https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106752
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ON_QA
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-463787a597
seamonkey-2.53.13-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
R-Rcpp-1.0.9-1.el7
R-qtl-1.52-1.el7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102698
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102614
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103378
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Socket-2.035-1.fc37|perl-Socket-2.035-1.fc37
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102614
Bug 2102614 depends on bug 2102624, which changed state.
Bug 2102624 Summary: Add perl-Devel-ArgNames to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102624
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102624
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106528
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
It's not even a question worth asking because it's both impractical and
unlikely to actually fix the situation we have.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105729
--- Comment #9 from Hans de Goede ---
Thanks, that is a bit of a weird backtrace.
What GPU are you using and which driver are you using with this GPU ? Is this
perhaps inside a virtual-machine ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105729
--- Comment #8 from Sergio Basto ---
bt
#0 0x in ?? ()
#1 0x7fffdf70e330 in __glXGetDrawableAttribute () from
/lib64/libGLX_mesa.so.0
#2 0x7fffe9f4d2c4 in X11_GL_GetSwapInterval (_this=0x56bb3db0) at
Jul 13, 2022 1:13:38 PM Adam Williamson :
> If they need to be rebuilt for an API/ABI change, then by policy they
> should be grouped together. We do not want a situation where the
> API/ABI change gets pushed stable but some of the rebuilds do not, or
> vice versa.
We're not talking about
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 03:38:29PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Bodhi is a nice interface to create multi-builds update from side-tags,
> but it is not really optimized for massive updates. In the past we had
> some troubles pushing updates with a lot of builds. There are too many
>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 03:19:12PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> On 7/13/22 15:13, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:34:12PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> >> Hi Fedora Devs,
> >>
> >> Would someone be able to help getting an official-respin done from F36
> >> latest please? Similar
On 7/13/22 15:13, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:34:12PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
>> Hi Fedora Devs,
>>
>> Would someone be able to help getting an official-respin done from F36
>> latest please? Similar to what was done for the Carbons etc.
>>
>> We need one for the Z13 & Z16
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:34:12PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> Hi Fedora Devs,
>
> Would someone be able to help getting an official-respin done from F36
> latest please? Similar to what was done for the Carbons etc.
>
> We need one for the Z13 & Z16 preload. We're waiting on one FW fix but
>
My 2 cents... we should try and get bodhi (and the rest of the pipeline)
to work with these large updates if at all possible.
Having releng merge tags works of course, but as Adam pointed out, it
skips our CI and feedback testing area. Additionally, it's more work to
releng folks and more
On Sunday, 10 July 2022 at 19:43, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Hello.
>
> fmt 9.0.x update will include a soversion bump from .8 to .9. It has both
> API and ABI changes.
[...]
> mkvtoolnix
mkvtoolnix updated and built in the side tag:
Hi Fedora Devs,
Would someone be able to help getting an official-respin done from F36
latest please? Similar to what was done for the Carbons etc.
We need one for the Z13 & Z16 preload. We're waiting on one FW fix but
Fedora itself is in good shape (at least from my testing) so I want to
get an
On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 19:49 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 7:32 PM Maxwell G via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 22/07/13 08:58AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > It's also where we usually route *manual* testing feedback. If people
> > > can't comment and karma a Bodhi update,
On 22/07/13 07:49PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I wonder if it would have made sense to have submitted those 300+
> builds in separate bodhi updates (at least in several smaller batches,
> if not individually)?
> At least in this case, that would've been a little bit more work, but
> would have
On 22/07/13 05:35PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > This is what we (I) aren't sure of, and that's why I first obtain the
> capabilities manually and then query for them. If someone can confirm
> that this is indeed the case, that would certainly simplify things.
Here is confirmation:
```
sudo dnf
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 7:32 PM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
> On 22/07/13 08:58AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > It's also where we usually route *manual* testing feedback. If people
> > can't comment and karma a Bodhi update, where can they test this big
> > and very-potentially-destabilizing
On 22/07/13 08:58AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's also where we usually route *manual* testing feedback. If people
> can't comment and karma a Bodhi update, where can they test this big
> and very-potentially-destabilizing change?
The go rebuilds in question are not very destabilizing, and they
On 6/30/22 10:23, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I take a pretty dim view towards arguments about "Flathub is
untrusted" and "Flathub packaging is poor" since proponents of these
arguments conveniently ignore the fact that traditional RPMs are
totally unsandboxed. [...]
Opponents of Flatpak have
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 18:43, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 12:25, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 18:13, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> >
>> > Maxwell G via devel writes:
>> >
>> > > I believe Miro uses this for the FTI bugs. It tends to be more accurate,
>> >
Hello,
Thanks for that---some really useful bits in there that I wasn't aware
of.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 10:09:10 -0500, Maxwell G wrote:
> I don't think you need to do all of this. With
>
> ```
> sudo dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide -q --whatrequires dcmtk | xargs sudo dnf
> repoquery
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 12:25, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 18:13, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> >
> > Maxwell G via devel writes:
> >
> > > I believe Miro uses this for the FTI bugs. It tends to be more
> accurate,
> > > especially when there hasn't been a compose for a couple days. If
Jul 13, 2022 10:45:02 AM Mattia Verga via devel :
> Meanwhile I'll keep an eye on the recent massive Golang update (which
> carries 315 builds...) to see if it shows any hiccups. (I'm quite
> surprised it didn't screw up already)
The recent 315 build F35 Bodhi update is not the first one that
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 18:13, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Maxwell G via devel writes:
>
> > I believe Miro uses this for the FTI bugs. It tends to be more accurate,
> > especially when there hasn't been a compose for a couple days. If this
> > is something people are interested in, I think it's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106752
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106752
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Hi All,
QATlib 22.07 (https://github.com/intel/qatlib) is going to be released
in about 2 weeks.
This will include a soversion bump (from 2 to 3).
I can rebuild the dependent packages (qatlib and qatengine) once qatlib
is be updated.
Regards,
--
Giovanni
Maxwell G via devel writes:
> I believe Miro uses this for the FTI bugs. It tends to be more accurate,
> especially when there hasn't been a compose for a couple days. If this
> is something people are interested in, I think it's worthwhile to
> include this repo definition in fedora-packager.
On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 15:38 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Bodhi is a nice interface to create multi-builds update from side-tags,
> but it is not really optimized for massive updates. In the past we had
> some troubles pushing updates with a lot of builds. There are too many
> things done
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102698
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
Bodhi is a nice interface to create multi-builds update from side-tags,
but it is not really optimized for massive updates. In the past we had
some troubles pushing updates with a lot of builds. There are too many
things done in the background that can break while processing a massive
update and
On 22/07/13 02:19PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm sure this exists somewhere but I couldn't find one, so with the help
> of folks on #fedora-devel, I hacked up this simple shell script to get
> the all the deps of a package. It's useful when your package update
> includes a soname bump,
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 16/239 (x86_64), 31/167 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220712.n.0):
ID: 1323573 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
On 7/11/22 Marius Schwarz wrote:
I have just create(d/ not finished yet, started 15 minutes ago) a ~2.5 GB rpm
and found, that rpmbuild is an extrem bottleneck.
IMHO, this is caused by a fileread function which reads files in 32k blocks,
which is very slow and extrem IO intensive. The result
ive been trying to rebuild their rpm using only the missing agents and
am having trouble getting the sources at a minimum. would someone be
able and interested in helping get these other agents into epel?
i am happy to test and will be a constant user, but not sure i am the
best for long term
On Fri, 01 Jul 2022 11:56:38 -
"Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote:
> Blueman, the bluetooth manager [0], requires the user to be in the
> "wheel" group in order to perform certain functions (like
> enabling/disabling bluetooth). This leads to a sub-optimal user
> experience, where the user is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102685
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(walt@gouldfamily.
On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 14:19 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm sure this exists somewhere but I couldn't find one,
(IMHO) The script that give really all deps is
find_unblocked_orphans.py from
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans.py
, you can use it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102687
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102581
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106394
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102698
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102698
--- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Paul, you have access now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102698
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102581
--- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
You have access now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102581
Hi folks,
I'm sure this exists somewhere but I couldn't find one, so with the help
of folks on #fedora-devel, I hacked up this simple shell script to get
the all the deps of a package. It's useful when your package update
includes a soname bump, and you need to figure out what packages need to
be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106752
Bug ID: 2106752
Summary: perl-Chart-2.403.2 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Chart
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 6:29 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 06:34:16PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> > > > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
> > > > which have their
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 2:46 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-07-11 at 07:02 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> > >
> > > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora
Hello folks,
I am a software engineer who has worked mainly in startups. I have made
very few contributions to some free/open source software, but that will be
changing :) I just created a package review(
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106699) it is about a new
package with
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220712.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220713.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 119
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.69 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 06:34:16PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> > > Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
> > > which have their own somewhat different release/life cycles? What about
> > > module lifecycles?
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 08:52:28AM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 6:02 AM Josh Boyer
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
> > >
> > > Another - what do we do about, e.g.,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102581
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
I can take care of the build if you grant me access. My FAS username is
jplesnik.
It needs to be built twice due to bootstrap.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
Hi All!
On 7/6/22 01:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 06. 07. 22 1:17, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 06. 07. 22 0:14, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Stephen Smoogen wrote:
Hyperbole aside, it isn't a joke. Looking at the chain we see a common
If mesa's i686 support should be removed, then this proposal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102614
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102698
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
--- Comment #1 from
On 7/13/22 09:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 13. 07. 22 8:58, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
Has a bug been filed against subversion (and other low-lying deps) yet?
The bugs were filled agaisnt all native direct depndencies of java(-devel) and
against all transitive depndencies of java, which are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Github
|
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220712.0):
ID: 1323555 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106528
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106528
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-8bcc85b42a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8bcc85b42a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106640
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106394
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106528
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106640
Bug ID: 2106640
Summary: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5-1.42 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106394
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220712.0):
ID: 1323539 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 13. 07. 22 8:58, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
Has a bug been filed against subversion (and other low-lying deps) yet?
(I could not see any bug and wondering why not?)
Yes and it has been fixed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103909
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC:
Has a bug been filed against subversion (and other low-lying deps) yet?
(I could not see any bug and wondering why not?)
Naively it looks like the filed bugs are more targeting higher dependent
packages which is less useful.
I think it is the immediate dependencies like subversion (and possibly
75 matches
Mail list logo
