[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2023-06-15 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-3dd846c7ab radare2-5.8.6-1.el8 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c018b37680 chromium-114.0.5735.106-1.el8 1

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

2023-06-15 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e6d2f056c2 radare2-5.8.6-1.el9 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5b8cf596eb chromium-114.0.5735.106-1.el9 1

[Bug 2164148] CVE-2023-24038 perl-HTML-StripScripts: Handler for style attribute is vulnerable to ReDoS [fedora-all]

2023-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164148 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.06 |perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.06

[Bug 2164148] CVE-2023-24038 perl-HTML-StripScripts: Handler for style attribute is vulnerable to ReDoS [fedora-all]

2023-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164148 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.06

[Bug 2212972] perl-Graphics-TIFF-20 is available

2023-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2212972 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-27e30392f6 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 2212972] perl-Graphics-TIFF-20 is available

2023-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2212972 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-2bfbd1fff5 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 2164149] CVE-2023-24038 perl-HTML-StripScripts: Handler for style attribute is vulnerable to ReDoS [epel-all]

2023-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164149 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.06 |perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.06

[Bug 2164149] CVE-2023-24038 perl-HTML-StripScripts: Handler for style attribute is vulnerable to ReDoS [epel-all]

2023-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164149 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.06 |perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.06

[Bug 2212972] perl-Graphics-TIFF-20 is available

2023-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2212972 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8254b0f713 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 2164149] CVE-2023-24038 perl-HTML-StripScripts: Handler for style attribute is vulnerable to ReDoS [epel-all]

2023-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164149 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.06

Re: Modules without modularity

2023-06-15 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 10:19 +0200, Remi Collet wrote: > Hi, > > Le 13/06/2023 à 18:32, Petr Pisar a écrit : > > > I spent some time thinking how to approximate the nice features > > with current > > state of RPM, Koji, and DNF and come up with this approach > >

Re: U-Boot for x86 BIOS systems

2023-06-15 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 6/15/23 15:00, Jeremy Linton wrote: > Hi, > > On 5/22/23 06:01, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 6:57 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >>> >>>Hi, >>> But could we use U-Boot to fill in this gap so these systems still work? We'd then treat x86 like ARM (if no UEFI, use U-Boot

Re: U-Boot for x86 BIOS systems

2023-06-15 Thread Jeremy Linton
Hi, On 5/22/23 06:01, Neal Gompa wrote: On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 6:57 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote: Hi, But could we use U-Boot to fill in this gap so these systems still work? We'd then treat x86 like ARM (if no UEFI, use U-Boot UEFI). How does u-boot handle EFI variables in that case?

Re: ACPI-related bug in 6.3.X? At least an issue in ucsi_acpi, affecting several systems

2023-06-15 Thread Christopher Klooz via devel
I assume there is a little confusion in https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2511 -> the MR refers to the BZ#2212012-related ask.Fedora thread (f38, which can be mitigated by `|module_blacklist=ucsi_acpi|`) but it refers to the BZ#2213179 bug report (f37, which can be

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2023-06-13) - #inaction Edition

2023-06-15 Thread Jens Petersen
> Members of the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo) would like to > express their gratitude to Ben "#action bcotton" Cotton for his tireless work > as - both the most recent and last - Fedora Program Manager (FPgM). We were > surprised to learn that his role had been eliminated in the

Re: LibreOffice packages

2023-06-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 01. 06. 23 22:16, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: I've taken ownership of libreoffice for the time being, at least to keep the lights on. Co-maintainers, as always, welcome. Thanks. Could you please prioritize making it build? The LibreOffice package fails to build in rawhide for months.

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2023-06-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2023-06-16 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: * x86_64-v3 baseline and dropping i686 multilib * Plans for the

[rpms/perl-Net-SNMP] PR #1: Remove deprecated Socket6 library

2023-06-15 Thread Tom Callaway
spot merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-SNMP` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Remove deprecated Socket6 library `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-SNMP/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 2215065] perl-Coro doesn't exist in EPEL 9 and FTBFS when I'm trying to build it

2023-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215065 --- Comment #4 from Yaroslav Fedevych --- On still another hand: at the moment it hangs, gdb says that the backtrace looks like this: #0 0x7fdccb14ea7a in epoll_wait () from target:/lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x7fdccb2b86b5 in

Re: Modules without modularity

2023-06-15 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 13/06/2023 18:32, Petr Pisar wrote: Comments are welcome. Trying to reinvent Fedora Modularity without modules with the same problems as before. Instead of using modules, we should use parallel-installable packages. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Re: Modules without modularity

2023-06-15 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 03:04, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 01:33:38AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a): > > Petr Pisar wrote: > > > and accept that > > users now have to explicitly opt in to those modules. > > That's exactly what killed the current modularity. Nobody felt a

[Bug 2215065] perl-Coro doesn't exist in EPEL 9 and FTBFS when I'm trying to build it

2023-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215065 --- Comment #3 from Yaroslav Fedevych --- The libev-source is compiled in the perl-EV package by the same author (perl-Coro doesn't depend on libev directly, as far as my eyes and ripgrep can tell). Both the bundled sources, perl-EV, and the

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2023-06-15 Thread sgallagh
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2023-06-16 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10449/ ___ devel

[Bug 2215065] perl-Coro doesn't exist in EPEL 9 and FTBFS when I'm trying to build it

2023-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215065 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

Re: nest: python package still setup.py; also needs to be built for MPI

2023-06-15 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 10:13:28 -, David Schwörer wrote: > > $ sudo dnf repoquery -l python3-bout++ | grep info > > # returns nothing > > > > Thanks again for all your replies. I'm going to spend some time > > tinkering with the nest sources to see what I can do. > > They should be though in

Re: Test the side-tag: (was: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE)

2023-06-15 Thread Petr Pisar
V Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 12:03:39PM +0200, Nicola Sella napsal(a): > *TL;DR please, test scratch builds in f39-build-side-68994 side-tag.* > > The changes for dnf5 are now ready to be tested before landing in rawhide. > We made a side-tag with the newest dnf and dnf5, and we would like to get >

Re: Test the side-tag: (was: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE)

2023-06-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15. 06. 23 12:03, Nicola Sella wrote: Hi all, *TL;DR please, test scratch builds in f39-build-side-68994 side-tag.* The changes for dnf5 are now ready to be tested before landing in rawhide. We made a side-tag with the newest dnf and dnf5, and we would like to get some feedback on that. We

Re: nest: python package still setup.py; also needs to be built for MPI

2023-06-15 Thread David Schwörer
> $ sudo dnf repoquery -l python3-bout++ | grep info > # returns nothing > > Thanks again for all your replies. I'm going to spend some time > tinkering with the nest sources to see what I can do. They should be though in the mpi packages: $ sudo dnf repoquery -l python3-bout++-mpich | grep info

Test the side-tag: (was: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE)

2023-06-15 Thread Nicola Sella
Hi all, *TL;DR please, test scratch builds in f39-build-side-68994 side-tag.* The changes for dnf5 are now ready to be tested before landing in rawhide. We made a side-tag with the newest dnf and dnf5, and we would like to get some feedback on that. We would like to push the changes to rawhide

Re: nest: python package still setup.py; also needs to be built for MPI

2023-06-15 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 12:59:40 -, David Schwörer wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 08:31:49 -, David Schwörer wrote: > > That's interesting. So it builds the cpython as part of the cmake build > > and then simply installs it in the required directory. > > > > How does it generate the

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230615.n.0 changes

2023-06-15 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230614.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230615.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:7 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 152 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 61.17 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: Review requests: gtksourceviewmm3, mingw-qt6-qtlocation

2023-06-15 Thread Chris Kelley
Hi Sandro, I see someone took gtksourceviewmm3, can you swap for apache-logging-parent please? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214834 Also unretirement; bump to latest upstream version. It is a parent POM for metadata so it is a simple one. Cheers, Chris On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at

[Bug 2215065] perl-Coro doesn't exist in EPEL 9 and FTBFS when I'm trying to build it

2023-06-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215065 --- Comment #1 from Yaroslav Fedevych --- FWIW, the package's tests pass fine on Fedora 33, which used to ship the same Perl version as EL9 (5.32). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Review requests: gtksourceviewmm3, mingw-qt6-qtlocation

2023-06-15 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi I'd appreciate a review of the following packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215251 - gtksourceviewmm3 - Review to revive retired package, which I need as a dependency for gimagereader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211959 - mingw-qt6-qtlocation - Review

Re: Modules without modularity

2023-06-15 Thread Petr Pisar
V Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 01:33:38AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a): > Petr Pisar wrote: > > I spent some time thinking how to approximate the nice features with > > current state of RPM, Koji, and DNF and come up with this approach > > . The