date:20220427

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079105

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-ea480de06e has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-ea480de06e`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ea480de06e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079105
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078560] perl-libwww-perl-6.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-79edd93b00 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-79edd93b00`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-79edd93b00

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2079189] perl-App-cpanminus-1.7046 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-0df82d458e has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-0df82d458e`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0df82d458e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078705] perl-Perl-Critic-StricterSubs-0.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078705



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-901d774743 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-901d774743`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-901d774743

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078705
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Ancient Puppet version in EPEL-7: remove it?

2022-04-27 Thread Demi Marie Obenour

On 4/27/22 07:40, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 09:03:45PM -0500, Carl George wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:25 PM Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> There is an ancient version of Puppet in EPEL-7. Version 3.6 has been
>>> EOL for ages now. https://binford2k.com/2016/11/22/puppet-3.x-eol/ has a
>>> nice EOL overview:
>>>
>>> * Puppet 3 - 2016-12-31
>>> * Puppet 4 - 2018-10-??
>>> * Puppet 5 - 2021-02-??
>>>
>>> Puppet 6 requires a newer Ruby version than is available in EL7 so
>>> rebasing the whole stack is not going to work. In theory you could use
>>> SCLs but I think it's unrealistic to expect that.
>>>
>>> However, all bugs open for Puppet relate to EPEL-7[1] so I'm wondering
>>> what to do.
>>>
>>> We can close all bugs as WONTFIX (including the security ones), but
>>> would it be better to also remove the package from EPEL-7?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
>>>
>>> [1]: 
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW_status=ASSIGNED=Fedora=puppet_id=12574395=Fedora=Fedora%20EPEL
>>
>> Retiring epel7's puppet may be the preferred option.  It is allowed
>> [0], but if you go this route please mention it on the epel-devel list
>> (and perhaps epel-announce) first.
> 
> I should have realized this, will bring it up there.
> 
>> Alternatively, have you considered doing an incompatible update [1] to
>> version 5?  It may already be EOL, but surely that's a better option
>> than the current version 3 or removing it entirely.
> 
> The Ruby version in EL7 is simply too old. In theory you could write a 
> ton of patches to make it compatible again, but the Puppet modules users 
> have may be assuming Ruby 2.4+ with Puppet 5. Also note that Puppet 5 
> itself is already EOL (for more than a year), but packaging Puppet 6 vs 
> Puppet 5 (or really, Puppet 7 as well) isn't a big difference: you need 
> a newer Ruby. After that it's all minor differences.
> 
>> [0] 
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#what_can_be_retired
>> [1] 
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/

Bundle a newer Ruby?

-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)

OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2022-04-27

2022-04-27 Thread Dusty Mabe

Minutes: 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-04-27/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-04-27-16.30.html
Minutes (text): 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-04-27/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-04-27-16.30.txt
Log: 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-04-27/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-04-27-16.30.log.html


#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_coreos_meeting



Meeting started by dustymabe at 16:30:24 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-04-27/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-04-27-16.30.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---
* roll call  (dustymabe, 16:30:29)

* Action items from last meeting  (dustymabe, 16:36:24)
  * jlebon reached out and we have reps from the nmstate here with us
today  (dustymabe, 16:36:45)
  * jaimelm and dustymabe met with Fedora releng/infra to discuss
forward strategy for Fedora container hosting. The goal is to get
off of their own infra and onto quay.io
(https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10386), thought they
have some open questions about if flatpaks can be hosted there.
(dustymabe, 16:37:21)
  * We are going to all work together over the next week to try to chase
down any open questions and then move forward with putting our FCOS
containers in quay.io if no blockers are found.  (dustymabe,
16:37:38)
  * This will lead Fedora's transition to quay.io by some months, but
the releng/infra team feels it's best if we start there for new
containers rather than go to the old infra right before a
transition.  (dustymabe, 16:37:49)

* New Package Request: nmstate-libs and nmstate  (dustymabe, 16:39:58)
  * LINK: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1175
(dustymabe, 16:40:03)
  * AGREED: nmstate is useful for dynamically configuring a running
system OR generating NM keyfiles with no running system needed. The
nmstate YAML config itself can't be used on system boot without an
accompanying service to apply the config. In order to use it for
provisioning a user would need to write a systemd unit themselves to
apply the config they wrote using Ignition. At this time
(dustymabe, 17:33:05)

* open floor   (dustymabe, 17:35:58)
  * LINK:

https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/automated-fedora-coreos-35-for-raspberry-pi-4-b-400/38359
(aaradhak[m], 17:36:34)
  * we will be having our FCOS community video meeting next Wednesday at
https://meet.google.com/meo-enbb-rur?hs=224   (dustymabe, 17:39:18)

Meeting ended at 17:41:03 UTC.




Action Items






Action Items, by person
---
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---
* dustymabe (87)
* zodbot (27)
* ffmancera (26)
* jlebon (25)
* walters (22)
* thaller (18)
* lucab (11)
* aaradhak[m] (4)
* miabbott (2)
* jbrooks (1)
* gursewak (1)
* saqali (1)
* aaradhak (1)
* jaimelm (1)
* ravanelli (1)
* mnguyen (0)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.4

.. _`MeetBot`: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Re: [HEADS UP] ImageMagick side-tag for epel8

2022-04-27 Thread Troy Dawson

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 4:38 PM Sérgio Basto  wrote:

> On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 23:44 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 17:54 -0500, Carl George wrote:
> > > > This was approved [0] in today's EPEL Steering Committee meeting.
> > > > Please continue with the process for incompatible upgrades from
> > > > step 4
> > > > forward [1].
> > > >
> > > > [0]
> > > >
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/epel/epel.2022-04-13-20.00.html
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/#process_for_incompatible_upgrades
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carl George
> > >
> > > Based on repoquery it looks like only three packages need to be
> > > rebuilt for this.
> > >
> > > converseen
> > > digikam
> > > dvdauthor
> >
> > Correct the other packages "just" use Imageagick tools , I need to
> > check
> > also packages that use perl(ImageMagick)
> >
> > I'm going start now !
>
> digikam is updated in epel8-next , I'm doing a side-tag in epel8 .
>
> This case brings one question , the packages of epel8-next will be
> branch to epel8 ?
> The way I see it is rhel 8.5 + epel 8 and centos stream 8 + epel 8 next
> , rhel 8.6 is branched from centos stream 8 and epel 8 should also be
> branched from epel 8 next . This implies that packages on epel 8 must
> have lower versions than epel 8 next  .
>
>
> what I should do with digikam ?
>

The version in digikam epel8 and epel8-next are different.  The reason is
because of a package update (opencr) that is currently in CentOS Stream 8
that won't make it into RHEL 8 until RHEL 8.6.
For the epel8 version, just do a bump and build like you have the other
packages on your list, keeping it's version the same.
I can do the epel8-next rebuild after you are done.  And when RHEL 8.6 is
released, I'll be bringing the higher version that is in epel8-next, over
to epel8.

Troy
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Change proposal: make Change proposals more obvious

2022-04-27 Thread Adam Williamson

OK, so this is a bit meta, but I couldn't resist :P

Since the Fedora 37 proposed Changes got posted, we have got the now-
inevitable round of news stories which talk about proposed Changes as
if they're approved already, like this one:

https://forums.theregister.com/forum/all/2022/04/27/fedora_starts_to_simplify_linux/

Could we consider, in future, posting a clarification for journalists
in flaming six-foot high letters (I exaggerate only slightly) at the
top of *every* proposed Change page, and *every* official mail relating
to a proposed Change, which clarifies that it's *proposed* not
*accepted*, and that means it might not happen? I feel like we'd have
to firefight less if we could do that.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Change: Legacy Xorg Driver Removal (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-04-27 Thread Adam Williamson

On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 13:32 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:10 AM Adam Jackson  wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 6:06 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> >  wrote:
> > > 
> > > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > Right now it's not entirely clear whether this is considered part of
> > > > the Change scope or not. The paragraph about the `uvesafb` driver seems
> > > > kind of aspirational and doesn't seem to commit to anything. The
> > > > "Benefit to Fedora" section states "Verified modern supported paths for
> > > > cases currently handled by vesa/fbdev", but I'm not 100% clear what is
> > > > meant by that.
> > > 
> > > IMHO, it is not acceptable to remove the vesa driver without having
> > > something like uvesafb to replace it.
> > 
> > I like how I'm being told _not_ to find out where the remaining bugs
> > are in our native drivers, and instead preserve something awful for
> > eternity.
> 
> Turns out the support story is less bad than I thought, the simpledrm
> change was more powerful than I knew. I've updated the change again
> but the short story is vga= on kcmdline will give you just as good of
> support as UEFI framebuffer.

If we can do the "make basic graphics mode do vga=ask and then write
the chosen config to the installed system bootloader" thing, then that
sounds sufficient to me. That will require co-ordination with the
anaconda team, though (and I think with bcl to get the necessary
changes into the image bootloader configurations).

Thanks for looking into it!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Re: [HEADS UP] ImageMagick side-tag for epel8

2022-04-27 Thread Sérgio Basto

On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 23:44 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 17:54 -0500, Carl George wrote:
> > > This was approved [0] in today's EPEL Steering Committee meeting.
> > > Please continue with the process for incompatible upgrades from
> > > step 4
> > > forward [1].
> > > 
> > > [0]
> > > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/epel/epel.2022-04-13-20.00.html
> > > [1]
> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/#process_for_incompatible_upgrades
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Carl George
> > 
> > Based on repoquery it looks like only three packages need to be
> > rebuilt for this.
> > 
> > converseen
> > digikam
> > dvdauthor
> 
> Correct the other packages "just" use Imageagick tools , I need to
> check
> also packages that use perl(ImageMagick)
> 
> I'm going start now ! 

digikam is updated in epel8-next , I'm doing a side-tag in epel8 .

This case brings one question , the packages of epel8-next will be
branch to epel8 ? 
The way I see it is rhel 8.5 + epel 8 and centos stream 8 + epel 8 next
, rhel 8.6 is branched from centos stream 8 and epel 8 should also be
branched from epel 8 next . This implies that packages on epel 8 must
have lower versions than epel 8 next  .


what I should do with digikam ? 





-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Re: [HEADS UP] ImageMagick side-tag for epel8

2022-04-27 Thread Sérgio Basto

On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 17:54 -0500, Carl George wrote:
> > This was approved [0] in today's EPEL Steering Committee meeting.
> > Please continue with the process for incompatible upgrades from
> > step 4
> > forward [1].
> > 
> > [0]
> > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/epel/epel.2022-04-13-20.00.html
> > [1]
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/#process_for_incompatible_upgrades
> > 
> > --
> > Carl George
> 
> Based on repoquery it looks like only three packages need to be
> rebuilt for this.
> 
> converseen
> digikam
> dvdauthor

Correct the other package "just" use Imageagick tools , I need to check
also packages that use perl(ImageMagick)

I'm going start now ! 

Thank you 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Rawhide-20220427.n.1 compose check report

2022-04-27 Thread Fedora compose checker

Missing expected images:

Minimal raw-xz armhfp

Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed

Failed openQA tests: 9/231 (x86_64), 27/161 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220426.n.0):

ID: 1243349 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243349
ID: 1243352 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243352
ID: 1243383 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243383
ID: 1243405 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243405
ID: 1243410 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243410
ID: 1243423 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_resize_lvm@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243423
ID: 1243447 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243447
ID: 1243496 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243496
ID: 1243532 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243532
ID: 1243615 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243615
ID: 1243617 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243617
ID: 1243619 Test: aarch64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243619
ID: 1243620 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243620
ID: 1243624 Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243624
ID: 1243641 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_hd_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243641
ID: 1243692 Test: aarch64 universal 
install_kickstart_firewall_configured@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243692
ID: 1243698 Test: aarch64 universal install_pxeboot@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243698

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220426.n.0):

ID: 1243293 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243293
ID: 1243314 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243314
ID: 1243391 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243391
ID: 1243393 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243393
ID: 1243419 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243419
ID: 1243430 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243430
ID: 1243486 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243486
ID: 1243491 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_fprint
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243491
ID: 1243544 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243544
ID: 1243597 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243597
ID: 1243603 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243603
ID: 1243613 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243613
ID: 1243626 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243626
ID: 1243639 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243639
ID: 1243640 Test: x86_64 universal install_serial_console
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243640
ID: 1243690 Test: aarch64 universal install_serial_console@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243690
ID: 1243700 Test: aarch64 universal install_iscsi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243700
ID: 1243764 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243764
ID: 1243765 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243765

Soft failed openQA tests: 11/231 (x86_64), 1/161 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220426.n.0):

ID: 1243342 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso

Re: The future of FMN (Fedora Messaging Notifications)


On 22. 04. 22 12:12, Aurelien Bompard wrote:

Groups. I want to be notified of what happens on group's artifacts, events
referring to the group's name.


Good point! So let's say when an artifact is owned by a group you're a member 
of, you'll be considered an owner, and notified as such. Would that work for 
you?


Unfortunately no, it won't. I am a mamber of a group that has too many 
artifacts to be notififed about all of them by default. This needs to be opt-in.



There's currently no standard way for app maintainer to declare that events 
refer to a group, as they currently can do with usernames. But maybe we should 
add that possibility, it's pretty easy.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: The future of FMN (Fedora Messaging Notifications)

2022-04-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 12:26:06PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 9:49 PM Adam Williamson
>  wrote:
> > Replying to a reply because I can't find the original mail, sorry.
> >
> > I want to be easily able to *NOT* be notified of things I just did. In
> > fact this should probably be the default. Right now my FMN
> > notifications are floods of "adamwill did X to Y" - yes, I know, I just
> > did it!
> 
> Exactly. I want to get notifications for events that are happening to
> packages that I'm associated with
> (either by being a (co-)maintainer, being a member of a co-maintainer
> group, or by "watching" a package on dist-git)
> that were *not* triggered by myself. For example:
> 
> - somebody else pushes a commit to the package on dist-git
> - somebody else launches a koji build for the package
> - somebody else submits an update containing the package to bodhi
> - koschei notices that the package starts to be FTBFS
> - somebody or something filed a bug against the package
> - etc.

Lest it sound like everyone just wants it to behave this way, I
personally _do_ like getting emails for actions I did myself. 
I find that later when I am looking back to see what changed by who I
can (sometimes surprisingly) find out it was me. :) 

So, I would prefer this be a pref (perhaps set to not notify by
default?)

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Allow non-packagers to push to dist-git forks without fedpkg

2022-04-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 04:14:03PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 03:44:01PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > If I understand correctly, SSH access is a security/legal/whatever
> > no-go for nonpackagers, but can we offer some kind of standard git
> > mechanism to authenticate? API tokens maybe?
> 
> If there is a technical thing we want to do to make Fedora easier to
> contribute to, we should figure out how to remove any legal (or "whatever")
> blockers. And mitigate any security concerns.

To my knowledge there's no legal issue around ssh access. 

It's simply that when we setup pkgs.fedoraproject.org so long ago, the
way it was done was to add packagers as local accounts so they could ssh
in. Non packagers don't have any account there, so they can't directly
ssh in. 

Ideally we would just redo this so packagers don't have real accounts
either, and just use a wrapper, but thats likely to be a bunch of work.

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Third-party repositories and Fedora

2022-04-27 Thread Matthew Miller

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 04:00:28PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Legal ML ignored this question, so I'll post it here.

Please be patient. Messages involving legal sometimes take more than a few
days to respond to.


-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220427.n.1 changes

2022-04-27 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220426.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220427.n.1

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  4
Dropped packages:17
Upgraded packages:   143
Downgraded packages: 2

Size of added packages:  5.58 MiB
Size of dropped packages:1.69 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   3.52 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 3.40 MiB

Size change of upgraded packages:   119.69 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 182.53 KiB

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: loudgain-0.6.8-9.fc37
Summary: ReplayGain 2.0 audio loudness normalizer
RPMs:loudgain
Size:247.52 KiB

Package: openrgb-0.7-1.fc37
Summary: Open source RGB lighting control
RPMs:openrgb openrgb-udev-rules
Size:5.14 MiB

Package: printer-driver-brlaser-6-1.20200420git9d7ddda.fc37
Summary: Brother laser printer driver
RPMs:printer-driver-brlaser
Size:146.57 KiB

Package: python-mrcfile-1.3.0-2.fc37
Summary: MRC2014 file format used in structural biology to store image and 
volume data
RPMs:python3-mrcfile
Size:58.29 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: rust-ab_glyph-0.2.15-1.fc37
Summary: API for loading, scaling, positioning and rasterizing OpenType font 
glyphs
RPMs:rust-ab_glyph+default-devel rust-ab_glyph+libm-devel 
rust-ab_glyph+libm2-devel rust-ab_glyph+std-devel rust-ab_glyph-devel
Size:55.72 KiB

Package: rust-alsa-0.6.0-4.fc36
Summary: Thin but safe wrappers for ALSA (Linux sound API)
RPMs:rust-alsa+default-devel rust-alsa-devel
Size:76.33 KiB

Package: rust-cgmath-0.18.0-8.fc36
Summary: Linear algebra and mathematics library for computer graphics
RPMs:rust-cgmath+default-devel rust-cgmath+mint-devel 
rust-cgmath+rand-devel rust-cgmath+serde-devel rust-cgmath+swizzle-devel 
rust-cgmath+unstable-devel rust-cgmath-devel
Size:109.70 KiB

Package: rust-cloudflare-zlib-sys-0.3.0-7.fc36
Summary: Cloudflare fork of zlib with massive performance improvements
RPMs:rust-cloudflare-zlib-sys+asm-devel 
rust-cloudflare-zlib-sys+default-devel rust-cloudflare-zlib-sys-devel
Size:144.05 KiB

Package: rust-cstr-argument-0.1.2-2.fc36
Summary: Trait for converting function arguments to null terminated strings
RPMs:rust-cstr-argument+default-devel rust-cstr-argument+nightly-devel 
rust-cstr-argument-devel
Size:27.57 KiB

Package: rust-hound-3.4.0-4.fc36
Summary: Wav encoding and decoding library
RPMs:rust-hound+default-devel rust-hound-devel
Size:50.02 KiB

Package: rust-imgui-sys-0.8.2-2.fc37
Summary: Raw FFI bindings to dear imgui
RPMs:rust-imgui-sys+default-devel rust-imgui-sys+freetype-devel 
rust-imgui-sys+pkg-config-devel rust-imgui-sys+wasm-devel rust-imgui-sys-devel
Size:543.82 KiB

Package: rust-libdeflate-sys-0.7.5-2.fc36
Summary: DEFLATE (de)compression exposed as non-streaming buffer operations
RPMs:rust-libdeflate-sys+default-devel 
rust-libdeflate-sys+freestanding-devel rust-libdeflate-sys-devel
Size:157.54 KiB

Package: rust-libsystemd-sys-0.9.3-2.fc36
Summary: FFI bindings to libsystemd and libelogind
RPMs:rust-libsystemd-sys+bus-devel rust-libsystemd-sys+default-devel 
rust-libsystemd-sys+journal-devel rust-libsystemd-sys+systemd_v245-devel 
rust-libsystemd-sys-devel
Size:61.81 KiB

Package: rust-minimp3-sys-0.3.2-4.fc36
Summary: Rust bindings for the minimp3 library
RPMs:rust-minimp3-sys+default-devel rust-minimp3-sys-devel
Size:68.55 KiB

Package: rust-news-flash-1.2.1-6.fc36
Summary: Base library for a modern feed reader
RPMs:rust-news-flash+default-devel rust-news-flash-devel
Size:121.95 KiB

Package: rust-newsblur_api-0.1.2-2.fc36
Summary: Rust implementation of the NewsBlur-API
RPMs:rust-newsblur_api+default-devel rust-newsblur_api-devel
Size:32.32 KiB

Package: rust-ogg-0.8.0-4.fc36
Summary: Ogg container decoder and encoder written in pure Rust
RPMs:rust-ogg+async-devel rust-ogg+bytes-devel rust-ogg+default-devel 
rust-ogg+futures-devel rust-ogg+tokio-io-devel rust-ogg-devel
Size:69.25 KiB

Package: rust-piston-viewport-1.0.2-1.fc37
Summary: Library for storing viewport information
RPMs:rust-piston-viewport+default-devel rust-piston-viewport-devel
Size:18.36 KiB

Package: rust-ringbuf-0.2.8-1.fc37
Summary: Lock-free SPSC FIFO ring buffer with direct access to inner data
RPMs:rust-ringbuf+benchmark-devel rust-ringbuf+default-devel 
rust-ringbuf+std-devel rust-ringbuf-devel
Size:49.75 KiB

Package: rust-rusttype-0.9.2-5.fc36
Summary: Pure Rust alternative to libraries like FreeType
RPMs:rust-rusttype+crossbeam-deque-devel 
rust-rusttype+crossbeam-utils-devel rust-rusttype+default-devel 
rust-rusttype+gpu_cache-devel rust-rusttype+has-atomics-devel 
rust-rusttype+libm-devel rust-rusttype+libm-math-devel 
rust-rusttype+linked-hash-map-devel rust-rusttype+num_cpus-devel 
rust-rusttype+rustc-hash-devel rust-rusttype+std-devel rust-rusttype-devel
Size:123.95 KiB

Package: rust

[EPEL-devel] CentOS Stream 8 and 9 - KDE un-updateable for a week

2022-04-27 Thread Troy Dawson

During the past week qt5 was updated on CentOS Stream 8 and 9 to version
5.15.3.  This caused updates to break for KDE users running CentOS Stream 8
and 9.  The epel 8 and 9 packages affected are being rebuilt at this time.
We expect everything rebuilt and through testing next week.

Question: Does this affect my RHEL/Alma/Rocky 8/9 install?
Answer: Not at this time.  This qt5 update isn't going to be released until
RHEL 8.7 and 9.1.

Question: What is being rebuilt?
Answer:
epel8 - We believe about 30 packages.  That includes all of the qt5
packages in epel8, as well as several plasma and kf5 packages that have
tight version dependencies on qt5.

epel9 - The entire KDE Plasma Desktop stack. (about 380 packages).  There
recently has been an update to wayland-protocols in Stream 9.  It didn't
break anything, but it had been an update that was needed to update to the
latest kf5 and plasma releases.  Since we knew that the qt5 update was
coming, we held off rebuilding everything until qt5 came out.  Now that it
is out, we are updating everything.

Troy Dawson
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

REMINDER: Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting tomorrow

2022-04-27 Thread Ben Cotton

Hi everyone,

The Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting[1] is scheduled for
Thursday 28 April at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we
will determine the status of the F36 Final for the 3 May target date
#2[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the
wiki[3].

[1] https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/meeting/10242
[2] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting

-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Test-Announce] REMINDER: Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting tomorrow

2022-04-27 Thread Ben Cotton

Hi everyone,

The Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting[1] is scheduled for
Thursday 28 April at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we
will determine the status of the F36 Final for the 3 May target date
#2[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the
wiki[3].

[1] https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/meeting/10242
[2] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting

-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Change: RPM 4.18 (System-Wide Change proposal)


On 27. 04. 22 17:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 5:08 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:


On 27. 04. 22 10:36, Joe Orton wrote:

On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:47:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 12:24 PM Ben Cotton  wrote:

== Detailed Description ==

RPM 4.18 contains various improvements over previous versions, but in
particular this release addresses a whole class of symlink handling
related security issues, some with CVE's, from 2021. Other notable
improvements include
* A more intuitive conditional builds macro `%bcond`


I looked this up[1] because it caught my attention. This is an
extremely welcome change and I would like to shower praise upon
everyone who worked on it.


Big +1 from me too, this is so good to see.  Thanks Panu & all.


I like this so much I've opened Fedora 36 and 35 backports:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/182
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/183

Will also try to see if this is technically possible in c9s.


It should be possible to put it in epel-rpm-macros at the worst, no?
(Related: can we get a backport to EPEL 8 and EPEL 9?)


What I've meant by "technically possible": Does the RPM version in EL 9 support 
the syntax used in the macro?


If it does, it can go to EPEL 9 and even to c9s eventually, if accepted. If it 
doesn't, we might need to use a different syntax which would require more work. 
This also applies to EL 8, but I suspect even more problems there.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078560] perl-libwww-perl-6.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-2f6a4a2e96 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2f6a4a2e96


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078560] perl-libwww-perl-6.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-79edd93b00 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-79edd93b00


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078560] perl-libwww-perl-6.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-9425f33f05 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9425f33f05


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Change: RPM 4.18 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-04-27 Thread Stephen Gallagher

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 5:08 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> On 27. 04. 22 10:36, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:47:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 12:24 PM Ben Cotton  wrote:
> >>> == Detailed Description ==
> >>>
> >>> RPM 4.18 contains various improvements over previous versions, but in
> >>> particular this release addresses a whole class of symlink handling
> >>> related security issues, some with CVE's, from 2021. Other notable
> >>> improvements include
> >>> * A more intuitive conditional builds macro `%bcond`
> >>
> >> I looked this up[1] because it caught my attention. This is an
> >> extremely welcome change and I would like to shower praise upon
> >> everyone who worked on it.
> >
> > Big +1 from me too, this is so good to see.  Thanks Panu & all.
>
> I like this so much I've opened Fedora 36 and 35 backports:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/182
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/183
>
> Will also try to see if this is technically possible in c9s.

It should be possible to put it in epel-rpm-macros at the worst, no?
(Related: can we get a backport to EPEL 8 and EPEL 9?)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-libwww-perl] PR #30: 6.64 bump


mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
6.64 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/30
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2079189] perl-App-cpanminus-1.7046 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-0df82d458e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0df82d458e


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2079189] perl-App-cpanminus-1.7046 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-App-cpanminus-1.7046-1
   ||.fc37
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-libwww-perl] PR #30: 6.64 bump


mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that 
you are following:
``
6.64 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/30
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2079189] perl-App-cpanminus-1.7046 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
   |mmasl...@redhat.com,|
   |mspa...@redhat.com  |
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Third-party repositories and Fedora

2022-04-27 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel


Hello.

Legal ML ignored this question, so I'll post it here.

Why we can[1] add unfiltered Flathub (it contains both patent-encumbered 
and proprietary software) and we can't[2] add RPM Fusion at the same time?


Btw, some of most popular OSS applications on Flathub even doesn't built 
from sources on Flathub's infra. Examples:

1. Mozilla Firefox;
2. OBS Studio;
3. Signal[3];
4. Element[4];
5. Blender[5].

All RPM Fusion packages are built from sources without network access.

[1]: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/300
[2]: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/300#comment-793791
[3]: 
https://github.com/flathub/org.signal.Signal/blob/master/org.signal.Signal.yaml#L62-L65
[4]: 
https://github.com/flathub/im.riot.Riot/blob/master/im.riot.Riot.yaml#L97-L101
[5]: 
https://github.com/flathub/org.blender.Blender/blob/master/org.blender.Blender.json#L143-L145



--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2079156] perl-Imager-1.013 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079156

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Fixed In Version||perl-Imager-1.013-1.fc37
Last Closed||2022-04-27 13:59:28




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079156
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-libwww-perl] PR #29: 6.64 bump


mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
6.64 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/29
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Rust Stack Spring Cleaning (April 2022 Edition)

2022-04-27 Thread Fabio Valentini

Hello Rust packagers,

Following up on my previous emails, there are still a lot of Rust packages that
were imported to Fedora, but the recommended "initial setup" for them was never
finished.

I have started by adding them all "rust-*" packages to koschei, which makes it
way easier for me to see at a glance whether there are any broken packages in
our Rust stack at any point in time.

There is also the question about whether anitya release-monitoring.org is
actually set up for those packages, but I don't have an easy way to make
scripted checks for this yet. If you add new Rust packages to Fedora, please
make sure to set up release-monitoring with these settings:

  project: $crate
  homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate
  backend: crates.io
  version scheme: semantic
  version filter: alpha;beta;rc;pre
  distro: Fedora
  Package: rust-$crate

In addition, I would ask of all of you to make sure all your packages have been
added to the @rust-sig group on src.fedoraproject.org (at least with "commit"
access), unless there is a very good reason not to do so (and if that is the
case for a particular package on this list, I'd be interested in knowing the
reason).

Without that, it makes it very hard for us to keep the Rust stack
up-to-date and in working order, because the "rust-sig" list / bugzilla account
does not get CC'd on new bugs that way, and your bugs do not show up in our
BugZilla queries.

If you want a scripted way of adding "@rust-sig" group to many packages, you
can generate an API token on src.fedoraproject.org (with "Modify an existing
project") access level, and use the simple Python script from this GitHub gist:

https://gist.github.com/decathorpe/9d128982cb00e2d345d9e397372538ec

Below is the list of "incompletely set-up" packages, in alphabetic order, and
at the bottom, is a list per package maintainer.

Thanks,
Fabio / decathorpe



Maintainers per package:

- rust-arrayvec0.5: eclipseo
- rust-atomic-traits: salimma
- rust-aws-nitro-enclaves-cose: pbrobinson
- rust-blsctl: javierm
- rust-clap_generate: eclipseo
- rust-clap_generate_fig: eclipseo
- rust-clircle: eclipseo
- rust-cryptoki: pbrobinson
- rust-cryptoki-sys: pbrobinson
- rust-cty: nickblack
- rust-dbus-codegen: pbrobinson
- rust-dbus-crossroads: pbrobinson
- rust-derivative: pbrobinson
- rust-directories-next: jbtrystram
- rust-drg: jbtrystram
- rust-helvum: salimma
- rust-is_ci: salimma
- rust-is_debug: atim
- rust-josekit: pbrobinson
- rust-js-sys: pbrobinson
- rust-keccak: pbrobinson
- rust-libspa: salimma
- rust-libspa-sys: salimma
- rust-navi: jbtrystram
- rust-nu-engine: salimma
- rust-nu-parser: salimma
- rust-nu-protocol: salimma
- rust-oauth2: jbtrystram, ctron
- rust-oid: pbrobinson
- rust-owo-colors: salimma
- rust-parsec-client: pbrobinson
- rust-parsec-interface: pbrobinson
- rust-phf0.8: ignatenkobrain
- rust-phf_generator0.8: ignatenkobrain
- rust-phf_macros0.8: ignatenkobrain
- rust-phf_shared0.8: ignatenkobrain
- rust-picky-asn1: pbrobinson
- rust-picky-asn1-der: pbrobinson
- rust-picky-asn1-x509: pbrobinson
- rust-pipewire: salimma
- rust-pipewire-sys: salimma
- rust-pkcs11: pbrobinson
- rust-process_control: petersen, atim
- rust-prost: pbrobinson
- rust-prost-build: pbrobinson
- rust-prost-derive: pbrobinson
- rust-prost-types: pbrobinson
- rust-psa-crypto: pbrobinson
- rust-psa-crypto-sys: pbrobinson
- rust-qstring: jbtrystram, ctron
- rust-rsa: pbrobinson
- rust-rustcat: dcavalca
- rust-sd-notify: pbrobinson
- rust-secrecy: pbrobinson
- rust-serde_with: pbrobinson
- rust-sha3: pbrobinson
- rust-shadow-rs: atim
- rust-shellwords: jbtrystram
- rust-signal: salimma
- rust-simple_asn1: pbrobinson
- rust-starship-battery: atim
- rust-supports-color: salimma
- rust-supports-hyperlinks: salimma
- rust-supports-unicode: salimma
- rust-tabular: jbtrystram
- rust-tss-esapi-sys: pbrobinson
- rust-universal-hash: pbrobinson
- rust-version: pbrobinson
- rust-versions: atim
- rust-webbrowser: jbtrystram, ctron

Packages per maintainer:

atim (5): rust-is_debug, rust-process_control, rust-shadow-rs,
rust-starship-battery, rust-versions

ctron (3): rust-oauth2, rust-qstring, rust-webbrowser

dcavalca (1): rust-rustcat

eclipseo (4): rust-arrayvec0.5, rust-clap_generate,
rust-clap_generate_fig, rust-clircle

ignatenkobrain (4): rust-phf0.8, rust-phf_generator0.8,
rust-phf_macros0.8, rust-phf_shared0.8

javierm (1): rust-blsctl

jbtrystram (8): rust-directories-next, rust-drg, rust-navi,
rust-oauth2, rust-qstring, rust-shellwords, rust-tabular,
rust-webbrowser

nickblack (1): rust-cty

pbrobinson (31): rust-aws-nitro-enclaves-cose, rust-cryptoki,
rust-cryptoki-sys, rust-dbus-codegen, rust-dbus-crossroads,
rust-derivative, rust-josekit, rust-js-sys, rust-keccak, rust-oid,
rust-parsec-client, rust-parsec-interface, rust-picky-asn1,
rust-picky-asn1-der, rust-picky-asn1-x509, rust-pkcs11, rust-prost,
rust-prost-build, rust-prost-derive,

[rpms/perl-libwww-perl] PR #29: 6.64 bump


mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that 
you are following:
``
6.64 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/29
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-libwww-perl] PR #28: 6.64 bump


mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
6.64 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/28
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2079156] perl-Imager-1.013 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079156

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
   |st...@silug.org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079156
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-libwww-perl] PR #28: 6.64 bump


mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that 
you are following:
``
6.64 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/28
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2079320] perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.13-2.fc37 FTBFS: Failed test 't/data/tests/bailout' at t/formatter.t line 40.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079320

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||p...@city-fan.org



--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth  ---
https://github.com/bleargh45/TAP-Formatter-JUnit/pull/9 fixes this for me.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079320
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Change in 201x-era python packaging macros?

2022-04-27 Thread Michael J Gruber

> On 26. 04. 22 17:50, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> 
> And by unchanged spec file, you mean by updating the package to a new version 
> and not changing anything else, or literally by building the same package 
> version again? Because the rpminspect logs assume you updated it.

The former: notmuch 0.35 to notmuch 0.36. Sorry for not being clearer.

> No, nothing has changed in the macros themselves.
> 
> 
> Sounds like a new dependency. That might have happened upstream.

Those are the python bindings, and nothing has changed upstream regarding the 
dependency.

> This looks like the new version now uses setuptools to create egg-info 
> directory. Previously, this was a file (distutils creates a file). If this 
> only 
> happens on Fedora 37, it might be setuptools 60+ related.

Again, no upstream change in that regard, and jenkins reports this on f37 only.

I guess I'll add the explicit version dependency then and look at what changed 
in setuptools.

Thanks for your hints!

Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-libwww-perl] PR #27: 6.64 bump


mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
6.64 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/27
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078560] perl-libwww-perl-6.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560

Michal Josef Spacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #9 from Michal Josef Spacek  ---
Changes:

6.64  2022-04-26 13:16:03Z
- Remove unused variable introduced in 9d73bc422 (GH#411) (Olaf Alders)

Bugfix, for r34, r35, r36 and rawhide


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2079320] New: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.13-2.fc37 FTBFS:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079320

Bug ID: 2079320
   Summary: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.13-2.fc37 FTBFS:
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
   URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-TAP-For
matter-JUnit
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit
  Assignee: berra...@redhat.com
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: berra...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2045102 (F37FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.13-2.fc37 fails to build in Fedora 37 because a test
fails:

t/01-compile.t . ok
#   Failed test 't/data/tests/bailout'
#   at t/formatter.t line 40.
# During compare:
# no element found at line 1, column 0, byte -1
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 22.
t/formatter.t .. 
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/22 subtests 

A difference between passing and failing build root is at
.



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045102
[Bug 2045102] Fedora 37 FTBFS Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079320
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Ancient Puppet version in EPEL-7: remove it?

2022-04-27 Thread Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 09:03:45PM -0500, Carl George wrote:

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:25 PM Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
wrote:

Hello everyone,

There is an ancient version of Puppet in EPEL-7. Version 3.6 has been
EOL for ages now. https://binford2k.com/2016/11/22/puppet-3.x-eol/ has a
nice EOL overview:

* Puppet 3 - 2016-12-31
* Puppet 4 - 2018-10-??
* Puppet 5 - 2021-02-??

Puppet 6 requires a newer Ruby version than is available in EL7 so
rebasing the whole stack is not going to work. In theory you could use
SCLs but I think it's unrealistic to expect that.

However, all bugs open for Puppet relate to EPEL-7[1] so I'm wondering
what to do.

We can close all bugs as WONTFIX (including the security ones), but
would it be better to also remove the package from EPEL-7?

Regards,
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden

[1]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW_status=ASSIGNED=Fedora=puppet_id=12574395=Fedora=Fedora%20EPEL

Retiring epel7's puppet may be the preferred option. It is allowed
[0], but if you go this route please mention it on the epel-devel list
(and perhaps epel-announce) first.

I should have realized this, will bring it up there.

Alternatively, have you considered doing an incompatible update [1] to
version 5? It may already be EOL, but surely that's a better option
than the current version 3 or removing it entirely.

The Ruby version in EL7 is simply too old. In theory you could write a
ton of patches to make it compatible again, but the Puppet modules users
have may be assuming Ruby 2.4+ with Puppet 5. Also note that Puppet 5
itself is already EOL (for more than a year), but packaging Puppet 6 vs
Puppet 5 (or really, Puppet 7 as well) isn't a big difference: you need
a newer Ruby. After that it's all minor differences.

[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#what_can_be_retired
[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078464] Add perl-List-UtilsBy to EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078464

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-90d261ea38 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-90d261ea38


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078464
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2066618] perl-Database-DumpTruck-1.2-21.fc37 FTBFS: Failed test 'Could retrieve table structure'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066618

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2022-04-27 11:30:44




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066618
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2066618] perl-Database-DumpTruck-1.2-21.fc37 FTBFS: Failed test 'Could retrieve table structure'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066618

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Database-DumpTruck-1.2
   ||-22.fc37
   Assignee|lkund...@v3.sk  |ppi...@redhat.com




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066618
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-libwww-perl] PR #27: 6.64 bump


mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-libwww-perl` that 
you are following:
``
6.64 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl/pull-request/27
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-List-UtilsBy] PR #1: Import perl-List-UtilsBy to EPEL8


mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-List-UtilsBy` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Import perl-List-UtilsBy to EPEL8
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-List-UtilsBy/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-List-UtilsBy] PR #1: Import perl-List-UtilsBy to EPEL8


mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-List-UtilsBy` that 
you are following:
``
Import perl-List-UtilsBy to EPEL8
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-List-UtilsBy/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220427.0 compose check report

2022-04-27 Thread Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220426.0):

ID: 1243093 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243093
ID: 1243102 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1243102

Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078560] perl-libwww-perl-6.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-f4de93ddbc has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-f4de93ddbc`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-f4de93ddbc

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078705] perl-Perl-Critic-StricterSubs-0.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078705



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-da0f45d444 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-da0f45d444`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-da0f45d444

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078705
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078251] perl-Text-Bidi-2.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-d8e9c08b3a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-d8e9c08b3a`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d8e9c08b3a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078560] perl-libwww-perl-6.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-5b832c5195 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-5b832c5195`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-5b832c5195

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078251] perl-Text-Bidi-2.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-b0e3cf5aad has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-b0e3cf5aad`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b0e3cf5aad

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2078705] perl-Perl-Critic-StricterSubs-0.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078705



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-6191f2362e has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-6191f2362e`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6191f2362e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078705
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Change: RPM 4.18 (System-Wide Change proposal)


On 27. 04. 22 10:36, Joe Orton wrote:

On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:47:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 12:24 PM Ben Cotton  wrote:

== Detailed Description ==

RPM 4.18 contains various improvements over previous versions, but in
particular this release addresses a whole class of symlink handling
related security issues, some with CVE's, from 2021. Other notable
improvements include
* A more intuitive conditional builds macro `%bcond`


I looked this up[1] because it caught my attention. This is an
extremely welcome change and I would like to shower praise upon
everyone who worked on it.


Big +1 from me too, this is so good to see.  Thanks Panu & all.


I like this so much I've opened Fedora 36 and 35 backports:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/182
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/183

Will also try to see if this is technically possible in c9s.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2022-04-27 Thread updates

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e7404b9cd7   
zchunk-1.2.2-1.el7
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1e126c870e   
stb-0-0.8.20211022gitaf1a5bc.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

argparse-manpage-3-1.el7

Details about builds:



 argparse-manpage-3-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fa4b94b123)
 Build manual page from Python ArgumentParser object

Update Information:

new upstream release: https://github.com/praiskup/argparse-
manpage/releases/tag/v3

ChangeLog:

* Wed Apr 27 2022 Pavel Raiskup  - 3-1
- new upstream release: 
https://github.com/praiskup/argparse-manpage/releases/tag/v3
* Thu Mar  3 2022 Pavel Raiskup  - 2.2-1
- new release - fix build for the setuptools v60+
* Wed Jan 19 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 2.1-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: "The system is going down for suspend NOW!" broadcast messages

2022-04-27 Thread Marián Konček

On my system (Fedora Rawhide with KDE) I suspend either by holding the 
power button for a short time where it asks me what action I want to 
take, or directly from the "start" menu.


On 27. 4. 2022 10:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:36:47AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:

V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:45:44AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a):

On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 16:28 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:

V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:54:10PM +0200, Sandro Mani napsal(a):

Since some recent update (can't pinpoint which exactly), everytime the
system suspends, it sends a "The system is going down for suspend NOW!"
broadcast message to all terminals. Any idea anyone how to switch this off?
(Running up-to-date rawhide).

How is the suspend triggered (i.e. by some explicit command, or key press, or
a desktop environment timer…)? Also please describe your enviroment, so it's
easier to reproduce.


What's wrong with the message? Do you not want to notify all the users of your
system that it will be powered down?

On a workstation?
No, you already know you are suspending and there is no need to spam
terminals, you want them to stay as they are so when yo un-suspend the
output is not "corrupted".


On a single-user system no. Ideally the emmitter of the warning should count
users of an interactive sessions.


This message is emitted by shutdown tool. That tool has --no-wall option to
disable the message. You need to find out what executes that command and then
patch it. It could be e.g. systemd/logind.

This message is emitted by logind.


Is this an upstream change?


I have no idea. I do not use suspend. I only know that a similar message is
reported for reboot and poweroff. On Fedora /usr/sbin/shutdown is provided by
systemd. I was unable to find any relevant notice in systemd's NEWS.

I don't think we should emit messages for suspend. This is probably an 
unintended
effect of recent changes, https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/cdf370626f
seems like the most likely culprit.

For some reason, I can't reproduce the issue
(tried 'systemctl suspend' and 'systemctl suspend --message …' and
'sudo busctl call org.freedesktop.login1 /org/freedesktop/login1 
org.freedesktop.login1.Manager Suspend b 0').

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


--
Marián Konček
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2079105] perl-App-cpm-0.997011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079105



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-ea480de06e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ea480de06e


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079105
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2022-04-27 Thread updates

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0bb4947962   
zchunk-1.2.2-1.el8
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a55cc9e04f   
stb-0-0.8.20211022gitaf1a5bc.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

argparse-manpage-3-1.el8
livecd-tools-30.0-1.el8
suricata-5.0.9-1.el8

Details about builds:



 argparse-manpage-3-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8bca2b5b8a)
 Build manual page from Python ArgumentParser object

Update Information:

new upstream release: https://github.com/praiskup/argparse-
manpage/releases/tag/v3

ChangeLog:

* Wed Apr 27 2022 Pavel Raiskup  - 3-1
- new upstream release: 
https://github.com/praiskup/argparse-manpage/releases/tag/v3
* Thu Mar  3 2022 Pavel Raiskup  - 2.2-1
- new release - fix build for the setuptools v60+
* Wed Jan 19 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 2.1-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild




 livecd-tools-30.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4330344c6b)
 Tools for building live CDs

Update Information:

Release 30.0 (ngompa13)

ChangeLog:

* Tue Apr 26 2022 Neal Gompa  - 1:30.0-1
- Release 30.0 (ngompa13)
- imgcreate/fs.py: abort on hard-unmount failure (lersek)
- imgcreate/util: Fix errors import (T-vK) (#2078710)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2078710 - livecd-tools-29.0-1.fc36: ModuleNotFoundError: No module 
named 'errors'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078710




 suricata-5.0.9-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-667d59a6db)
 Intrusion Detection System

Update Information:

Various security, performance, accuracy and stability issues have been fixed.

ChangeLog:

* Tue Apr 26 2022 Steve Grubb  5.0.9-1
- New security and bugfix release


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: "The system is going down for suspend NOW!" broadcast messages

2022-04-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:34:44AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> 
> On 27.04.22 10:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:36:47AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:45:44AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > > > On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 16:28 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > > > V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:54:10PM +0200, Sandro Mani napsal(a):
> > > > > > Since some recent update (can't pinpoint which exactly), everytime 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > system suspends, it sends a "The system is going down for suspend 
> > > > > > NOW!"
> > > > > > broadcast message to all terminals. Any idea anyone how to switch 
> > > > > > this off?
> > > > > > (Running up-to-date rawhide).
> > How is the suspend triggered (i.e. by some explicit command, or key press, 
> > or
> > a desktop environment timer…)? Also please describe your enviroment, so it's
> > easier to reproduce.
> 
> On my part it's a current fedora rawhide with systemd-251~rc1-3.fc37.x86_64,
> and triggered when closing the laptop lid or pressing the suspend button.

Environment? I'm asking because it matters if it's gnome initiating the event
or logind…

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2079105] perl-App-cpm-0.997011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079105

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-App-cpm-0.997.011-1.fc
   ||37




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079105
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Change: RPM 4.18 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-04-27 Thread Joe Orton

On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:47:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 12:24 PM Ben Cotton  wrote:
> > == Detailed Description ==
> >
> > RPM 4.18 contains various improvements over previous versions, but in
> > particular this release addresses a whole class of symlink handling
> > related security issues, some with CVE's, from 2021. Other notable
> > improvements include
> > * A more intuitive conditional builds macro `%bcond`
> 
> I looked this up[1] because it caught my attention. This is an
> extremely welcome change and I would like to shower praise upon
> everyone who worked on it.

Big +1 from me too, this is so good to see.  Thanks Panu & all.

Regards, Joe
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: "The system is going down for suspend NOW!" broadcast messages

2022-04-27 Thread Sandro Mani



On 27.04.22 10:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:36:47AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:

V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:45:44AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a):

On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 16:28 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:

V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:54:10PM +0200, Sandro Mani napsal(a):

Since some recent update (can't pinpoint which exactly), everytime the
system suspends, it sends a "The system is going down for suspend NOW!"
broadcast message to all terminals. Any idea anyone how to switch this off?
(Running up-to-date rawhide).

How is the suspend triggered (i.e. by some explicit command, or key press, or
a desktop environment timer…)? Also please describe your enviroment, so it's
easier to reproduce.


On my part it's a current fedora rawhide with 
systemd-251~rc1-3.fc37.x86_64, and triggered when closing the laptop lid 
or pressing the suspend button.


Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: "The system is going down for suspend NOW!" broadcast messages

2022-04-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:36:47AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:45:44AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 16:28 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:54:10PM +0200, Sandro Mani napsal(a):
> > > > Since some recent update (can't pinpoint which exactly), everytime the
> > > > system suspends, it sends a "The system is going down for suspend NOW!"
> > > > broadcast message to all terminals. Any idea anyone how to switch this 
> > > > off?
> > > > (Running up-to-date rawhide).

How is the suspend triggered (i.e. by some explicit command, or key press, or
a desktop environment timer…)? Also please describe your enviroment, so it's
easier to reproduce.

> > > What's wrong with the message? Do you not want to notify all the users of 
> > > your
> > > system that it will be powered down?
> > 
> > On a workstation?
> > No, you already know you are suspending and there is no need to spam
> > terminals, you want them to stay as they are so when yo un-suspend the
> > output is not "corrupted".
> > 
> On a single-user system no. Ideally the emmitter of the warning should count
> users of an interactive sessions.
> 
> > > This message is emitted by shutdown tool. That tool has --no-wall option 
> > > to
> > > disable the message. You need to find out what executes that command and 
> > > then
> > > patch it. It could be e.g. systemd/logind.

This message is emitted by logind.

> > Is this an upstream change?
> > 
> I have no idea. I do not use suspend. I only know that a similar message is
> reported for reboot and poweroff. On Fedora /usr/sbin/shutdown is provided by
> systemd. I was unable to find any relevant notice in systemd's NEWS.

I don't think we should emit messages for suspend. This is probably an 
unintended
effect of recent changes, https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/cdf370626f
seems like the most likely culprit. 

For some reason, I can't reproduce the issue
(tried 'systemctl suspend' and 'systemctl suspend --message …' and
'sudo busctl call org.freedesktop.login1 /org/freedesktop/login1 
org.freedesktop.login1.Manager Suspend b 0').

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2079105] perl-App-cpm-0.997011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079105

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|jples...@redhat.com |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079105
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2079189] New: perl-App-cpanminus-1.7046 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189

Bug ID: 2079189
   Summary: perl-App-cpanminus-1.7046 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-App-cpanminus
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com,
mspa...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 1.7046
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.7045-1.fc36
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-cpanminus/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2636/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079189
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: "The system is going down for suspend NOW!" broadcast messages

2022-04-27 Thread Petr Pisar

V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:45:44AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 16:28 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > V Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:54:10PM +0200, Sandro Mani napsal(a):
> > > Since some recent update (can't pinpoint which exactly), everytime the
> > > system suspends, it sends a "The system is going down for suspend NOW!"
> > > broadcast message to all terminals. Any idea anyone how to switch this 
> > > off?
> > > (Running up-to-date rawhide).
> > > 
> > What's wrong with the message? Do you not want to notify all the users of 
> > your
> > system that it will be powered down?
> 
> On a workstation?
> No, you already know you are suspending and there is no need to spam
> terminals, you want them to stay as they are so when yo un-suspend the
> output is not "corrupted".
> 
On a single-user system no. Ideally the emmitter of the warning should count
users of an interactive sessions.

> > This message is emitted by shutdown tool. That tool has --no-wall option to
> > disable the message. You need to find out what executes that command and 
> > then
> > patch it. It could be e.g. systemd/logind.
> 
> Is this an upstream change?
> 
I have no idea. I do not use suspend. I only know that a similar message is
reported for reboot and poweroff. On Fedora /usr/sbin/shutdown is provided by
systemd. I was unable to find any relevant notice in systemd's NEWS.

-- Petr


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Change: RPM 4.18 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-04-27 Thread Panu Matilainen


On 4/26/22 12:53, Fabio Valentini wrote:

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:50 AM Panu Matilainen  wrote:


On 4/7/22 19:13, Ben Cotton wrote:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.18

== Summary ==
Update RPM to the [https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.18.0 4.18] release.



FWIW, this is in rawhide now. Submitted yesterday already but some
bodhi/koji delay caused it to only go live today AFAICS.

As per the usual drill, if you so much as suspect a bug/regression in
rpm, don't dwell on it, just go ahead and file it. A few possible false
positives early on is a cheap price to pay compared to having to do
rebuilds en masse later.


I would have appreciated it if you at least waited with pushing it to
rawhide until the FESCo ticket was approved...


Indeed. I do know how the process goes, been through it many, many 
times, and not sure what made me short-circuit it this time around. 
Perhaps it was the distressed state of mind from our dog getting hit by 
a car on Monday morning.


Apologies for that, and having seen the fesco meeting log - indeed it 
would not hurt to say wait for explicit APPROVED stamp, no matter how 
obvious it seems.


Oh, and the dog appears okay. Seems we were very, very lucky there.

- Panu -
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Change: Replace jwhois package with whois for Fedora Workstation (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-04-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 10:08:35AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_jwhois_with_whois_in_Fedora_Workstation
> == How To Test ==
> * Run `rpm -q --whatprovides whois`
> * It should print `whois-*`

How will the replacement be implemented? Will existing installations
be upgraded?

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Change in 201x-era python packaging macros?