Re: spin-kickstarts package

Neal Gompa a écrit : > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 2:52 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > Greetings everyone. > > > > So, we used to have a release requirement that we package up and release > > along side the release a spin-kickstarts rpm package with the current > > kickstarts used for that release. >

Re: Should the policy documents better reflect real package maintenance practice?

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 04:04:59PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > In the wild, I often see Fedora described as a "semi-rolling" release. As a > policy matter, the distribution promises to be mostly stable, but I find it > increasingly hard to honestly present it as such. > > As a couple of quick

Re: zdohnal pushed to tests/vim (main). "upstream-unittests: Apply RPM workaround for package notes from Ruby (..more)"

Thanks, Mamoru! Looks like a race condition between me and Vita :D Either way, I've tested whether Vim with Ruby interpreter can be built without Ruby's LDFLAGS and it worked fine, so I've sent a patch which removes Ruby's LDFLAGS from Vim. The patch was accepted, so hopefully I can avoid

[Bug 2142699] Please build perl-Lchown for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142699 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2130616] Please branch and build perl-Inline-C in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130616 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

Re: GSSDP and GUPnP 1.6 coming to Rawhide

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 2:04 PM David King wrote: > > The 1.6 series of both GSSDP and GUPnP was released a while ago, and the > 1.6.2 releases contain an important fix for Rygel (which itself depends > on the 1.6 series in the latest version): > >

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On Thu Nov 24, 2022 at 02:39 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > go-compilers > go-srpm-macros These should both be orphaned. go-srpm-macros has been retired, as it's now a subpackage of go-rpm-macros. go-compilers is Obsoleted by go-rpm-macros itself, but it looks like it has not yet been retired. I've

Re: spin-kickstarts package

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 2:52 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings everyone. > > So, we used to have a release requirement that we package up and release > along side the release a spin-kickstarts rpm package with the current > kickstarts used for that release. > > This resulted in a bunch of last

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 10 proposal

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 2:27 PM Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote: > > On Wed Nov 23, 2022 at 00:52 CST, Carl George wrote: > > I would also ask that feedback be provided there instead of as email > > replies here on the list. > > I don't think there's been a formal discussion about moving EPEL >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221123.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221122.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221123.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:8 Upgraded packages: 148 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 152.05 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On 23. 11. 22 21:17, Jan Chaloupka wrote: I you want all your golang packages reassigned to eclipseo, all you need is to tell me to do it and I'll do it. That would be great. By all means. Thank you. Also, thank you eclipseo for taking care of the packages. In progress. This is what was

Should the policy documents better reflect real package maintenance practice?

In the wild, I often see Fedora described as a "semi-rolling" release. As a policy matter, the distribution promises to be mostly stable, but I find it increasingly hard to honestly present it as such. As a couple of quick examples, I'd point out that in Fedora 35, Blender updated from 2.93

Re: FESCo election nominations are now open

This is your reminder that nominations are open through 30 November. There are currently four nominations for five open seats. On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 12:49 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > Now through 30 November, you may nominate candidates for the open > seats on the Fedora Engineering Steering

[Bug 2147442] New: perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07051 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2147442 Bug ID: 2147442 Summary: perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07051 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 10 proposal

On Wed Nov 23, 2022 at 00:52 CST, Carl George wrote: > I would also ask that feedback be provided there instead of as email > replies here on the list. I don't think there's been a formal discussion about moving EPEL discussions over to the forums. We already have communication split between the

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

> I you want all your golang packages reassigned to eclipseo, all you need is > to tell me to do it and I'll do it. That would be great. By all means. Thank you. Also, thank you eclipseo for taking care of the packages. Jan ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On 23. 11. 22 17:35, Jan Chaloupka wrote: Hi Robert-André, Checking the consul it looks like I need to create a ticket for all orphaned package to change their point of contact. Assuming the same holds for all other orphaned packages one ticket with request to change their PoC is more

F38 proposal: Add Fedora Auto Firstboot Services to desktop variants (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AutoFirstBootServices This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

F38 proposal: LLVM 16 (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LLVM-16 This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee. ==

F38 proposal: Add Fedora Auto Firstboot Services to desktop variants (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AutoFirstBootServices This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

F38 proposal: LLVM 16 (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LLVM-16 This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee. ==

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 05:44:01PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > The mitigation/successor strategy is to have comaintainers for every > package. > > Unfortunately our tools enforce the notion of a "main admin" and > if that person leaves that role has to be given to another > comaintainer

spin-kickstarts package

Greetings everyone. So, we used to have a release requirement that we package up and release along side the release a spin-kickstarts rpm package with the current kickstarts used for that release. This resulted in a bunch of last minute scrambling and blockers, and even then, we often pushed

Re: [HEADS UP] Rebuild of wxGTK wxGLCanvas-using packages

On 11/23/22 12:58 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 11/23/22 12:23 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: Hi all, In order to fix some incompatibilities with wxWidgets wxGLCanvas (which is currently built with OpenGL EGL support) and several package users which are expecting OpenGL GLX support, I need to

A very brief introduction.

Hello there, i'm Jaime Andres Torres Bermejo, and i'm currently a student in Colombia (My current time zone is UTC -5, as a result), and i'm currently trying to find places where i could help in fedora, this being my first sent contact. My previous experiences with python include being able to

Re: [HEADS UP] Rebuild of wxGTK wxGLCanvas-using packages

On 11/23/22 12:23 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: Hi all, In order to fix some incompatibilities with wxWidgets wxGLCanvas (which is currently built with OpenGL EGL support) and several package users which are expecting OpenGL GLX support, I need to rebuild wxWidgets with a different configuration

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 01:20:24PM +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > Am 23.11.22 um 12:20 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > > Hello. > > > > Based on my conversation with Fridolín Pokorný @fpokorny, I've removed > > them from their Fedora packages. > > > > They left Red Hat and are no longer interested

Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2022-11-23

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-11-23/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-11-23-16.29.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-11-23/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-11-23-16.29.txt Log:

[HEADS UP] Rebuild of wxGTK wxGLCanvas-using packages

Hi all, In order to fix some incompatibilities with wxWidgets wxGLCanvas (which is currently built with OpenGL EGL support) and several package users which are expecting OpenGL GLX support, I need to rebuild wxWidgets with a different configuration option. Unfortunately, this results in an

Re: %{bash_completions_dir} or %{%bash_completion_dir} what is the correct macro ?

Sérgio Basto wrote: > I fully agree with this commit, maybe you can go ahead with an official > PR. Done, thanks! EPEL8 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/57 EPEL7 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/58 -- Todd signature.asc

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

Hi Robert-André, Checking the consul it looks like I need to create a ticket for all orphaned package to change their point of contact. Assuming the same holds for all other orphaned packages one ticket with request to change their PoC is more practical than creating one for each. Feel free to

Re: Update: Porting to Modern C

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 04:48:08PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > Quite hard to scan this list without having maintainer names, > > What's the name of the script that does the mapping? In Debian it's > called dd-list, but I can't find the Fedora equivalent.

Re: Update: Porting to Modern C

* Richard W. M. Jones: > Quite hard to scan this list without having maintainer names, What's the name of the script that does the mapping? In Debian it's called dd-list, but I can't find the Fedora equivalent. > but I would just comment that: > >> mingw-gcc > > ... this is just GCC with

Re: Update: Porting to Modern C

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 08:58:12AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > I'm still in the process of setting thigs up. I've created a wiki page > separately from the change proposal that documents some project > procedures: > > > > It has

[Bug 2145192] New: perl-Mojolicious-9.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2145192 Bug ID: 2145192 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-9.30 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: %{bash_completions_dir} or %{%bash_completion_dir} what is the correct macro ?

On Tue, 2022-11-22 at 20:55 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > in an effort to do things correctly and without hacks > > I noticed that redhat-rpm-config-202-1.fc35.noarch defines > > %bash_completions_dir and epel-rpm-macros %defines > > bash_completion_dir > > > > Which one

Future of BIOS RAID support in the installer

Hi, I am planning to change how we support BIOS RAID (sometimes also called Firmware or Fake RAID) in the installer in the future. I plan to go through the official Fedora change process for Fedora 38, but I'd like to get some feedback first. We are currently using dmraid to support these types

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

Am 23.11.22 um 12:20 schrieb Miro Hrončok: Hello. Based on my conversation with Fridolín Pokorný @fpokorny, I've removed them from their Fedora packages. They left Red Hat and are no longer interested in maintaining Fedora packages. I am wondering, why Red Hat/FESCO/... still hasn't

Re: zdohnal pushed to tests/vim (main). "upstream-unittests: Apply RPM workaround for package notes from Ruby (..more)"

notificati...@fedoraproject.org wrote on 2022/11/23 20:34: Notification time stamped 2022-11-23 11:34:19 UTC From 1f016e5dedbb5bc7293c1638e1238989d6fabaa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zdenek Dohnal Date: Nov 23 2022 11:30:01 + Subject: upstream-unittests: Apply RPM workaround for

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On 23. 11. 22 13:03, Miro Hrončok wrote: Also jchaloup is also out of the picture, could you see with him for orphaning is golang packages too? I can try. I do not think they left Red Hat. If you want, you can follow the nonresponsive packager policy or email them yourself on their email

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On 23. 11. 22 12:45, Bob Mauchin wrote: On Wed, 23 Nov 2022, 12:21 Miro Hrončok, > wrote: Hello. Based on my conversation with Fridolín Pokorný @fpokorny, I've removed them from their Fedora packages. They left Red Hat and are no longer

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On Wed, 23 Nov 2022, 12:21 Miro Hrončok, wrote: > Hello. > > Based on my conversation with Fridolín Pokorný @fpokorny, I've removed > them > from their Fedora packages. > > They left Red Hat and are no longer interested in maintaining Fedora > packages. > > Co-maintainers BCC'ed. > > fpokorny is

Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

Hello. Based on my conversation with Fridolín Pokorný @fpokorny, I've removed them from their Fedora packages. They left Red Hat and are no longer interested in maintaining Fedora packages. Co-maintainers BCC'ed. fpokorny is main admin of rpms/consul rpms/consul co-maintainers: @jchaloup

[rpms/perl-Convert-BER] PR #1: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Convert-BER` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Convert-BER/pull-request/1 ___

Re: F39 proposal: Replace DNF with DNF5 (System-Wide Change proposal)

> Dne 25. 10. 22 v 14:00 Jaroslav Mracek napsal(a): > > > That is nice, but honestly who reads man pages? And especially who reads > man pages of SW they are not using (assuming that the manpage will be > part of DNF5 and not DNF). Thank you for very much for a good point. We already played

[rpms/perl-Convert-BER] PR #1: Package tests and update license to SPDX format

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Convert-BER` that you are following: `` Package tests and update license to SPDX format `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Convert-BER/pull-request/1

New Anaconda Web UI preview image is public -- looking for feedback!

Hi everyone, We are excited to announce that Anaconda Web UI preview image mentioned by Fedora change[0] is now public for testing and providing feedback. You can find more information here: https://fedoramagazine.org/anaconda-web-ui-preview-image-now-public Feel free to download the ISO,

Re: FF 107.0 scratch builds - just for fun

Dne 22. 11. 22 v 20:41 Adam Williamson napsal(a): On Tue, 2022-11-22 at 12:48 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Would it be possible to develop a way to better manage updates of some interconnected packages? FF + NSS would be one case, but when we are doing Ruby on Rails update, it always involve more

Re: Regular crash of the internal DirectoryServer389 replication

Is the server crashing, or is replication not working? There's a big difference between the two. If it's crashing please obtain a stack trace from the core file: https://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/FAQ/faq.html#sts=Debugging%C2%A0Crashes If it's just replication not working then we need a lot

Re: Building Python 3.12 with no-omit-frame-pointer

On 22. 11. 22 18:30, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 21. 11. 22 11:01, Petr Viktorin wrote: And since the Python slowdown comes from a single weird function, I think that Fedora should ignore the Python benchmarks when evaluating the distro default -- and if Fedora switches to no-omit-frame-pointer,

How to choose paper for custom a baord book?

What paper is used for printing board books? For many authors who are print their board books for the first time, most of them don't know use what kind of paper to print their board books. Combine with my years of board book printing experiences. Let us detail discuss this issue. In fact, in