https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079105
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078705
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-901d774743 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
On 4/27/22 07:40, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 09:03:45PM -0500, Carl George wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:25 PM Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> There is an ancient version of Puppet in EPEL-7. Version 3.6 has been
>>> EOL
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-04-27/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-04-27-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-04-27/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-04-27-16.30.txt
Log:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 4:38 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 23:44 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 17:54 -0500, Carl George wrote:
> > > > This was approved [0] in today's EPEL Steering Committee meeting.
> > > > Please continue with the process for
OK, so this is a bit meta, but I couldn't resist :P
Since the Fedora 37 proposed Changes got posted, we have got the now-
inevitable round of news stories which talk about proposed Changes as
if they're approved already, like this one:
On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 13:32 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:10 AM Adam Jackson wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 6:06 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > Right now it's not entirely clear whether this is considered part
On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 23:44 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 17:54 -0500, Carl George wrote:
> > > This was approved [0] in today's EPEL Steering Committee meeting.
> > > Please continue with the process for incompatible upgrades from
> > > step 4
> > > forward [1].
> > >
> > >
On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 17:54 -0500, Carl George wrote:
> > This was approved [0] in today's EPEL Steering Committee meeting.
> > Please continue with the process for incompatible upgrades from
> > step 4
> > forward [1].
> >
> > [0]
> >
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 9/231 (x86_64), 27/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220426.n.0):
ID: 1243349 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso
On 22. 04. 22 12:12, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
Groups. I want to be notified of what happens on group's artifacts, events
referring to the group's name.
Good point! So let's say when an artifact is owned by a group you're a member
of, you'll be considered an owner, and notified as such. Would
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 12:26:06PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 9:49 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > Replying to a reply because I can't find the original mail, sorry.
> >
> > I want to be easily able to *NOT* be notified of things I just did. In
> > fact this should
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 04:14:03PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 03:44:01PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > If I understand correctly, SSH access is a security/legal/whatever
> > no-go for nonpackagers, but can we offer some kind of standard git
> > mechanism to
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 04:00:28PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Legal ML ignored this question, so I'll post it here.
Please be patient. Messages involving legal sometimes take more than a few
days to respond to.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220426.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220427.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:17
Upgraded packages: 143
Downgraded packages: 2
Size of added packages: 5.58 MiB
Size of dropped packages
During the past week qt5 was updated on CentOS Stream 8 and 9 to version
5.15.3. This caused updates to break for KDE users running CentOS Stream 8
and 9. The epel 8 and 9 packages affected are being rebuilt at this time.
We expect everything rebuilt and through testing next week.
Question:
Hi everyone,
The Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting[1] is scheduled for
Thursday 28 April at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we
will determine the status of the F36 Final for the 3 May target date
#2[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the
wiki[3].
[1]
Hi everyone,
The Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting[1] is scheduled for
Thursday 28 April at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we
will determine the status of the F36 Final for the 3 May target date
#2[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the
wiki[3].
[1]
On 27. 04. 22 17:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 5:08 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 04. 22 10:36, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:47:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 12:24 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
== Detailed Description ==
RPM 4.18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-2f6a4a2e96 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2f6a4a2e96
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-9425f33f05 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9425f33f05
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 5:08 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 27. 04. 22 10:36, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:47:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 12:24 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>> == Detailed Description ==
> >>>
> >>> RPM 4.18 contains various
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.64 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/30
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-0df82d458e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0df82d458e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-App-cpanminus-1.7046-1
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that
you are following:
``
6.64 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/30
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Hello.
Legal ML ignored this question, so I'll post it here.
Why we can[1] add unfiltered Flathub (it contains both patent-encumbered
and proprietary software) and we can't[2] add RPM Fusion at the same time?
Btw, some of most popular OSS applications on Flathub even doesn't built
from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079156
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.64 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/29
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hello Rust packagers,
Following up on my previous emails, there are still a lot of Rust packages that
were imported to Fedora, but the recommended "initial setup" for them was never
finished.
I have started by adding them all "rust-*" packages to koschei, which makes it
way easier for me to see
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that
you are following:
``
6.64 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/29
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.64 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/28
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079156
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
|st...@silug.org
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that
you are following:
``
6.64 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/28
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079320
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
--- Comment #1 from
> On 26. 04. 22 17:50, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> And by unchanged spec file, you mean by updating the package to a new version
> and not changing anything else, or literally by building the same package
> version again? Because the rpminspect logs assume you updated it.
The former: notmuch
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.64 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/27
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079320
Bug ID: 2079320
Summary: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.13-2.fc37 FTBFS:
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-TAP-For
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 09:03:45PM -0500, Carl George wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:25 PM Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
wrote:
Hello everyone,
There is an ancient version of Puppet in EPEL-7. Version 3.6 has been
EOL for ages now. https://binford2k.com/2016/11/22/puppet-3.x-eol/ has a
nice
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078464
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066618
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066618
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that
you are following:
``
6.64 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/27
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-List-UtilsBy` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Import perl-List-UtilsBy to EPEL8
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-List-UtilsBy/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-List-UtilsBy` that
you are following:
``
Import perl-List-UtilsBy to EPEL8
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-List-UtilsBy/pull-request/1
___
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220426.0):
ID: 1243093 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-f4de93ddbc has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078705
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-da0f45d444 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d8e9c08b3a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-5b832c5195 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-b0e3cf5aad has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078705
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-6191f2362e has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
On 27. 04. 22 10:36, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:47:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 12:24 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
== Detailed Description ==
RPM 4.18 contains various improvements over previous versions, but in
particular this release addresses a
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e7404b9cd7
zchunk-1.2.2-1.el7
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1e126c870e
stb-0-0.8.20211022gitaf1a5bc.el7
The following builds
On my system (Fedora Rawhide with KDE) I suspend either by holding the
power button for a short time where it asks me what action I want to
take, or directly from the "start" menu.
On 27. 4. 2022 10:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:36:47AM +0200, Petr Pisar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079105
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-ea480de06e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ea480de06e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0bb4947962
zchunk-1.2.2-1.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a55cc9e04f
stb-0-0.8.20211022gitaf1a5bc.el8
The following builds
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:34:44AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 27.04.22 10:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:36:47AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:45:44AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > > > On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 16:28 +0200,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079105
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:47:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 12:24 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Detailed Description ==
> >
> > RPM 4.18 contains various improvements over previous versions, but in
> > particular this release addresses a whole class of symlink
On 27.04.22 10:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:36:47AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:45:44AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 16:28 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:54:10PM +0200, Sandro Mani
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:36:47AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:45:44AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 16:28 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:54:10PM +0200, Sandro Mani napsal(a):
> > > > Since some recent update (can't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079105
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com |
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189
Bug ID: 2079189
Summary: perl-App-cpanminus-1.7046 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-App-cpanminus
Keywords: FutureFeature,
V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:45:44AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 16:28 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:54:10PM +0200, Sandro Mani napsal(a):
> > > Since some recent update (can't pinpoint which exactly), everytime the
> > > system suspends, it sends a
On 4/26/22 12:53, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:50 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 4/7/22 19:13, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.18
== Summary ==
Update RPM to the [https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.18.0 4.18] release.
FWIW, this is in
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 10:08:35AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_jwhois_with_whois_in_Fedora_Workstation
> == How To Test ==
> * Run `rpm -q --whatprovides whois`
> * It should print `whois-*`
How will the replacement be implemented? Will existing
On 26. 04. 22 17:50, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Hi there,
with an unchanged spec file, I'm getting some new errors from rpminspect now.
And by unchanged spec file, you mean by updating the package to a new version
and not changing anything else, or literally by building the same package
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/229 (x86_64), 8/161 (aarch64)
ID: 1242529 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1242529
ID: 1242534 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL:
Hi,
Neal Gompa wrote:
> I don't know if it's been mentioned,
IIRC, Chris Murphy did.
> but until very recently, pretty
> much all TianoCore based UEFI implementations failed to boot
> protective MBR marked GPT partitions.
> [...]
>
On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 03:57 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 36 Candidate RC-1.2 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
>
76 matches
Mail list logo
