https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109629
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099976
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-DBIx-Simple-1.37-16.el
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102687
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102659
Bug 2102659 depends on bug 2102687, which changed state.
Bug 2102687 Summary: Add perl-Text-RecordParser to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102687
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102597
Bug 2102597 depends on bug 2102658, which changed state.
Bug 2102658 Summary: Add perl-SQL-Abstract-Classic to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102658
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022, Marcus Müller wrote:
Since the pgtk toolkit supports both X and wayland under the hood, I'd very
much propose that we do not only package an emacs-pgtk binary, but also, that
it becomes what you get by default (i.e. when you install and run `emacs`).
The emacs developers
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 2:10 PM Dan Čermák
wrote:
> Sorry for breaking your packages Jerry. Maybe we should add some gating
> tests to prevent this kind of breakage in the future. Would you have
> some details what happened?
Bigloo was easy to fix, so no problem there. The pvs-sbcl package
uses
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> It would be entirely possible to mark the package as deprecated, but
> also give it to new maintainers.
Why not leave the decision to the new maintainers then?
I do not see a good reason to prevent adding software depending on pcre (1)
as long as somebody maintains pcre
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 12:23 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Given that there's a very long list of affected packages, just
> > dropping the package in a few weeks would have disastrous effects on
> > Fedora.
> > I also see core components of several Editions and
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 11:47 PM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> On 22/07/22 10:24PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > the script that determines leaf packages in the Rust SIG
>
> Can you provide a link to this?
I can, now that I've published it (again):
https://pagure.io/ironthree/fedora-rust-sig-leaf-check
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Given that there's a very long list of affected packages, just
> dropping the package in a few weeks would have disastrous effects on
> Fedora.
> I also see core components of several Editions and Spins on that list,
> so I assume just dropping pcre would also make QA,
(It seems my previous message didn't send properly...)
On 22/07/22 10:24PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> the script that determines leaf packages in the Rust SIG
Can you provide a link to this?
> $ (dnf repoquery --whatrequires pcre ; dnf repoquery --whatrequires
> pcre-cpp ; dnf repoquery
On 22/07/22 10:24PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> the script that determines leaf packages in the Rust SIG
Can you provide a link to this?
> $ (dnf repoquery --whatrequires pcre ; dnf repoquery --whatrequires
> pcre-cpp ; dnf repoquery --whatrequires pcre-devel ; dnf repoquery
> --whatrequires
On Fri, 2022-07-22 at 22:50 +0200, Dan Čermák wrote:
> David Malcolm writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 13:29 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Emacs_28
> > >
> > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > > process, proposals
David Malcolm writes:
> On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 13:29 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Emacs_28
>>
>> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
>> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
>> community feedback. This
Hi,
Lukas Javorsky writes:
> i3
> i3-gaps
there is a patch to make i3 (and thus i3-gaps) compatible with pcre2 [1],
which has been merged upstream. I can cherry pick it and rebuild i3 in
Rawhide without requiring pcre, if this is urgent. Otherwise I'd rather
wait for the next upstream release.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 04:26:28PM -, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to take over the orphaned package dnstracer.
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnstracer
>
> I submitted a ticket with releng for this as there was no "take" button
> present.
>
>
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:24:21PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On 22/07/22 09:08AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > notmuch failed to build from source because of a strange test suite failure
> > on ppc64le:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89837091
> >
> > The
* Lukas Javorsky [22/07/2022 14:24] :
>
> perl-HTML-Template-Pro
I'll build against pcre2 in the coming days (probably this weekend).
Emmanuel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 08:24:32AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 8:22 AM Lukas Javorsky wrote:
>
> Thanks for all of the replies,
>
> The list of affected packages I've provided was generated using the 'dnf
> repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires pcre'
> Is
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:24:00PM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> coccinelle
This is an optional dependency but we'd lose a particular feature by
disabling it. I have asked upstream if they plan to port to PCRE2.
Also the OCaml bindings they are using for regexps don't support PCRE2
(see below).
On 22/07/22 09:08AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> notmuch failed to build from source because of a strange test suite failure
> on ppc64le:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89837091
>
> The only failing test is a pytest run on the bindings
>
> ```
> T391-python-cffi:
On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 13:29 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Emacs_28
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c06521ff93
chromium-103.0.5060.114-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
tito-0.6.21-1.el7
Details about builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102581
Bug 2102581 depends on bug 2102614, which changed state.
Bug 2102614 Summary: Add perl-Data-Dumper-Concise to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102614
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102698
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102635
Bug 2102635 depends on bug 2102698, which changed state.
Bug 2102698 Summary: Add perl-UNIVERSAL-moniker to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102698
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106528
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-File-MimeInfo-0.33-1.f |perl-File-MimeInfo-0.33-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102614
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Data-Dumper-Concise-2.
V Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 03:21:02PM +0200, Lukas Javorsky napsal(a):
> The list of affected packages I've provided was generated using the 'dnf
> repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires pcre'
>
> Is this command giving the right output or should I use another? If so
> which one?
>
If I run your command
Hi,
I'd like to take over the orphaned package dnstracer.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnstracer
I submitted a ticket with releng for this as there was no "take" button present.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10915
My username is jonathanspw
Next failure is portmidi due to "Drop_i686_JDKs"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs
I don't know how I missed that change proposal. I cannot even make sense of the
English in those template mails (never got any myself). This is going to be a
lot of fun ...
After a lot of discussions, testing, trials, errors, patching and more
testing, we have worked out the next phases of our KDE EPEL Roadmap.
As a reminder, we are trying to do updates just once a year, corresponding
with minor RHEL releases. This gives us the stability that Enterprise
users
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109629
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 03:21:02PM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Thanks for all of the replies,
>
> The list of affected packages I've provided was generated using the 'dnf
> repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires pcre'
> Is this command giving the right output or should I use another? If so
> which
Thanks for all of the replies,
The list of affected packages I've provided was generated using the 'dnf
repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires pcre'
Is this command giving the right output or should I use another? If so
which one?
We will definitely discuss all of these concerns within the team and
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 8:25 AM Lukas Javorsky wrote:
>
> As a result of this announcement, the older PCRE library in Fedora will be
> retired.
> Without upstream support, we don't have enough capacity to keep up with the
> security and bugs-related issues, and thus we will support only the new
On 22/07/2022 14:24, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
As from the pcre-8.45, the upstream stopped supporting this library.
If it builds from sources we can maintain it in downstream due to a big
number of dependent packages.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On 7/22/22 08:26, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
>> Hence, I am not convinved the benefit really outweighs the effort
>> here. Modifying your kernel command line is invasive, and hackish, and
>> hence I think it's OK to leave it out of the model.
> It may be
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 12:56:47 UTC
From 69172a85ad5fcf9ca1ebbbcefe45f510bf93adf0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 12:56:42 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109851
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 2:25 PM Lukas Javorsky wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As from the pcre-8.45, the upstream stopped supporting this library. The
> recommended procedure is to switch onto the new pcre2 library that has full
> upstream support. [1]
>
> As a result of this announcement, the older PCRE
V Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:24:00PM +0200, Lukas Javorsky napsal(a):
> As from the pcre-8.45, the upstream stopped supporting this library. The
> recommended procedure is to switch onto the new pcre2 library that has full
> upstream support. [1]
>
> As a result of this announcement, the older PCRE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109851
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 12:28:53 UTC
From 225308efc802d3853ff74d4f5166d428f6211e3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 12:28:49 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 12:27:18 UTC
From 4ec304ab6b648f706731e93386a012be35e5b966 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 12:27:13 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
> Hence, I am not convinved the benefit really outweighs the effort
> here. Modifying your kernel command line is invasive, and hackish, and
> hence I think it's OK to leave it out of the model.
It may be invasive or hackish, but sometimes it is
Hi,
As from the pcre-8.45, the upstream stopped supporting this library. The
recommended procedure is to switch onto the new pcre2 library that has full
upstream support. [1]
As a result of this announcement, the older PCRE library in Fedora will be
retired.
Without upstream support, we don't
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 12:18:54 UTC
From da385d99dfca3b249f525d9c1ddc039a2b4bb03c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 12:18:49 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 12:18:26 UTC
From bcaa6d36c3fdac580d1e1b85f36abf97b36ef77b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 12:18:21 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 at 08:43, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 at 16:12, Dan Čermák
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kevin and all,
>>
>> "Kevin P. Fleming" writes:
>>
>> > On 7/20/22 14:57, Marcus Müller wrote:
>> >> Oh! That comes as a surprise. Let me try a rebuild!
>> >>
>> >> :( I was
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team.
If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or
contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat (https://libera.chat/).
Week: 18th - 22nd of July 2022
If you wish to read this in
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 11:54:04 UTC
From e550d776c33b70d6b1565835d9990ddd8de8ea82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 11:53:59 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109851
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Github
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109629
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Bauer ---
Thank you, sir.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109629
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109500
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109851
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
URI bisected to:
commit f4183117b1b19fc66918a2ea0b8db0527884870e (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
Author: Perlbotics
Date: Tue Jun 7 11:18:57 2022 +0200
uri-test: use local implementation (./lib) while
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 11:06:53 UTC
From 3476295c324466158e0fc73f4349892f36b5a721 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 11:06:48 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 11:06:13 UTC
From f3f2f386e0f47224fba14bb1451da20a93b991a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 11:06:08 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109851
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
This is triggered by upgrading perl-URI from 5.10-3.fc37 to 5.11-1.fc37.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109851
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 10:56:45 UTC
From ea9c6976523204fbee3d234e3e61b8150cdbee14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 10:56:39 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 10:43:17 UTC
From bc9f42b5731efa051abd71b64e533efaad6fe193 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 10:43:12 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 10:39:59 UTC
From de56e7f4ada96e5c250ff9b2bedb7c3547f2c2b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 10:39:54 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 10:37:08 UTC
From f9606c3d753838a4fd6426ca0af45c0880d690da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 10:37:03 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 10:36:59 UTC
From 6576698bd6fae37b79529777f1207857f127347c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 10:36:54 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 37 RC 20220722.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
On 7/22/22 05:40, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mi, 20.07.22 20:48, Demi Marie Obenour (demioben...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>> So, in my view of the world, the kernel command line is fixated in the
>>> unified kernel image (if you use systemd-stub, this already happens if
>>> a .cmdline PE section
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109851
Bug ID: 2109851
Summary: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP-2.28-12.fc37
FTBFS: tests fail: I had a problem posting to event
TOP of session 1 for DIR handler '^/$'. As reported by
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 10:09:50 UTC
From 353eea09166c5d7bc5053bead872c8327b436be2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 10:09:45 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
On Do, 21.07.22 05:56, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
> >> We recently did
> >> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/1840 for Fedora
> >> CoreOS (more background:
> >> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1244 ) and
> >> I'd like to consider applying
On Mi, 20.07.22 20:48, Demi Marie Obenour (demioben...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > So, in my view of the world, the kernel command line is fixated in the
> > unified kernel image (if you use systemd-stub, this already happens if
> > a .cmdline PE section exists, and SecureBoot is on). If you want to
>
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 09:36:40 UTC
From 3cffde484d3a6ec7b7078d2da0181c56befdddf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 09:36:35 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 09:36:29 UTC
From 52235506cf9c08a842f4c7bf9f9c1b4c5757d39b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 09:36:24 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 09:36:18 UTC
From 205b332debc689bb1019175937da29c3403a00b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 09:36:13 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
notmuch failed to build from source because of a strange test suite failure on
ppc64le:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89837091
The only failing test is a pytest run on the bindings
```
T391-python-cffi: Testing python bindings (pytest)
FATAL:
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 08:53:37 UTC
From 0dd6fff58745a6024238538794d6dc1a50bf149e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 08:53:31 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 08:50:13 UTC
From 92c46d44e4abb07ce12d0df0e18052ec53041a3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 08:50:08 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 07:42:07 UTC
From 874ea3f38f47a6309ab7071f8cb07a2458ea51ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 07:42:02 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 07:40:46 UTC
From 63c9d31247132bd862ee2902c8fce3731899c81f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 07:40:42 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 07:39:27 UTC
From f56ca195dd27513587a8884bf253864c8b611d5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 07:39:22 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 07:36:17 UTC
From 8260adaa4a4e9e4526110954203853eeeda10030 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 07:36:12 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 07:27:44 UTC
From af8d44a5ab2a678ebd8c53bf1860458d0599089e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 07:27:39 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:39:55PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:56 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 16:48:02 +0200
> > Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > > On 15. 07. 22 23:48, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > > == Summary ==
> > > > Move the minimal architecture
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 07:01:30 UTC
From cdff5ce26812da70c4a7401419740f6ee6070a4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 07:01:25 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 06:51:00 UTC
From c4579487725c38423b72031077e395bd66f1a93c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 06:50:55 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 06:49:47 UTC
From dbc552657ca86466774bfe7461dd5f24a021c87b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 06:49:42 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109629
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Notification time stamped 2022-07-22 05:56:04 UTC
From 6e8c487ed618cdba720686de3914ccdd4472c80c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 22 2022 05:55:44 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109437
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-5d1f0583d1 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109440
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-59c24eb56a has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220719.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220721.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 320
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 9.79 MiB
Size of dropped packages:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 9:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> The current minimum at zEC12 is
> targeting hardware that has been already obsoleted by the vendor.
As I understand it, while zEC12 is EOL (you can no longer
purchase it), it is not (yet) EOS, so existing systems can
still obtain service from
92 matches
Mail list logo
