[Bug 2186946] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.38 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186946 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 2187674] perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187674 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

Re: invalid 'sshpubkey': invalid SSH public key

Kenneth Goldman a écrit : >Knowing that it should work, I tried from Windows and it seems OK.  >Newline issue perhaps. Windows is known to (automatically) add a newline at the end of a copy-paste. -- GnuPG: AE157E0B29F0BEF2 at keys.openpgp.org CA Cert:

Re: subarchitectures and RISC-V, was Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/19/23 00:26, Benson Muite wrote: Probably each hardware vendor will need to become more involved in creating an RPM distribution for their use case and providing hardware for test builds. A single monolithic Fedora will not work. Having a subset of base packages would be very

Re: subarchitectures and RISC-V, was Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/19/23 07:46, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jeff Law: Rather than trying to track all the individual extensions and combinations thereof, I would suggest focusing on RVI defined profiles. Essentially they provide a set of mandatory features the architecture must support (to be compliant with

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230419.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230418.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230419.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 92 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 29.48 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

RE: invalid 'sshpubkey': invalid SSH public key

Thanks. Knowing that it should work, I tried from Windows and it seems OK. Newline issue perhaps. BTW, that mailto was not in my original email. Some Outlook 'value add', detecting the email address and trying to be helpful. ☹ From: Kevin P. Fleming Sent: Wednesday, April 19,

Re: invalid 'sshpubkey': invalid SSH public key

On 4/19/23 15:42, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 06:45:57PM +, Kenneth Goldman wrote: Newbie - first time . I'm trying to upload my SSH public key to my fedora project account. The web page gives me the above error. My key is an RSA 4096 key. ssh-rsa

Re: invalid 'sshpubkey': invalid SSH public key

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 06:45:57PM +, Kenneth Goldman wrote: > Newbie - first time . I'm trying to upload my SSH public key to my fedora > project account. The web page gives me the above error. > > My key is an RSA 4096 key. > > ssh-rsa B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAACAQ . y4lWQ==

[Bug 2188044] perl-Sereal-5.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188044 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA

[Bug 2188044] perl-Sereal-5.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188044 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

invalid 'sshpubkey': invalid SSH public key

Newbie - first time . I'm trying to upload my SSH public key to my fedora project account. The web page gives me the above error. My key is an RSA 4096 key. ssh-rsa B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAACAQ . y4lWQ== kgold...@us.ibm.com Is that the wrong format? Is

[Bug 2188043] perl-Sereal-Encoder-5.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188043 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA

[Bug 2188043] perl-Sereal-Encoder-5.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188043 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2023-04-19

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-04-19/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-04-19-16.29.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-04-19/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-04-19-16.29.txt Log:

[Bug 2188045] perl-Sereal-Decoder-5.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188045 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2188045] perl-Sereal-Decoder-5.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188045 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

FESCo election nominations are now open

Now through 10 May, you may nominate candidates for the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo). To nominate yourself (or others, if you check with them first), visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations For more information, see the Community Blog post:

FESCo election nominations are now open

Now through 10 May, you may nominate candidates for the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo). To nominate yourself (or others, if you check with them first), visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations For more information, see the Community Blog post:

Re: subarchitectures and RISC-V, was Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 09:26:55AM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > Probably each hardware vendor will need to become more involved in > creating an RPM distribution for their use case and providing hardware > for test builds. A single monolithic Fedora will not work. Having a > subset of base

[Bug 2188007] perl-Function-Parameters-2.002003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188007 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA

[Bug 2188007] perl-Function-Parameters-2.002003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188007 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 2188045] New: perl-Sereal-Decoder-5.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188045 Bug ID: 2188045 Summary: perl-Sereal-Decoder-5.004 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sereal-Decoder Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 2188043] New: perl-Sereal-Encoder-5.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188043 Bug ID: 2188043 Summary: perl-Sereal-Encoder-5.004 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sereal-Encoder Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 2188044] New: perl-Sereal-5.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188044 Bug ID: 2188044 Summary: perl-Sereal-5.004 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sereal Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

On Sun, 2023-04-16 at 09:46 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 07:37:55AM +, Mattia Verga via devel > wrote: > > I've just tried a 'dnf system-upgrade' and got: > > > > Errore: Errore test di transazione: > >    il file /usr/lib64/libheif/libheif-libde265.so >

Re: subarchitectures and RISC-V, was Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

* Jeff Law: > Rather than trying to track all the individual extensions and > combinations thereof, I would suggest focusing on RVI defined > profiles. Essentially they provide a set of mandatory features the > architecture must support (to be compliant with the profile). Do at least some of

[Bug 2105085] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085 --- Comment #12 from Michal Josef Spacek --- Fix was delivered by upstream version of HTTP::Daemon 6.15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085

[Bug 2188007] New: perl-Function-Parameters-2.002003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188007 Bug ID: 2188007 Summary: perl-Function-Parameters-2.002003 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Function-Parameters Keywords:

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

I've gotten a similar result. Without --allowerasing: Error: Problem 1: conflicting requests - problem with installed package gimp-heif-plugin-1.1.0-12.fc37.x86_64 - gimp-heif-plugin-1.1.0-12.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 2: problem with installed

Fedora 38 support in Copr

Hello all, Fedora 38 was released yesterday and we're excited to announce that Copr fully supports building in Fedora 38 chroots. This means you can now build packages for Fedora 38 with ease and ensure compatibility with the latest version of the operating system for multiple architectures.

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

If I add --allowerasing, some packages will be removed: Removing dependent packages: ffmpeg-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 2.2 M libavcodec-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 9.6 M libavdevice-free

[Bug 2187674] perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187674 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-d933c8cf70 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d933c8cf70 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2187674] perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187674 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.

Re: subarchitectures and RISC-V, was Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/15/23 19:56, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 08:38:47AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> >> >> On 4/15/23 00:10, David Abdurachmanov wrote: >> >> >>> >>> We have to support SCBs as-is. We even have 64-core OoO (and even >>> dual-socket 128-core) systems coming that are still RVA20 (what