On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 18:43:01 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf
Thanks, I reported the issue to PyPy:
https://foss.heptapod.net/pypy/pypy/-/issues/3702
Victor
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 1:26 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 07. 03. 22 10:51, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > How can someone reproduce the issue? I was asked by a developer
> > running Ubuntu. Is there an
Thanks, I reported the issue to PyPy:
https://foss.heptapod.net/pypy/pypy/-/issues/3702
Victor
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 1:26 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 07. 03. 22 10:51, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > How can someone reproduce the issue? I was asked by a developer
> > running Ubuntu. Is there an
# F36 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2022-03-14
# Time: ** 16:00 ** UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 2 proposed Beta blockers, 1 proposed Beta freeze
exception issue, and 4 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's
have a review meeting on Monday.
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2022-03-14
# Time: ** 15:00 ** UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
It's been a couple of weeks since we met, so let's get together and
see where we're at for
On 2022-03-11 09:43, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061505
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-CGI-Ex-2.53 is |perl-CGI-Ex-2.54 is
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/214 (x86_64), 23/161 (aarch64)
ID: 1170089 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1170089
ID: 1170092 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:15 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 09:26:04AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > There is a new FTBFS for KiCad [1]. I filed an issue with KiCad [2] and
> > got a comment from the project leader:
> >
> > This looks like cmake issue to
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 09:26:04AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> There is a new FTBFS for KiCad [1]. I filed an issue with KiCad [2] and got
> a comment from the project leader:
>
> This looks like cmake issue to me. For some reason cmake is creating an
> incorrect build folder:
>
This
HI Paulo,
It's great to hear from you. I hope you are well.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:42 AM Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
wrote:
> If nobody takes it, I can review.
Ankur took it already. On the other hand, he doesn't seem to have
actually started the review yet...
> I was about to ask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061505
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-CGI-Ex-2.52 is |perl-CGI-Ex-2.53 is
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. anaconda — When running anaconda on Wayland with two keyboard
layouts configured, hitting any modifier key with the second layout
selected switches to the first layout — POST
ACTION: Maintainers to package upstream PR
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 36 Candidate Beta-1.1 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
On 3/11/22 13:33, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 8:07 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 12:23:41 -0600,
>> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 09:06:01 -0600,
>>>
>>> The Fedora 36 beta is likely to slip because firefox was not building
>>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005973
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061969
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062685
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:51 AM Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 09:44 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022, at 12:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
> > >
> > > As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux
> >
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:21:09AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 09:36 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Ron Olson:
> >
> > > Building swiftlang on F36/Rawhide results in a a failure that,
> > > boiled down to its essence, appears to be:
> > >
> > > /usr/bin/ld:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 5:51 PM Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
(snip)
> I don't see the opt-out as being "simple" at all, as IIUC all it would take is
> one maintainer not paying close enough attention to reverse dependencies to
> break the i686 buildroot. Not to mention that it ends up polluting the
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 8:07 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 12:23:41 -0600,
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 09:06:01 -0600,
> >
> >The Fedora 36 beta is likely to slip because firefox was not building
> >successfully on i686, but was on other arches.
>
===
#fedora-meeting: ELN SIG 2022-03-11
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:00:13 UTC. The full logs are available
athttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-03-11/eln.2022-03-11-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf --releasever=36
On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 11:51 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Given how we use bugzilla (we do not really use any big feature there)
Uhhh! Whoah! Yes, we certainly do!
I think people may be underestimating how much of Bugzilla we use.
Replacing it would *certainly* not be a drop-in operation.
We use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062963
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details bellow:
GenericError: File upload failed:
cli-build/1647019973.7948303.oefuhEEZ/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0.18-1.fc34.src.rpm
Traceback:
File
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062963
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 01:52:53PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters wrote:
> > > Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by Fedora,
> > > personally I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
> >
> > Yes, I personally think
On 2022-03-11 1:34 a.m., Dan Horák wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 01:24:58 -0800
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I encountered a weird error[0] when building blender[1] with upstream
> patch[2] for USD support:
>
> ld.gold: fatal error: /usr/lib64: pread failed: Is a directory
looks
On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 15:31 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 8:41 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 12:12 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > Why isn't this as simple as:
> > >
> > > 1) Create an f37-multilib-build build tag with all supported arches
On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 13:52 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters
> > wrote:
> > > Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by
> > > Fedora,
> > > personally I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
> >
> > Yes, I personally think
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022, at 04:55, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Josh Boyer:
>
>> As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
>> cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with the spring
>> 2022 release coming soon. That means planning for the next release
>> will
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022, at 04:55, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Josh Boyer:
>
>> As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
>> cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with the spring
>> 2022 release coming soon. That means planning for the next release
>> will
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022, 8:53 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters
> wrote:
> > > Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by Fedora,
> > > personally I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
> >
> > Yes, I personally think gitlab.com
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/229 (x86_64), 13/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220310.n.0):
ID: 1169479 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1169479
ID: 1169540
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063243
Bug ID: 2063243
Summary: perl-Data-MessagePack-1.02 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Data-MessagePack
Keywords: FutureFeature,
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220310.0):
ID: 1169928 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1169928
ID: 1169940 Test: x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060072
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Inline-C-0.82-1.fc37 |perl-Inline-C-0.82-1.fc37
I tried building on Rawhide for aarch64 and had a similar, but different
error:
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/lto-llvm-759ff6.o: relocation
R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 against symbol `signgam@@GLIBC_2.17' which
may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object;
recompile with -fPIC
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 02:34:29PM +0100, mkol...@redhat.com wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 08:59 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 01:41:15PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 19:28 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > > wrote:
> > > > On
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 8:41 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 12:12 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > Why isn't this as simple as:
> >
> > 1) Create an f37-multilib-build build tag with all supported arches + i686,
> > and an f37-multilib{,-candidate} build targets to use it (with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060072
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Inline-C-0.82-1.fc37 |perl-Inline-C-0.82-1.fc37
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Colin Walters wrote:
> > Long term if Bugzilla slowly morphs into only being used by Fedora,
> > personally I'd prefer to have bugs/issues in gitlab instead.
>
> Yes, I personally think gitlab.com would be a good replacement for
> src.fedoraproject.org and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005973
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-f1728ecc63 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-f1728ecc63
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:25:36AM -0500, Steve Cossette wrote:
> Le jeu. 10 mars 2022, à 09 h 24, Fabio Valentini a
> écrit :
> > "Deployment tools have been deprecated for a while now"
> Ah, didn't see that on the page. Thanks!
I've occasionally used icedtea-web to run Java applets as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042867
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005973
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060072
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 08:59 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 01:41:15PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 19:28 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 17:51, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > Also I always
OLD: Fedora-36-20220310.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220311.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hello,
On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 09:36 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Ron Olson:
>
> > Building swiftlang on F36/Rawhide results in a a failure that,
> > boiled down to its essence, appears to be:
> >
> > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/lto-llvm-4fd0b1.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32
> > against undefined symbol
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220310.0):
ID: 1169352 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
* Josh Boyer:
> As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
> cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with the spring
> 2022 release coming soon. That means planning for the next release
> will start in earnest in the very near future. As some of you may
>
* Josh Boyer:
> As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
> cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with the spring
> 2022 release coming soon. That means planning for the next release
> will start in earnest in the very near future. As some of you may
>
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 10:57:29AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11. 03. 22 10:36, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:14:31AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:01:20AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063099
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On 11. 03. 22 10:36, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:14:31AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:01:20AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'll see if we can move the OCaml packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063099
Bug ID: 2063099
Summary: F36FailsToInstall: perl-Crypt-PWSafe3
Product: Fedora
Version: 36
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-PWSafe3
Assignee: c...@fea.st
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:14:31AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:01:20AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > I'll see if we can move the OCaml packages to CRB. It seems to be the
> > >
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 01:24:58 -0800
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I encountered a weird error[0] when building blender[1] with upstream
> patch[2] for USD support:
>
> ld.gold: fatal error: /usr/lib64: pread failed: Is a directory
looks like something is wrong with USD library
Hello team,
I encountered a weird error[0] when building blender[1] with upstream
patch[2] for USD support:
ld.gold: fatal error: /usr/lib64: pread failed: Is a directory
Can someone investigate the problem? I included the patch for testing
purpose.
Reference:
[0]
Hello team,
I encountered a weird error when building blender[1] with upstream
patch[2] for USD support:
ld.gold: fatal error: /usr/lib64: pread failed: Is a directory
Can someone investigate the problem? I included the patch for testing
purpose.
Reference:
[1]
On 09.03.22 21:50, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 03.03.22 11:29, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm planing on landing tesseract-5.1.0 and proj-9.0.0 in rawhide and
F36 in the coming days. I'm doing a test run in these COPR repos:
tesseract: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/tesseract5/
(all
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 01:41:15PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 19:28 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 17:51, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Also I always resented that I need two separate accounts to deal with
> > > Fedora
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220310.0):
ID: 1169336 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
V Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:35:32PM -0500, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:55:39AM +0100, Alex wrote:
> > I have seen in https://lwn.net/Articles/887313/ that you plan to remove the
> > "telnet" protocol from curl-minimal.
> > I use `curl -v telnet://` almost every day for
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 07:07:09PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:41 AM Paul Howarth wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:26:54 +0100
> > Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> >
> > > On 10/03/2022 11:55, Alex wrote:
> > > > May I suggest to leave at least the telnet
67 matches
Mail list logo
