group? I'd appreciate it!
(I was bouncing around the documentation for that, but it seems there's no
formalized process currently - sorry if I missed something)
I have two outstanding PRs that I think are hanging on uploading new sources to
t
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:45 PM Jilayne Lovejoy wrote:
>
> There were some license combinations (could be AND, OR, or WITH) that
> are on the "good" list but a different combination might need separate
> approval.
>
> Off top of head, I think any L/GPL WITH [exception] would fall into the
> categor
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF36
== Summary ==
Update the Fedora 36 GNU Toolchain to gcc 12 and glibc 2.35.
The gcc 12 is currently under development and will be included in
Fedora 36 upon release. The glibc 2.35 change will be tracked in this
top-level GNU Toolchain system-
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 11:26, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Django4.0
>
> == Summary ==
> Update Django to version 4.0.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:mrunge| Matthias Runge]]
> * Email: mru...@redhat.com
>
>
> == Detailed Description ==
>
> The Django project has r
On 2022-01-12, or slightly later, I plan to update c4core to version
0.1.8 [1] in Rawhide, which will bump the SONAME version. There are
currently no dependent packages; c4core will be a dependency for
rapidyaml, which is not yet packaged.
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/c4core/pull-req
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220103.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220104.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 88
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 25.23 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:29 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> - create a ticketing system for idea / text submissions (project with
> issue tracker on pagure?)
> - there, Fedora contributors can propose their cool new features /
> packages for inclusion in the next article
> - person / small group of
Hey!
i just recognized and remembered i never sent an introduction to the devel
list for Fedora
I am Luna Jernberg 31 year old non binary person
Already helped out with Fedora since Nest 2020
and done some Swedish translations for anaconda, Fedora Websites and dnf
also has done some Kernel and
Welcome to the community Vanessa.
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022, 8:16 pm Vanessa Christopher,
wrote:
> Hi, I'm Vanessa Christopher from Cameroon, an Outreachy intern with Fedora
> "Extend and improve NeuroFedora's user consumable artefacts". It's really
> been exciting learning new stuffs and joining the F
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 3:17:43 PM EST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:37:48AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 20:19 +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> > > Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:43 AM Sérgio Basto
> > > >
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:37:48AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 20:19 +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:43 AM Sérgio Basto > > > wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > a big BTW when /etc/init.d/network will be remov
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 07:15:49PM -, Vanessa Christopher wrote:
> Hi, I'm Vanessa Christopher from Cameroon, an Outreachy intern with Fedora
> "Extend and improve NeuroFedora's user consumable artefacts". It's really
> been exciting learning new stuffs and joining the Fedora community.
Awesom
On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 20:19 +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:43 AM Sérgio Basto > > wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > a big BTW when /etc/init.d/network will be removed or migrate to
> > > systemd scripts ?
> > >
> > > rpm -qf /etc/init.d/netwo
On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 10:09 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 09:19:15PM +0100, Dan Čermák wrote:
> > > new-tech? noteable-changes? new-features?
> >
> > fedora-contributor-announce?
>
> Heh: see
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/proposal-contributor-announce-mailing-li
Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:43 AM Sérgio Basto
It's deprecated and expected to be retired eventually. I doubt a
"port" would ever happen.
initscripts is needed by audit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2029105
___
devel mailing list --
Hi, I'm Vanessa Christopher from Cameroon, an Outreachy intern with Fedora
"Extend and improve NeuroFedora's user consumable artefacts". It's really been
exciting learning new stuffs and joining the Fedora community.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lis
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:10 PM Caolán McNamara wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-12-30 at 09:21 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:01:49AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > == How To Test ==
> > > 1. Check if default installed dictionary path is
> > > `/usr/share/hunspell/
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 8:34 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
> I've got this sad boy waiting for a review since September:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006685
> pasdoc - Documentation generator for Pascal source code
>
> I can review some C, C++, Pascal or shell stuff in return.
On 05. 01. 22 17:38, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 11:59 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade
wrote:
I think these packages are wrong upstream. The `sphinxcontrib`
directory is provided by python3-sphinx, and it specifically doesn't
have `__init__.py` there. Those extensions should not be ad
On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 15:58 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 09:48:13AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:43 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > a big BTW when /etc/init.d/network will be removed or migrate to
> > > systemd scripts ?
> > >
>
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 11:59 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade
wrote:
> I think these packages are wrong upstream. The `sphinxcontrib`
> directory is provided by python3-sphinx, and it specifically doesn't
> have `__init__.py` there. Those extensions should not be adding one,
> so as to keep the implici
I don't think we need to go too deep on this cloud-init vs Ignition thread; but
you have a great message here and I just want to clarify some points,
everything else you said here is fair/accurate/relevant from my PoV.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022, at 10:41 AM, David Duncan wrote:
> In most of those
> ca
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Django4.0
== Summary ==
Update Django to version 4.0.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:mrunge| Matthias Runge]]
* Email: mru...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
The Django project has regular releases about every 9 months. Django
4.0 is a major milestone,
Peter Robinson writes:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:05 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>> >
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoIfcfgFiles
>> >
>> > == Summary ==
>> > Do not not include NetworkManager support for legacy network
>> > configur
> Am 05.01.2022 um 15:05 schrieb Ben Cotton :
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoIfcfgFiles
>
> == Summary ==
> Do not not include NetworkManager support for legacy network
> configuration files by in new installations.
>
> ……
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners: Split the ifcfg plugi
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 09:48:13AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:43 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > a big BTW when /etc/init.d/network will be removed or migrate to
> > systemd scripts ?
> >
> > rpm -qf /etc/init.d/network --qf "packge = %{sourcerpm}\nsub-package =
> > %{name}
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 at 18:35, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 03. 01. 22 19:16, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Testing rpm-specs/hibernate-jpa-2.0-api.spec
> > No terminal defined for 'E' at line 1 col 2
> >
> > EPL and BSD
> >
> > What is the problem with this one ?
>
> There is no EPL in https://fedoraproj
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:33 AM Jonathan Lebon wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:46 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > That is not Ignition configuring the network, that is *you* knowing
> > what an NM file looks like and dropping it in. With cloud-init, it
> > knows how to access cloud provider data sou
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 10:17:29AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:12 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > Uhh, I think something is wrong here. How did this article get
> > namespaced like that? Maybe Ben could help fix it if you don't know
> > how that happened...
>
> Fixed.
Thank
Hi folks,
I want to add "intro to IMA signing" instructions to
https://docs.pagure.org/koji/signing/ . I wrote a basic PR at
https://pagure.io/koji/pull-request/3206 but it lacks technical
details.
- How do I generate my own new keypair so I can IMA-sign an RPM?
- Can I use my existing GPG keypa
I've got this sad boy waiting for a review since September:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006685
pasdoc - Documentation generator for Pascal source code
I can review some C, C++, Pascal or shell stuff in return.
A.FI.
___
devel mailing li
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:46 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> That is not Ignition configuring the network, that is *you* knowing
> what an NM file looks like and dropping it in. With cloud-init, it
> knows how to access cloud provider data sources to get configuration
> information and translate it into mac
On 5/01/2022 05:04, Jerry James wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM Jerry James wrote:
Happy New Year!
I am in need of some package reviews to update parts of the OCaml stack:
- ocaml-bos: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031160
- ocaml-odoc-parser: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:12 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Uhh, I think something is wrong here. How did this article get
> namespaced like that? Maybe Ben could help fix it if you don't know
> how that happened...
Fixed.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:10 AM Matthias Runge wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 05:19:24AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > As hinted in the previous paragraph, I am not involved in any
> > > development connected to Django for some time now. This is a cry for
> > > help. The whole Django stack in
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 05:19:24AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > As hinted in the previous paragraph, I am not involved in any
> > development connected to Django for some time now. This is a cry for
> > help. The whole Django stack in Fedora could use more helping hands.
> > Upstream is very good a
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 12:12:38PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 01:26:33PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
The License tag was never formally defined. If we agree that there can be
anything, then let it be.
The Pending PR here updates that to: SPDX License identifier or ex
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:52 AM David Cantrell wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 09:22:20AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:11 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:05 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 09:22:20AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:11 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:05 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoIfcfgFiles
> >
> > == Summar
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:48 AM Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022, at 9:05 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoIfcfgFiles
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Do not not include NetworkManager support for legacy network
> > configuration files by in new installati
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:43 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> a big BTW when /etc/init.d/network will be removed or migrate to
> systemd scripts ?
>
> rpm -qf /etc/init.d/network --qf "packge = %{sourcerpm}\nsub-package =
> %{name}\n"
>
> packge = initscripts-10.09-1.fc34.src.rpm
> sub-package = network-
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022, at 9:05 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoIfcfgFiles
>
> == Summary ==
> Do not not include NetworkManager support for legacy network
> configuration files by in new installations.
It'd be nice to note this Change is actually just doing for oth
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:42 AM Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022, at 9:22 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > There are none. Ignition deliberately cannot configure the network,
>
> This is not true.
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/sysconfig-network-configuration/#_
a big BTW when /etc/init.d/network will be removed or migrate to
systemd scripts ?
rpm -qf /etc/init.d/network --qf "packge = %{sourcerpm}\nsub-package =
%{name}\n"
packge = initscripts-10.09-1.fc34.src.rpm
sub-package = network-scripts
On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 09:05 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> h
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022, at 9:22 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> There are none. Ignition deliberately cannot configure the network,
This is not true.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/sysconfig-network-configuration/#_via_ignition
> and as a CoreOS tool, it is incapable of configurin
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:11 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:05 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoIfcfgFiles
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > > Do not not include NetworkManager sup
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:05 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoIfcfgFiles
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Do not not include NetworkManager support for legacy network
> > configuration files by in new installations.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:05 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoIfcfgFiles
>
> == Summary ==
> Do not not include NetworkManager support for legacy network
> configuration files by in new installations.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:Lkundrak| Lubomir Rintel]]
> * E
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoIfcfgFiles
== Summary ==
Do not not include NetworkManager support for legacy network
configuration files by in new installations.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Lkundrak| Lubomir Rintel]]
* Email:
* Name: Ana Cabral
* Email:
* Name: [[User:Thaller| Thomas
Hi,
This is now postponed and it's going to happen in two weeks, on the 19th of
January.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 3:30 PM wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Fedora Source-git SIG on 2022-01-05 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT
>At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse
>
> T
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 11:07 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
> Another case is the math symbols: Should the default sans-serif math font be
> changed to Noto Sans Math? STIX is a serif font, so it probably makes sense
> to keep as the serif math font (also considering that there is, at least at
>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 12:25:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 14:57 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > One of the packages which caught my attention and previously was not
> > installed is systemd (there always were just systemd-libs). So is
> > systemd to blame or is it som
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:41 AM Matthias Runge wrote:
>
> Hey there,
>
> would it be too late to upgrade Django for Fedora 36 to version 4.0.x?
> It may require some more package updates, not just Django itself.
>
> The releasenotes are here[1], We have version 3.2 in Fedora 35, which
> is a long-t
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220104.0):
ID: 1095837 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hey there,
would it be too late to upgrade Django for Fedora 36 to version 4.0.x?
It may require some more package updates, not just Django itself.
The releasenotes are here[1], We have version 3.2 in Fedora 35, which
is a long-term supported release (until 2024)[2].
Unfortunately, I am not able
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 11:20 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I am processing results of license-validate audit, but it takes longer...
>
> So I am providing raw results of what I have. If you are maintainer one of
> these packages you may expect either BZ report or Pagure PR for your
> package in upco
72 matches
Mail list logo
