https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150051
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Log-Dispatchouli-3.001
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Log-Dispatchouli`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
3.001 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Log-Dispatchouli/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Log-Dispatchouli`
that you are following:
``
3.001 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Log-Dispatchouli/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:02 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 19:27 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >
> > > The examples you provide are definitely interesting. They all
> > > essentially boil down to, well, "I know exactly how this process works
> > > and I'm
On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 19:27 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > The examples you provide are definitely interesting. They all
> > essentially boil down to, well, "I know exactly how this process works
> > and I'm gonna take advantage of that to achieve the right outcome
> > behind
On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 10:06 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 6:32 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>
>> Final statement, instead of wasting my time and energy on arguments,
>> Imagemagick7 could already be built on rawhide if someone had done the
>> package review for me
>
>
> I
On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 7:32 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 17:14 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 5:07 PM Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 14:33 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 9:39 AM Stephen Smoogen
> > > >
On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 6:32 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Final statement, instead of wasting my time and energy on arguments,
> Imagemagick7 could already be built on rawhide if someone had done the
> package review for me
>
I understand the sentiment as another person who has donated 1000s of
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8f2df2e1e2
botan2-2.19.3-1.el9
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-48ffd03f66
snapd-2.57.6-1.el9
The following builds have been
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d9f41aade7
snapd-2.57.6-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
coturn-4.6.1-1.el8
ipv6calc-4.0.2-67.el8
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-63588ab702
woff-0.20091126-11.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-058d69433a
snapd-2.57.6-1.el7
0
On 12/4/22 16:29, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>> I would prefer that *every* build would automatically generate a side
>> tag, even if it's a side-tag of one package. Or at least provide an
>> option to do that. That would provide opportunities for server-side
>> automation
On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 17:14 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 5:07 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 14:33 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 9:39 AM Stephen Smoogen
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 3 Dec 2022
Thanks for the excellent explanation, Adam. It makes me to understand the
problem now.
Jiri
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 10:03 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 21:25 +0100, Jiri Kucera wrote:
> > Yes, builds in [1] were built with the `f38-build-side-60497` side tag.
> In
> > [1]
This will be not that easy as it looks like:
```
[ 63%] Generating
/builddir/build/BUILD/libphonenumber-8.12.57/cpp/src/phonenumbers/test_metadata.cc,
/builddir/build/BUILD/libphonenumber-8.12.57/cpp/src/phonenumbers/test_metadata.h
JAVA_BIN-NOTFOUND -jar
FF 107.0 shipped in all current Fedora releases a while ago. You can
find all that in bodhi. If you mean 107.0.1, that will depend on the FF
maintainers. Maybe they see no reason to respin, because the bugs fixed
in that release are not something that is important in Fedora - not
sure.
--
Bojan
On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 4:35 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > You can filter out things that use ImageMagick as a build dependency
> > because that's just the command line utilities. That's why I checked
> > only the ones that use the libraries, where the API changes and
On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 5:07 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 14:33 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 9:39 AM Stephen Smoogen
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 at 11:55, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 11:25 AM Sérgio
On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 14:33 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 9:39 AM Stephen Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 at 11:55, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 11:25 AM Sérgio Basto
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57
Neal Gompa wrote:
> You can filter out things that use ImageMagick as a build dependency
> because that's just the command line utilities. That's why I checked
> only the ones that use the libraries, where the API changes and the
> required rebuilds are needed.
How backwards-compatible is the
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022, at 16:27, Major Hayden wrote:
>> For those reasons, we propose to create a Sway spin and an ostree one,
>> called `Sericea`.
>
> What made you choose the name? (Just curious.)
It's actually named after Terminalia sericea [0] not Cornus sericea.
The reasons were:
*
Neal Gompa wrote:
> I would prefer that *every* build would automatically generate a side
> tag, even if it's a side-tag of one package. Or at least provide an
> option to do that. That would provide opportunities for server-side
> automation for populating side-tags with updated builds against a
Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> ... I wonder why... AFAIK, GLES should be better for low resource
> systems like raspberry, isn't it?
Probably yes. KDE upstream recommends it for Plasma Mobile, and Manjaro ARM
builds a few qt5-es2-* packages (conflicting with the regular qt5-* ones)
for the
On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 12:04:18PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 02/12/2022 22:30, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > 1. Packages that have been pushed stable since the last time a compose
> > succeeded (for Rawhide that's a Rawhide compose, for Branched it's a
> > Branched compose, for
On 12/3/22 22:41, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> 107.0.1 build for
> F37/x86_64: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bojan/FF/
>
> If you want/need or are obsessive about version numbers, like yours
> truly. ;-)
When will FF107 actually ship in Fedora?
--
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour
On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 2:28 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 03:35:31PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 00:14 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 10:30 PM Adam Williamson
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > So there's
On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 9:39 AM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 at 11:55, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 11:25 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>> > > On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>
On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 2:21 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:35 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 11:25 AM Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > > > On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 03:35:31PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 00:14 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 10:30 PM Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> >
> > > So there's this CI ticket ATM[0] about whether the environment in which
> > > CI tests are run should
On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 17:41 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 5:38 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 11:34 AM Kalev Lember
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 5:26 PM Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly
On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:35 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 11:25 AM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > > On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 00:41 +, Daniel Alley wrote:
>
> * zchunk and deltarpm both reimplement / "bundle" multiple different
> hashing algorithms
zchunk does have bundled versions of various hashing algorithms, but,
if it's compiled against OpenSSL (as it is in Fedora), it uses the
OpenSSL
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-LWP-MediaTypes` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-LWP-MediaTypes/pull-request/1
___
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-LWP-MediaTypes`
that you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-LWP-MediaTypes/pull-request/1
On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 at 11:55, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 11:25 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > > On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new package
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Module-Runtime` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Runtime/pull-request/1
___
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Module-Runtime`
that you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Runtime/pull-request/1
Dne 01. 12. 22 v 16:43 Tomasz Torcz napsal(a):
What does this warning mean?
ladvd warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please check
Hmm, let me look. The ladvd license is ICS
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ladvd/blob/rawhide/f/ladvd.spec#_10
and both
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221203.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221204.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 29
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.00 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-srpm-macros` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-srpm-macros/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-srpm-macros` that
you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-srpm-macros/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Inline` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX license
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Inline/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
Il 03/12/22 19:01, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
>
> Good question, I don't know. Seems glvnd provides the libraries, maybe
> that's enough?
I had a look at mesa specfile, first it is build with
-Dgles1=disabled \
-Dgles2=enabled \
but then:
# XXX can we just not build this
rm -vf
I'm reviewing the un-retirement ticket of python-nss [1] and rpmlint is
complaining about header files under the python module directory. The specfile
is using the %pyproject_save_files macro to get the file list.
I'm unsure if this is a false positive or I must ask the submitter to filter
out
44 matches
Mail list logo
