On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:35:32PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
> On 11/15/22 08:37, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > Il 15/11/22 00:23, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 6:03 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> >> wrote:
> >>> So let me sum up:
> >>>
> Some Python building
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, 12:24 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 14. 11. 22 20:53, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > 1) You can use https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff and use it to
> identify
> > your license. This is a Chrome and Firefox plugin and allows you to
> select the
> > text; and in the context
Dne 15. 11. 22 v 10:44 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
In that case, IMHO, the tool should NOT suggest a license from the
list at all, and definitely not arbitrarily suggest the last one it
loaded, which is highly likely to be wrong. If it wants to suggest,
then suggest the most likely option out
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143099
Bug ID: 2143099
Summary: perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.12 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Devel-NYTProf
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2da86b14b9
js-jquery-ui-1.13.2-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
clinfo-3.0.21.02.21-4.el8
inxi-3.3.23-1.el8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130616
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8d55a68e09
js-jquery-ui-1.13.2-1.el9
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
clinfo-3.0.21.02.21-4.el9
inxi-3.3.23-1.el9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142699
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4d30ee90cd
nginx-1.20.1-10.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a06d5c7af1
js-jquery-ui-1.13.2-1.el7
The following builds have
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 7:52 PM Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 2022-11-15 15:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > This is not true. However, until recently, support for hardware
> > accelerated open codecs was limited to Intel QuickSync Video, which is
> > blocked on the VA-API driver landing in Fedora[1].
>
On 2022-11-15 15:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
This is not true. However, until recently, support for hardware
accelerated open codecs was limited to Intel QuickSync Video, which is
blocked on the VA-API driver landing in Fedora[1].
AMD VP9 decoding was added in VCN 1.0:
Sorry, I'm still not clear
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 5:27 PM Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> After reading this thread and bz 2123998, I had thought that the Fedora
> 37 mesa packages retained accelerated video for open codecs (for AMD
> hardware). However, the Fedora wiki[1] indicates that even open codecs
> are no longer
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, at 8:23 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 14. 11. 22 20:53, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> 1) You can use https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff and use it
>>to identify your license. This is a Chrome and Firefox plugin and
>>allows you to select the text; and in the context
Richard Shaw wrote on 2022/11/16 1:10:
I had to back off updating OpenColorIO as it needed a newer version of
minizip-ng than what's available.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-518f2de934
The only fallout is supercollider which failed to build for other reasons:
After reading this thread and bz 2123998, I had thought that the Fedora
37 mesa packages retained accelerated video for open codecs (for AMD
hardware). However, the Fedora wiki[1] indicates that even open codecs
are no longer accelerated without third party packages. Is that true?
(I don't
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:29 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2022-11-16 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@irc.libera.chat
>
> More information available at:
>
Following our scheduling policy around Fedora major version releases [1]
we will be rolling out the Fedora Linux 37 rebase over the next few weeks.
This rollout started earlier today with the `testing` stream.
Of note is that during this development cycle we were promoted to an official
edition
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I think we are going to just have to agree to disagree here.
>
> I think we have had this discussion a number of times now and aren't
> going to convince the other.
So Bodhi will continue to become more and more unmaintainable due to piling
up more and more complicated
"Colin Walters" writes:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, at 12:00 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
>> If your model doesn't permit the system to cease execution during
>> bootloader updates, then I'm not sure why you need bootupd at all -
>> traditional RPM updating will work just fine (assuming the A/B
> tl;dr: Python 3.12 should be built with no-omit-frame-pointer if
> upstream recommends it.
Absolutely not, because…
> Apparently there are some benchmarks that make Python look extra slow
> when the flags are turned on
… considering those benchmarks, Python is one of the programs for which
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022, at 12:00 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> If your model doesn't permit the system to cease execution during
> bootloader updates, then I'm not sure why you need bootupd at all -
> traditional RPM updating will work just fine (assuming the A/B change
> we've been talking about).
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022, at 11:41 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022, at 6:08 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> Ben Cotton writes:
>>
>>> By design, ostree does not manage bootloader updates as they can not
>>> (yet) happen in a transactional, atomic and safe fashion.
>>
>> As we've talked
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:54:32PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
...snip...
I think we are going to just have to agree to disagree here.
I think we have had this discussion a number of times now and aren't
going to convince the other.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-11-15/fesco.2022-11-15-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-11-15/fesco.2022-11-15-17.00.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-11-15/fesco.2022-11-15-17.00.log.html
Hello maintainers!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock v3.4. There
are just two small new things, a better --forcearch check and
the device-mapper control file is exposed in chroot. Full release notes:
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/Release-Notes-3.4
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:17 PM Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:05 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
> >> Am I missing something obvious or does licensecheck not work
> >> as expected? This is with licensecheck-3.3.0-2.fc36.noarch.
> >
> > licensecheck does
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:05 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> Am I missing something obvious or does licensecheck not work
>> as expected? This is with licensecheck-3.3.0-2.fc36.noarch.
>
> licensecheck does not follow/use SPDX-License-Identifier at all. It
> predates that
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:05 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:24 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> Do we have a command line tool for this? Does licensecheck support SPDX
> >> identifiers?
> >>
> >> (I find the use of browser extension for this very weird.
Timothée Ravier writes:
>> Bootloaders are not single files. Consider UEFI:
>>
>> For grub2, there's both a .efi and some configuration that I'll handwave
>> for purposes of this conversation. For shim, it's more like 4 things -
>> the main shim*64.efi, fallback.efi, boot.efi, and boot.csv.
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Todd Zullinger said:
>> Sylvain Jones via epel-devel wrote:
>>> It appears the update to pypolicyd-spf-2.9.3 from pypolicyd-spf-2.0.x
>>> crashes Postfix unexpectedly. Perhaps a missing dependency?
>>
>> It looks like pypolicyd-spf-2.9.3-2 should be in
>>
This compat package was created when OpenColorIO 2 was "new" and a few
projects failed to build with it.
Currently USD is the only consumer and I was able to get it to build with
OCIO 2 just now. I'll wait a bit to see if there's any fallout and if not,
retire it within a week.
Thanks,
Richard
I had to back off updating OpenColorIO as it needed a newer version of
minizip-ng than what's available.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-518f2de934
The only fallout is supercollider which failed to build for other reasons:
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:24 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> Do we have a command line tool for this? Does licensecheck support SPDX
>> identifiers?
>>
>> (I find the use of browser extension for this very weird. I have the LICENSE
>> file unpackaged with the sources on my machine,
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2022-11-16 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
Dear Sir/Madam,
Good day!
My name is Lewis Hu. I'm in charge of overseas sales with Hystou company. I
found your information on your website.
Now I want to tell you the good news:
Here's a mini pc right now for just $290 with free shipping!
Product model: K4
PC size: 240*150*57mm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142938
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142938
Bug ID: 2142938
Summary: perl-Getopt-Long-2.53 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Getopt-Long
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:29 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 11. 22 20:53, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > 1) You can use https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff and use it to
> > identify
> > your license. This is a Chrome and Firefox plugin and allows you to select
> > the
> > text; and in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142699
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142486
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142631
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-11-15 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Dne 15. 11. 22 v 10:44 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
Interestingly when I run 'license-fedora2spdx MIT' is just
always prints 'mpich2', and the list of suggestions is entirely
reversed from what you show here. Why 'mpich2' - it is simply
because it is last in the list to be loaded. This is
Once upon a time, Todd Zullinger said:
> Sylvain Jones via epel-devel wrote:
> > It appears the update to pypolicyd-spf-2.9.3 from pypolicyd-spf-2.0.x
> > crashes Postfix unexpectedly. Perhaps a missing dependency?
>
> It looks like pypolicyd-spf-2.9.3-2 should be in
> epel-testing now. That
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:24 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 11. 22 20:53, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > 1) You can use https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff and use it to
> > identify
> > your license. This is a Chrome and Firefox plugin and allows you to select
> > the
> > text; and in the
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Coro` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Coro/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:35:32PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
On 11/15/22 08:37, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 15/11/22 00:23, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 6:03 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
So let me sum up:
Some Python building backends, eg. setuptools,
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Coro` that you are
following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Coro/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
On 11/15/22 08:37, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 15/11/22 00:23, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 6:03 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
>> wrote:
>>> So let me sum up:
>>>
Some Python building backends, eg. setuptools, explicitly allow
creating package with version
On 14. 11. 22 20:53, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
1) You can use https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff and use it to identify
your license. This is a Chrome and Firefox plugin and allows you to select the
text; and in the context menu, you can choose to identify the license. It will
print, e.g.,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 03:24:07PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraSilverblueBootupd
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142631
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
> == Summary ==
>
> We currently don't use the initial-setup application in the main KDE
> Spin and Kinoite installation ISOs as everything gets configured at
> installation time via Anaconda. We thus want to remove this package
> from the installation ISOs while keeping it where we currently
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221114.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221115.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:39
Upgraded packages: 99
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.40 MiB
Size of dropped packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073893
errata-xmlrpc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Red Hat Product Errata
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139414
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Dancer-1.3513-15.fc38
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073893
--- Comment #4 from errata-xmlrpc ---
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Via RHSA-2022:8054 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:8054
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Good point. We'll have to do that indeed.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
We'll need to investigate this option. I've added it in
https://pagure.io/fedora-kde/SIG/issue/243
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Mozilla-CA` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
20221114 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mozilla-CA/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Mozilla-CA` that
you are following:
``
20221114 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mozilla-CA/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060186
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:53:09PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> MIT and BSD are very common licenses and can be tricky to convert to SPDX
> license identifiers. Just today, I got two questions about it. We have this
> covered in FAQ
>
>
On 15. 11. 22 0:03, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
(Though actually, would %global __provides_exclude_from … together with a
manual Provides: python3dist(…) = 0 not work?)
I believe that %__provides_exclude_from would actually work.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:34 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> We currently don't use the initial-setup application in the main KDE
> Spin and Kinoite installation ISOs as everything gets configured at
> installation time via Anaconda.
While that's true, wouldn't it make sense to adjust Anaconda to
V Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:53:09PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> There are two common ways to find out what SPDX identifier you should use in
> such cases.
>
>
> 1) You can use https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff and use it to
> identify your license. This is a Chrome and Firefox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130616
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8170747ecb has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8170747ecb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130616
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
V Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:01:54AM -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a):
> To clarify -- while SPDX license strings are not valid for RHEL 9, are
> they valid for EPEL 9?
>
Yes. Fedora packaging guidelines also apply to EPEL.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
69 matches
Mail list logo
